Monarch Cottages la Jolla.
A large home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 40 California facilities with a similar number of beds.
RCFE · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
3 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
3 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
The rules that apply to this facility.
State requirements with the exact regulation citation, plain-language explanation, and a question to ask on tour. Rules this facility has been cited for appear first.
Plain language
Because a facility markets dementia or Alzheimer's care, state law mandates higher training standards: 12 hours of initial dementia training (6 hours before a staff member works independently with residents, 6 more within the first 4 weeks), 8 hours of annual dementia in-service every year thereafter, and an administrator must include 8 hours of dementia-specific continuing education in every 2-year recertification cycle. Training must cover individualized care plans, behavioral expressions, appropriate supervision, and the facility's dementia care philosophy.
Ask on tour
“Can you show me each direct-care staffer's most recent dementia training certificate, and tell me when their next refresher is due?”
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
8 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.
2026-08-10Complaint InvestigationNo findings
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janet Ngallo conducted a case management – Incident visit in response to an incident that occurred at the facility on 08/09/2026. LPA was welcomed by, identified herself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Executive Director Risa Jester. According to the Executive Director, a fire occurred at approximately 4:40 PM on 08/09/2026. The facility contacted the fire department, which responded and extinguished the fire. As a result of the fire, the facility’s sprinkler system activated and caused flooding on the first floor. The second floor of the facility was not affected. Due to the fire and resulting flood, the facility initiated resident relocations. A total of twenty (20) residents were relocated to nearby facilities and other safe locations. Two residents were transported to the hospital as a precaution due to smoke inhalation and/or medical needs. The remaining residents were relocated among neighboring facilities that had available capacity, as the facility’s designated temporary relocation sites listed in the Emergency Disaster Plan had no availability at the time of the incident. The Executive Director reported that one resident is expected to be discharged to a facility after precautionary evaluation, and another resident remains at a hospital due to existing medical conditions and is anticipated to be discharged back to the facility when operations resume. The facility anticipates a temporary relocation timeline of 48–72 hours. The Executive Director stated that there was no damage to the facility kitchen and shared that both the fire department and the Department of Public Health have cleared the facility to resume operations. [Cont. on LIC 809-C] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 [Cont. from LIC 809] LPA conducted a tour of the facility, including areas impacted by the incident. No additional health or safety concerns were observed during the visit. An exit interview conducted with Executive Director Risa Jester, to whom a copy of this report, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058), were provided. Their signature below confirms receipt of these documents.
2026-03-11Complaint InvestigationMixedType B · 1 finding
“Based on a review of facility records, S1 transferred R1 without the assistance of another staff member, in violation of R1’s care plan and potentially compromising one of twenty-eight residents in care’s safety.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
It was further alleged that facility staff did not follow physician's orders by not insuring resident used Compression Socks Interviews with staff report that they put R1’s compression socks on in the morning, and removed them at night, care staff washed the socks so they would be clean for the morning. This is consistent with resident’s care plan. This allegation is Unsubstantiated It was alleged that facility staff did not follow resident's care plan. Specifically that R1 was in the bathroom and a care giver was further away from the bathroom that they should have been. Interviews and a review of the resident’s care plan states that staff will “Provide as much privacy as possible during bathing” for R1. This allegation is Unsubstantiated. It was further alleged that the facility did not centrally store resident's medication. Specifically that R1’s prescription shampoo and another unidentified medication were in R1’s room. Interviews revealed that medication is taken directly to the med room upon arrival from the pharmacy. Prior to R1’s bathing, facility staff get the prescription shampoo from the medication room and when the care has been provided return it to the medication room. No information was revealed that any other medication was in R1’s room when it should have been centrally stored. This allegation is Unsubstantiated. It was further alleged that facility staff did not ensure R1 was hydrated as evidenced by R1 being hospitalized for dehydration Interview revealed numerous ways staff are trained to encourage liquid consumption by residents and to monitor for signs of dehydration. A review of the “after visit summary” from the period of hospitalization that was specific to this allegation does not mention dehydration as a cause of the hospitalization, R1 was discharged with new medication and referral to a hospice agency. This allegation is Unsubstantiated. Lastly it was alleged that resident’s documents were inaccurate. Specifically that S2 logged that they had come in to assist R1 when S2 did not. Interviews determined that there were logs in R1’s room that were placed there by an outside source. Any such logs or other documents are not facility documentation. No evidence was revealed that the facility’s documentation was not completed accurately. This allegation is Unsubstantiated. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Based on interviews and a review of documentation above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED meaning that the evidence did not meet the preponderance of evidence standard and is insufficient to compel further action. An exit interview was conducted with Risa Jester; a copy of this report and Licensee's Rights (LIC9058) were provided.
