Capriana.
Capriana is Ranked in the top 35% of California memory care with 3 CDSS citations on record; last inspected Apr 2026.

A large home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 24 California facilities with a similar number of beds.
CCRC · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
Capriana has 3 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
3 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
3 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
The rules that apply to this facility.
State requirements with the exact regulation citation, plain-language explanation, and a question to ask on tour. Rules this facility has been cited for appear first.
Plain language
Because a facility markets dementia or Alzheimer's care, state law mandates higher training standards: 12 hours of initial dementia training (6 hours before a staff member works independently with residents, 6 more within the first 4 weeks), 8 hours of annual dementia in-service every year thereafter, and an administrator must include 8 hours of dementia-specific continuing education in every 2-year recertification cycle. Training must cover individualized care plans, behavioral expressions, appropriate supervision, and the facility's dementia care philosophy.
Ask on tour
“Can you show me each direct-care staffer's most recent dementia training certificate, and tell me when their next refresher is due?”
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Capriana's record and state requirements.
The facility has 1 serious citation on file across all inspections — can you provide your corrective-action plan for the cited item, and show families any documentation of remediation steps taken?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Six complaints are on file with CDSS — were any substantiated, and what remediation did the facility take in response to substantiated findings?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
The most recent inspection was on 2026-01-30 — can you provide the deficiency notice from that visit and walk families through the specific corrective actions implemented?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
14 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2026-04-28Other VisitType B · 1 finding
“Based on LPA interviews, the requested records were not received within 2 days which poses a potential risk for residents in care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
(Continued from LIC 9099) It was alleged that Facility did not provide requested care log documentation. R1’s Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) requested Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care logs regarding Resident #1 (R1) on February 11, 2026 via email. Three of three staff interviewed stated they responded to Power of Attorney (POA) and provided documentation requested. Additional documentation was requested by the POA but the February ADL care log was determined to be an internal document by the facility and was not provided. ED stated the information on the ADL care logs were transcribed into the alert charting notes; which the POA was given. The original care logs were not provided. Department review of the requested documents determined that the ADL care logs are documentation of R1’s ADL’s which could impact the resident's ability to function or for needed services required. The requested documentation was not provided within two business days to the POA. Based on document review and interviews the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met and the allegation that Facility did not provide requested care log documentation is Substantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director (ED) Tonya Reynolds and a copy of this report was given to the facility along with a copy of the LIC 9099-D and Appeal Rights.
2026-04-28Complaint InvestigationType B · 1 finding
“ADL documentation was not retained for three years for Resident #1 (R1). This poses a potential risk to residents due to not maintaining records that provide the full scope of care documentation to properly assess residents’ care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rose Ruppert made an unannounced visit for a Case Management deficiency. LPA was greeted and granted entry by the Concierge at 9:45am. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Tonya Reynolds and explained the purpose of the visit. During a complaint investigation, by the Department, it was discovered that Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care documentation is shredded monthly by Memory Care Director (MCD) and Health Services Director (HSD) due to the documents being classified as “internal” and that this was proprietary information. LPA requested copies of the ADL care documentation for review. Per review of documentation provided, documents contained information related to resident’s ADL care which could impact the resident's ability to function or for needed services required. Per facility policy on Retention of Resident Related Records, “Resident records will be retained according to CA state requirements. In the absence of a state requirement, the records will be retained according to the following guidelines: 5. Resident Monthly Staff Assignment Sheets: Completed sheets are considered worksheets and destroyed when completed at the end of the month.” While the ED stated the information on the ADL care logs were transcribed into the alert charting notes, transcribing of the records does not comply with requirement of original records or photographic reproductions. The following deficiency is being cited per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director (ED) Tonya Reynolds and a copy of this report was given to the facility along with a copy of the LIC 809-D and Appeal Rights.
