California · Aliso Viejo

Belmont Village Aliso Viejo.

RCFE · Memory Care180 bedsDementia-trained staff
Facility · Aliso Viejo
A 180-bed RCFE · Memory Care with 5 citations on file.
Licensed beds
180
Last inspection
May 2026
Last citation
May 2026
Operated by
Bmsh I Belmont Av Gp Llc; Belmont Three Llc
Snapshot

A large home, reviewed on public record.

Peer Comparison

Compared to 93 California facilities with a similar number of beds.

RCFE memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing.

Severity rank
37th%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
50th%
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

FACILITY WATCH · BETA

Belmont Village Aliso Viejo has 5 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.

New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.

Save for comparison:
The Rulebook

The rules that apply to this facility.

State requirements with the exact regulation citation, plain-language explanation, and a question to ask on tour. Rules this facility has been cited for appear first.

What dementia-care training must staff complete?22 CCR §87705 / HSC §1569.625
+
Plain language

Because a facility markets dementia or Alzheimer's care, state law mandates higher training standards: 12 hours of initial dementia training (6 hours before a staff member works independently with residents, 6 more within the first 4 weeks), 8 hours of annual dementia in-service every year thereafter, and an administrator must include 8 hours of dementia-specific continuing education in every 2-year recertification cycle. Training must cover individualized care plans, behavioral expressions, appropriate supervision, and the facility's dementia care philosophy.

Ask on tour

Can you show me each direct-care staffer's most recent dementia training certificate, and tell me when their next refresher is due?

Tour Prep

Questions to ask before you visit.

A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Belmont Village Aliso Viejo's record and state requirements.

01 /

The facility has 7 serious citations on file across all inspections — can you provide your corrective-action plan for each cited item, and show families any documentation of remediation steps taken?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

02 /

Nine complaints are on file with CDSS — were any substantiated, and what remediation did the facility take in response to substantiated findings?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

03 /

The most recent inspection was February 19, 2026 — can you provide families a copy of the deficiency notice from that visit and walk through the corrective actions taken for each cited item?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

14 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.

14
reports on file
5
total deficiencies
4
severe (Type A)
2026-05-14
Other Visit
No findings
Read raw inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced case management visit. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the visit, LPA delivered an amended report from case management visit on 05/08/2026. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was left at the facility.

2026-05-08
Annual Compliance Visit
Type A · 1 finding
Type A22 CCR §87464(f)(1)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87464(f)(1)

Based on interviews conducted and record review, Licensee failed to ensure care and supervision was provided to R1. R1 had 14 falls within a five month period which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care. CIVIL PENALTY ASSESSED

