Ivy Terrace at Garden Grove.
Ivy Terrace at Garden Grove is Ranked in the top 41% of California memory care with 3 CDSS citations on record; last inspected Apr 2026.

A large home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 54 California facilities with a similar number of beds.
RCFE · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
Ivy Terrace at Garden Grove has 3 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
3 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
3 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
The rules that apply to this facility.
State requirements with the exact regulation citation, plain-language explanation, and a question to ask on tour. Rules this facility has been cited for appear first.
Plain language
Because a facility markets dementia or Alzheimer's care, state law mandates higher training standards: 12 hours of initial dementia training (6 hours before a staff member works independently with residents, 6 more within the first 4 weeks), 8 hours of annual dementia in-service every year thereafter, and an administrator must include 8 hours of dementia-specific continuing education in every 2-year recertification cycle. Training must cover individualized care plans, behavioral expressions, appropriate supervision, and the facility's dementia care philosophy.
Ask on tour
“Can you show me each direct-care staffer's most recent dementia training certificate, and tell me when their next refresher is due?”
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Ivy Terrace at Garden Grove's record and state requirements.
The facility has 1 serious citation on file across all inspections — can you provide your corrective-action plan for the cited item, and show families any documentation of remediation steps taken?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
3 complaints are on file with CDSS — were any substantiated, and what remediation did the facility take in response to substantiated findings?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
The most recent inspection was conducted on September 26, 2025 — can you provide families with a copy of the deficiency notice from that visit and walk through each cited item?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
7 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2026-04-22Complaint InvestigationSubstantiatedType A · 1 finding
“Based on documents and interviews, the licensee did not ensure R1 received care and supervision, as a result R1 suffered multiple falls on November 12, 2024 and December 6, 2024, which caused a serious injury which poses an immediate health and safety risk to persons in care. CIVIL PENALTY ASSESSED.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
The investigation into the allegation, lack of supervision resulted in resident sustaining multiple falls , revealed the following: It was alleged, lack of supervision resulted in resident sustaining multiple falls. Resident 1 (R1) moved to the facility on April 1, 2023. R1 was diagnosed with a major neurocognitive disorder, anxiety and hyperlipidemia. R1’s physician’s report dated April 5, 2023, lists R1 as non-ambulatory and requires the use of a wheelchair. R1 was given a fall mat next to their bed at the time of move in and had a pendant placed on their wheelchair to alert staff when R1 was not in the wheelchair. 4 out of 4 staff interviewed reported that R1 was a fall risk. 4 out of 4 staff interviewed reported that the fall prevention methods were ineffective for R1. R1 sustained a fall on November 12, 2024, and on December 6, 2024. On November 12, 2024, R1 required assistance with incontinence care and needed a diaper change. Staff 1 (S1) and Staff 2 (S2) were assisting R1. The Health and Wellness Director reported that at this time staff were made aware that R1 should be changed on their bed because of their declining condition. Staff 2 reported they wanted to change R1 on their bed, but Staff 1 decided they should change R1 while they are standing and holding onto the handrail in the bathroom. Staff 2 agreed and R1 was assisted while they were standing and holding onto a handrail in the bathroom. R1 fell toward the ground, Staff 2 could not prevent the fall and R1 fell and hit their head. Staff called 911 and R1 was transported to the hospital for evaluation. Staff notified R1’s responsible party and Primary Care Physician (PCP). R1 returned later the same day with no new orders. On December 6, 2024, R1 suffered an unwitnessed fall. R1 was seen by a phlebotomist for a blood draw at approximately 10:30 am on December 6, 2024. Staff interviewed reported that the phlebotomist did not notify staff they were leaving. R1 was left unattended after the blood draw. At approximately 11:00 am Staff 3 found R1 lying next to their wheelchair with a large frontal laceration on their head. Staff 3 called 911 and R1 was transported to the hospital. Staff 3 contacted R1’s responsible party and PCP. R1 returned to the facility the same day with no new orders. There are no additional falls reported after December 6, 2024. R1 was placed on Hospice on December 9, 2024. R1 passed away on December 15, 2024, at the facility under Hospice care, cause of death, end stage senile degeneration of the brain, underlying causes: none. Other significant conditions contributing to death: none. During the course of the investigation, the Department obtained sufficient evidence to substantiate the allegation that lack of supervision resulted in residents sustaining multiple falls. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is Substantiated. See LIC9099D for cited deficiencies per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. Immediate civil penalties are being assessed. See LIC421IM. A Civil Penalty is pending determination by the Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) per Health & Safety Code section 1569.49(f). 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 The investigation into the allegation, lack of supervision resulted in resident sustaining serious injuries revealed the following. R1 was seen by a phlebotomist for a blood draw at approximately 10:30 am on December 6, 2024. Staff interviewed reported that the phlebotomist did not notify staff they were leaving. 