Atria Golden Creek.
Atria Golden Creek is Ranked in the top 30% of California memory care with 2 CDSS citations on record; last inspected Apr 2026.

A large home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 123 California facilities with a similar number of beds.
RCFE · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
Atria Golden Creek has 2 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
2 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
2 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
The rules that apply to this facility.
State requirements with the exact regulation citation, plain-language explanation, and a question to ask on tour. Rules this facility has been cited for appear first.
Plain language
Because a facility markets dementia or Alzheimer's care, state law mandates higher training standards: 12 hours of initial dementia training (6 hours before a staff member works independently with residents, 6 more within the first 4 weeks), 8 hours of annual dementia in-service every year thereafter, and an administrator must include 8 hours of dementia-specific continuing education in every 2-year recertification cycle. Training must cover individualized care plans, behavioral expressions, appropriate supervision, and the facility's dementia care philosophy.
Ask on tour
“Can you show me each direct-care staffer's most recent dementia training certificate, and tell me when their next refresher is due?”
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Atria Golden Creek's record and state requirements.
The facility holds an active license for 155 beds but has zero deficiencies and zero complaints on file with CDSS — can you provide the date of the most recent state inspection and walk families through the facility's internal quality-assurance protocols?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
CDSS licensing records do not formally designate this facility for memory care, though the operator markets memory-care services — can you clarify which units or beds are allocated to memory care, and provide the written dementia-care program required by Title 22 §87705?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
With zero complaints filed to date, what is the facility's procedure for documenting and escalating resident or family concerns internally before they reach the state complaint process?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
11 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2026-04-21Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
On an unannounced visit, a state licensing analyst delivered amended findings from a previous complaint investigation to the facility and reviewed the report with the executive director. No new violations or concerns were identified during this visit. The facility received copies of both the amended report and original complaint findings.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced visit to deliver amended complaint findings for complaint control # 22-AS-20260413161414. LPA delivered amended findings to facility and reviewed the report with Executive Director Jeremy Gilmore. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report along with amended report was provided.
2026-04-14Other VisitNo findings
2026-04-14Complaint InvestigationType B · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
Inspectors conducted an unannounced annual inspection of this 78-bed facility and found it well-maintained, with clean bathrooms, adequate food and supplies, working emergency equipment, and varied activities for residents. However, inspectors cited a deficiency because five of the six staff members reviewed did not have the required annual training hours. The facility's administrator certificate is current through October 2027.
“Based on observation and records reviewed the licensee did not comply with the cited above in 5 out of 6 staff training records as required hours were not completed. This poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 04/28/2026 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 Executive Director agreed to conduct inservice training and provide proof to LPA by POC due date.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kimberly Lyman and Andrea Mendivil conducted an unannounced visit to conduct a required annual. Facility is licensed for 78 non-ambulatory residents. Facility has an approved hospice waiver for 10 residents.. Administrator Jeremy Gilmore has an administrator certificate expiring on 10/21/2027. LPAs Lyman and Mendivil along with Administrator Gilmore toured the facility at 10AM. LPAs toured the physical plant, checked food service, facility records and the first aid kit. The facility consists of three stories including a library, bistro, cinema room, game room and hair salon. Memory Care is accessible through secured door near dining room. Resident bedrooms had the required furniture, bed linens and closet/drawer space to accommodate each resident comfortably. Resident bathrooms were checked. Toilets and water faucets worked properly, grab bars were secure and shower was free of mold/mildew. Water temperature measured between 105 degrees F and 118.7 degrees F in all restrooms. Resident bath towels, toiletries and personal hygiene supplies were adequately stocked. Emergency pull cord response times were immediate. Common areas were clean and clear of hazards, doorways were free of obstructions. Perishable and non-perishable food supply was checked and adequately stocked at time of visit. Facility had posted appliance temperatures and all were in range. Dining room has varied menu choices for residents. Smoke detectors and fire/ sprinkler inspections are conducted by a third party on 02/03/2026. Fire extinguishers were fully charged. LPAs reviewed the emergency disaster plan and plan is thorough and complete. Facility conducts emergency drills with the last drill conducted on 03/20/2026. . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LPAs observed ample emergency food and water. Outside grounds were toured. LPAs observed outside patio areas for both assisted living and memory care. There is ample outdoor shaded seating for residents. Walkways around the facility were clear of hazards. There are no security bars or weapons on the premises. LPAs observed residents participating in activities and facility offers an array of activities including outings in the community. First aid kit contained all required items including tweezers, scissors and thermometer. LPAs reviewed ten resident files and six staff files. All resident files contained required documentation including admission agreements, physician reports and resident appraisals. Staff files reviewed contained required documentation including medical assessment, criminal record clearance and proof of CPR training. LPA Mendivil observed 5 out of 6 staff did not have required annual training hours. LPAs reviewed medication administration and storage. Medications are stored in locked medication carts and facility utilizes an electronic medication record. Medications appear to be administered per physician order. Based on the observations made during today's visit, deficiencies are being cited. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was left at the facility.
