Atria Newport Beach.
Atria Newport Beach is Ranked in the top 36% of California memory care with 4 CDSS citations on record; last inspected Mar 2026.

A large home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 123 California facilities with a similar number of beds.
RCFE · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
Atria Newport Beach has 4 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
4 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
4 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
The rules that apply to this facility.
State requirements with the exact regulation citation, plain-language explanation, and a question to ask on tour. Rules this facility has been cited for appear first.
Plain language
Because a facility markets dementia or Alzheimer's care, state law mandates higher training standards: 12 hours of initial dementia training (6 hours before a staff member works independently with residents, 6 more within the first 4 weeks), 8 hours of annual dementia in-service every year thereafter, and an administrator must include 8 hours of dementia-specific continuing education in every 2-year recertification cycle. Training must cover individualized care plans, behavioral expressions, appropriate supervision, and the facility's dementia care philosophy.
Ask on tour
“Can you show me each direct-care staffer's most recent dementia training certificate, and tell me when their next refresher is due?”
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Atria Newport Beach's record and state requirements.
The facility has 2 serious citations on file across all inspections — can you provide your corrective-action plan for each cited item, and show families any documentation of remediation steps taken?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
5 complaints are on file with CDSS — were any substantiated, and what remediation did the facility take in response to substantiated findings?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
The most recent inspection on 2026-03-26 is documented in state records — can you provide families with a copy of the deficiency notice from that visit and walk through any corrective actions completed since then?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
10 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2026-03-26Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
This was a complaint investigation into three allegations involving a resident who had moved out of the facility on January 31, 2025: whether staff failed to provide correct medication dosages, did not return medications when the resident left, and made inappropriate comments to the resident. The investigation found that all prescribed medications were released to an authorized representative when the resident moved out, though one medication was initially missed but picked up the same day; other residents and staff denied the medication dosage and inappropriate comment allegations, and the department determined there was not enough evidence to substantiate any of the three complaints.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
The Department was unable to conduct an interview with R1 for this complaint, due to R1 moving out of the facility on January 31, 2025. The Department conducted an additional six resident interviews. Five out of the six residents interviewed denied the allegation and stated that they have not had any issues with receiving their medication from staff. However, one out of the six residents stated that they have received the wrong dosage of their medication by staff on two previous occasions. The Department conducted five staff interviews. Five out of the five staff interviewed denied the allegation and stated that R1 was given all of her medications according to orders prescribed by her physician. Regarding the allegation, staff did not return medication to resident upon termination of services, the following has been concluded: It was alleged that staff did not return medication to R1 upon termination of services. The Department was unable to conduct an interview with R1 for this complaint, due to R1 moving out of the facility on January 31, 2025. The Department reviewed R1's medication release form, which describes the medications that were released for R1 upon her termination from the facility. The Department observed that all of R1's prescribed medications were released to an authorized representative on January 31, 2025. The Department conducted five staff interviews. Five out of the five staff interviewed denied the allegation and stated that all medications were released for R1 to an authorized representative when she moved out of the facility. However, one staff stated that one medication was not initially provided to the authorized representative for R1. The staff stated that when they realized this issue, R1's responsible party was contacted and that they picked up the missing medication the same day. The staff stated that the medication release form for R1 was later updated to reflect the additional medication release. Regarding the allegation, staff made inappropriate comments to resident, the following has been concluded: It was alleged that staff made inappropriate comments to R1. The Department was unable to conduct an interview with R1 for this complaint, due to R1 moving out of the facility on January 31, 2025. The Department conducted six resident interviews. Six out of the six residents interviewed denied the allegation and stated that staff have never made any inappropriate comments to them. The Department conducted five staff interviews. Five out of the five staff interviewed denied the allegation and stated that they have never observed, or heard of any staff making any inappropriate comments to R1, or any other resident. CONTINUED ON LIC9099-C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Based on the evidence gathered during the investigation, the Department is unable to ascertain if the allegations occurred as reported. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or refute the alleged violation occurred; therefore, the three allegations are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted with Assistant Executive Director Sofiane Lahouasnia and a copy of the report was provided.
2026-03-18Complaint InvestigationType B · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that when emergency personnel arrived to transport a resident to the hospital, staff did not provide necessary medical documentation until the ambulance was leaving the facility, delaying access to important information needed for emergency care. Two staff members confirmed this occurred. The facility received a citation for this violation.
