California · Fallbrook

Regency Fallbrook.

RCFE75 bedsDementia-trained staff(760) 728-8504
Facility · Fallbrook
A 75-bed RCFE with one citation on file.
Licensed beds
75
Last inspection
Nov 2025
Last citation
May 2024
Operated by
Regency Fallbrook, Llc
Snapshot

A large home, reviewed on public record.

Regency Fallbrook

© Google Street View

Approximate location
Peer Comparison

Compared to 54 California facilities with a similar number of beds.

RCFE · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing.

Severity rank
74th%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
81st%
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

FACILITY WATCH · FREE

Regency Fallbrook has 1 citation on record. Know the moment anything changes.

New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.

Where are you in the process? (optional)

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

1 deficiency on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 10 · dashed
No citation activity in this window.
peer median
Jul 2024as of Jun 2026

Finding distribution

1 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J
K
L
Sev 3
G
H
I
Sev 2
D1
E
F
Sev 1
A
B
C
The Rulebook

The rules that apply to this facility.

State requirements with the exact regulation citation, plain-language explanation, and a question to ask on tour. Rules this facility has been cited for appear first.

What dementia-care training must staff complete?22 CCR §87705 / HSC §1569.625
+
Plain language

Because a facility markets dementia or Alzheimer's care, state law mandates higher training standards: 12 hours of initial dementia training (6 hours before a staff member works independently with residents, 6 more within the first 4 weeks), 8 hours of annual dementia in-service every year thereafter, and an administrator must include 8 hours of dementia-specific continuing education in every 2-year recertification cycle. Training must cover individualized care plans, behavioral expressions, appropriate supervision, and the facility's dementia care philosophy.

Ask on tour

Can you show me each direct-care staffer's most recent dementia training certificate, and tell me when their next refresher is due?

Tour Prep

Questions to ask before you visit.

A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Regency Fallbrook's record and state requirements.

01 /

Three complaints are on file with CDSS — were any substantiated, and what remediation did the facility take in response to substantiated findings?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

02 /

The November 2025 inspection cited one deficiency — can you provide your corrective-action plan for the cited item, and show families any documentation of remediation steps taken?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

03 /

The facility is licensed for 75 beds and operated by Llc Regency Fallbrook — can you confirm the current license status remains in good standing and provide a copy of the active license for review?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

6 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.

6
reports on file
1
total deficiencies
2025-11-21
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings

Plain-language summary

A routine annual inspection was conducted on November 21, 2025, and found no violations. The facility was clean and well-maintained, with proper safety equipment in place, secure storage of medications and hazardous materials, adequate food supplies, and required resident rights postings visible to residents.

Read raw inspector notes

On November 21, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Venus Mixson made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct the Required Annual visit, and met with the Administrator, Kari Moreno. LPA Mixson toured the facility along with the Administrator, Kari Moreno and made observations pertaining to the annual visit. The LPA inspected the facility inside and outside. There were no obstructions or debris to the indoor or outdoor passageways currently. The facility is licensed to serve seventy five (75) elderly residents; ages 60 and above; all of whom may be non-ambulatory and ambulatory, currently there are 64 residents and approximately 40 staff. The facility has an approved hospice waiver for fifteen (15) residents and ten (10) bedridden in rooms. The facility is approved for delayed egress. Physical Plant: The facility phone number is (760)728-8504, and is operable. LPA Mixson observed a sample of the resident living units, and they are equipped with required furniture as per Title 22. The LPA inspected the facility restrooms, and the hot water temperature tested within regulations. The restrooms were clean and appliances were operating appropriately at the time of this visit. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors, carbon monoxide alarms, and fire extinguishers. The LPA observed required postings such as; the Ombudsman poster, "If you See Something, Say Something" and the "Personal Rights" postings were posted in a common area. The cleaning supplies and sharp items were kept locked and inaccessible to the residents. There was a designated office for the resident and staff files and it was locked. Medications : were reviewed with the facility nurse, and were locked and inaccessible to residents. The overall facility is clean, welcoming, and the furniture is in good condition. The facility heating and other appliances were operable currently at the time of this visit. Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient per regulations, and there are a variety of food types available for the residents. Dishes and utensils were in sufficient supply and stored properly. Records Review: LPA Mixson reviewed staff and resident files. There were no Title 22, Division 6 Regulation violations observed and/or cited during todays visit. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was given to the Administrator, Kari Moreno.

2024-11-07
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings
Inspector · Sara Martinez

Plain-language summary

This was a routine annual inspection conducted without advance notice. The inspector reviewed the facility's physical condition, safety systems, staff qualifications, resident records, medication storage, food supplies, and emergency preparedness, and found no violations or deficiencies.