2026-02-06Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
This was a routine inspection in which investigators interviewed residents and staff about multiple allegations, including claims about forged medical documents, unsecured medications, unreported incidents, scabies cases, and medication management errors. Residents and most staff denied the allegations, no medications were observed out of place, and investigators found no direct evidence of violations during their visit. The department determined there was not enough evidence to prove any of the allegations occurred.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Interviews were conducted with thirteen staff and five residents. Five of five residents denied having any knowledge of staff forging physician signatures or altering physician orders. Three of five residents stated their facility file, and paperwork is complete to their knowledge and two of five residents stated they were unsure of what paperwork would be required. Nine of thirteen staff interviewed denied staff forging or altering physician signatures and denied having any knowledge of incomplete paperwork or delayed destruction of medication. One of thirteen staff stated they do not work with medication or resident paperwork and did not know if staff had forged or altered physician orders or signatures. Three separate attempts were made to contact three of thirteen staff, however, they could not be reached to confirm or deny allegations. Regarding allegation, Centrally stored medications are not kept in a safe and locked place, the following was revealed: Five of five residents denied the allegation and stated they have not seen any medication out of place or in common areas. Ten of thirteen staff denied the allegation and stated medication is maintained centrally stored and locked. Three separate attempts were made to contact three of thirteen staff, however, they could not be reached to confirm or deny allegation. During the course of the investigation, LPA did not observe any medication out of place or in common areas. Regarding allegation, Staff failed to report incident(s), the following was reviewed: It is alleged staff were prevented from reporting incidents, including behavioral and psychological changes, to residents’ family. During their interview, five of five residents denied the allegation and stated all incidents, including changes in their condition are reported to their responsible parties. Eight of thirteen staff interviewed stated incidents, including changes in condition, are always reported to the residents’ responsible parties and denied ever being personally instructed not to report an incident or having any knowledge of staff ever being prevented from reporting any incident. Two of thirteen staff stated they were not responsible for reporting incidents and did not know if all incidents were or are being reported. Three separate attempts were made to contact three of thirteen staff, however, they could not be reached to confirm or deny allegation. Regarding allegation, Residents have scabies, the following was reviewed: It is alleged the facility refused to admit the presence of scabies resulting in an unknown number of residents and five staff contracting scabies. Five of five residents interviewed have been residing at the facility since 2021 and denied the presence of scabies then and now. During the course of the investigation, five of five staff identified as having scabies were contacted. (Cont. LIC9099-C) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Three of five staff stated they had contracted scabies while working the facility and had been provided with medical treatment by the Licensee, however, were unable to identify residents alleged to have also contracted scabies. Three separate attempts were made to contact two of five staff, however, they could not be reached to confirm or deny allegation. Regarding allegation, Staff failed to protect residents from harm, the following was revealed: It is alleged Staff 1 (S1) interacted with COVID residents and was then mandated to pass medication in the COVID-free residents. Three of five residents stated there was a division of staff working with COVID positive residents and a separate division of staff working non-COVID residents. Two of five residents denied knowing whether or not there was separation of staff working with COVID and non-COVID residents. Nine of thirteen staff interviewed denied having knowledge of alleged incident and stated there was a division of staff working with COVID residents and a separate division of staff working with non-COVID residents. One of thirteen staff stated they do not provide care to the residents and stated they did not know whether or not there was a division of staff. Three separate attempts were made to contact S1 and two additional staff, however, they could not be reached to confirm or deny allegation. Based on observations made during the course of the investigation, resident record review, and due to allegations being uncorroborated during interviews conducted, the Department is unable to determine if Staff mismanaged residents' medications, if Staff mismanaged residents' medical records, if Staff did not administer medications to residents according to physician’s orders, if Centrally stored medications were not kept in a safe and locked place, if Staff failed to report observed changes of condition, if Staff failed to report incident(s), if Residents had scabies or, if Staff failed to protect residents from harm. Although the above allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore at this time the above allegations are unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted and copy of this report was provided at the end of the inspection.