Read raw inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on an investigation conducted regarding an incident report received by the Department on March 24, 2025. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. Per the Incident report, on March 17, 2025, Resident 1 (R1) had been found on the floor with a red eye and blood on their nose. 911 was called and the resident was transported to the Hospital where resident was diagnosed with a closed blowout fracture of right orbital floor, fracture of L5 lumbar vertebrae and a fractured rib and left clavicle. The resident moved to Belmont Village Assisted Living on July 31, 2023. Per pre-placement appraisal dated August 03, 2023, R1 required minimal assistance for activities of daily living (ADL’s). Per physician report dated March 24, 2025, R1 had a diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease, Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (A rare, degenerative brain disease that affects movement, balance, and eye control) and had mild cognitive impairment. R1 utilized a walker for mobility. On October 24, 2024, facility staff noticed a change in condition as the resident became more confused and disoriented while becoming progressively unsteady and beginning to have falls. R1 began to fall in November 2024, without injury, and was initially re-assessed December 10, 2024. Resident was subsequently re-assessed four more times between December 10, 2024, and March 20, 2025, after additional falls. Management had R1 medically evaluated by a mobile physician who visited the facility two to three times weekly checking on residents including R1. The physician adjusted R1’s medications and staff continued to monitor them for changes. Continued on LIC 9099C DATED 05/08/2026 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 During R1’s residency at the facility, they had approximately 14 falls that were reported to the Department which occurred during the evening and early hours. R1 was not diagnosed with sundowning, however, staff reported the resident was restless at night and had difficulty sleeping. On March 17, 2025, staff reported finding R1 in front of their apartment with a red and purple eye and blood around the nose. 911 was activated and the resident was transferred to the Hospital where they were diagnosed with a sustained closed blowout fracture of the right orbital floor; fracture of the L5 lumbar vertebrae; and fractures to rib and the left clavicle. R1 was discharged and returned to the facility same day with orders for follow-up appointments with primary care and orthopedic physicians. On March 26, 2025, at about 11:39 PM, R1 was found on the floor by a caregiver and 911 was activated. R1 was sent out to the hospital, and no additional injuries were noted. The resident was discharged from the hospital at about 6:30 AM and returned to the facility. The resident’s family was contacted and a companion from a Homecare Agency was hired to accompany R1 between 11 PM and 7AM for additional supervision. Five out of seven staff and Administrator confirmed R1 was provided with fall prevention tools including a bed alarm, floor mat and motion cameras in the room as well as a pendant and a bracelet for R1 to use if remembered. Administrator stated having multiple conversations with the resident’s family regarding a higher level of care, hiring a companion and the option of moving to a smaller environment. R1’s family confirmed the conversations. The facility provided measures to alert staff if R1 had a fall, however, R1 still had 14 falls within a five-month period. While the facility implemented fall risk measures to alert staff when R1 had falls, measures implemented failed to ensure R1’s safety. R1 required additional supervision and a higher level of care to protect them from repeated falls. The facility was unable to mitigate R1’s falls with measures utilized and additional mitigation measures such as a full-time companion were not implemented. R1 was placed at a board and care on March 31, 2025, where R1 is reported to be doing well, and no falls have been reported. Based on the totality of evidence obtained, the Department has concluded that the facility failed to provide adequate care and supervision to a known fall-risk resident by not implementing sufficient reasonable safety measures or monitoring practices resulting in R1 sustaining an unwitnessed fall and injury. The following is being cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. A Civil Penalty is pending determination by Community Care Licensing Division as per H&S Code 1569.49(f). An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Anie Becker and a copy of this report was provided.

2026-02-19
Other Visit
No findings

Plain-language summary

This was a routine annual inspection of Belmont Village on February 19, 2026, where inspectors toured the entire facility including memory care and assisted living units, reviewed resident and staff files, checked medication storage and administration, and inspected food service, bathrooms, emergency systems, and common areas. The facility was clean and safe, emergency equipment and fire safety systems were in working order, and all required documentation was in place. No violations were found.

