Atria Newport Beach
RCFE
A Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) is a non-medical residential care home licensed by California CDSS under Health & Safety Code §1560. Residents receive assistance with daily living activities such as bathing, dressing, meals, and medication management in a home-like setting. RCFEs are not hospitals or skilled nursing facilities — they do not provide round-the-clock medical care.
393 Hospital Road · Newport Beach, 92663
Quick facts
Inspection comparison
Updated May 1, 2026Compared to 89 California RCFE facilities of similar size, over the last 36 months.
Source: California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing Division. View raw inspection records →
Peer comparison
Percentile vs 89 similar California CA / rcfe_general / xl beds facilities · higher = better
Weighted citations per bed
Repeat deficiencies as share of total
Deficiencies per inspection
Tick mark at 50% = peer median
Citation severity over time
↑ worseningWeighted severity score per month · 24 months
Weighted score (24mo)
23
Last citation
Mar 26
Finding distribution
4 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
The rules that apply to this facility
California Title 22 requirements for this facility, with the specific regulation and a suggested question for each.
What dementia-care training must staff complete?22 CCR §87705 / HSC §1569.625
Because this facility markets dementia or Alzheimer's care, state law mandates higher training standards:
- 12 hours initial dementia training — 6 hours before a staff member works independently with residents, 6 more within the first 4 weeks.
- 8 hours annual dementia in-service — required every year thereafter.
- Administrator CE — the administrator must include 8 hours of dementia-specific continuing education in every 2-year recertification cycle.
Training must cover individualized care plans, behavioral expressions, appropriate supervision, and the facility's dementia care philosophy.
Ask on tour: Ask how dementia training records are kept — families may request documentation.
How many staff must be on duty overnight?22 CCR §87415
Based on 195 licensed beds:
One awake caregiver on duty, one on-call caregiver physically on premises, and one additional on-call caregiver.
Violation pattern to watch for:A facility that documents a staff member as "on call" but with that person physically off-site — when the law requires on-premises presence — is in violation of this section.
Ask on tour: Ask the facility to walk you through their overnight staffing plan and confirm whether on-call staff are on premises or off-site.
What health conditions can this facility legally accept or refuse?22 CCR §87612–87615
Restricted — allowed with physician order + care plan
- Supplemental oxygen
- Insulin and injectable medications
- Indwelling or intermittent catheters
- Colostomy / ileostomy
- Stage 1 and Stage 2 pressure injuries
- Wound care (non-complex)
- Incontinence
- Contractures
Prohibited — facility must refuse or discharge
- Stage 3 or Stage 4 pressure injuries
- Feeding tubes (PEG, NG, or J-tube)
- Tracheostomies
- Active MRSA or communicable infections requiring isolation
- 24-hour skilled nursing needs
- Total ADL dependence with inability to communicate needs
A hospice waiver (HSC §1569.73) can allow continued care for residents on hospice who would otherwise fall into a prohibited category.
Ask on tour: Ask whether your loved one's specific care needs are restricted or prohibited, and what the facility's process is if needs change after admission.
What must this facility report to the state — and how fast?22 CCR §87211 / WIC §15630
- ImmediateElopement, fire, epidemic outbreak, or poisoningImmediately
- 2 hoursAbuse with serious bodily injury2-hour phone report + 2-hour written report — to the California Department of Social Services (CDSS), Adult Protective Services, and law enforcement
- 24 hrsAbuse without serious bodily injuryWithin 24 hours
- Next dayDeath of a residentPhone by next working day; written within 7 days
- Next dayInjury requiring medical treatment beyond first aidPhone by next working day; written within 7 days
- WrittenBankruptcy, foreclosure, eviction, or utility shutoff noticeWritten notice to CDSS and residents — $100/day penalty (max $2,000) for failure
Your enforcement lever:Incidents that aren't reported on time are themselves a separate violation. If you believe a reportable event wasn't filed, you can submit a complaint directly to the California Department of Social Services (CDSS).
How does CDSS enforce these rules?22 CCR §87755–87777 / HSC §1569.58
- 1Notice of DeficiencyWritten citation with a correction deadline. Facility must submit a Plan of Correction.
- 2Civil PenaltyStarts at $50/day for non-serious; $150/day for serious deficiencies — immediately, with no grace period. Repeats escalate to $150 first day + $50/day, then $1,000 first day + $100/day.
- 3Suspension of AdmissionsFacility cannot accept new residents until violations are corrected.
- 4Temporary Suspension or RevocationEmergency suspension for imminent danger; full revocation after administrative hearing.
- 5Exclusion OrderAdministrator and operator can be barred from all CDSS-licensed facilities — not just this one.
See how these rules have been applied to this specific facility:
View state inspection record and citationsQuestions to ask on your tour
Based on Atria Newport Beach's state inspection record.
The facility has 2 serious citations on file across all inspections — can you provide your corrective-action plan for each cited item, and show families any documentation of remediation steps taken?