2026-01-30Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint alleged that staff failed to assist a resident with feeding and hydration. The facility's records showed the resident was receiving feeding assistance and hydration support, staff members all denied the allegation, and three residents interviewed stated they were being assisted with food and water, though one witness disagreed—investigators found insufficient evidence to substantiate the complaint.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
(Continued from LIC 9099) Notes January 4 - January 29. 2026. Charting Notes report R1 is being fed and hydrated on January 4th and a change of condition occurred on January 14, 2026. Home Health was contacted regarding R1 having issues with swallowing. On January 16, 2026 the nurse assessed R1's swallowing and noted R1 was able to swallow water, as well as Ensure; a thicker liquid. The Responsible Party was notified by the nurse and continued to be updated of R1's changing condition. R1 was noted to be lethargic on January 20. 2026. Charting continued to document R1's food intake and hydration On January 25, 2026 R1 was lethargic and refused fluids or food. R1 was sent out to the hospital for further evaluation at 3;30pm. On January 26, 2026 home health recommended an R1 assessment for hospice but R1 was in the hospital at this time. It was also alleged that Staff does not ensure to assist resident with feeding. LPA interviewed four of four staff members who all denied this allegation. Staff stated R1 was full assistance and was assisted with each meal in the dining room unless R1 refused. LPA interviewed three of three residents. Three of three residents denied the allegation that they are not assisted with getting food or water. LPA interviewed one witness who stated staff did not ensure resident was being fed or given proper hydration. Based on LPA's record review, observations and interviews the allegations that Staff does not ensure resident is hydrated and Staff does not ensure to assist resident with feeding are Unsubstantiated. The allegations may have happened or are valid, but there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred. An exit interview was conducted with Tony Reynolds, Executive Director and a copy of this report and LIC 811 were provided to the facility.
2026-01-26Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
A state inspector visited the facility on January 24, 2026 to follow up on an unusual incident report: a resident had an unwitnessed fall in the bathroom on January 21, 2026 while not wearing her call pendant and sustained a right leg fracture. The resident, who is independent and does not have a history of falls, was found by staff who immediately called 911 and she remains hospitalized. The facility was found to be in compliance with regulations and no violations were cited.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rose Ruppert made an unannounced Case Management visit to follow-up on an Unusual Incident Report received in the Regional Office on January 24, 2026. LPA was greeted and granted entry by the Concierge at 3pm. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Tonya Reynolds and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA reviewed Resident #1 (R1's) last two medical assessments dated November 18, 2025 and January 31, 2023. R1 is an independent resident who can ambulate but has a call pendant in case of an emergency On January 21, 2026 at approximately 5:30am, the resident had an unwitnessed fall in the bathroom and was not wearing the call pendant at the time of the fall. Staff discovered resident and immediately called 911. R1's diagnoses include: right superior and inferior pubic ramus, tremors and, osteoporosis. R1 does not have a history of falls. Emergency room evaluation reported resident had a right leg fracture. R1 remains at the hospital at this time. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, the facility appears to be in compliance with Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations, no deficiencies cited on this date. An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director (ED) Tonya Reynolds and a copy of the report LIC 811 were given at the time of the visit.
2026-01-06Complaint InvestigationNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint alleged that staff were not keeping accurate medication records for a resident. The investigation found that the facility uses an outside pharmacy while maintaining an in-house system, which creates some confusion in how physician names appear on records, but the facility is correctly managing medications according to regulations and the complaint was unfounded.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
(Continued by LIC 9099) It was explained that the Physician's Orders medication record is "profile only" since the pharmacy R1 uses an outside pharmacy. For medications to be inputted to the electronic Medication Administration Record, all medication lists go through the in-house pharmacy. The prescribing physician shown does not change on the profile only. The in-house pharmacy does not actively fill R1's routine medications, thus, the physician on record is the last prescribing physician. R1 came in August 22, 2024 and some medications have not changed and thus, there have been no changes in the prescribing physician unless the prescription changed. LPA interviewed three of three staff members and three of three witnesses. Based on staff and witness interviews, it was agreed the medication record discrepancy from the medication bottle is confusing. It was determined the licensee is complying with regulations. The allegation that Staff are not ensuring accurate information on the resident's physician's orders for medication is Unfounded. The allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted with Tonya Reynolds, Executive Director and Lizette Flores, Health Services Director and a copy of this report was provided to the facility.