2026-01-14Complaint InvestigationNo findings
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Liliana Silveira, made an unannounced visit to conduct the required Annual Inspection to ensure substantial compliance with Title 22 regulations. LPA Silveira was granted entry into the facility by Cognitive Enrichment Director Karen Moran, after identifying herself and stating the purpose of the inspection. The facility serves 52 non-ambulatory residents, age 60 and above, of which 8 may be bedridden. There is an approved Hospice Waiver for 12 residents. This is a two-story complex, equipped with delayed egress and secured perimeters. Currently, there are 18 residents living in the facility. LPA, accompanied by Karen, toured of the facility. The tour was conducted inside and out and included a sample of resident units, the dining area, recreation rooms, and food storage areas. The last disaster drill was conducted on December 18, 2025. No bodies of water are on the premises. Passageways were free from obstructions. According to Karen, there are no weapons and/or ammunition stored on the premises. Signal Systems was available in each resident unit and LPA observed functionality of said system. Delayed Egress and secured perimeter doors were also tested for functionality. Resident's room temperatures were within a comfortable range. Each resident had clean and sufficient bed linens. All extra linens, towels, and washcloth inventory was kept in each resident’s room. All residents’ rooms were equipped with required furnishings. Lighting was present in the bedrooms. Residents’ bathrooms were observed to be sanitary and operational. Toilets and showers were equipped with grab bars. Hot water temperature in residents’ bathrooms were compliant. [CONTINUED ON LIC 809-C] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 [CONTINUED FROM LIC 809] Facility has a two-day supply of perishable foods and a seven-day supply of nonperishable food items. Food was observed to be properly stored and labeled. Food menus and activities schedule were posted. Chemicals and cleaning supplies were stored in a locked closet. The medication room is secured and has a locked medication cart, emergency supplies, and medications were labeled and kept in compliance with label instructions. Staff records review verified that all staff records were complete and compliant. Staff records review verified that all staff have a current First Aid certificate and at least one staff member, per shift, has a First Aide/CPR certificate. Resident records were reviewed and confirmed compliant. Administrator’s certification is current. LPA also interviewed staff and spoke briefly to residents. No deficiencies were cited at the time of visit. LPA observed that residents were being treated with dignity by staff, and there were sufficient staff on duty to meet the residents needs. An exit interview was conducted and this report was discussed with Karen Moran. A copy of the report, along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 01/2106) were provided to Karen via email. Signature on this form acknowledges receipt of the documents.
2026-01-12Annual Compliance VisitType B · 1 finding
“Based on records and interviews the licensee did not arrange for the provision of podiatry care as needed in 1 of 23 persons in care (R1) which posed an potential risk to the health of persons in care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
R1 received podiatry care approximately every two months for a total of four podiatry visits. For reasons that could not be ascertained R1 did not receive any podiatry care after those visits. Interviews revealed that all residents were to receive podiatry care from the identified outside provider unless alternative arrangements had been made. There was not evidence that alternative arrangements were made for R1’s podiatry needs. The investigation did not reveal any evidence of R1 receiving any podiatry care for the last year of R1’s residency in the facility. The investigation revealed the condition of R1’s feet at the time R1 moved out of the facility was consistent with a lack of podiatry care to meet R1’s foot care needs. This condition was the result of the facility’s failure to arrange such care. The allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. A deficiency is cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 (refer to the attached LIC 9099-D). An exit interview was conducted with Karen Moran, LVN Cognitive Entrenchment Director a copy of this report and Licensee's Rights (LIC9058) were provided. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 It was also alleged that facility staff did not keep facility free from incontinence odor. Interviews with internal and external sources and LPA observations did not reveal any concern about odor in the facility on a regular or ongoing basis. This allegation is unsubstantiated. Based on the evidence obtained during the complaint investigation, the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED, meaning the preponderance of evidence standard was not met. An exit interview was conducted with Karen Moran, LVN Cognitive Entrenchment Director , a copy of this report and Licensee's Rights (LIC9058) were provided.