5 complaints are on file with CDSS — were any substantiated, and what remediation did the facility take in response to substantiated findings?
The most recent inspection on 2026-03-26 is documented in state records — can you provide families with a copy of the deficiency notice from that visit and walk through any corrective actions completed since then?
The facility is licensed for 195 beds and does not hold a formal memory-care designation from CDSS — what specific policies or protocols are in place to serve residents with dementia, and can you provide written documentation of those protocols?
State records
California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing- License number
- 306005789
- License type
- RESIDENTIAL CARE ELDERLY
- License status
- LICENSED
- License expires
- Not yet indexed
- Licensed beds
- 195
- Operator
- Aslo Gp Llc,gp of Newport Beach Opco Lp;atria Mgmt
Inspections & citations
17
reports on file
5
total deficiencies
2
Type A (actual harm)
Other visitMarch 26, 2026· UnsubstantiatedNo deficiencies
Inspector: Brandon Lopez
Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.
Plain-language summary
This was a complaint investigation into three allegations involving a resident who had moved out of the facility on January 31, 2025: whether staff failed to provide correct medication dosages, did not return medications when the resident left, and made inappropriate comments to the resident. The investigation found that all prescribed medications were released to an authorized representative when the resident moved out, though one medication was initially missed but picked up the same day; other residents and staff denied the medication dosage and inappropriate comment allegations, and the department determined there was not enough evidence to substantiate any of the three complaints.
View full inspector notes
The Department was unable to conduct an interview with R1 for this complaint, due to R1 moving out of the facility on January 31, 2025. The Department conducted an additional six resident interviews. Five out of the six residents interviewed denied the allegation and stated that they have not had any issues with receiving their medication from staff. However, one out of the six residents stated that they have received the wrong dosage of their medication by staff on two previous occasions. The Department conducted five staff interviews. Five out of the five staff interviewed denied the allegation and stated that R1 was given all of her medications according to orders prescribed by her physician. Regarding the allegation, staff did not return medication to resident upon termination of services, the following has been concluded: It was alleged that staff did not return medication to R1 upon termination of services. The Department was unable to conduct an interview with R1 for this complaint, due to R1 moving out of the facility on January 31, 2025. The Department reviewed R1's medication release form, which describes the medications that were released for R1 upon her termination from the facility. The Department observed that all of R1's prescribed medications were released to an authorized representative on January 31, 2025. The Department conducted five staff interviews. Five out of the five staff interviewed denied the allegation and stated that all medications were released for R1 to an authorized representative when she moved out of the facility. However, one staff stated that one medication was not initially provided to the authorized representative for R1. The staff stated that when they realized this issue, R1's responsible party was contacted and that they picked up the missing medication the same day. The staff stated that the medication release form for R1 was later updated to reflect the additional medication release. Regarding the allegation, staff made inappropriate comments to resident, the following has been concluded: It was alleged that staff made inappropriate comments to R1. The Department was unable to conduct an interview with R1 for this complaint, due to R1 moving out of the facility on January 31, 2025. The Department conducted six resident interviews. Six out of the six residents interviewed denied the allegation and stated that staff have never made any inappropriate comments to them. The Department conducted five staff interviews. Five out of the five staff interviewed denied the allegation and stated that they have never observed, or heard of any staff making any inappropriate comments to R1, or any other resident. CONTINUED ON LIC9099-C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Based on the evidence gathered during the investigation, the Department is unable to ascertain if the allegations occurred as reported. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or refute the alleged violation occurred; therefore, the three allegations are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted with Assistant Executive Director Sofiane Lahouasnia and a copy of the report was provided.
ComplaintMarch 18, 2026Type B1 deficiency
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that when emergency personnel arrived to transport a resident to the hospital, staff did not provide necessary medical documentation until the ambulance was leaving the facility, delaying access to important information needed for emergency care. Two staff members confirmed this occurred. The facility received a citation for this violation.
View full inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hanna Gough made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a case management visit. LPA was greeted and granted entry by staff. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Brian Keys and discussed the purpose of the visit. During the course of the investigation for complaint control number #22-AS-20250902095612 it was revealed by 2 of 5 staff that emergency personnel were not given necessary documentation for Resident #1 (R1) until they were leaving the facility to transport R1 to the hospital. Based on today's visit California Code of Regulations are being cited on the attached LIC9099D. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report, clearance letter, LIC9099D and appeal rights were left at the facility.
Regulation
87469(c)(1)Advanced Directives and Requests Regarding Resuscitative Measures(1) Immediately telephone 9-1-1, present the advance directive and/or request regarding resuscitative measures form to the responding emergency medical personnel...
Inspector finding
This requirement is not met as evidence by: 2 of 5 staff confirmed that emergency services were not given necessary documentation until they were leaving the facility with R1. This poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risks to persons in care.