2025-12-17Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
This was an investigation into a complaint that staff neglected a resident during carpet cleaning in November 2025. Staff said they offered the resident the option to leave the room multiple times, the resident chose to stay, and when staff noticed the resident appeared cold, they provided a blanket and removed the fan being used to dry the carpet; the resident's spouse and most witnesses could not confirm the allegation of neglect. The investigator found the complaint unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence that neglect occurred.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
(Continued from LIC 9099) also interviewed R1's spouse, Resident #2 (R2) who was not present when the carpet cleaning occurred. R2 visits R1 every afternoon and did not smell odors during the afternoon visit on November 25, 2025. R2 also was not sure why the carpet was cleaned. Two of two residents could not confirm the allegation when questioned. LPA obtained the TELS work order; which can be entered for any cleaning or repair work by facility staff, residents or families. A work order was placed on November 20, 2025 to clean the carpet in R1's room. LPA interviewed three of three witnesses. One of three witnesses, Witness #2 (W2), observed R1 shivering in the room upon entry and confirmed the allegation. Two of the three witnesses were not present and could not confirm, nor deny the allegation that Staff neglected resident and left them in the room. LPA interviewed three of three staff members regarding the allegation Two of three staff members stated they asked Resident #1 (R1) if they wanted to exit the room while the carpet was cleaned but R1 did not respond. Staff offered assistance to R1 several times, in different ways, if R1 would like to leave the room but R1 did not want to move. Staff stated they were in and out of the room within thirty minutes. Three of three staff members denied the allegation that Staff neglected resident and left them in the room. LPA reviewed the Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for the carpet cleaner. The cleaner is approved for facility use and according to the staff member who cleaned the carpet, is used frequently to clean carpets throughout the facility. After cleaning R1's carpet on November 25, 2025, staff left the apartment door open and used the industrial fan to quickly dry the carpet area. A second staff member checked on R1 and provided a blanket for the resident; when it was brought to the staff member's attention that R1 appeared cold. The staff member also quickly removed the industrial fan from the area. Based on LPA's record review, observations and interviews, the allegation that Staff neglected resident and left them in the room is Unsubstantiated. The allegation may have happened or is valid, but there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director, Tonya Reynolds, and a copy of this report was provided to the facility.
2025-12-17Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
Plain-language summary
This was a complaint investigation into four allegations: inappropriate staff interactions with a resident, medication mismanagement, staff accessing residents' cellphones without permission, and failure to report incidents. All four allegations were found to be unsubstantiated—investigators interviewed residents, staff, and witnesses and did not find sufficient evidence that these violations occurred. The facility provided documentation that staff received training in May 2025 on resident rights, cellphone policies, and phone etiquette.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
(Continued from LIC 9099) Staff members are not allowed to take photos or videos while working and all residents have photo consents included in their Residency agreements. It was alleged that Staff engaged in inappropriate interactions with resident in care. It was reported that a former employee was texting inappropriate photos to a resident. LPA interviewed six of six residents who all denied this allegation. Two of six residents indicated they like to take photos with staff members and did not know there was a policy where staff were not allowed to take photos or videos while working. Six of six residents denied receiving inappropriate content on their cell phones. Thus this allegation is Unsubstantiated. It was alleged that Staff mismanaged resident's medication. LPA reviewed R1's October and November electronic Medication Administration Records (MAR) but no discrepancies were found on the eMAR. R1's medications are in bottles. Two of six staff members stated medications are occasionally mismanaged by staff, such as when medication needs to be refilled or that staff do not watch if residents take the medications. Four of six staff members denied this allegation. Thus this allegation is Unsubstantiated. It was also alleged that, Staff accessed resident's cellphone without proper authorization. LPA asked six of six residents if staff members access their cell phones without resident's permission. Six of six residents denied this allegation. LPA interviewed six of six staff members if they accessed residents' cell phones without their permission. Six of six staff members denied this allegation. LPA interviewed five of five witnesses if Staff accessed resident's cellphone without proper authorization. Two of five witnesses confirmed this allegation; stating staff members obtain a resident's cell phone to delete content without permission. Three of five witnesses could not confirm or deny this allegation. Lastly, it was alleged that Staff did not report resident incidents to appropriate parties, Two of five witnesses were not informed or included in meetings with Resident #1(R1) regarding mental evaluations or medications. LPA reviewed email communications between witnesses and facility. Mismanaged medications for R1 were not reported to licensing. LPA reviewed eMAR reports and did not find any discrepancies in documentation, thus it was not reported to licensing. . Staff members interviewed understood they were mandated reporters for resident incidents, including medication errors but did not feel R1's medications were 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 (Continued from LIC 9099-C) mismanaged. LPA obtained documentation that staff were in-serviced on May 29, 2025 regarding resident rights, cell phone policies and phone etiquette. Three of five witnesses denied the allegation that Staff did not report resident incidents to appropriate parties. (Continued on LIC 9099-C1) Based on LPA's observations, record review and interviews, the allegations that: Staff engaged in inappropriate interactions with resident in care, Staff mismanaged resident's medication, Staff accessed resident's cellphone without proper authorization and Staff did not report resident incidents to appropriate parties are Unsubstantiated. The allegations may have happened or are valid, but there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations occurred. An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director, Tonya Reynolds, and a copy of this report was provided to the facility.
