Ponte Palmero.
A large home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 160 California facilities with a similar number of beds.
RCFE · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
1 deficiency on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
1 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
The rules that apply to this facility.
State requirements with the exact regulation citation, plain-language explanation, and a question to ask on tour. Rules this facility has been cited for appear first.
Plain language
Because a facility markets dementia or Alzheimer's care, state law mandates higher training standards: 12 hours of initial dementia training (6 hours before a staff member works independently with residents, 6 more within the first 4 weeks), 8 hours of annual dementia in-service every year thereafter, and an administrator must include 8 hours of dementia-specific continuing education in every 2-year recertification cycle. Training must cover individualized care plans, behavioral expressions, appropriate supervision, and the facility's dementia care philosophy.
Ask on tour
“Can you show me each direct-care staffer's most recent dementia training certificate, and tell me when their next refresher is due?”
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
14 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.
2026-04-27Other VisitNo findings
2025-12-16Other VisitNo findings
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Lavinia Muscan arrived on 12/16/2025 to conduct the annual inspection. During today's annual inspection, the Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement Tool was used. LPA reviewed ten resident (10) and ten staff (10) files. All residents files contained the required paperwork. All staff files contained the required paperwork and training. LPA, Administrator Landon Pilegaard, and Assisted Living Director Jennifer Hinch toured the facility together to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. The areas toured included resident apartments, kitchen, hallways, memory care apartments, memory care dining room/kitchen, and memory care common areas. Water temperatures in the apartments toured were within the required range of temperature. In the areas toured, there were no health or safety violations observed. LPA requested a copy of the LIC 500, LIC610E and current liability insurance to be sent to the Department by end of the month. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was printed and given to Administrator.
2025-06-10Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 06/10/25, around 01:30 PM, Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Troy Ordonez, Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Laura Munoz, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Talwinder Bains, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Lavinia Muscan were present for a Non-compliance Conference with Licensee Erik Pilegaard, Administrator Landon Pilegaard and Managing Director Terry Howard, which was held in-person in the office. This conference does not in any manner excuse past problems or resolve the Department’s case against the licensee if the problems are not corrected. The Non-Compliance Conference may be the last step prior to initiating administrative action following unsuccessful attempts by the Department to gain compliance. Since 2021, the facility has been issued 2 A citations, 1 B citation and assessed 1 civil penalty in the amount of $500. (1) open complaints and (1) outstanding appeal. We did receive your appeal for the citations issued on April 8, 2025 which is currently under review. Substantiated Complaints include allegations in the following areas: - Timely medical -Observation of resident - Four separate incidents involving serious resident injuries and one death The licensee shall submit the following: Training, policies, management oversight, ensuring care staff is aware and familiar with the needs of the residents they provide care for and when to call 911. Develop and implement new protocols for timely medical response; supervision and fall reduction; conducting mandatory training for all staff in the above areas. Implement internal audits and increased administrative oversight. Compliance plan documents shall be submitted to CCL by: 6/17/25 COB; Fully implement plan with documentation by 7/10/25. Provide proof of staff training completion. Submit all documents to lavinia.muscan@dss.ca.gov. The licensee agreed with the drafted non-compliance plan as outlined in LIC 9111. No citations were issued today. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to the licensee.
2025-06-09Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Staff sexually abused residents while in care. During the course of the investigation, R1’s details of the incident was inconsistent. Based on R1’s medical records, R1 has diminished mental functions including dementia and schizoaffective disorder. The Sheriff’s Office conducted an investigation and were unable to substantiate the allegation based on lack of evidence and inconsistent statements made by R1. Additionally, the descriptions R1 provided of the suspect were inconsistent. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, there is insufficient evidence that staff sexually abused residents while in care. Facility does not have adequate staffing to meet residents' needs. Based on three (3) staff interviews, three (3) resident interviews, and record review, department was able to determine that there is adequate staffing to meet resident’s needs. Staff and residents were asked if there is adequate staffing. Nearly all persons said that there is adequate staffing and that all resident care needs are being met. Staff and residents could not provide a list of resident needs that were not provided or being met. Based upon the information obtained during investigation, the above allegations are unsubstantiated. A finding that the complaint is UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Exit interview conducted. Report left with facility.