InspectionJanuary 12, 2026No deficiencies
Plain-language summary
On January 12, 2026, state inspectors made an unannounced visit to conduct the facility's annual inspection and found no violations. Inspectors checked resident apartments, bathrooms, the kitchen, emergency supplies, fire safety equipment, medication storage, and staff and resident files—all met requirements. The facility is licensed for 195 residents and maintains current certifications and emergency preparedness.
View full inspector notes
On January 12, 2026, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Brandon Lopez and William Vanegas made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct the required annual inspection. LPAs were greeted and granted entry into the facility by staff after explaining the purpose for the visit. Executive Director (ED) Brian Keys was present and assisted on today's visit. LPAs observed that Brian Keys has a valid Administrator certificate which expires on February 18, 2027. The facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) licensed for one hundred and ninety five residents, all of which can be non-ambulatory, ten can be bedridden, and has a hospice waiver for eight. The facility consist of two buildings, both of which are two stories. Each building consist of resident apartments, with bathrooms located in suite, a commercial kitchen, a dining room, a wellness center, a salon, laundry rooms, medication rooms, activity rooms, and storage rooms. LPAs, accompanied by the ED, conducted a tour of the interior portions of the facility. LPAs observed the See Something, Say Something poster (PUB 475) mounted on the wall by the entryway of the facility. LPAs inspected a total of sixteen resident apartments, including both buildings. LPAs observed resident apartments to be free of hazards. LPAs observed resident apartments to have the required furnishings of a bed, a chair, a chest of drawers, and a lamp. LPAs observed resident beds to have clean linens and blankets. LPAs tested the call buttons in resident apartments and they tested operational. LPAs inspected the resident bathrooms in the apartments inspected and observed them to be clean. LPA observed resident bathrooms to be equipped with grab bars and nonskid floor mats. Faucets and toilets were operational. Hot water temperature measured between 111.9 and 116.7 degrees Fahrenheit. LPAs inspected the facility commercial kitchen area and observed it be clean. CONTINUED ON 809-C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LPAs observed the facility to have a minimum two day perishable and seven day non-perishable food supply on hand. LPAs observed the facility has a three day emergency food and water supply kept in a storage room. LPAs observed multiple fire extinguishers in both buildings to be mounted on the walls. All fire extinguishers were observed to be charged and up to date on service. LPAs observed that the facility had their most recent fire inspection conducted on July 9, 2025. LPAs observed that the facility fire sprinklers and smoke detectors tested operational during the inspection. LPAs observed the facility conducted their last emergency disaster drill on December 12, 2025. LPAs observed the centrally stored medication to be kept in locked medicine carts located in the medication room, in their respective buildings. LPAs observed first aid kits to be stored in each of the medication rooms and they had all the required components. LPAs observed all the facility's chemicals and toxins to be stored in a locked storage room. LPAs observed other common areas such as the dining rooms, staff offices, and activity areas to be clear of any hazards. LPAs, accompanied by the ED, conducted a tour of the exterior portions of the facility. LPAs observed that each buildings has their respective outdoor seating areas. LPAs observed shaded outdoor seating areas with furniture for resident use. LPAs observed the exterior to be free of obstructions and hazards. LPAs tested the delay egress doors located on the exterior portions which tested operational. There are no bodies of water on the premises. LPA reviewed the sixteen resident files. All the required documentation were present and current in the resident files reviewed. LPA reviewed residents' medication and medication administration records. LPAs reviewed sixteen staff files. All staff are background cleared and associated to the facility. Based on the observations made during today's visit, no deficiencies are being cited per the Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director Brian Keys and a copy of the report was provided.
Other visitSeptember 9, 2025· SubstantiatedNo deficiencies
Inspector: Hanna Gough
Substantiated — CDSS found a violation and issued a citation. Full citation details are on file with the state.
Plain-language summary
During a routine visit, inspectors found that when emergency services were called for a resident on August 24, 2025, staff performed chest compressions even though the resident had a do-not-resuscitate directive in place; staff only stopped compressions after emergency personnel informed them of the directive. There were also delays in providing emergency personnel with the resident's medical documentation, with some staff reporting the printer was down and others saying paperwork was given as the resident was being transported. The facility's policy requires staff to provide emergency personnel with necessary medical documents upon arrival and to follow advance directives, but these requirements were not consistently followed in this case.