2025-12-29Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
It was further alleged that staff did not respond timely to Resident 2’s (R2) call button in a timely manner. The investigation revealed that the facility care providers all have radios and they check with each other to see who is available to provide care when a call button is pushed. The MedTech on duty is responsible for monitoring the situation and will respond if all care providers are assisting other residents. It was also revealed that almost all calls are responded to from immediately to 10 minutes. On a rare occasion when all caregivers and the MedTech are busy assisting other residents, it might be 15 minutes before care can be delivered. No records were available to confirm response times. “Timely manner” is not specifically defined, however the preponderance of evidence revealed during the investigation did not confirm that response times are of regular concern or that any specific incident was egregious or endangered any resident’s wellbeing. This allegation is Unsubstantiated. It was lastly alleged that the facility did not provide adequate incontinence care for R2. Interviews with internal and external sources revealed that residents are checked every two hours to assess their toileting needs. Excluding the above allegation no concerns regarding resident incontinence care were revealed during the investigation. A review of documents did not reveal any skin breakdown for R1, or other indications of inadequate incontinence care. This allegation is Unsubstantiated. Based on the evidence obtained during the complaint investigation, the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED, meaning the preponderance of evidence standard was not met. An exit interview was conducted with Risa Jester, Executive Director ; a copy of this report and Licensee's Rights (LIC9058) were provided.
2025-06-04Complaint InvestigationMixedType A · 1 finding
“Based on records and interviews the licensee did not provide personal assistance and care as needed in 1 of 23 persons in care (R1) which posed an immediate Safetyisk to persons in care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
According to Staff 1 (S1) on April 28, 2023, between 7:30pm and 8:00pm, R1 was scheduled to receive a shower. S1 proceed to ask Staff 2 (S2) for assistance in transferring R1 from wheelchair to shower chair. Interview with S2 revealed that S2 assisted S1 in the transfer and left S1 alone to bathe R1. S1 stated that minutes later, S1 reached for a washcloth and as they reached away from R1, R1 fell from shower chair and hit head on the floor. S1 proceed to call for assistance from S2, Staff 3 (S3) and Staff 4(S4). S3 then assisted S1 and S2 in proving first aid to R1 and S4 contacted emergency personnel. R1 was then taken to be medically evaluated and received sutures to left forehead above the eye. According to medical records on April 29, 2023, at 2:56 am, R1 was discharged and returned to the facility with a diagnosis of laceration to the top of the left forehead. Interview with an outside source, confirmed R1 received medical care post fall. Facility status notes revealed that as of May 3, 2023, R1 refused to eat and drink. On May 5, 2023, R1’s responsible party requested for R1 to be evaluated by a medical professional and R1 was then sent out for additional medical follow up. Medical records revealed that at this time, R1 was diagnosed with a closed fracture of left hip and received surgery to treat the fracture. Based on staff and outside source interviews conducted, review of records, including outside sources records, a preponderance of evidence exists to support the allegation neglect/lack of supervision resulted in R1 sustaining a fracture and sutures as a result of not following R1’s care plan. The allegation is therefore substantiated. A deficiency is cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 (refer to the attached LIC 9099-D). The Department has determined this violation resulted in injuries to the resident in care. An immediate Civil Penalty of $500.00 is charged and is noted on the LIC421IM. At this time, per Health and Safety Code Section 1569.49, an additional civil penalty assessment is under review by the Program Administrator of Community Care Licensing Division. An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director RIsa Jester, and a Plan of Correction was jointly developed. A copy of this report, LIC811, LIC 9099-C, LIC 9099-D, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided to Executive Director RIsa Jester , signature on this form confirms receipt of documents. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Interview with multiple staff revealed R1 returned from the hospital with a rash sometime in May of 2023. Records collected corroborated R1 was admitted to the hospital in May of 2023 where R1 received extended care for an unrelated medical issue. Interview with staff revealed residents are monitored for incontinence care every 2 hours. It was also alleged that R1 was observed to have pest on their personal items. On June 6, 2023, LPA Strong conducted a facility inspection and did not observe any pests. Interview with multiple staff revealed they have not observed any pest. Interview with an outside source established that they have not seen any pest at the facility. On today’s date, LPAs conducted an additional facility inspection and did not observe any pests. The third allegation states that R1 did not receive assistance with dental care needs. Records collected revealed R1 was scheduled and attended multiple dental appointment in 2023. Interview with staff revealed facility schedules regular dental appointments for residents and will provide transportation to such appointment. Lastly, it was alleged R1 did not receive regular blood sugar monitoring. Interviews with staff revealed that R1 is diagnosed with diabetes but does not require continuous blood monitoring. Records collected corroborated that R1 is diagnosed with diabetes but does not have a diabetic diet or require monitoring. Medical records collected did not reveal any information to establish that facility was not providing adequate care for R1’s diabetic diagnosis. Based on a review of pertinent records and interviews, the preponderance of the evidence standard was not met to prove the allegations. An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director Risa Jester, to whom a copy of this report, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided.