2025-10-23Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint alleged the facility lacked adequate staffing to meet residents' needs. An investigator interviewed all six residents and five staff members, who confirmed that resident needs are being met, staff respond to calls within 10 minutes, and staff receive annual training. No violation was found.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Based on interviews with 6 out of 6 residents stated their needs are being met. LPA Mendivil interviewed 5 out of 5 caregiving staff and they all stated they are able to meet residents needs. 5 out of 5 staff stated they answer pendant calls in under 10 mins and there has not been a time when staff has left a resident soiled for an extended period of time. 5 out of 5 staff stated they are trained annually regarding providing assistance with activities of daily living. Therefore based on the preponderance of evidence through interviews the allegation that Facility lacks staffing in which resident needs are not being met is determined to be UNSUBSTANTIATED, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. No deficiencies cited. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided.
2025-04-24Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
During a routine annual inspection, inspectors found the facility met all requirements including proper hot water temperatures, adequate food supplies, current medications being administered correctly, and a qualified administrator on staff. The facility had various activities available for residents including exercise, movies, and salon services. No violations were cited.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On this day, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Andrea Mendivil and Fred Arias made an unannounced visit to conduct a required annual. LPAs were greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. Licensed capacity is (155) current census (122). During today’s visit, LPA Mendivil along with Executive Director Jim Craddock toured the facility and inspected the physical plant, including but not limited to testing hot water temperature in five bathrooms. The hot water temperature measured between 110 and 118 degrees Fahrenheit. The facility’s last fire drill was conducted on March 12th 2025. LPA inspected the facility food supply and observed the facility retained a minimum of two days perishable and seven days non-perishable food on hand. LPA Mendivil observed medication storage and reviewed the centrally stored medications for two residents. Per review completed medication appear to be being given as prescribed. LPA Mendivil observed activities in the form of group exercise, movie theater, hair salon and gym. LPA Arias reviewed six out of six staff records. LPA Arias conducted a complete review of eight resident records. LPA Mendivil confirmed that administrator has a current administrator certificate which expires on July 28th 2026 Based on the observations made during today’s visit no deficiencies cited on this date. An exit interview was conducted with facility staff and copy of this report was provided.
2024-07-16Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
A routine annual inspection of the facility found no violations. Inspectors verified that the facility is clean and safe, bedrooms and bathrooms are well-maintained, there are adequate staff available 24/7, food supplies are sufficient and varied, and medical records and staff certifications are in order.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Rico made an unannounced visit to the Executive Director Dorice Redman facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection. LPA met with was granted entry to the facility. Licensed capacity is (155) current census (106). LPA was accompanied by Executive Director Dorice Redman to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). There are no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature. LPA inspected client bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, night stands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPA observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Posters such as personal rights, the CCL complaint poster, and the disaster plan were posted in a common area. Cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, and other dangerous items were kept inaccessible to clients in care. There was a designated space for client/staff files. Overall, the facility is clean, in good repair, and operating in safe conditions for clients in care. Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient for number of clients in care. Facility has a variety of food available for clients. Dishes, cups, and utensils were also stored properly. Care & Supervision: Facility has sufficient care staff for coverage 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Record Review: LPA reviewed (8) client file for admission agreements, updated physician reports, and needs and services plans. LPA audit (8) medications. LPA also reviewed (5) staff files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, training's, and health screening. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809) was discussed and provided to Executive Director Dorice Redman.