View full inspector notes
LPA observed a Directive to Physicians dated March 19, 2008, signed by R1 stating that if R1 at any time is in a terminal condition or should have an incurable and irreversible condition that, without the administration of life-sustaining treatment, will in the opinion of R1s attending physician withhold or withdraw treatment that only prolongs the process of dying and is not necessary for R1s comfort or to alleviate pain. During interviews it was revealed that staff called emergency services twice on August 24, 2025, for R1 due to changes in condition. It was revealed that 3 of 5 staff were present at the time of the incidents. 2 of 5 staff informed LPA that staff were delayed in giving emergency personnel all necessary documentation due to the printer being down. 2 of 5 staff informed LPA that emergency services were given all of the necessary documentation as they were exiting the facility with R1. Staff #3 (S3) informed LPA that emergency services were called again in the evening due to R1 being unresponsive. S3 informed LPA that they started chest compressions until emergency personnel arrived to the facility. S3 informed LPA that emergency personnel informed them that there was a POLST and DNR in place for R1 and S3 stopped compressions once they were made aware of the directives in place. 2 of 5 staff informed LPA that it is the facility policy to provide emergency personnel with necessary documentation upon their arrival and to follow the DNR and POLST directives that are in place. 4 of 5 staff informed LPA that when giving emergency personnel documentation they give the face sheet, insurance documentation, and medication list. Witness #1(W1) informed the Department that they saw staff conducting chest compressions on R1. W1 informed the Department that there was a delay with facility staff giving the necessary documentation upon emergency personnel’s arrival. Based on observation, interviews, record review and information gathered during the investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22 Division 6 are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. An exit interview was conducted with ED Brian Keys and a copy of this report, LIC9099-D and appeal rights were left at the facility.
ComplaintJanuary 31, 2025· SubstantiatedType A1 deficiency
Inspector: Alvaro Ramirez Jr.
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that a resident who cannot follow evacuation instructions exited the facility alone after a staff member left a door open; the resident was found at a nearby elementary school about 45 minutes later and returned safely. The facility was cited for failing to prevent the resident from leaving unsupervised and was issued a $500 penalty. A separate allegation that the facility failed to provide required two-hour check-ins was found to be unfounded.
View full inspector notes
Per UIIR Report on December 10, 2024, R1 exited the building, resident was found at a local elementary school and resident was returned to the building. During the investigation LPA reviewed documents including the Preplacement Appraisal Information dated November 20, 2024, for R1. Per Preplacement Appraisal Information R1 is not mentally and physically able to follow signals and instructions for evacuation. During the course of the interviews with Staff, Staff 1 (S1) reported that one of the team members left the door open and stated that R1 exited behind the staff member. Per S1, staff noticed that R1 was missing approximately 20 minutes after. S1 reported that the local Police Department was called and stated that R1 was found within 45 minutes. An immediately $500 Civil Penalty was issued today. Based on observations and the interviews which were conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the following allegation: staff did not prevent resident from exiting facility alone is deemed SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. An exit interview was conducted with ED Keys and a copy of this report along with the Appeal Rights were provided at the time of this visit. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Per Atria Newport Beach Resident Functional Needs Assessment R1 requires status checks every two hours for up to 14 hours per day. During the course of the interviews with Staff, Staff 1 (S1) reported that R1 was never issued an Eviction and stated that R1 needs a 1:1 caregiver for their safety. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNFOUNDED, meaning the allegation is false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. LPAs conducted an exit interview with ED Keys, and a copy of this report was provided to the facility.
Regulation
Basic Services: Basic services shall at a minimum include: (1)Care and supervision as defined in Section 87101(c)(3) and Health and Safety Code section 1569.2(c). This requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on interviews and records reviewed R1 exited the Memory Care through a
Inspector finding
delayed egress door, left the facility unassisted and was found at a local Elementary School. This poses an immediately health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
InspectionJanuary 27, 2025No deficiencies
Inspector: Joseph Alejandre
Plain-language summary
This was a routine annual inspection of the facility's assisted living and memory care buildings. Inspectors found the facility clean and well-maintained, with properly stocked food supplies, working fire safety equipment, secured medications, and staff files in order; resident rooms had appropriate furnishings and clean bathrooms, and call system response times averaged 4 minutes. No violations were found.