Read raw inspector notes

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kimberly Lyman and Andrea Mendivil conducted an unannounced visit to Belmont Village. The purpose of today’s visit was to conduct the required 1 year inspection. LPAs were allowed entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. Facility is licensed for 180 non-ambulatory residents of which 35 may be bedridden. Facility has an approved hospice waiver for 35 residents. There are 10 residents on hospice during today's visit. The facility has 147 apartments with 46 units for memory care. Administrator Rosa Ayala has an administrator certificate expiring on 10/23/2026. Upon entry, facility appears clean, safe and sanitary. LPAs Lyman and Mendivil along with Building Engineer John Lachey toured the facility at 9:40 AM. LPAs toured the physical plant, checked food service, reviewed files as well as reviewed medication administration. LPAs toured the memory care unit as well as assisted living. The main kitchen was inspected. Perishable and non-perishable food supply was checked and adequately stocked at time of visit. Maintenance records were observed in the main kitchen and temperatures were in compliance. LPAs observed menus in the main dining room. Residents order off a menu and facility has daily specials for variety. There is an auxiliary kitchen and dining room in the memory care unit as well as a bistro in the assisted living. Resident bedrooms had the required furniture, bed linens and closet/drawer space to accommodate each resident comfortably. LPAs pulled emergency cords and staff response was immediate. Resident bathrooms were checked. Toilets and water faucets worked properly, grab bars were secure and shower was free of mold/mildew. Ten resident bathrooms were tested for water temperature and water temperature measured between 113 and 118.4 degrees F in tested bathrooms. Resident bath towels, toiletries and personal hygiene supplies were adequately stocked. Common areas were clean and clear of hazards, doorways were free of obstructions. Smoke/carbon monoxide detectors are hardwired and facility has sprinklers. CONTINUED ON LIC 809C DATED 02/19/2026 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LPAs observed documentation of last fire inspection dated 07/08/2025 conducted by West Coast Fire and Integration. Smoke detectors are monitored through an electronic monitoring system, alerting staff when there is any issue with a smoke detector. Fire extinguishers were fully charged. LPAs reviewed the emergency disaster plan as well as documentation of monthly fire drills with the last drill conducted on 01/30/2026. Facility is equipped with a generator. Facility provides daily activities in the form of exercise, games, and outings in the community. LPAs toured the outside grounds and observed a locked, alarmed pool as well as ample shaded seating for residents. Facility has a theater as well as a hair and nail salon. LPAs reviewed ten resident files and six staff files. Resident files reviewed contained required documentation including physician reports, admission agreements, and resident appraisals. Resident files reviewed contained required documentation including criminal background clearance, personnel record, required annual training, and health screen/TB. LPAs reviewed medication administration and storage. Medications are stored in locked medication carts. Medications appear to be administered per physician order. LPAs observed the first aid kit contained all required items. No deficiencies noted during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was left at the facility.

2025-02-20
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings
Inspector · Kimberly Lyman

Plain-language summary

This was a follow-up inspection on February 4, 2025, to verify that the facility had corrected a medication storage problem noted in a previous visit. The inspector found that medications are now properly secured, and the facility has resolved the issue.

Read raw inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of a Plan of Correction (POC) visit, based upon the deficiencies cited in LIC form 809D on 02/04/2025. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. *Deficiency cited under Title 22 Regulation 87465(h)(2) pertaining to Centrally Stored Medications has been cleared. LPA observed medications are secured. Licensee has complied with the POC. Licensee has been advised to maintain all areas of facility in compliance. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was left at the facility.

2025-02-04
Annual Compliance Visit
Type A · 1 finding
Inspector · Fred Arias

Plain-language summary

During the required annual inspection, inspectors found the facility clean and well-maintained, with proper emergency safety systems, adequate food supplies, and organized medication storage. One violation was cited regarding medications found in a resident bathroom, though the report does not detail the nature or outcome of this violation. All resident rooms, staff files, and medical records reviewed met requirements, and staff responded promptly to emergency alarms during testing.

Type A22 CCR §87465(h)(2)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87465(h)(2)

Based on LPA observation, a bottle of acetaminophen was found in a resident 1's medicine cabinet. The physician's report for this resident stated resident cannot self administer PRN medication which poses an immediate health and safety risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 02/05/2025 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 Remove noted item and forward proof of correction to LPA by due date.