2025-04-08Complaint InvestigationSubstantiatedType A · 1 finding
“This requirement was not met based on facility failed reassess R1 and R3 after residents sustained multiple falls, some resulting in injury. R1 sustained 7 falls within an 8-month period and R3 sustained 16 falls between 10/24/2020 and 06/27/2024. This posed an immediate Health and Safety risk to residents in care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Questionable Death Records were reviewed regarding the death of R1. On June 18, 2024, at about 0144 hours, R1 was admitted to the emergency department due to a recent unwitnessed fall and sustained a head injury with a hematoma on their left ear. R1 was found on the ground between approximately 0100 hours and was last seen by Ponte Palmero staff in bed at 2300 hours. R1 was admitted to the hospital due to the blunt/critical trauma level II and diagnosed with a subdural hematoma, hematoma of the left ear, and falls. Due to the severity of R1’s injuries, R1 was place on comfort care. On June 29, 2024, R1 passed away. Certificate of Death indicated that R1 died from cardiac arrest and a traumatic brain injury with a subdural hematoma. R1’s facility file documents, Physician’s Report, Resident Assessment, Resident Charting Notes, Incident Reports, and Needs and Services plans, revealed that R1 was documented as being a fall risk, using a walker to ambulate, and having unsteady gait. R1 was admitted to Ponte Palmero Memory Care Unit on August 23, 2022. Records indicated R1 fell (7) seven times on 10/2/2023, 11/29/2023, 1/31/2024, 3/30/2024, 4/29/2024, 5/3/2024, and 6/18/2024. R1 only had two Resident Assessment’s dated August 18, 2023, and September 30, 2023, that indicated R1 needed more standby assistance. R1 did not receive any additional care services, such as an alarm mat, to prevent them from falling. Memory Care Director, Dej’ja Bracy stated that R1 was not considered a fall risk and did not need a fall prevention plan. Former staff mentioned R1 was independent, however could be considered a fall risk and noticed a change in R1’s ability to walk or to get out of bed. Based on department record review and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standards has been met. Therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 Division 6, Chapter 8, a deficiency is being cited on the attached 9099-D page. A civil penalty in the amount of $500 is assessed. Page 1 continued on 9099-C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Neglect/lack of care and supervision resulted in staff failing to seek timely medical attention for residents. Neglect/lack of care and supervision resulting in residents in care sustaining multiple falls with a serious injury. R1 On June 18, 2024, Emergency Medical Services were contacted at about 0104 hours, EMS arrived at the facility at about 0117 hours, and transported R1 to the Hospital at 0141 hours. It is unclear the time frame between R1 falling and the staff contacting 911. The incident report completed by staff indicated that R1 was found on the floor at about 0128 hours. Documents obtained did not appear to accurately reflect the time frame of when R1 was found by staff and when EMS was contacted. Interviews and documentation revealed that prior to calling 911, S1 contacted Ms. Bracy for direction and Ms. Bracy directed S1 to contact R1’s responsible party to inquire with R1’s family would transport R1 the hospital. R1’s responsible party directed S1 to call 911. S1 estimated it took about 20 minutes. Interview with S1 indicated S1 remembered R1 telling them that R1 had been on the floor for hours and found R1 with a visible head injury and was bleeding from their left ear. R1 was admitted to Ponte Palmero Memory Care Unit on August 23, 2022. Documents revealed R1 fell seven times on 10/2/2023, 11/29/2023, 1/31/2024, 3/30/2024, 4/29/2024, 5/3/2024, and 6/18/2024 while in care. Interview Memory Care Director Dej’ja Bracy stated that R1 was not considered a fall risk and did not need a fall prevention plan. R1’s medical records and facility documents show that R1 was a fall risk. The facility failed to update R1’s care after multiple falls and change in condition. Page 2 Continued on 9099-C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 R2 On April 29, 2024, at about 0921 hours, R2 was admitted to the Hospital and diagnosed with a closed fracture of neck of left femur, pneumonia of both lungs, dementia, hypomagnesemia, and a closed fracture of left hip. R2’s notes indicated that they woke up in morning, was trying to get out of bed, fell down, and was found at the side of the bed by the facility staff. R2 had a skin tear to their left forearm, an abrasion to their left knee, and multiple bruises to their bilateral upper extremities. X-rays of the hip and pelvis showed a left hip fracture and chest x-ray showed possible bibasilar pneumonias. R2 required surgery to repair the hip. On May 3, 2024, R2 was discharged to Ponte Palmero with hospice care. Ponte Palmero had two LIC624 Unusual Incident/Injury Reports dated April 29, 2024. The first incident report documented on April 29, 2024, at about 0040 hours, Med Tech S1 found R2 on the floor by the front of the bed with a small skin tear to their left wrist, an abrasion to their left knee, and a small abrasion to the small finger