View full inspector notes
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Joseph Alejandre, Hanna Gough and Fred Arias made an unannounced visit to conduct the required annual inspection. LPAs met with Executive Director (ED) Brian Keys and explained the reason for the visit. Facility consists of two buildings, one is for Assisted Living (AL) and the other for Memory Care (MC). The capacity is 195 non-ambulatory of which ten can be bedridden and a hospice waiver for eight. Brian Keys' Administrator's Certificate expires on February 18, 2025. LPAs observed the PUB 475 poster (See Something, Say Something Poster) posted in the main entry way is 11 1/2 by 17 1/2. The PUB 475 poster posted by the mailboxes is 20" X 26." LPAs and ED Keys toured the facility. LPAs observed the kitchen is clean and organized. There is a two day supply of perishable food and a seven day supply of non-perishable food on-hand in the kitchen. LPAs observed an emergency food and water supply stored in a storage room. LPAs observed that the refrigerator and the freezer had a temperature log posted in the kitchen. The refrigerators and freezers are at the required temperature. LPAs and ED toured resident rooms on the first and second floors in AL. LPAs and ED toured the resident rooms in the MC building. LPAs inspected 15 resident rooms. All resident rooms had the required furnishings. All resident bathrooms were clean and operational. The hot water in the fifteen resident rooms inspected measured 107.2 degrees Fahrenheit to 115.5 degrees Fahrenheit. There is a fitness room and activity room for AL residents. There is a movie theater, music room and activity room from MC residents in the MC building. There is an outdoor courtyard in both buildings for residents to sit outside. There are fire extinguishers on every floor and all fire extinguishers are fully charged. LPAs observed emergency evacuation chairs in each stairwell. The last emergency fire drill was conducted on January 4, 2025. The delayed egress tested operational in the MC Building. The fire alarm and life safety system was inspected and tested operational on July 5, 2024. LPAs observed medications are kept secured in a medication cart that is locked in a medication room. LPAs observed that the First Aid Kit in the medication room has all the required elements. LPAs interviewed staff and residents. LPAs reviewed 5 staff files with no discrepancies observed. All staff files reviewed had current training and CPR/First Aid training. LPAs observed the resident library has a computer with internet access for resident use. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LPAs tested the call system in both buildings, the average response time was 4 minutes. LPAs reviewed 16 resident files with no discrepancies observed. LPAs inspected medication and medication administration records. No discrepancies observed. All resident files had the required documents. No obstacles or hazards were noted inside or outside of the facility. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of this visit. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report provided.
Other visitDecember 12, 2024Type A1 deficiency
Inspector: Kevin Saborit-Guasch
Plain-language summary
This was a follow-up visit to investigate a December 2024 incident in which a memory care resident left the facility unsupervised and was missing for about two and a half hours before being found and returned safely. The resident, who is assessed to need constant supervision, left the unit by following a staff member out of the secure area. Since the incident, the facility has assigned a private caregiver to supervise the resident 24 hours a day and trained all staff on preventing residents from leaving unsupervised.
View full inspector notes
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Saborit-Guasch made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of following up on an incident report submitted by the facility on December 10, 2024. Per the incident report submitted and reviewed, resident R1 left the community unassisted on December 10, 2024 at approximately 11:58am. R1's absence was noticed at approximately 12:25pm. 911 was called and a search performed which resulted in the resident being located and brought back unharmed to the facility. During the present visit, LPA requested R1's physician report and individual needs assessment which confirmed R1 resides in the Memory Care unit of the facility and is assessed to not be able to leave the facility unsupervised after following an unspecified staff member out of the secure perimeter of the memory care unit. Based on the incident report and records reviewed, it is thus confirmed that no supervision was provided temporarily until the resident was found approximately two and a half hours later. Since the incident, R1 has been provided with 72-hours of private caregiver supervision. All facility staff has received an updated in-service training on elopement prevention, documentation of which was obtained during the visit. Based on the evidence gathered during today's visit, a type A deficiency is being cited. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the present report along with appeal rights was provided to a facility representative.
Regulation
Per CCR Section 80078(a) regarding the Responsibility for Providing Care and Supervision: "(a) The licensee shall provide care and supervision as necessary to meet the client's needs". This requirement was not met as evidenced by:
Inspector finding
Based on interviews and records reviewed, resident R1 was assessed to be unable to leave the premises unassisted and was unsupervised for approximately 2.5 hours outside the facility. This constitutes an immediate rsisk to the health, safety and personal rights of residents in care.
ComplaintJuly 22, 2024· UnsubstantiatedNo deficiencies
Inspector: Jerome Haley
Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.
Plain-language summary
A complaint alleged that a resident became intoxicated at the facility. The facility called 911 and the resident was transported away; they returned a few hours later with a private care companion for the rest of the night. The Department investigated through interviews and document review but could not find enough evidence to substantiate or refute the complaint.
View full inspector notes
When 911 was called they decided to transport R1 for intoxication. R1 returned to the facility a few hours later and had a private care companion for the remainder of the night. Based on the information gathered during the investigation through interviews and document review, the Department is unable to ascertain if the allegations occurred as reported. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or refute the alleged violations occurred; therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated.
Other visitApril 23, 2024No deficiencies
Inspector: Joseph Alejandre
Plain-language summary
This was the facility's required annual inspection, conducted without advance notice. Inspectors found the facility in good order: resident rooms and bathrooms were clean and properly furnished, kitchens maintained adequate food supplies and proper temperatures, fire safety equipment was functional, staff training was current, and medication management met requirements. No violations were cited.