“This requirement is not met as evidence by: 2 of 5 staff confirmed that emergency services were not given necessary documentation until they were leaving the facility with R1. This poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risks to persons in care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hanna Gough made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a case management visit. LPA was greeted and granted entry by staff. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Brian Keys and discussed the purpose of the visit. During the course of the investigation for complaint control number #22-AS-20250902095612 it was revealed by 2 of 5 staff that emergency personnel were not given necessary documentation for Resident #1 (R1) until they were leaving the facility to transport R1 to the hospital. Based on today's visit California Code of Regulations are being cited on the attached LIC9099D. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report, clearance letter, LIC9099D and appeal rights were left at the facility.
2026-01-12Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
On January 12, 2026, state inspectors made an unannounced visit to conduct the facility's annual inspection and found no violations. Inspectors checked resident apartments, bathrooms, the kitchen, emergency supplies, fire safety equipment, medication storage, and staff and resident files—all met requirements. The facility is licensed for 195 residents and maintains current certifications and emergency preparedness.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On January 12, 2026, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Brandon Lopez and William Vanegas made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct the required annual inspection. LPAs were greeted and granted entry into the facility by staff after explaining the purpose for the visit. Executive Director (ED) Brian Keys was present and assisted on today's visit. LPAs observed that Brian Keys has a valid Administrator certificate which expires on February 18, 2027. The facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) licensed for one hundred and ninety five residents, all of which can be non-ambulatory, ten can be bedridden, and has a hospice waiver for eight. The facility consist of two buildings, both of which are two stories. Each building consist of resident apartments, with bathrooms located in suite, a commercial kitchen, a dining room, a wellness center, a salon, laundry rooms, medication rooms, activity rooms, and storage rooms. LPAs, accompanied by the ED, conducted a tour of the interior portions of the facility. LPAs observed the See Something, Say Something poster (PUB 475) mounted on the wall by the entryway of the facility. LPAs inspected a total of sixteen resident apartments, including both buildings. LPAs observed resident apartments to be free of hazards. LPAs observed resident apartments to have the required furnishings of a bed, a chair, a chest of drawers, and a lamp. LPAs observed resident beds to have clean linens and blankets. LPAs tested the call buttons in resident apartments and they tested operational. LPAs inspected the resident bathrooms in the apartments inspected and observed them to be clean. LPA observed resident bathrooms to be equipped with grab bars and nonskid floor mats. Faucets and toilets were operational. Hot water temperature measured between 111.9 and 116.7 degrees Fahrenheit. LPAs inspected the facility commercial kitchen area and observed it be clean. CONTINUED ON 809-C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LPAs observed the facility to have a minimum two day perishable and seven day non-perishable food supply on hand. LPAs observed the facility has a three day emergency food and water supply kept in a storage room. LPAs observed multiple fire extinguishers in both buildings to be mounted on the walls. All fire extinguishers were observed to be charged and up to date on service. LPAs observed that the facility had their most recent fire inspection conducted on July 9, 2025. LPAs observed that the facility fire sprinklers and smoke detectors tested operational during the inspection. LPAs observed the facility conducted their last emergency disaster drill on December 12, 2025. LPAs observed the centrally stored medication to be kept in locked medicine carts located in the medication room, in their respective buildings. LPAs observed first aid kits to be stored in each of the medication rooms and they had all the required components. LPAs observed all the facility's chemicals and toxins to be stored in a locked storage room. LPAs observed other common areas such as the dining rooms, staff offices, and activity areas to be clear of any hazards. LPAs, accompanied by the ED, conducted a tour of the exterior portions of the facility. LPAs observed that each buildings has their respective outdoor seating areas. LPAs observed shaded outdoor seating areas with furniture for resident use. LPAs observed the exterior to be free of obstructions and hazards. LPAs tested the delay egress doors located on the exterior portions which tested operational. There are no bodies of water on the premises. LPA reviewed the sixteen resident files. All the required documentation were present and current in the resident files reviewed. LPA reviewed residents' medication and medication administration records. LPAs reviewed sixteen staff files. All staff are background cleared and associated to the facility. Based on the observations made during today's visit, no deficiencies are being cited per the Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director Brian Keys and a copy of the report was provided.