2025-10-03Complaint InvestigationType A · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that a resident left the facility without permission on September 26, 2025, and was located outside by police about 35 minutes later; the resident was checked for injuries, found unharmed, and transported to a hospital for evaluation as a precaution. The state cited the facility for violations related to this incident and assessed immediate penalties. The facility's management was notified of the findings and their right to appeal.
“care and supervision when R1 was unaccounted for from approximately 6:40 p.m. to 7:15 p.m. on 9/26/2025 and was later located off premises by law enforcement. This failure to provide care and supervision posed an immediate health and safety risk to R1”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Samer Haddadin conducted a Case Management – Deficiency Visit at the facility. Upon arrival, LPA met with Memory Care Director (MCD), and and Excusive Director Tonya Reynolds who granted entry into the facility. Marisa Zamudio, who granted entry into the facility. The facility submitted a Special Incident Report (SIR) to Community Care Licensing regarding an elopement incident that occurred on September 26, 2025. According to the report, at approximately 6:40 p.m., R1 was observed missing from their room during a routine status check. An All-Call was initiated via walkie, and staff began a head count while searching for R1. At approximately 7:15 p.m., the facility received a call from the Brea Police Department advising that R1 had been located outside of the facility. Nursing staff and other employees immediately responded to assist R1. Upon return, R1 was assessed and showed no signs or symptoms of pain or injury. As a precautionary measure, 911 was contacted, and R1 was transported to UCI Medical Center for further evaluation. The resident’s primary care physician and power of attorney were subsequently notified. Based on the information obtained during this visit, deficiencies are being cited under Title 22, Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. See LIC809D. Immediate civil penalties are being assessed. See LIC421IM. An exit interview was conducted, and copies of this report, including appeal rights, were provided to MCD, Marisa Zamudio.
2025-09-19Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint alleged that staff failed to supervise residents after an incident on May 5, 2025, in which one resident inappropriately touched another resident who was asleep in a common area. Staff immediately called 911 and the resident's family, a private companion was assigned the next day, and the facility updated the resident's care plan; however, the investigator found insufficient evidence to confirm or deny whether inadequate supervision caused the incident. The facility's staffing levels and monitoring practices were reviewed and the complaint was determined to be unsubstantiated.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
(Continued from LIC 9099) On today's date LPA reviewed R1 and R2's Facesheets, Physician's Reports, Needs and Services Plans, Appraisals and facility progress notes. Per facility progress notes, at 8:45pm on Monday, May 5, 2025, a staff member reported that R2 had their hand in R1's pants in the common area. R1 was asleep during the incident. The Med Tech immediately called 911, as well as R1 and R2's Power of Attorneys (POA)s, regarding the incident. R1's POA arrived at the facility within twenty minutes and remained with R1 through bedtime. Local law enforcement arrived on-site and spoke with staff and Health and Wellness Nurse (HWN) at approximately 9pm. The facility submitted an Unusual Incident Report with the Department on Tuesday, May 6, 2025. R1's POA met with Executive Director and HWN on May 6, 2025 to follow-up on the incident that occurred. On May 6, 2025, HWN spoke with R2's POA to follow-up with Primary Care Physician (PCP) regarding behavior. A private companion was recommended and a virtual appointment was scheduled with PCP at 3:30p on the same day. A private companion arrived at 2:30pm on May 6, 2025. LPA conducted a health and safety check and toured the facility. LPA observed residents eating breakfast and participating in activities. LPA also interviewed six