View full inspector notes
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Joseph Alejandre, Faith La, Michael Tea and Rose Ruppert made an unannounced visit to conduct the required annual inspection. LPAs met with Executive Director (ED) Brian Keys and explained the reason for the visit. Facility consists of two buildings in which one is for Assisted Living (AL) and the other for Memory Care (MC). The capacity is 195 non-ambulatory of which ten can be bedridden and a hospice waiver for eight. Brian Keys' Administrator's Certificate expires on February 18, 2025. LPAs observed the PUB 475 poster (See Something, Say Something Poster) posted next to the mailboxes and not in the main entrance of the facility. The PUB 475 poster posted is 20" X 26." LPAs and ED Keys toured the facility. LPAs observed the kitchen is clean and organized. There is a two day supply of perishable food and a seven day supply of non-perishable food on-hand in the kitchen. LPAs observed that the refrigerator and the freezer had a temperature log posted in the kitchen. LPAs and ED toured resident rooms on the first and second floors in AL. LPAs and ED toured the resident rooms in the MC building. LPAs inspected ten resident rooms. All resident rooms had the required furnishings. All resident bathrooms were clean and operational. The hot water in the ten resident rooms inspected measured 111.5 degrees Fahrenheit to 119.3 degrees Fahrenheit. LPAs observed residents participating in yoga in the yoga room. There is a fitness room and activity room for AL residents. There is a movie theater, music room and activity room from MC residents in the MC building. There is an outdoor courtyard in both buildings for residents to sit outside. There are fire extinguishers on every floor and all fire extinguishers are fully charged. LPAs observed emergency evacuation chairs in each stairwell. The last emergency fire drill was conducted on March 29, 2024. The delayed egress tested operational in the MC Building. The fire alarm and life safety system was inspected and tested operational on July 7, 2023. LPAs observed medications are kept secured in a medication cart that is locked in a medication room. LPAs observed that the First Aid Kit did not contain a current edition First Aid Manual but had a pocket First Aid booklet. LPAs interviewed staff and residents. LPAs reviewed ten staff files with no discrepancies observed. All staff files reviewed had current CPR/First Aid training. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 All direct care staff files reviewed met training requirements. LPAs reviewed twelve resident files with no discrepancies observed. LPAs inspected medication and medication administration records (MAR) for six residents. No discrepancies observed. All resident files had the required documents. No obstacles or hazards were noted inside or outside of the facility. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of this visit. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report provided.
ComplaintFebruary 15, 2024· MixedType B1 deficiency
Inspector: Kimberly Lyman
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that one staff member did not have required annual training, a violation that was confirmed through interviews and records. A separate allegation about a resident's safety and medication management could not be substantiated based on available evidence, including electronic records showing staff checked on the resident about 12 times daily and responded to alert calls within an average of 11 minutes.
View full inspector notes
Staff 1 (S1) does not have required annual training. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to facility administrator along with appeal rights. *This is an amended report to be deleted in the system. The continuation page was formatted onto one page at delivery and this page did not delete due to a system error. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 any knowledge of missing medications. Five out of five staff indicate R1's responsible party would refuse staff entry into the resident's room. Facility utilizes electronic scanning to enter a resident's room as well as to reset a pendant alert. Facility documentation shows facility staff scanned in to check on resident on average 12.02 times a day between 04/01/2022 and 04/25/2022. Pendant alert documentation indicated the resident alerted 4 times in April 2022 and staff responded, on average, within 11 minutes. Based on interviews conducted and record review, LPA is unable to corroborate the allegations. Therefore, the allegations are deemed unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to facility.
Regulation
Licensees shall maintain in the personnel records verification of required staff training and orientation. This req is not being met as evidenced by:
Inspector finding
Based on record review, Licensee failed to ensure verification of staff records are in the file. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.
Other visitJune 16, 2023No deficiencies
Inspector: Claudia Gutierrez
Plain-language summary
A state licensing analyst conducted an unannounced visit to the facility's newly renovated North Building, which opened yesterday with three memory care residents. The analyst toured the building, observed residents in their rooms and during walking activities, and confirmed that meals and one-on-one activities were being provided. No deficiencies were found.
View full inspector notes
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Claudia Gutierrez made a unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of conducting a case management visit regarding operations of the newly renovated North Building of the facility. LPA met with Memory Care Director (MCD) Kyle Coleman and toured the premises. MCD confirmed that residents had begun moving-in yesterday and the building currently has a total of three residents. All three residents are in memory care, which is located on the first floor of the building. Residents were observed to be in their bedroom and engaging in a walking activity. Residents have meals delivered from the main building and activities are being provided directly one one one with each resident. LPA observed activity calendar posted and visible in the activity room . The second story will be used for assisted living and currently has no residents. Executive Director Brian Keys arrived at 9:30 a.m. No deficiencies were observed during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was left at the facility.
Other visitJune 9, 2023No deficiencies
Inspector: Kevin Saborit-Guasch
Plain-language summary
This was a pre-licensing inspection of the facility's newly renovated North Building, which will house assisted living and memory care residents. The inspector toured the building and found it ready for operation, with properly equipped resident rooms, functioning safety systems including smoke and carbon oxygen detectors, secure medication storage, adequate food supplies, and activity spaces tailored to the needs of memory care residents. A Temporary Certificate of Occupation was issued during the visit.