2025-09-09Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
During a routine visit, inspectors found that when emergency services were called for a resident on August 24, 2025, staff performed chest compressions even though the resident had a do-not-resuscitate directive in place; staff only stopped compressions after emergency personnel informed them of the directive. There were also delays in providing emergency personnel with the resident's medical documentation, with some staff reporting the printer was down and others saying paperwork was given as the resident was being transported. The facility's policy requires staff to provide emergency personnel with necessary medical documents upon arrival and to follow advance directives, but these requirements were not consistently followed in this case.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
LPA observed a Directive to Physicians dated March 19, 2008, signed by R1 stating that if R1 at any time is in a terminal condition or should have an incurable and irreversible condition that, without the administration of life-sustaining treatment, will in the opinion of R1s attending physician withhold or withdraw treatment that only prolongs the process of dying and is not necessary for R1s comfort or to alleviate pain. During interviews it was revealed that staff called emergency services twice on August 24, 2025, for R1 due to changes in condition. It was revealed that 3 of 5 staff were present at the time of the incidents. 2 of 5 staff informed LPA that staff were delayed in giving emergency personnel all necessary documentation due to the printer being down. 2 of 5 staff informed LPA that emergency services were given all of the necessary documentation as they were exiting the facility with R1. Staff #3 (S3) informed LPA that emergency services were called again in the evening due to R1 being unresponsive. S3 informed LPA that they started chest compressions until emergency personnel arrived to the facility. S3 informed LPA that emergency personnel informed them that there was a POLST and DNR in place for R1 and S3 stopped compressions once they were made aware of the directives in place. 2 of 5 staff informed LPA that it is the facility policy to provide emergency personnel with necessary documentation upon their arrival and to follow the DNR and POLST directives that are in place. 4 of 5 staff informed LPA that when giving emergency personnel documentation they give the face sheet, insurance documentation, and medication list. Witness #1(W1) informed the Department that they saw staff conducting chest compressions on R1. W1 informed the Department that there was a delay with facility staff giving the necessary documentation upon emergency personnel’s arrival. Based on observation, interviews, record review and information gathered during the investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22 Division 6 are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. An exit interview was conducted with ED Brian Keys and a copy of this report, LIC9099-D and appeal rights were left at the facility.
2025-01-31Complaint InvestigationSubstantiatedType A · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that a resident who cannot follow evacuation instructions exited the facility alone after a staff member left a door open; the resident was found at a nearby elementary school about 45 minutes later and returned safely. The facility was cited for failing to prevent the resident from leaving unsupervised and was issued a $500 penalty. A separate allegation that the facility failed to provide required two-hour check-ins was found to be unfounded.
“delayed egress door, left the facility unassisted and was found at a local Elementary School. This poses an immediately health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Per UIIR Report on December 10, 2024, R1 exited the building, resident was found at a local elementary school and resident was returned to the building. During the investigation LPA reviewed documents including the Preplacement Appraisal Information dated November 20, 2024, for R1. Per Preplacement Appraisal Information R1 is not mentally and physically able to follow signals and instructions for evacuation. During the course of the interviews with Staff, Staff 1 (S1) reported that one of the team members left the door open and stated that R1 exited behind the staff member. Per S1, staff noticed that R1 was missing approximately 20 minutes after. S1 reported that the local Police Department was called and stated that R1 was found within 45 minutes. An immediately $500 Civil Penalty was issued today. Based on observations and the interviews which were conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the following allegation: staff did not prevent resident from exiting facility alone is deemed SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. An exit interview was conducted with ED Keys and a copy of this report along with the Appeal Rights were provided at the time of this visit. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Per Atria Newport Beach Resident Functional Needs Assessment R1 requires status checks every two hours for up to 14 hours per day. During the course of the interviews with Staff, Staff 1 (S1) reported that R1 was never issued an Eviction and stated that R1 needs a 1:1 caregiver for their safety. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNFOUNDED, meaning the allegation is false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. LPAs conducted an exit interview with ED Keys, and a copy of this report was provided to the facility.