Read raw inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sara Martinez conducted an unannounced annual required visit . LPA was granted entry and met with Executive Director Kari Moreno who was informed of the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted a tour of the interior and exterior, reviewed facility documents and conducted interviews. LPA observed the following: Physical plant, floors, windows, and doors were observed to be clean. Fixtures and furniture were in good repair were present. The outdoor area was observed to be free of hazards and LPA observed the facility courtyard with outdoor furniture and shaded area for residents. Facility contained PPE equipment and cleaning supplies to do regular cleaning of the facility. Cleaning supplies, detergents, and the sharp and dangerous objects were locked and inaccessible to the residents in the facility's janitorial and maintenance supply rooms. Facility sketch, exit routes, personal rights, complaint information and emergency phone numbers were found posted in the facility. The smoke detector, carbon monoxide, and facility sprinkler system was operational and is maintained annually with the last inspection dated 05/01/2024. Facility kitchen had the ability to prepare food in clean environment. LPA observed the facility met the required 2-day supply of perishable and 7-day supply of non-perishable foods. LPA was informed the facility receives multiple food deliveries a week. LPA observed medication in both Assisted Living and the Memory Care unit to be locked and inaccessible to residents in care. MedTechs document medication administration on the facility's electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR). LPA reviewed four (4) staff files and training. All staff have the required personnel records on file and criminal record clearance, health screening report, and updated training along with CPR/First Aid Certification. Six (6) resident files were reviewed, and possessed all required paperwork which included Admissions Agreement, Needs and Service Plan, and Physician's Report. The listed administrator Kari Moreno possesses a current administrator's certificate with an expiration date of 05/06/2026. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Facility has an updated emergency and disaster plan and Infection Control plan. LPA observed all facility exits were clear from obstructions. Facility contained multiple charged fire extinguishers located throughout the facility. Facility conducts disaster/fire drills with the last drill conducted on 10/29/2024 which met Department Requirements. No deficiencies were cited at the time of the visit. An exit interview was conducted where a copy of this report was provided to Executive Director Moreno.

2024-07-26
Complaint Investigation
Unsubstantiated
No findings
Inspector · Jacqueline Shaw Ross

Plain-language summary

A complaint alleged that staff physically abused a resident and failed to supervise properly on April 21, 2026. The resident developed bruises on both forearms over the following two days; the investigation found no evidence that staff caused these injuries and believes they likely resulted from the resident hitting their arms on restroom rails during a toileting incident where the resident became agitated and refused assistance. Both allegations were found to be unsubstantiated, and the facility properly documented the bruising, notified the family, and reported the incident as required.

Read raw inspector notes

Based on the above information, there is no evidence to support staff physically abused or was negligent in the care or treatment of R1. The investigation did not reveal that facility staff contributed to the bruises seen on both forearms and subsequent injuries sustained by R1. It is believed that R1 might have hit arms and hands on nearby restroom rails and counter. Therefore, the allegation that "Staff inappropriately handled resident while in care" is deemed to be UNSUBSTANTIATED Regarding allegation "Staff failed to properly supervise staff with residents in care." Interviews were conducted, as well as records and photos were additionally reviewed regarding the allegation. In the morning of April 21, resident #1 (R1) was being assisted by Staff #1 (S1) for a bowel movement (BM) where R1 soiled self and areas around restroom. S1 attempted to assist R1 with cleaning and dressing, however, R1 became agitated and pushed S1 away (refusing assistance). When R1 calmed down, S1 was able to assist R1 with cleaning and dressing. Afterward, S1 immediately reported the incident to a co-worker and facility administrator. R1 was evaluated by on-site Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) and no transportation was required. Over the following two days, bruising began to show and increase. Facility staff photographed the bruising, notified family members and reported to incident as required. Based on the above information, there is no evidence to support staff failed to provide assistance as needed or was negligent in the care or treatment of R1. The investigation did not reveal that facility staff contributed to the bruises seen on both forearms and subsequent injuries sustained by R1. Therefore, the allegation that "Staff failed to properly supervise staff with residents in care" is deemed to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding of UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted with Kari Moreno, Executive Director, and a copy of this report was provided.

2024-06-19
Complaint Investigation
Unsubstantiated
No findings
Inspector · Debbie Correia

Plain-language summary

A complaint investigation found no violations at the facility. Inspectors reviewed records showing the facility maintains weekly nutritious menus with kitchen staff accommodating resident requests, toured the building and found it clean and well-maintained with proper temperature control, and confirmed staff receive appropriate training and the facility meets licensing requirements. Residents interviewed had no complaints about food service, the building condition, or facility operations.

Read raw inspector notes

It was alleged the Licensee did not provide adequate food service. A facility record review revealed the facility maintains a weekly menu with nutritional meals. Interviews conducted with residents revealed being happy with the meals offered at the facility. Resident interviews also revealed the kitchen staff are very accommodating and offer substitute food when requested. It was alleged the facility is in disrepair. The facility tour also revealed the facility was well kempt and in good repair. The facility carpets were observed to be clean and in good condition, furniture and fixtures were also observed to be in good repair. The facility’s ambient temperature at the time of visit was between 74 degrees and 77 degrees Fahrenheit. A facility records review dated May 31, 2021, revealed having a contract with an outside source agency that provides ongoing maintenance to the facility central air conditioning/heating units as needed. Interviews conducted with residents had no complaints regarding the issues, such as disrepair, with the facility’s physical plant. It was also alleged facility staff did not receive adequate training and the Licensee failed to meet Licensing reporting requirements. A facility records review revealed staff are provided the appropriate training based on hired position. A records review did not reveal any evidence supporting failure to meet reporting requirements. Lastly, it was alleged the content of the facility's Admission Agreement did not meet Licensing requirements. A facility records review did not support the allegation. Based on the Department's investigation, there was not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations occurred, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Moreno to whom a copy of this report, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) will be provided at the conclusion of the visit. Signature below confirms receipt of the reports.