on the right hand. The second incident report documented on April 29, 2024, at 0800 hours, S2 notified R2’s responsible party of R2’s fall. S2 explained that R2's responsible party came to the facility to try to take R2 to see a doctor and was unable to. R2’s responsible party requested for S2 to contact 911. Statements with staff were consistent that R2 fell on 4/29/2024 at 0040 hours, placed back in bed and was not transported to the hospital until at 0800 hours. R2 did not receive immediate medical attention despite having pneumonia and displaying signs of being in severe pain. S3 recalled putting R2 back into bed and R2 expressing that they were in pain. R2 did not get medical attention until 8 hours after their fall, therefore the facility failed to seek timely medical attention. Page 3 Continued on 9099-C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 R3 On April 7, 2024, at about 0023 hours, R3 was admitted to the emergency department and was diagnosis with a community acquired pneumonia, left intertrochanteric femur fracture, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). R3 had surgery to a cephallomedullary nail placement. On April 13, 2024, R3 was discharged to a Skilled Nursing Facility for rehabilitation. Ponte Palmero had two LIC624 Unusual Incident/Injury Reports dated April 4, 2024, documenting that at about 1315 hours, R3 was found on the floor in their bathroom. R3 did not have any apparent injuries. The second incident report documented that at about 1515 hours, R3 complained of body aching, pain, and coughing more than usual. 911 was called and R3 was taken to the Hospital. R3’s PCP and family were notified. The second incident report was documented inaccurately as R3 was admitted to the hospital on April 7, 2024. The facility did not have any incident reports documenting R3’s hospital visits on April 7, 2024. Several staff interviews revealed that R3 fell off the toilet on April 4, 2024, and was placed back in bed for a few days prior to being sent to the hospital on April 7, 2024. Interviews indicated S4 was supposed to be supervising R3 while R3 was using the bathroom, but S4 stepped away from R3 and R3 fell. S4 called S5 and Ms. Bracy to come assess R3’s injuries. R3 was in pain, but S5 and Ms. Bracy placed R3 in a wheelchair. R3 did not go to the hospital on April 4, 2024, when R3 sustained their fall and was taken three days later on April 7, 2024. Interviews with S5 and Ms. Bracy revealed similar statements of R3 falling in their room and helping R3 back into a wheelchair but did not recall R3 being in any pain. S5 and Ms. Bracy indicated they were aware that R3 sustained a fractured femur and returned to the facility. R3 was admitted to Ponte Palmero on August 21, 2019. R3 was documented as having 16 falls on 10/24/2020, 2/17/2021, 2/27/2021, 6/29/2021, 12/17/2021, 1/23/2022, 3/29/2022, 5/4/2022, 5/9/2022, 8/29/2022, 9/1/2023, 3/11/2024, 3/24/2024, 4/4/2024, 5/17/2024, and 6/27/2024. Staff statements revealed consistently that R3 was considered a fall risk and could not walk or barely stand on their own. R3 may have been documented as a fall risk; however, the facility failed to have a fall plan in place at the time of R3’s fall on June 27, 2024, resulted in R3 sustaining an intertrochanteric femur fracture. Page 4 Continued on 9099-C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 R4 Based on documentation obtained, R4 sustained a fall on June 27, 2024, which reported the facility failed to seek timely medical attention. On June 27, 2024, at about 0752 hours, R4 was seen in the ER due to a fall and diagnosed with a UTI, a closed head injury, contusion of the right orbital tissues, and an abrasion to their face. R4 had an unwitnessed fall in an unknown location. R4 was found on the floor at Ponte Palmero’s Memory Care Unit. On June 27, 2024, at about 1302, R4 was discharged to return to Ponte Palmero. R4’s LIC624 Unusual Incident/Injury Reports documented that on June 27, 2024, at about 0624 hours, R4 was found on the floor next to their bed, lying face down with swelling and a small laceration on their right side of face. R4’s responsible party was notified twice, and a voice message was left. 911 was contacted and R4 was taken to the hospital. Hospital medical records revealed R4 arrived at about 0752 hours and was diagnosed with a closed head injury, contusion of the right orbital tissues, and an abrasion on R4’s face. S2 stated that after R4’s fall on June 27, 2024, it took too long to get R4 medical attention. S2 explained that Ms. Bracy did not allow S2 to contact 911 and Ms. Bracy told S2 to get ahold of R4’s responsible party to take R4 to the hospital. R4’s Narrative Charting, LIC624 Unusual Incident/Injury Reports, and hospital medical records indicated that R4 fell