Read raw inspector notes

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kimberly Lyman and Fred Arias made an unannounced visit to conduct the required annual inspection. LPAs met with Executive Director (ED) Rosa Ayala and explained the reason for the visit. The facility is a three story building which consist of 30 units on the first floor reserved for memory care residents, and 16 additional units on the second floor for memory care residents. The capacity of the facility is 180 non-ambulatory and a hospice waiver for thirty five and bed ridden waiver for thirty five. There are currently a total of 134 residents, 46 of them are in memory care, and 14 on hospice. Rosa Ayala's Administrator's Certificate is in process of renewal as of 12/23/24. LPAs observed the PUB 475 poster (See Something, Say Something Poster) posted by the resident mail box. The PUB 475 poster posted is 20" X 26." LPAs observed the kitchen is clean and organized. There is a two day supply of perishable food and a seven day supply of non-perishable food on-hand in the kitchen. LPAs observed the emergency food and water. LPAs and ED toured resident rooms on three floors of the facilities. LPAs and ED toured the resident rooms in memory care unit area. LPAs inspected twelve resident rooms. All resident rooms had the required furnishings. All resident bathrooms were clean and operational. At 9:58am, one out of twelve resident rooms observed had PRNs in the bathroom. LPAs tested the emergency alarms and observed the staff came promptly when alerted. The hot water in the twelve resident rooms inspected measured 112.4 degrees Fahrenheit to 117.3 degrees Fahrenheit. LPAs observed residents participating in exercises in the activities room in the memory care area. There is fitness room and activities room for all residents. There is an outdoor courtyard for residents to sit outside. In the outside area there is a garden for residents to plant things. There is a pool area secured with a gate. Residents can utilize the pool as long as they are accompany with a staff who is water safety certified or a family member. In the summer they have water aerobics. There are fire extinguishers on every floor and all fire extinguishers are fully charged. LPAs observed emergency evacuation chairs in each stairwell. The last emergency fire drill was conducted on 1/29/25. The fire safety system is inspected annual every year by an outside agency, The last inspection was 8/30/24. LPAs reviewed twelve resident files with no discrepancies. All resident files had the required documents. Continued on LIC-809C 2/4/2025 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LPAs reviewed five staff files with no discrepancies observed. All staff files reviewed had current CPR/First Aid training. At around 2:30 PM, LPAs inspected medication and medication administration records (MAR) for selected residents. No discrepancies observed. LPAs observed medications are kept secured in a medication cart that is locked in a medication room. LPAs observed the first aid kits to have all the required components and a first aid book at hand. LPAs interviewed staff and residents. No obstacles or hazards were noted inside or outside of the facility. Based on the observations made during today's visit, the following violation is being cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report as well as appeal rights were discussed and provided with facility representative.

2025-02-04
Complaint Investigation
Unsubstantiated
No findings
Inspector · Kimberly Lyman
2024-05-06
Complaint Investigation
Unsubstantiated
No findings
Inspector · Kimberly Lyman

Plain-language summary

This complaint investigation looked into allegations that the facility improperly pressured a resident about bedding arrangements. Based on interviews and record review, including a physician's assessment that the resident was making his own decisions, the investigator found no evidence to support the complaint.

Read raw inspector notes

Resident shares a room with the resident's wife. Resident stated that upon admission, resident shared a queen bed with wife in the facility apartment. A few months later the resident's wife needed a hospital bed and the resident donated the queen bed to charity without informing the facility. Resident indicated pressure from facility to utilize another bed and resident refused. Last week, resident obtained a bed from the facility and LPA observed the bed in the resident's room. Per physician report dated 09/27/2023, Resident is independent and making own decisions. Based on record review and interviews conducted, LPA is unable to corroborate the allegations. Therefore, the allegations are deemed unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to facility.

2024-04-30
Other Visit
No findings
Inspector · Michael Tea

Plain-language summary

This was the required annual inspection of the facility on an unannounced visit. Inspectors toured the building, reviewed resident and staff files, checked medications, tested emergency systems, and observed resident activities and living conditions; no violations were found.