2 on-duty caregivers were on break when the phlebotomist left. R1 was left unattended after the blood draw. R1 attempted to get up by themselves after being left alone in the room. At approximately 11:00 am Staff 3 found R1 lying next to their wheelchair with a large frontal laceration on their head around 7 cm long. Staff 3 called 911 and R1 was transported to the hospital. Staff 3 contacted R1’s responsible party and PCP. R1 returned to the facility the same day with no new orders. There are no additional falls reported after December 6, 2024. R1 was placed on Hospice on December 9, 2024. R1 passed away on December 15, 2024, at the facility under Hospice care, cause of death, end stage senile degeneration of the brain, underlying causes: none. Other significant conditions contributing to death: none. R1 sustained a fall on December 6, 2024, which caused a serious injury. During the course of the investigation, the Department obtained sufficient evidence to substantiate the allegation that lack of supervision resulted in resident sustaining serious injuries. See LIC9099D for cited deficiencies per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. Immediate civil penalties are being assessed. See LIC421IM. A Civil Penalty is pending determination by the Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) per Health & Safety Code section 1569.49(f). An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report and appeal rights were discussed with and provided to facility representative.
2025-09-26Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
A state investigator looked into multiple complaints about care at this facility and found no evidence that staff failed to assist with meals, supervise residents, do laundry properly, provide hygiene care, help with phone calls, or ensure hydration—all allegations were unsubstantiated. However, the investigator discovered that emergency call cords in at least one resident's room were not working due to a system issue that occurred after a battery change, and staff did not respond when the investigator tested the cord, though the facility has since fixed the devices.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Seven out of seven staff state resident was being assisted but was refusing meals as well as water and tea. Facility charting notes shows staff were documenting amounts of food consumed as well as refusals. Regarding the allegation that staff are socializing and not providing care and supervision, the investigation revealed the following: Six out of seven staff state staff were not socializing in R1's room. S2 and S3 deny any socializing in the room. Regarding the allegation that laundry was not done appropriately, the investigation revealed the following: Laundry is done on AM/ PM shift and laundry is put away on NOC shift. Five out of five staff state doing laundry effectively and are not aware of any items becoming gray from laundering. LPA observed the laundry facilities and each wing does their own laundry and has their own machine to prevent items becoming mixed up. Regarding the allegation that staff are not trained on care plan for a resident, the investigation revealed the following: Five out of five staff state being aware of resident needs and requirements through their job and observing notes and shift change. R1's responsible party provided a list of expectations to staff that were not items on the care plan and were merely requests including certain TV shows and exercise at specific times. Regarding the allegation that there is no staff supervision on weekends or overnight, the investigation revealed the following: Facility schedule shows 6 caregivers and 2 med techs on 1st and 2nd shift and med tech and 2 caregivers on NOC. Facility states filling call outs with overtime. Seven out of seven staff state staffing is fine and resident needs are being met. Regarding the allegation that staff did not address resident's personal hygiene, staff did not meet a resident's incontinence needs and staff did not follow care plan to assign a female for showering, the investigation revealed the following: Seven out of seven staff state R1's needs were being met. Incontinence care is provided at a minimum 3 times a shift. Initially R1 was independent of toileting but as the resident declined, more assistance was needed. All staff interviewed denied resident was not provided incontinence care or showering. Facility does not have shower records as facility changed systems prior to complaint. Staff state that initially a male caregiver would shower R1 but after family requested a female, the male did not provide showering. Seven out of seven staff deny a male caregiver showered the resident after the request. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Regarding the allegation that Staff did not assist a resident with making phone calls, the investigation revealed the following: R1's family member requested that staff assist resident with calling the resident's boyfriend. Five out of five staff state that assistance would be offered and the resident would refuse at times. Staff state due to cognitive decline, resident was unsure of who the resident would be calling and would have anxiety to make the call. Regarding the allegation that Staff did not ensure resident was hydrated, the investigation revealed the following: Per family request, staff were to ensure resident consumed 72 oz of water per day along with tea. Five out of five staff state encouraging resident to drink water and tea but resident would refuse at times. Resident had a large jug of water at all times to drink from as the resident wanted. Regarding the allegation that Staff did not provide adequate care and supervision of the residents, the investigation revealed the following: Seven out of seven staff state resident needs are being met. Staff state incontinence care and showering were provided. LPA observed residents in the common area on two different occasions with adequate staffing and residents being assisted. LPA observed residents at meal times being assisted and at activities as well. Seven out of seven staff deny R1 being a victim of an assault from another resident but state that there are behaviors at the facility as it is specifically memory care. Based on observations and interviews conducted, LPA is unable to corroborate the allegations. Therefore, the allegations are deemed unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to facility. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 During the visit, LPA pulled the emergency cord in room B5 at 10:20 AM. Staff did not respond to the pull. Further investigation by the facility determined that the devices needed to be rebooted after a change of batteries. Two staff and witness states an incident (date unknown) where R1's emergency cord was pulled and the device was not working. Facility is unable to provide emergency pull records due to a change of system but was able to provide fall monitoring response records with an average response time of 4 minutes. Based on interviews conducted and observation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED, California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to facility administrator along with appeal rights.
2025-06-18Annual Compliance VisitType B · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A routine annual inspection of Ivy Terrace at Garden Grove found the facility to be clean, safe, and well-maintained, with functional safety equipment, adequate food and supplies, and residents who reported feeling satisfied and safe. Staff members were responsive to emergency calls, activities were available, and resident rooms were comfortable with necessary furniture and supplies. The facility was cited for one deficiency: three staff members did not have proof of required annual training on file.
“Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in three out of three staff without proof of training in the file which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 07/02/2025 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 Licensee to ensure all staff have proof of required training in the file and forward proof to LPA by POC due date.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced visit to Ivy Terrace at Garden Grove. The purpose of today’s visit was to conduct the Annual Required inspection. LPA was allowed entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. Facility is licensed for 72 ambulatory of which 38 may be non-ambulatory. Facility has an approved hospice waiver for 12 residents and the facility currently has 6 residents on hospice care. Kyle Coleman has an administrator certificate expiring on 09/26/2025. LPA Lyman along with Administrator Coleman toured the facility at 9:26 AM. LPA toured the physical plant, checked food service, facility records and the first aid kit. Facility appears to be clean, safe, and sanitary. Facility consists of one main building housing residents surrounded by a large outdoor patio. LPA observed main kitchen, dining room, beauty salon, activity areas and outside area. Resident rooms had the required furniture, bed linens and closet/drawer space to accommodate each resident comfortably. LPA observed one resident with half bed rails. Resident restrooms were checked. Toilets and water faucets worked properly, grab bars were secure and shower was free of mold/mildew. Water temperature measured between 105.8 and 114.2 degrees F in facility restrooms. Resident bath towels, toiletries and personal hygiene supplies were adequately stocked at time of visit. Staff responded within 5 minutes for emergency cord pull. Common areas were clean and clear of hazards, doorways were free of obstructions. First aid kit had all the required elements including tweezers, thermometer, and scissor. LPA observed no toxins unsecured. Kitchen was inspected. Perishable and non-perishable food supply was checked and adequately stocked at time of visit. Facility is keeping a log of freezer/ refrigerator temperatures and all were in range. Smoke detectors and fire inspections are conducted quarterly by an outside company, Cal Building Systems with the last inspection date of 07/07/2024. Facility tested fire system during the visit and alarms were operational as well as exit gate attached to alarm. CONTINUED ON LIC 809C DATED 06/18/2025 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LPA observed carbon monoxide detector in facility hallway and it was tested to be operational. Fire extinguishers are fully charged. LPA toured the outside grounds and there is ample shaded seating for residents. LPA observed ample emergency food and water. LPA reviewed the emergency disaster plan and infection control plan during the visit. Plans are thorough and complete. Facility conducts quarterly emergency drills with the last drill conducted on 05/06/2025. Facility provides activities in the form of games, exercise, and crafts. LPA observed residents participating in activities during the visit. LPA spoke with residents during the visit who stated satisfaction with facility services and verbalized feeling safe. LPA observed no health or safety concerns during the visit. LPA reviewed select resident and staff files. Resident files contained required documents including admission agreements, physician reports, physician orders for bed rails as indicated and resident appraisals. Staff files reviewed contained required documentation such as health screen/TB, and criminal record clearance. LPA observed three out of three staff files did not contain proof of required annual training. LPA reviewed select medications during the visit. Medications are secured in a medication cart and facility uses an electronic medication administration record. Medications are being administered per physician order. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, deficiency is being cited per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. This report was discussed with the facility representative and a copy was provided as well as appeal rights.