of six residents regarding care provided and if they have been inappropriately touched by either another resident or staff. Five of six interviewed denied this allegation. One of six interviewed confirmed this allegation. LPA interviewed five of five staff members. Five of five staff confirmed that R2 has inappropriate behavior and a 24 hour personal companion arrived the day after the incident on May 5, 2025 occurred. Physician's Report for R2 does not document any behaviors. R2's Individualized Service Plan was updated on May 13, 2025 with a care plan meeting with R2's Power of Attorneys via telephone. Recently, R2's behaviors have stabilized and have been managed with medications. A personal companion remains from 8am to 8pm and R2 sleeps throughout the night. Staff continued to document R2's incidents in progress notes. LPA interviewed the LVN nurse and Med Tech who were present at time of incident. Staffing for the PM shift is the same as the day shift with one Med Tech and three caregivers per floor and one Nurse for the Villagio building. The incident took place in a common area and was immediately noted by staff. (Continued on LIC 9099-C1) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 (Continued from LIC 9099-C) Based on LPA's file review, observations and interviews, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore the allegation that: Staff are not supervising residents resulting in resident-on-resident incidents is Unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted Marisa Zamudio,Memory Care Director and a copy of this report and LIC 811 was provided to the facility.
2025-07-29Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
An inspector conducted a follow-up visit on May 2, 2026 to review incident reports involving a resident who had three falls between July 2 and July 28, 2025—one unwitnessed fall with no injury, one resulting in a broken nose, and one resulting in a hip fracture. The facility had hired a one-on-one caregiver and updated the resident's care plan in response to the incidents, and the resident's family reported being satisfied with the care. No violations were found during the inspection.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rose Ruppert made an unannounced Case Management visit to follow-up on Unusual Incident Reports received in our Regional Office. LPA was greeted and granted entry into Villagio by the Concierge and met with Memory Care Director (MCD) Marisa Hernandez. The following documents were obtained and reviewed: Resident #1 (R1)'s Facesheet, Physician's Report dated 1/24/2025, Individualized Service Plan (ISP) dated 7/24/2025, Resident Assessment, Pre-appraisal Assessment and Hospice Plan of Care dated 7/18/2025. LPA interviewed two of two staff and Resident #1 (R1)'s Responsible Party. On July 2, 2025 R1 had an unwitnessed fall and was transported to the hospital for further evaluation. There were no medical issues noted at this time. On July 4, 2025 R1 had an unwitnessed fall in the community hallway. R1 was transported to the hospital and was diagnosed with a broken nose. R1 returned to the community and for four days family members remained at the community with R1 due to R1 trying to remove nasal tubes. On July 11, 2025 a 1:1 private caregiver was hired to remain with R1 and to help with tube removal behaviors. On July 18, 2025 R1 began receiving hospice services. On July 24, 2025 a care plan meeting was held with family regarding R1's change of condition and a new ISP was signed on 7/24/2025. On July 28, 2025 R1 was leaving the community with a family member for an outing when R1 fell. R1 was sent out to the hospital and was diagnosed with a hip fracture. (Continued on LIC 809-C) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 (Continued from LIC 809) LPA spoke with Responsible Party who stated they were happy with the care being provided to Resident #1 and that there are no issues at this time. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, the facility appears to be in compliance with Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations, no deficiencies cited on this date. An exit interview was conducted with Marisa Hernandez, Memory Care Director and a copy of the report and files reviewed (LIC 811) were given at the time of the visit.