2025-01-27Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
This was a routine annual inspection of the facility's assisted living and memory care buildings. Inspectors found the facility clean and well-maintained, with properly stocked food supplies, working fire safety equipment, secured medications, and staff files in order; resident rooms had appropriate furnishings and clean bathrooms, and call system response times averaged 4 minutes. No violations were found.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Joseph Alejandre, Hanna Gough and Fred Arias made an unannounced visit to conduct the required annual inspection. LPAs met with Executive Director (ED) Brian Keys and explained the reason for the visit. Facility consists of two buildings, one is for Assisted Living (AL) and the other for Memory Care (MC). The capacity is 195 non-ambulatory of which ten can be bedridden and a hospice waiver for eight. Brian Keys' Administrator's Certificate expires on February 18, 2025. LPAs observed the PUB 475 poster (See Something, Say Something Poster) posted in the main entry way is 11 1/2 by 17 1/2. The PUB 475 poster posted by the mailboxes is 20" X 26." LPAs and ED Keys toured the facility. LPAs observed the kitchen is clean and organized. There is a two day supply of perishable food and a seven day supply of non-perishable food on-hand in the kitchen. LPAs observed an emergency food and water supply stored in a storage room. LPAs observed that the refrigerator and the freezer had a temperature log posted in the kitchen. The refrigerators and freezers are at the required temperature. LPAs and ED toured resident rooms on the first and second floors in AL. LPAs and ED toured the resident rooms in the MC building. LPAs inspected 15 resident rooms. All resident rooms had the required furnishings. All resident bathrooms were clean and operational. The hot water in the fifteen resident rooms inspected measured 107.2 degrees Fahrenheit to 115.5 degrees Fahrenheit. There is a fitness room and activity room for AL residents. There is a movie theater, music room and activity room from MC residents in the MC building. There is an outdoor courtyard in both buildings for residents to sit outside. There are fire extinguishers on every floor and all fire extinguishers are fully charged. LPAs observed emergency evacuation chairs in each stairwell. The last emergency fire drill was conducted on January 4, 2025. The delayed egress tested operational in the MC Building. The fire alarm and life safety system was inspected and tested operational on July 5, 2024. LPAs observed medications are kept secured in a medication cart that is locked in a medication room. LPAs observed that the First Aid Kit in the medication room has all the required elements. LPAs interviewed staff and residents. LPAs reviewed 5 staff files with no discrepancies observed. All staff files reviewed had current training and CPR/First Aid training. LPAs observed the resident library has a computer with internet access for resident use. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LPAs tested the call system in both buildings, the average response time was 4 minutes. LPAs reviewed 16 resident files with no discrepancies observed. LPAs inspected medication and medication administration records. No discrepancies observed. All resident files had the required documents. No obstacles or hazards were noted inside or outside of the facility. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of this visit. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report provided.
2024-12-12Other VisitType A · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
This was a follow-up visit to investigate a December 2024 incident in which a memory care resident left the facility unsupervised and was missing for about two and a half hours before being found and returned safely. The resident, who is assessed to need constant supervision, left the unit by following a staff member out of the secure area. Since the incident, the facility has assigned a private caregiver to supervise the resident 24 hours a day and trained all staff on preventing residents from leaving unsupervised.
“Based on interviews and records reviewed, resident R1 was assessed to be unable to leave the premises unassisted and was unsupervised for approximately 2.5 hours outside the facility. This constitutes an immediate rsisk to the health, safety and personal rights of residents in care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Saborit-Guasch made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of following up on an incident report submitted by the facility on December 10, 2024. Per the incident report submitted and reviewed, resident R1 left the community unassisted on December 10, 2024 at approximately 11:58am. R1's absence was noticed at approximately 12:25pm. 911 was called and a search performed which resulted in the resident being located and brought back unharmed to the facility. During the present visit, LPA requested R1's physician report and individual needs assessment which confirmed R1 resides in the Memory Care unit of the facility and is assessed to not be able to leave the facility unsupervised after following an unspecified staff member out of the secure perimeter of the memory care unit. Based on the incident report and records reviewed, it is thus confirmed that no supervision was provided temporarily until the resident was found approximately two and a half hours later. Since the incident, R1 has been provided with 72-hours of private caregiver supervision. All facility staff has received an updated in-service training on elopement prevention, documentation of which was obtained during the visit. Based on the evidence gathered during today's visit, a type A deficiency is being cited. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the present report along with appeal rights was provided to a facility representative.