Read raw inspector notes

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kimberly Lyman and Michael Tea made an unannounced visit to conduct the required annual inspection. LPAs met with Executive Director (ED) Rosa Ayala and explained the reason for the visit. The facility is a three story building which consist of 30 units on the first floor reserved for memory care residents, and 16 additional units on the second floor for memory care residents. The capacity of the facility is 180 non-ambulatory and a hospice waiver for thirty five and bed ridden waiver for thirty five. There are currently a total of 117 residents, forty two of them are in memory care, and eleven on hospice. Rosa Ayala's Administrator's Certificate expires on October 23, 2024. LPAs observed the PUB 475 poster (See Something, Say Something Poster) posted by the resident mail box. The PUB 475 poster posted is 20" X 26." Around 9:49 AM, LPAs and ED Ayala toured the facility. LPAs observed the kitchen is clean and organized. There is a two day supply of perishable food and a seven day supply of non-perishable food on-hand in the kitchen. LPAs and ED toured resident rooms on three floors of the facilities. LPAs and ED toured the resident rooms in memory care unit area. LPAs inspected twelve resident rooms. All resident rooms had the required furnishings. All resident bathrooms were clean and operational. LPAs tested the emergency pendants and observed the staff came promptly when alerted. The hot water in the twelve resident rooms inspected measured 112 degrees Fahrenheit to 118.2 degrees Fahrenheit. LPAs observed residents participating in exercises in the activities room in the memory care area. There is fitness room and activities room for all residents. There is an outdoor courtyard for residents to sit outside. In the outside area there is a garden for residents to plant things. Also there is a pool area with a gate. Residents can utilize the pool as long as they are accompany with a staff who is water safety certified or a family member. In the summer they have water aerobics. There are fire extinguishers on every floor and all fire extinguishers are fully charged. LPAs observed emergency evacuation chairs in each stairwell. The last emergency fire drill was conducted on March 13, 2024. The fire safety system is inspected annual every year by an outside agency, the last inspection was 9/19/23. Around 11:10 AM after the facility tour, LPAs reviewed twelve resident files with no discrepancies. All resident files had the required documents. Afterwards LPAs reviewed ten staff files with no discrepancies observed. Annual Report cont on LIC-809C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 All staff files reviewed had current CPR/First Aid training. At around 2:30 PM, LPAs inspected medication and medication administration records (MAR) for selected residents. No discrepancies observed. LPAs observed medications are kept secured in a medication cart that is locked in a medication room. LPAs observed the first aid kits to have all the required components and a first aid book at hand. LPAs interviewed staff and residents. No obstacles or hazards were noted inside or outside of the facility. Based on the observations made during today's visit, no deficiencies are being cited as a result of this visit. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report provided

2024-03-20
Complaint Investigation
Unsubstantiated
No findings
Inspector · Kimberly Lyman

Plain-language summary

A complaint alleged that staff failed to supervise a resident, resulting in injury during an attempted elopement. Video footage showed the resident removing a window screen and climbing out onto a ledge, then falling approximately 12 minutes later; the resident was found on the sidewalk and died from injuries sustained in the fall. The investigation determined the resident likely was unaware of the consequences of their actions and that the facility's safety measures—including windows that open only eight inches and alarms on all exit doors—were in place and functioning, so the allegation could not be substantiated as a violation of the facility's duty to provide care and supervision.

Read raw inspector notes

Per the video obtained, R1 can be seen knocking the screen out of the window and climbing halfway out the window. R1 then climbed out onto the small ledge beneath the window and turned around to jump to the ground. At approximately 6:41 PM cameras observed a shadow seen falling out the side of the building. At approximately 6:53 PM a staff member found R1 lying on the sidewalk below their bedroom window. Resident records obtained did not note R1 had a history of suicidal ideation. Interviews with five of seven staff reported R1 had a history of wandering and attempted elopement. Orange County Coroner Report lists R1’s cause of death as Hemopneumothorax, Rib Fracture and Traumatic fall. Per facility policy, windows in the facility memory care are fixed to open no more than eight inches to allow fresh air into the rooms for residents. All exit leading doors are equipped with auditory alarms and delayed egress to alert staff of attempted elopements. Although R1 sustained a traumatic fall resulting in their death, a review of records obtained and interviews conducted determined that R1’s injuries were not sustained as a result of neglect by the facility staff. Evidence obtained indicates more than likely that R1 was unaware of the consequences of their actions and likely fell while attempting to leave the facility. Therefore, based on interviews conducted and documents reviewed, the allegation that staff failed to provide care and supervision which resulted in resident sustaining injuries during elopement is deemed Unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report and confidential names list was left at the facility.

2023-11-29
Other Visit
No findings
Inspector · Kimberly Lyman

Plain-language summary

This was a follow-up visit to verify that the facility had corrected two deficiencies from a previous inspection in November 2023 related to basic services. The facility provided documentation showing both issues had been fixed and was in compliance. The inspector advised the facility to maintain these standards going forward.