2025-06-30Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
An unannounced annual inspection was conducted, during which inspectors toured both buildings, tested all fire safety equipment and hot water temperatures, reviewed resident and staff records, and observed residents in activities and dining areas. All smoke and carbon monoxide detectors were operational, fire extinguishers were charged, medications were being given as prescribed, and the facility's outdoor areas including walking paths and activity spaces were well-maintained. The facility was found to be in compliance with state regulations with no violations cited.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Samer Haddadin Rose Ruppert made an unannounced visit to the facility today to conduct an Annual Required Evaluation. LPAs were greeted and granted entry by the Concierge. During today’s visit, LPAs met with Tonya Reynolds Executive Director (ED) . The facility consists of two buildings which has a capacity of 200 with an approved fire clearance of 173 non-ambulatory residents of which ten may be bedridden and a hospice waiver for twenty. The facility currently has a census of 137 residents in care with 95 residents in the three-story, Independent/ Assisted Living building and 42 residents in the Villagio building; which is Memory Care. During today’s visit, LPAs toured the facility and inspected the physical plant, including but not limited to testing all smoke detectors, testing hot water temperature in six of six resident bathrooms, and testing auditory devices on all exits . The hot water temperature measured between 110.8 to 118.9 degrees Fahrenheit and all smoke and carbon monoxide detectors were operational and were tested on March 1, 2025 by an outside vendor. The fire extinguishers are charged and were serviced on March 27, 2025.. LPAs inspected the kitchen with the Executive Chef and observed a minimum of two days perishables and seven days nom-perishable food on hand. LPAs walked through refrigerator and freezers and both units were at the required temperatures. LPAs toured the Villagio building and the delayed egress was in working order. LPAs observed residents in activities and other residents relaxing after breakfast in both the upstairs and downstairs dining rooms. ED toured LPAs outdoors and the walking path was free of obstruction. There were koi ponds, a bridge and a locked pool area with various shaded seating areas. LPAs also observed a fenced dog area and observed (Continued on LIC 9099-C) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 (Continued from LIC 809-C) individual resident casitas to the north of building. The facility’s last fire drill was conducted on June 3, 2025 . LPAs observed medication storage and reviewed the centrally stored medications. Per review medications are being given as prescribed. Several First Aid kits were observed throughout the community with manuals. An evacuation chair was installed in the main lobby stairwell and the PUB 475, "See Something, Say Something" poster was displayed in prominent areas. There is a main dining room, Portofino, for residents in the main building with several adjacent dining rooms for families or events. LPAs also observed a bar/lounge for residents to enjoy in the evening. In the Villagio building there are dining areas on both floors. LPAs observed a theater, grand ballroom, a library, activities areas and a bistro in the lobby. LPAs reviewed six of six staff training and fingerprint records and reviewed eleven of eleven resident records . LPAs interviewed alert residents regarding their quality of care and spoke to staff present regarding care provided. LPAs confirmed that administrator has a current administrator certificate which expires on January 24, 2026. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, the facility appears to be in compliance with Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations, no deficiencies cited on this date. An exit interview was conducted with Tonya Reynolds, Executive Director (ED) and a copy of the report and files reviewed (LIC 858 & LIC 859) were given at the time of the visit.
2025-05-28Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
An analyst visited the facility on May 24, 2025, to investigate an incident of inappropriate behavior between two residents that occurred the previous evening and was not witnessed by staff. The facility reported the incident to the licensing office the day it was discovered, and the analyst found the facility in compliance with regulations based on interviews with staff, health and safety checks with both residents involved, and review of their care records. No deficiencies were cited.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rose Ruppert made an unannounced visit to the facility regarding an incident that took place on the evening of Friday, May 23, 2025. LPA was greeted and granted entry and met with Memory Care Director (MCD) Marisa Hernandez and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility and observed residents in the large upstairs dining room preparing to listen to live music and to enjoy Happy Hour. LPA interviewed and conducted a Health and Safety check with Resident #1 (R1) and Resident #2 (R2) and spoke to three of three staff regarding the incident on the 23rd. The incident, involving inappropriate behavior between two residents, was unwitnessed. The next day one of the residents verbally shared with MCD what happened and a report was submitted to the Licensing Regional Office on May 24, 2025. LPA obtained a copy of the resident and staff rosters for Villagio, Capriana's Memory Care. Copies from R1 and R2's files include: Facesheets, Physician's Reports, Needs and Services Plans, Appraisals and documentation regarding follow-up care plan meetings and electronic files regarding behavior documentation. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, the facility appears to be in compliance with Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations, no deficiencies cited on this date. An exit interview was conducted with Marisa Hernandez, Memory Care Director (MCD) and a copy of the report and files reviewed (LIC 811)) were given at the time of the visit.