2024-06-10Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
On May 24, 2024, a resident with dementia left a memory care unit and was found by staff in the facility's back parking lot near a gate with a delayed-egress alarm. Staff responded quickly to the alarm, brought the resident safely back inside within minutes, and reported the incident immediately. The inspector found no violations, noting that staffing was adequate, the resident never left the property, and staff followed proper protocol.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Tea conducted a case management visit to follow up on an incident report received by Community Care Licensing (CCL) on May 24, 2024 submitted by Resident Service Director (RSD) Elaheh Mobadifar. LPA was greeted and allowed entrance into the facility by Executive Director (ED) Dori Redman. LPA explained the reason for the visit. The purpose of this visit is for a case management incident where a resident eloped from the facility on May 24, 2024 and was found by Staff 1 (S1), Memory Care Medical Assistant/Med-Tech still on facility property. LPA requested resident file and staffing schedule. LPA interviewed S1. S1 was alerted by a private caregiver (S2) of a resident in memory care, who was near by in the memory care dining room when the alarm had gone off. S1 saw that the alert was coming from the back gate with delayed egress. S1 discovered the resident standing on the parking lot by the back gate of the facility. The parking lot has no traffic and has only one car parked at the time. Resident was immediately safely brought back to her room and she immediately reported the incident right away. LPA interviewed resident (R1) to ensure she was okay. Resident did not recall the incident, she is diagnosed with dementia. R1 stated that she was okay and said that she wants to go home. She waved to S1 and told LPA that S1 is her friend who helped her get back to her room, which was her only recollection of the event. Reviewing R1's file she is unable to leave the facility unassisted. None of the staff did not see R1 leave the facility because residents are allowed to walk around the memory care. The back gate where she was found is part of the large court yard of memory care where residents can sit and walk around. LPA tested delayed egress of the back gate to see the staff response. Within less than a minute, staff came to check what was going on and to make sure everything was alright. They responded in an appropriate timely manner. Continuation of Case Management on LIC809-C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Based on LPA observations and interviews there was adequate staffing at the time. Staff immediately responded to the alarm and followed protocol and immediately reported the incident right away to the department. Resident was still on the property of the facility and did not go off the property. Resident is safe and was monitored closely after the incident. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of this visit. An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director, Dori Redman and a copy of this report was provided with the LIC 811 at exit.
2024-04-26Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
Plain-language summary
An investigator looked into a complaint about a resident who was found on the floor in December 2020; the resident has since passed away. The facility provided records showing staff conducted scheduled nighttime checks and discovered the resident during a 4:30 a.m. check, and the investigator found no evidence the incident resulted from facility neglect. The complaint could not be substantiated.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
This is an amended report (continued from LIC9099) On 4/3/2024 LPA conducted interview with Executive Director (ED) Dorice Redman. ED stated that she started working at the facility in March of 2024. ED made no disclosures regarding allegation. LPA attempted to interview the Reporting Party (RP) twice by calling the phone number provided on 4/2/2024 at 1:31 pm and again on 4/3/2024 at 10:13am. LPA was told to expect a call back by the end of the day on 4/3/2024. LPA did not receive a call back. On 4/3/2024 LPA conducted interviews with Executive Director (ED) and facility staff. No disclosures were made regarding the allegation. LPA interviewed Resident 1 and Resident 2 who resided at the facility during the time of the allegation. No disclosures were made regarding the allegation. LPA could not interview the Alleged Victim (AV) because they passed away in December 2020. LPA obtained copies of the following files: resident roster, staff roster, staff schedule, incident reports, pre-placement appraisal, needs assessment, needs profile and physician's report. Based on record review, LPA determined R1 was diagnosed with dementia and required checks at approximately 12am, 2am, 4am and 6am. Based on interview with Staff 1, it was stated that R1 was checked on at approximately 4:30am on 12/12/2020 and that is when the resident was found on the floor. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed LPA determined that the facility conducted their nightly checks and Staff 1 discovered Resident 1 on the floor. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to indicate that this occurred as a result facility negligence. Although the allegation(s) may have happened or is valid; there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted, and this report was reviewed with Executive Director. A copy of this LIC-9099 was provided to the facility.