View full inspector notes
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Saborit-Guasch made a scheduled visit to the facility for the purpose of conducting a pre-licensing visit for the newly renovated North Building of the facility. LPA was greeted and granted entry by Executive Director Brian Keys. The North Building is a two-level building (with an additional basement level used for parking) situated next to the currently operating South Building. Activities and dining for all Assisted Living residents in the North Building will be held in the South Building's common area. LPA observed all infection control measures were in place including proper signage, sanitizing stations, and sign in area/symptom check at the front desk. Entry into the North Building is also routed through the main lobby where visitors and vendors sign in through an Accushield system allowing facility staff to access real time reporting of the number of visitors present in the facility along with a Care Predict system that is provided to all residents. Work assignments are handled digitally through the system as well in addition to pendant pushes. Facility staff states an average response time of 7.5 minutes for the currently operating building. LPA accompanied by facility staff conducted a tour of the North Building's physical plant and observed the following: Structure: Assisted Living on the second level is based on two typical floor plan including a studio and a one-bedroom apartment. One model unit for each type was observed by LPA to include all necessary items of furnishing. There are a total of 41 apartments on the second level. There are 42 apartments in the Memory Care on the first level, all of which are based on a studio floor plan which includes a private bathroom for every unit. The Memory Care is distributed around three interior modular activities spaces and two exterior spaces and is equipped with a full kitchen. Administrative and wellness offices are located throughout the building as well. CONTINUED ON FORM LIC809-C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 CONTINUED FROM FORM LIC809 Bedrooms: Resident rooms are generally unfurnished as residents bring their own furnishings. Bathrooms: All resident bathrooms have a working toilet, wash basin, showers and are equipped with non-slip tiles and grab bars. The built-in call system present was activated during the visit and observed to be fully operational. Food Service: Facility has ample supply of food and is fully supplied in anticipation of accepting residents. Executive director states that a minimum of three days of available menu-based food is present on the present along with 7 days of fresh food. Emergency measures allow for the use of butane to continue providing food in a shelter-in-place scenario. Smoke Detectors: Smoke detectors and sprinklers are observed throughout the physical plant. Carbon monoxide detectors are operational. Fire extinguishers are mounted and charged in multiple locations throughout the physical plant. Kitchen: LPA observed a clean and orderly kitchen with walk-in/reach-in freezer, refrigerator, and dry goods storage area. Functioning temperatures for all equipment is observed to be within range at 33F for the fridge and -8F for the freezer. Medications and First-Aid: LPA observed a locked medication room on the first level for assisted living as well as an additional locked room within the memory care units. The Med room on each level contains a locked rolling file cabinet, a locked medication carts, locked refrigeration units for prescribed controlled substances for resident medication as well as a first-aid kit. Reading Material, Games, and Equipment: LPA observed ample activity spaces and equipment throughout the facility. Activity programs will be displayed in each units via a voice recognition-enabled device and is also to be displayed on screens throughout the facility. A specific activity program is tailored to the Memory Care residents with additional consideration for the various level of dementia acuity displayed by the residents. Outside Areas: LPA observed three enclosed outdoor areas accessible to the memory care unit. A delayed egress exit is observed to be functional with three distinct modes. Fire Clearance : Approved on June 8, 2023 for 195 non-ambulatory residents, of which 10 may be bedridden. A Temporary Certificate of Occupation was delivered to the facility during the visit. The renovated section of the facility is ready to be included into the license and put into operation. An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director Brian Keys and a copy of this report was provided via and left at the facility.
Other visitMay 12, 2023No deficiencies
Inspector: Kevin Saborit-Guasch
Plain-language summary
An unannounced visit was made to collect a state licensing fee for a fire clearance related to the facility's new North building under construction. The facility paid the $25 fee, and no inspection findings were documented.
View full inspector notes
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Saborit-Guasch made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of collecting payment of the Department fee related to requesting an updated fire clearance ahead of the pre-licensing visit for the facility's soon-to-be-completed North building. LPA was greeted and granted entry by Sofiane Lahouasnia and collected a $25 check payable to the Department. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was emailed to Diane Morris, manager.
InspectionApril 26, 2022Type B1 deficiency
Inspector: Kimberly Lyman
Plain-language summary
During a complaint investigation visit, inspectors found that a family member had installed a video camera in a resident's room and the facility staff knew about it, but there was no posted notice informing people that recording was taking place. The facility was cited for this violation. An exit interview was conducted with facility management to discuss the findings and appeal rights.
View full inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced case management visit in conjunction with complaint investigation 22-AS-20211122170311. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the complaint investigation, it was revealed that Resident 1 (R1) had a ring video camera installed in the resident's room by family. Interview with facility management confirmed the facility staff was aware of the video camera. LPA toured the resident's room during the investigation on 11/24/2021 and did not observe any signage noting that video recording was occurring. Based on the observations made during the complaint investigation, the following violation is being cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report as well as appeal rights were discussed and provided with facility representative.