2025-03-19Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Staff did not provide medications to resident as prescribed. Based on documents obtained and statements reviewed for January 2025, the department determined that there was insufficient evidence that any medication errors have occurred. Documents obtained show that all current medications were administered and logged correctly for residents per their doctor’s orders. Five staff interviews (5) indicated that staff were not aware of any medication errors. Five resident interviews (5) expressed no concerns with medication administration. Based upon the information obtained during investigation, the above allegation is unsubstantiated. A finding that the complaint is UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Exit interview conducted. Report left with facility. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Staff did not ensure resident's hygiene needs are being met. Staff does not ensure resident's dressing needs are being met. Staff does not ensure resident's rooms are cleaned and sanitized. Staff does not ensure resident's laundry needs are being met. Department conducted record review, staff, and resident interviews to investigate this allegation. Five (5) staff interviews indicated that staff were providing all ADL assistance, including toileting to residents per their needs and service plan. Staff interviews indicated that staff were assisting residents for their toileting needs every 2 hours or as needed. Five (5) resident interviews reflected that their care needs were met by staff and there were no issues to address. Based on five staff interviews (5) and five resident interviews (5) and department observation, the department observed the facility to be clean and sanitary. During department visits on 1/13/25 and 2/5/25 the department did not observe any unmet laundry needs. The facility did not observe to be malodorous including resident rooms, common areas and restrooms. Residents stated the caregivers clean the facility and take out the trash frequently. Residents stated that their hygiene, toileting, and laundering needs are being met and that housekeeping, and the staff, do a great job. Staff interviews indicated that the facility is kept clean and sanitary without and concerns; therefore, the allegation is UNFOUNDED . A finding of unfounded means that the allegations are false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted. Report left with facility.
2025-02-05Other VisitNo findings
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Lavinia Muscan and Talwinder Bains arrived on 2/5/2025 to conduct the annual inspection. During today's annual inspection, the Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement Tool was used. LPAs reviewed ten resident (10) and ten staff (10) files. All residents files contained the required paperwork. All staff files contained the required paperwork and training. LPA and Assisted Living Director Jennifer Hinch toured the facility together to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. The areas toured included resident apartments, kitchen, hallways, memory care apartments, memory care dining room/kitchen, and memory care common areas. Water temperatures in the apartments toured were within the required range of temperature. In the areas toured, there were no health or safety violations observed. LPA requested a copy of the LIC 500, LIC610E and current liability insurance to be sent to the Department by end of the month. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was printed and given to Staff.
2024-10-01Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
2024-09-17Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Staff neglect resulted in a resident to be hospitalized - UNSUBSTANTIATED Staff left a resident unattended - UNSUBSTANTIATED Based on interviews and record reviewed, it was determined that based on R1’s resident assessment/care plan, R1 was able to independently bathe, dress, feed, toilet, manage cash, administer medications, and store medications on their own. R1 was able to independently transfer to and from bed. R1 did not require additional checks. R1’s resident assessment was completed approximately every six months without any major updates. Prior to R1’s hospitalization, R1 did not have any incidents of falling or sustaining injuries. Additionally, facility staff were checking on R1 three times a day which was the standard amount. R1 did not require additional checks and did not require checks during the NOC shift, therefore the allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator and a copy of this report was provided to the facility. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Staff did not ensure a resident's emergency pendant was properly operating - UNFOUNDED Staff did ensure the facility's radio was properly operating - UNFOUNDED Based on interviews and record reviewed, it was determined that the facility radio, along with the emergency pendant was operating properly. Documents show that R1’s pendant was pressed, and the pull switch was pulled, and the connection was delivered to radio/staff who responded within four minutes, therefore the above allegations are UNFOUNDED. A finding of unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Staff did not meet a resident's hygiene needs - UNFOUNDED Based on interviews and record reviewed, it was determined that based on R1’s resident assessment/care plan, R1 was able to independently bathe, dress, feed, toilet, manage cash, administer medications, and store medications on their own. R1 was able to independently transfer to and from bed. R1 did not require additional checks, therefore the above allegations are UNFOUNDED. A finding of unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator and a copy of this report was provided to the facility.