2024-03-15Complaint InvestigationNo findings
2023-08-30Complaint InvestigationSubstantiatedIJ · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that staff at this facility failed to identify and document multiple pressure ulcers on a resident who was admitted to the hospital in December 2020 with severe sepsis and malnutrition; hospice nurses documented seeing signs of skin damage during visits but facility staff did not notice or record the injuries, which had progressed significantly by the time the resident reached the hospital. The facility's leadership acknowledged after seeing hospital photographs that staff "missed it" and "should have seen it," and took responsibility for the lapse in care and supervision. The complaint was substantiated as neglect.
“Based on interviews conducted and record reviews, R1 developed pressure injuries under facility’s care. Facility failed to observe, document and treat R1's pressure injuries in a timely manner. This poses an immediate risk to the health & safety of the resident in care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Hospital records showed R1 arrived at the emergency department on 12/17/2020 at about 08:53 PM. Chief complaint was weakness as R1 had not been eating the past few days and has been weak and lethargic. R1 was diagnosed with severe sepsis with acute organ dysfunction, septic shock, dementia, myasthenia gravis, anxiety disorder, failure to thrive syndrome, sever protein calorie malnutrition, left ventricular mural thrombus, ischemic cardiomyopathy, coagulopathy, hypernatremia. Multiple pressure ulcers on left toe, right ankle, right lower leg, and coccyx (unstageable), right heel stage 1, and deep tissue pressure injury of right and left heel. Apex Hospice Care was approved for R1 from 12/04/2020 – 03/03/2021; Primary diagnosis – Senile degeneration. Records showed R1’s health was declining, with poor appetite, difficulty in swallowing, lethargic, and poorly responsive. Interviews with Apex Hospice staff (Registered Nurse, Licensed Vocational Nurse, Physician Assistant) revealed they observed left heel with suspected deep tissue injury, blister to right ankle, redness to buttocks, and bruising to upper and lower extremities during their visits, from 12/10/2020-12/15/2020. No other pressure injuries noted on R1’s body. Hospice staff stated they did not have any concerns regarding the pressure injuries, and they were monitoring R1’s condition at that time. Instructions were given to Atria care staff to apply calmoseptine, floating the heel, and to reposition R1 frequently as tolerated. All observations were documented on the visit notes. Hospice staff stated they notified appropriate individuals of R1’s declining health condition. Home Health Aide who came two times per week to assist R1 with bathing stated she did not observe any pressure injuries or bruises on R1’s body. Atria Golden Creek records documents staff noticed R1 with swollen discoloration on left arm near antecubital area on 12/08/2020 and with redness in R1’s perineal area on 12/09/2020. Hospice, family member who is also a Power of Attorney (POA), and physician were notified and staff was to continue to monitor the area and follow Dr.’s orders (medicated powder). No other documentation regarding skin discoloration or pressure injuries were observed anywhere else on R1’s body. No other observation/notes for R1 from 12/11/2020 – 12/16/2020. Atria Golden Creek’s Executive Director Nicole Wentworth and Resident Services Director April Princesa were interviewed. Wentworth and Princesa were shown photographs of R1’s pressure injuries that were taken at the hospital (12/18/2020). Wentworth and Princesa acknowledged the pressures injuries were “severe”. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Both stated they were not made aware by their care staff of R1’s skin condition. Both stated, “We [care staff] missed it. We should have seen it.” Both could not provide an explanation as to how the care staff were not able to notice and document the pressure injuries. Wentworth stated R1 was residing in their facility and was under their care and supervision and took full responsibility. Wentworth stated she will provide additional in-service staff training for the care staff. All necessary interviews have been conducted. Atria and Apex Hospice staff failed to observe, document, and treat all of R1’s pressure injuries prior to R1 being transferred to the hospital on 12/17/2020. The investigation provided sufficient evidence and corroborating information to Substantiate the allegation of Neglect/Lack of Care and Supervision of resident R1. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Craddoc. A copy of the following reports LIC9099, LIC9099C, LIC9099D, LIC421M, LIC9099A, LIC811, and Appeals Right was sent to email on file.
2 older inspections from 2022 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Other facilities in Orange County.
Other memory care facilities in Orange County with similar care offerings.
Free · Facility Watch
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.