Regulation
In addition to the rights listed in Section 87468.1.., residents in privately operated residential facilities... shall have the following rights: To have a reasonable level of personal privacy in accommodations... personal care assistance, visits, communication, telephone conversations, internet,. This requirement is not being met as evidenced by:
Inspector finding
Based on interview and observation, Licensee failed to ensure R1 was provided a reasonable level of privacy. R1's family posted a ring video camera in R1's room. There was no signage alerting that video taping was occurring. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.
Other visitFebruary 17, 2022No deficiencies
Inspector: Kimberly Lyman
Plain-language summary
State regulators conducted a routine annual inspection of this assisted living and memory care facility on an unannounced visit and found no deficiencies. The facility, which had 69 residents at the time of the inspection, was observed to be clean and well-maintained, with residents appearing happy and receiving appropriate care; inspectors verified that required safety equipment, medications, resident records, and COVID-19 protocols were all in place and functioning properly.
View full inspector notes
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kimberly Lyman and Andrea Mendivil conducted an unannounced visit for the purpose of conducting a required/ annual visit. LPAs were greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator Dorice Redman has a current administrator certificate expiring on 10/26/2022. At 9:33 AM, LPAs toured the facility with Executive Director George Gonzalez. Facility has 69 residents in care during today's visit with 3 residents on hospice care. Facility consists of Assisted Living with Memory Care under construction. LPAs observed a library, fitness room, yoga room, salon, spa, movie room, card room, and activity room. LPAs observed residents relaxing in the facility. All residents appeared happy and well taken care of. Facility appears clean and sanitary. All resident rooms had the required elements as well as restrooms stocked with soap/ sanitizer. Rooms are a combination of single and double occupancy. Facility screens all visitors to the facility and LPAs observed the screening/ sanitizing station in the facility. Facility utilizes an electronic visitor sign in sheet. Facility takes resident and staff temperatures daily and documents. LPAs observed the first aid kit has all required items. Facility mitigation plan has been approved. Facility has emergency evacuation chairs at the top of stairwells. LPAs observed an ample supply of emergency food and water. LPAs observed multiple outside visitation areas. LPAs observed the medication room and facility uses electronic medical records for medication management. Facility has a plan for covid testing residents and staff as needed as well as a plan for isolation and quarantine. LPAs reviewed select resident files during the visit and all files are up to date including emergency information. Most residents and all staff are vaccinated for Covid-19. No deficiencies noted during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was left at the facility.
InspectionFebruary 17, 2022No deficiencies
Inspector: Kimberly Lyman
Plain-language summary
Inspectors conducted a follow-up visit to investigate a 2022 incident in which one resident touched another resident on the hand; the facility had investigated the incident at the time and contacted police, and no injuries occurred. During the visit, inspectors interviewed both residents, toured the facility, and found no health and safety concerns or violations. Both residents appeared clean and well cared for, and the first resident expressed satisfaction with the facility.
View full inspector notes
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kimberly Lyman and Andrea Mendivil conducted an unannounced case management visit to follow up on an incident report/ SOC 341 dated 02/07/2022. LPAs were greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. Incident report indicated Resident 1 (R1) was touched inappropriately on the hand by R2. Facility investigated the incident as well as contacted Newport Beach Police. R1 is noted to have no injuries. During the visit, LPAs toured the facility as well as interviewed R1 and R2. Both residents appeared clean, happy, and well taken care of. R1 verbalized satisfaction with the facility. Per physician report dated 10/21/2021, R2 is diagnosed with Dementia. No health and safety concerns noted. No deficiencies noted during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was left at the facility.
ComplaintNovember 24, 2021No deficiencies
Inspector: Kimberly Lyman
Plain-language summary
A state inspector made an unannounced visit to investigate a complaint and found no health or safety violations. The facility appeared clean, residents seemed well cared for, and staff were following COVID-19 guidelines, though the inspector discussed camera placement rules with facility leadership during the visit.
View full inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman made an unannounced health and safety case management visit in conjunction with complaint visit 22-AS-20211122170311. LPA Lyman met with Digital Innovation Director Dori Redman and discussed the reason for visit. During the visit, LPA toured the facility. LPA observed residents relaxing or participating in activities. LPA spoke with Resident 1 (R1) who was visiting with family. LPA spoke with R2 in the dining room. Both residents appeared happy and well taken care of. LPA toured R1's room and observed a ring camera in the resident's room. Facility appears clean and sanitary and are adhering to Covid-19 guidelines. LPA consulted with Director Redman regarding guidelines pertaining to cameras in resident rooms. No health or safety violations noted during today's visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was left at the facility.
Federal summary
CMS Care CompareNot a CMS-certified facility
California RCFEs (residential care facilities for the elderly) are licensed by the state, not by CMS. CMS data only applies to skilled nursing facilities or to CCRCs that operate a licensed SNF wing.
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
No published reviews yet. Use the button above to share your experience.