2024-10-04Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
This was an unannounced follow-up visit to investigate a death that occurred at the facility in early October 2024. The inspector reviewed the resident's medical records, care plan, and staffing documentation, and interviewed the health services director and administrator about what happened. The report does not indicate what violations, if any, were found during this investigation.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rose Ruppert conducted an unannounced case management visit regarding an Incident Report received in our office on October 4, 2024. LPA was greeted and granted entry by the Concierge. The facility's current census is ninety-four residents. The purpose of the visit is to follow-up on a Death Report received in our office. LPA requested Resident #1 (R1)'s: Identification Form, Physician's Report, Needs and Services Plan/ Appraisal, Pre-appraisal, Progress Notes as well as copies of the Staffing schedule for October 1, 2024. LPA spoke with Lizette Flores, Health Services Director (HSD) regarding the incident and the chronological order of events. An exit interview was conducted with Ashley Lee, BOD and a copy of this report and LIC 858 were provided at exit.
2024-07-31Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
This was a routine annual inspection of a 200-resident facility with separate buildings for independent/assisted living and memory care. The inspector found the facility clean and well-maintained with proper emergency equipment, locked medication storage, operational safety features like smoke detectors and evacuation doors, adequate food and water supplies, and recreational activities for residents; staff files and resident records were in order. No violations were found.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Joseph Alejandre made an unannounced visit to conduct the required annual inspection. LPA met with the Executive Director Tonya Reynolds and explained the reason for the visit. The facility has 2 buildings, building 1 is for assisted and independent living and building 2 is for memory care. Building 1 has 3 stories and building 2 has 2 stories. LPA and the Executive Director toured the facility. LPA observed the See Something, Say Something poster (PUB 475) posted in the main entry way of the facility. LPA observed the fireplace in the lobby living room is screened. Facility has a capacity of 200 of which 173 can be non-ambulatory, 10 may be bedridden and a hospice waiver for 20. LPA did not observe an emergency evacuation chair in the lobby stairway. LPA and the Executive Director toured the kitchen and dining room. LPA observed the kitchen is clean and organized. LPA observed a 2 day perishable and a 7 day non-perishable food supply on hand in the kitchen. The refrigerators and freezers were at the required temperatures. LPA observed the facility emergency food and water supply stored in a large utility closet. LPA observed all the fire extinguishers in the facility are fully charged. LPA observed that all of the stairwells in the facility had emergency evacuation chairs. The facility has multiple activity rooms and a theater for residents. There are games, puzzles and books for residents in the activity rooms and the theater plays movies every night for residents. LPA observed the facility has computers for residents to access the internet. There is also a fitness room for residents. LPA observed the medication room on the first floor is kept locked and medication is stored in a locked cart in the medication room. The first aid kit in the medication room has all the required elements. LPA toured 2 resident rooms on each floor in building 1. LPA toured 2 rooms on each floor in building 2 for a total of 10 rooms inspected. Smoke detectors/carbon monoxide detectors tested operational. Hot water measured from 105.0 to 116.6 degrees Fahrenheit in rooms inspected. LPA observed all rooms had the required furnishings. LPA tested the delayed egress doors in memory care (building 2) and all of the delayed egress doors are operational. LPA interviewed staff and residents. No obstacles or hazards observed in building 1 or building 2. The facility has an outdoor patio area which includes a pool which is fenced and kept locked. LPA observed a fountain and a koi pond in the patio area. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 This area is inaccessible to residents in memory care. No obstacles or hazards observed in the outdoor patio area. LPA reviewed 10 resident files and medications. No discrepancies observed. LPA reviewed 7 staff files. No discrepancies observed. All staff are background cleared and associated to the facility. All staff files reviewed had the required training. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of this visit. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report provided.
2 older inspections from 2023 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Other facilities in Orange County.
Other memory care facilities in Orange County with similar care offerings.
Free · Tour Prep
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.