2025-04-23Annual Compliance VisitType A · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
During an unannounced follow-up visit, inspectors found that a resident with cognitive impairment left the facility unsupervised through an exit gate that may not have been properly locked during construction work; the resident was found outside about 15 minutes later without injury. The same resident also had a witnessed fall in the courtyard around the same time and was treated at a hospital for a shoulder injury. The facility has increased supervision checks for this resident and the state cited a violation.
“Based on interviews conducted and record review, Licensee failed to ensure care and supervision was provided to R1. R1 eloped out of the facility and was located outside the community. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced case management visit to follow up on incident reports received by the department. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. Incident report dated 04/11/2025 indicated Resident 1 (R1) was observed to be missing in the facility around 11:45 AM. Facility initiated search. Resident was located outside the community on the corner by a visiting Nurse Practitioner. Resident was assessed to be without injury. Facility investigation determined the resident had gone out an exit gate not normally used by staff. Due to ongoing construction, staff had used the gate which may not have been properly locked. The resident was determined to be out of the facility for approximately 15 minutes. Incident report dated 04/13/2025 indicated the resident had a witnessed fall in the courtyard. Resident complained of shoulder pain and was sent out where shoulder was popped back in place at the hospital. No further concerns with shoulder noted. Per physician report dated 10/18/2024, R1 is diagnosed with Mild Cognitive Impairment and is not allowed to leave the facility unassisted. Facility re-assessed resident and is on frequent checks when not in common area. LPA spoke with R1 during the visit. Resident appeared clean and well taken care of. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, deficiency is being cited per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. This report was discussed with the facility representative and a copy was provided as well as appeal rights.
2024-12-12Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
On December 12, 2023, state inspectors conducted a routine annual inspection of Crescent Landing at Garden Grove Memory Care Facility and found no violations. Inspectors checked resident rooms, bathrooms, medication records, kitchen food storage, fire safety equipment, and emergency preparedness—all were in proper working order and met state requirements. The facility was operating at 54 of its 72 licensed capacity with clean conditions, adequate supplies, and proper safety protocols in place.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 12/12/2023 at 11:00 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Calderon conducted an unannounced annual inspection visit at Crescent Landing at Garden Grove Memory Care Facility. LPA Calderon was allowed entry into the facility by Administrator Kyle Coleman. The facility is licensed for 72 residents with memory care issues. Currently there are 54 resident living at the facility. LPA Calderon explained to Administrator Kyle Coleman, the purpose of the 1-year Annual Inspection visit, and escorted LPA Calderon on a tour of the entire inside and outside facility grounds. As part of the inspection, LPA Calderon reviewed: (5) resident service records, (5) resident medication records, and inspected the inside facility and outside grounds. The facilities’ last fire drill was conducted on 12/12/2024. The one-story commercial building consisting of (36) resident bedrooms, (36) resident bathrooms, (6) common bathrooms, dining room, commercial kitchen, staff room, office area, commercial washer and dryer/ storage area, backyard with umbrella with table and chairs. No weapons were found or stored on the premises. Commercial Kitchen was inspected and observed to be clean and operational. Checked commercial refrigerators and storage for 2-day supply perishable and 7-day supply of non-perishable foods are present in the facility kitchen. Emergency Water Storage was also located in the kitchen area. LPA Calderon inspected resident room A3, B4, C6, D3. LPA Calderon observed that all facility rooms are clean and in good repair. A comfortable temperature was observed, and the facility has central air and heating. LPA Calderon observed the following during inspection of resident’s rooms: mattresses are in good condition, adequate lighting present, plenty of dresser/closet space is present, and all bed linens present. All bedrooms contain furniture, lighting fixtures and personal storage space as required, all beds have the required amount of linen and mattress covers, LPA Calderon observed fully stocked closet with bedding, towels, and toiletries supplies . Bathroom fixtures are clean, in good repair, and working properly and contain the required nonskid mats and grab bars. LPA Calderon observed bathrooms were found to be within Title 22 regulation. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Bathroom #1 hot water temperature properly measured at 109 degrees Fahrenheit, and bathroom #2 hot water temperature properly measured at 107 degrees Fahrenheit. Bathroom #3 hot water temperature properly measured at 105 degrees Fahrenheit. Facility (10) Carbon Monoxide and (50) Smoke Detectors hard wired and connected were tested and are working properly. The facility (10) Fire Extinguishers were checked and found to be fully charged and accessible . All exit doors in the facility have alarm systems. All toxins and knifes are locked/secured and inaccessible to residents. Medications are centrally stored and in a locked storage cabinet. Facility first aid kit is fully stocked with manual was checked and in order. Outside grounds were toured and no bodies of water were observed. All Exits/ Walkways around the home were free of debris and hazards. Outside patio accessible to residents. Five (5) resident files were reviewed and found to be complete. LPA Calderon reviewed (5) resident medications and they were all found to be administered according to doctor's orders. Three (3) staff files were checked and have the required documents. The facility does not handle resident's money/cash resources. Commercial General Liability Policy #SB00000007244 policy period from 05/01/2024 to 05/01/2025 underwritten by Everest Indemnity Insurance Company, coverage 1,000,000/3,000,000 is valid at time of inspection. Administrator Coleman to email LPA Calderon a full copy of the commercial insurance policy including all endorsements no later than 12/20/2024. All the required documents are posted in the facility in a clearly visible area. During the visit, LPA observed the facility infection control practices. LPA observed screening protocols for visitors, staff, and residents, sanitizing stations (Located in common areas and restrooms). LPA observed staff and residents were not wearing face coverings. LPA Calderon observed the facility has a 30-day supply of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). LPA Calderon advised the Administrator Coleman to continuously monitor the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) website and Community Care Likening Provider Informational Notices (PIN) for any updates relating to COVID-19 guidance. . According to the California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), LPA Calderon did not observe deficiencies therefore no citations were issued at this time. Annual Licensing Fee is CURRENT An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the Facility Evaluation Report was provided to Administrator Kyle Coleman.
2024-10-15Complaint InvestigationNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint was investigated about room temperature and ants in the resident's room. The inspector found the room temperature was 75 degrees, which falls within the required range of 68 to 85 degrees, and observed no ants in the room or the area outside the window despite the resident's report of finding ants on a pillow. The facility's air conditioning system was confirmed to be operational, and the complaint was determined to be unfounded.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Resident confirms temperature is usually 75 degrees F which the resident states is too hot. Department regulations state rooms shall be between 68 and 85 degrees F. Administrator indicates that the AC is operational and has had no issues with operating. Resident stated that on one occasion there were ants on the resident's pillow. LPA observed no ants in the resident's room. Maintenance Director indicated spraying outside the resident's window for ants when it was brought to his attention. Maintenance Director denies seeing any ants in the resident's room. LPA observed the area outside the window and did not observe any ants there either. Per physician report dated 10/16/2023, resident is diagnosed with Alzheimer's Dementia with psychosis. Based on interviews conducted and record review, the allegations are deemed unfounded, meaning the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was provided to facility representative.
2024-09-17Complaint InvestigationNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint alleged that the facility failed to help arrange medical or dental care for a resident with Alzheimer's disease, psychosis, and epilepsy. The state investigated and found no violation—the allegations were unfounded. The facility was notified of the findings.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Department regulations require Licensees to assist with arranging for medical or dental care appropriate to the needs of the resident. Per physician report dated 10/16/2023, the resident is diagnosed with Alzheimer's Dementia with Psychosis and Epilepsy. Based on interviews conducted and record review, the allegations are deemed unfounded, meaning the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was provided to facility representative.
1 older inspection from 2023 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Other facilities in Orange County.
Other memory care facilities in Orange County with similar care offerings.
Free · Contract Decoder
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.