2025-01-14Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabel Martinez conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The LPA introduced himself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Cognitive Enrichment Director Alycia Prichard. The facility was licensed for a capacity of fifty two (52) non-ambulatory residents, of which eight (8) may be bedridden. The facility also had a hospice waiver approved for twelve (12) residents, and approved delayed egress throughout the facility. The LPA, accompanied by staff, toured the interior and exterior of the facility. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstructions and slip hazards. Bedrooms contained the required furnishing and lighting was observed throughout. The signal/call buttons and delayed egress was tested and observed to be operational. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and resident activities. There was at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present, all safely stored. The were no toxic chemicals accessible to residents and medications were labeled and locked No pools, nor bodies of water were observed on the premises. Per staff, no firearms nor ammunition were kept at the facility. Fire extinguisher(s) were present. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. The LPA conducted interviews and reviewed facility records. No deficiencies were cited during today's annual inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Cognitive Enrichment Director Alycia Prichard, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058), were provided.
2024-01-09Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers, made an unannounced visit to conduct the required One-Year Inspection to ensure substantial compliance with Title 22 regulations. LPA Rodgers was granted entry into the facility by Director Risa Bishop, after identifying herself and stating the purpose of the inspection. The facility serves 52 non-ambulatory residents, age 60 and above, of which 8 may be bedridden. There is an approved Hospice Waiver for 12 residents. This is a two-story complex, equipped with delayed egress and secured perimeters. LPA was accompanied Director Bishop during a tour of the facility. Tour was conducted inside and out and included a sample of resident units, the dining area, recreation rooms, and food storage areas. The last disaster drill was conducted on December 21, 2023. No bodies of water are on premises. Passageways were free from obstructions. According to Director Bishop, there are no weapons and/or ammunition stored on the premises. Signal Systems was available in each resident unit and LPA observed functionality of said system. Delayed Egress and secured perimeter doors were also tested for functionality. Resident's room temperatures were within a comfortable range. Each resident had clean and sufficient bed linens. All extra linens, towels, and washcloth inventory was kept in each resident’s room. All residents’ rooms were equipped with required furnishings. Lighting was present in the bedrooms. Residents’ bathrooms were observed to be sanitary and operational. Toilets and showers were equipped with grab bars. Hot water temperature in residents’ bathrooms were compliant. [CONTINUED ON LIC 809-C] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 [CONTINUED FROM LIC 809] Facility has a two-day supply of perishable food and a seven-day supply of nonperishable food items. Food supply is replenished frequently by outside vendors. Food was observed to be properly stored and labeled. Food menus and activities schedule were posted. Chemicals and cleaning supplies were stored in a locked closet and outside storage area. The medication room is secured and has a locked medication cart, emergency supplies, and medications were labeled and kept in compliance with label instructions. Staff records review verified that all staff records were complete and compliant. Staff records review verified that all staff have a current First Aid certificate and at least one staff member, per shift, has a First Aide/CPR certificate. Resident records were reviewed and confirmed compliant. Administrator’s certification is current. LPA reviewed the theft and loss policy and procedures. LPA conducted a review of In-service training procedures. LPA interviews with Director Bishop confirm residences are provided with assistance necessary for medical and dental appointments. LPA reviewed the theft and loss policy and procedures. No deficiencies were cited at the time of visit. LPA observed that residents were being treated with dignity by staff, and there were sufficient staff on duty to meet resident’s needs. An exit interview was conducted, this report was discussed with Director Bishop, a copy along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 01/2106), and their signature on this form acknowledges receipt and a copy of the report was given to the Director Bishop.
1 older inspection from 2023 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Other facilities in San Diego County.
Other memory care facilities in San Diego County with similar care offerings.
Facility Watch · Premium
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.