2024-07-22Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint alleged that a resident became intoxicated at the facility. The facility called 911 and the resident was transported away; they returned a few hours later with a private care companion for the rest of the night. The Department investigated through interviews and document review but could not find enough evidence to substantiate or refute the complaint.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
When 911 was called they decided to transport R1 for intoxication. R1 returned to the facility a few hours later and had a private care companion for the remainder of the night. Based on the information gathered during the investigation through interviews and document review, the Department is unable to ascertain if the allegations occurred as reported. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or refute the alleged violations occurred; therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated.
2024-04-23Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
This was the facility's required annual inspection, conducted without advance notice. Inspectors found the facility in good order: resident rooms and bathrooms were clean and properly furnished, kitchens maintained adequate food supplies and proper temperatures, fire safety equipment was functional, staff training was current, and medication management met requirements. No violations were cited.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Joseph Alejandre, Faith La, Michael Tea and Rose Ruppert made an unannounced visit to conduct the required annual inspection. LPAs met with Executive Director (ED) Brian Keys and explained the reason for the visit. Facility consists of two buildings in which one is for Assisted Living (AL) and the other for Memory Care (MC). The capacity is 195 non-ambulatory of which ten can be bedridden and a hospice waiver for eight. Brian Keys' Administrator's Certificate expires on February 18, 2025. LPAs observed the PUB 475 poster (See Something, Say Something Poster) posted next to the mailboxes and not in the main entrance of the facility. The PUB 475 poster posted is 20" X 26." LPAs and ED Keys toured the facility. LPAs observed the kitchen is clean and organized. There is a two day supply of perishable food and a seven day supply of non-perishable food on-hand in the kitchen. LPAs observed that the refrigerator and the freezer had a temperature log posted in the kitchen. LPAs and ED toured resident rooms on the first and second floors in AL. LPAs and ED toured the resident rooms in the MC building. LPAs inspected ten resident rooms. All resident rooms had the required furnishings. All resident bathrooms were clean and operational. The hot water in the ten resident rooms inspected measured 111.5 degrees Fahrenheit to 119.3 degrees Fahrenheit. LPAs observed residents participating in yoga in the yoga room. There is a fitness room and activity room for AL residents. There is a movie theater, music room and activity room from MC residents in the MC building. There is an outdoor courtyard in both buildings for residents to sit outside. There are fire extinguishers on every floor and all fire extinguishers are fully charged. LPAs observed emergency evacuation chairs in each stairwell. The last emergency fire drill was conducted on March 29, 2024. The delayed egress tested operational in the MC Building. The fire alarm and life safety system was inspected and tested operational on July 7, 2023. LPAs observed medications are kept secured in a medication cart that is locked in a medication room. LPAs observed that the First Aid Kit did not contain a current edition First Aid Manual but had a pocket First Aid booklet. LPAs interviewed staff and residents. LPAs reviewed ten staff files with no discrepancies observed. All staff files reviewed had current CPR/First Aid training. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 All direct care staff files reviewed met training requirements. LPAs reviewed twelve resident files with no discrepancies observed. LPAs inspected medication and medication administration records (MAR) for six residents. No discrepancies observed. All resident files had the required documents. No obstacles or hazards were noted inside or outside of the facility. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of this visit. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report provided.
2024-02-15Complaint InvestigationMixedType B · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that one staff member did not have required annual training, a violation that was confirmed through interviews and records. A separate allegation about a resident's safety and medication management could not be substantiated based on available evidence, including electronic records showing staff checked on the resident about 12 times daily and responded to alert calls within an average of 11 minutes.
“Based on record review, Licensee failed to ensure verification of staff records are in the file. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Staff 1 (S1) does not have required annual training. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to facility administrator along with appeal rights. *This is an amended report to be deleted in the system. The continuation page was formatted onto one page at delivery and this page did not delete due to a system error. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 any knowledge of missing medications. Five out of five staff indicate R1's responsible party would refuse staff entry into the resident's room. Facility utilizes electronic scanning to enter a resident's room as well as to reset a pendant alert. Facility documentation shows facility staff scanned in to check on resident on average 12.02 times a day between 04/01/2022 and 04/25/2022. Pendant alert documentation indicated the resident alerted 4 times in April 2022 and staff responded, on average, within 11 minutes. Based on interviews conducted and record review, LPA is unable to corroborate the allegations. Therefore, the allegations are deemed unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to facility.
7 older inspections from 2021 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Other facilities in Orange County.
Other memory care facilities in Orange County with similar care offerings.
Free · Facility Watch
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.