2024-09-13Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Lavinia Muscan conducted unannounced case management visit on 09/13/2024. This visit is to confirm ORDERS TO INDIVIDUAL FOR IMMEDIATE EXCLUSION FROM ALL FACILITIES. LPA met with Assisted Living Director and stated the purpose of visit. Facility understands this is an Immediate Exclusion effective 09/13/2024 and S1 is excluded and cannot be allowed to work, live in, and/or have contact with clients in any residential facility licensed by the California Department of Social Services. Therefore, the Department orders the facility to remove S1 from any contact with clients and not allow this employee to be physically present in the facility. Exit interview conducted, a copy of this report provided on this date. A signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these forms.
2024-02-06Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Lavinia Muscan arrived on 2/6/2024 to conduct the annual inspection. During today's annual inspection, the Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement Tool was used. LPA reviewed resident (15) and staff (10) files. All resident files contained the required paperwork. All staff files contained the required paperwork and training. LPA and Administrator Landon Pilegaard toured the facility together to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. The areas toured included resident apartments, kitchen, hallways, memory care apartments, memory care dining room/kitchen, and memory care common areas. Water temperatures in the apartments toured were within the required range of temperature. In the areas toured, there were no health or safety violations observed. LPA requested a copy of the LIC 500, LIC610E and current liability insurance to be sent to the Department by end of the month. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was printed and given to Administrator.
2024-01-04Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
2023-10-30Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Staff neglected residents while in care .-UNFOUNDED Staff did not provide a safe and comfortable environment for residents. -UNFOUNDED Based on records reviewed, interviews, and department observations on 9/19/23 and 10/18/23, LPA observed that the staff meeting residents’ needs and provided a safe and comfortable environment for all residents in care. Furthermore, interviews with residents indicated that staff were providing care to residents per their care and service plans and were not neglecting residents care needs. Therefore, the allegation that residents are neglected while in care and not staff did not provide a safe and comfortable environment for residents is UNFOUNDED . A finding of unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Staff inappropriately transported deceased resident .- UNFOUNDED Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted by department on 09/19/23 and 10/18/23, the department did not find any evidence that staff inappropriately transported a deceased resident. Based on interviews it has been determined that only the mortician transports the deceased residents and that the staff only help if they are asked therefore the allegation staff inappropriately transported deceased resident is UNFOUNDED. A finding of unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator and a copy of this report was provided to the facility.
2023-10-11Complaint InvestigationNo findings
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Staff did not prevent resident from being injured by another resident. Based on interviews conducted with staff and with residents on 8/9/23 and 9/12/23. On 7/19/23 an incident was reported that a resident was moving in their wheelchair and accidentally grazed R1 on the leg. R1 sustained a bruise, however, did not sustain any additional injuries. Although R1 was injured by a resident’s wheelchair, the incident was an accident and did not occur again therefore the allegation is UNFOUNDED. A finding of unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Staff did not provide written incident report to resident's responsible party within 7 days Based on records reviewed and interviews it was determined that staff notified R1’s responsible party of an incident that occurred at the facility on 7/19/23, the same day the incident occurred. Upon review, it was also found that the facility notified the Department of the incident on 7/26/23 within 7 days per Title 22 requirements. Therefore, this allegation is UNFOUNDED. A finding of unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Staff do not assist resident with incontinence needs Regarding the allegation that staff do not assist residents with incontinence care, LPA met with several residents, spoke with several staff, and reviewed documentation. LPA learned that residents are checked regularly, at least every couple of hours, and staff assist residents with continence and incontinence per needs and service plans. Staff are aware of those residents who may need more frequent or extra assistance and monitor them. At this time, residents are changed when needed based on their needs and service plan. Therefore, the allegation is UNFOUNDED. A finding of unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report left at facility.
8 older inspections from 2021 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Tour Prep
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.