2024-05-03
Annual Compliance Visit
Type B · 1 finding
Inspector · Venus Mixson

Plain-language summary

An unannounced inspection was conducted on May 3, 2024, following an incident report that a staff member intimidated a resident; the facility was found to be clean and well-organized with adequate staffing, food supplies, and secure medication storage, with no immediate health or safety concerns observed during the tour. Deficiencies will be cited related to the intimidation incident.

Type B22 CCR §87468.1(a)(3)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87468.1(a)(3)

Based on information obtained from the Unusual Incident Report (SIR) received by the Department on 05/01/2024, the facility self reported, the licensee did not ensure that facility's residents to be free from punishment, humiliation, intimidation, abuse, or other actions of a punitive nature…. which poses an immediate health, safety, or personal rights risk to a person in care.

Read raw inspector notes

On May 03, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Venus Mixson conducted an unannounced case management with deficiencies visit and met with the Administrator. An Unusual Incident(SIR) was received for the facility on 05/01/2024, that stated a staff intimidated a resident in care. Deficiencies will be cited. LPA Mixson introduced herself, stated the purpose of the visit, and toured the facility along with the Administrator. LPA made observation and requested and received pertinent documentation. Currently at the facility are 40 staff and 55 residents there were no observable regulation violation during the tour of the facility. There were no imminent health or safety concerns observed at the time of visit. LPA Mixson observed the facility had working utilities and was clean and organized. The LPA observed adequate staffing to provide supervision for the residents in care. LPA Mixson observed the facility had more than a two-day supply of perishable foods and seven day supply of non-perishable food items. Medications were found to be in sufficient supply and were locked and inaccessible to residents. An exit interview was conducted where a copy of this report was reviewed, explained, and provided to Administrator Kari Moreno along with the Confidential Names List (LIC811), LIC809-D and Appeal Rights.

2023-11-03
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings
Inspector · Venus Mixson

Plain-language summary

This was a routine annual inspection on November 3, 2023, and the facility passed with no violations found. The inspector checked the building's safety features (smoke detectors, fire extinguishers, carbon monoxide alarms), living spaces, food service, medication storage, staffing levels, and resident records—all met requirements. The facility was clean, well-maintained, and properly equipped.

Read raw inspector notes

On November 03, 2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Venus Mixson made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct an annual licensing inspection, and met with the Administrator, Kari Moreno. The LPA introduced herself and stated the purpose of the visit. LPA Mixson toured the facility along with the Administrator, and inspected the facility inside and outside, and there were no obstructions to the indoor or outdoor passageways at the time of this visit. The facility is licensed to serve seventy five (75) elderly residents; ages 60 and above; all of whom may be non-ambulatory and ambulatory, currently there are 45 residents and 40 staff. The facility has an approved hospice waiver for fifteen (15) residents and ten (10) bedridden in rooms. The facility is approved for delayed egress, and the LPA observed a sampling of rooms. Physical Plant: The facility phone number is (760)728-8504, and is operable. The LPA observed a sample of the resident living units, and they are equipped with required furniture as per Title 22. The LPA inspected the facility restrooms, and the hot water temperature tested within regulations. The restrooms were clean and appliances were operating appropriately at the time of this visit. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors, carbon monoxide alarms, and fire extinguishers. The LPA observed required postings such as; the Ombudsman poster, "If you See Something, Say Something" and the "Personal Rights" postings were posted in a common area. The cleaning supplies and sharp items were kept locked and inaccessible to the residents. There was a designated office for the resident and staff files. Medications : were reviewed with the facility nurse, and were locked and inaccessible to residents. The overall facility is clean, welcoming, and the furniture is in good condition. The facility air conditioning and other appliances were operable currently at the time of this visit. Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient per regulations, and there are a variety of food types available for residents. Dishes and utensils were in sufficient supply and stored properly. Care & Supervision : Facility has sufficient staff, six caregivers at the time of this visit, and staff were engaging the residents. Records Review: The LPA reviewed five resident files, five staff files, and reviewed previous CCL forms. There were no Title 22, Division 6 Regulation violations observed and/or cited during todays visit. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was given to the Administrator, Kari Moreno.

2 older inspections from 2021 are not shown above.

Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Nearby cities · same county

More options in neighboring cities

Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.
Editorial Independence

The memory care site on the family's side: StarlynnCare receives no referral commissions, lead fees, or paid placement from facilities.