Read raw inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of a Plan of Correction (POC) visit, based upon the deficiencies cited in LIC form 809D on 11/07/2023. LPA were greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. *Deficiency cited under Title 22 Regulation 87464(f)(4) pertaining to Basic Services has been cleared. Licensee provided proof of correction. Licensee has complied with the POC. *Deficiency cited under Title 22 Regulation 87464(f)(1) pertaining to Basic Services has been cleared. Licensee provided proof of correction. Licensee has complied with the POC. Licensee has been advised to maintain all areas of facility in compliance. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was left at the facility.

2023-11-29
Complaint Investigation
Substantiated
Citation on file
Inspector · Kimberly Lyman

Substantiated — the state found a violation and issued a citation. Full citation details are on file with the state.

2023-11-07
Complaint Investigation
Substantiated
Type A · 2 findings
Inspector · Kimberly Lyman

Plain-language summary

A complaint investigation found that facility staff failed to give pain medication to a hospice resident who could not communicate verbally about their pain, despite clear medication orders and education from the hospice nurse. The resident was observed in pain on multiple occasions in late January 2022 without receiving prescribed morphine, and passed away on January 29, 2022. The facility was cited for this violation.

Type A22 CCR §87464(F)(4)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87464(F)(4)

Based on records reviewed, Licensee failed to ensure R1 was being assisted with medication assistance. Per hospice documentation, resident was not receiving prescribed pain management at end of life. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

Type A22 CCR §87464(f)(1)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87464(f)(1)

Based on record review, Licensee failed to ensure care was being provided to R1. Per hospice documentation, R1's oxygen was turned off on two different occasions when hospice arrived. R1 was prescribed continuous oxygen. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

Read raw inspector notes

R1 was initially prescribed Morphine .25 mg/ml as needed for pain. Per hospice notes dated 01/05/2022 and 01/07/2022, resident is unable to make needs known and unable to verbalize pain. Facility LVN's were the ones providing the Morphine to the resident as needed. Witness indicates expressing to staff that R1 was unable to verbalize pain and would request R1 be given the medication. Resident could be observed to be in pain by moaning and grimacing. Hospice prescribed a new order of Morphine in the morning on 01/26/2022 for Morphine 0.5 mg/ml, three times daily, routine. Per hospice notes, nurse arrived in the evening of 01/26/2022 to ensure medication was being administered. Resident is observed to be in pain with no Morphine administered. Hospice notes stated that Staff 1 (S1) indicated the staff had not received an order even as there was an order for Morphine as needed, still standing. Hospice nurse administered the medication to the resident. Hospice nurse attempted to educate S1 regarding medication orders and the purpose of hospice care and the staff was "Not receptive." The next day, 01/27/2022, Hospice nurse arrived to the facility to discover facility staff had failed to administer routine or as needed Morphine, again, despite education and medication orders. Hospice nurse administered the medication during the visit and resident was put on comfort measures that day. Resident passed away on 01/29/2022. Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director Ayala and a copy of this report was provided.

2023-10-11
Complaint Investigation
Unsubstantiated
No findings
Inspector · Alvaro Ramirez Jr.

Plain-language summary

A complaint was investigated about food service issues at the facility. The investigator found conflicting information and could not gather enough evidence to prove or disprove that the problem occurred. The complaint was deemed unsubstantiated.

Read raw inspector notes

During interviews conducted with Staff 1 (S1) it was reported that the kitchen has not received complaints regarding incorrect food orders and when there has been a complaint, it has come from a resident with cognitive impairment. Based on LPA's observation and information gathered during the investigation, LPA is unable to ascertain if the allegation occurred as reported due to conflicting information. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove or refute the alleged violation occurred; therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. LPA Ramirez conducted an exit interview with ED Ayala, and a copy of this report was provided to the facility. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 six minutes and fifty-four seconds. Per Resident 1 (R1) staff are helpful, do their best and assist in a reasonable time. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNFOUNDED, meaning the allegation is false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. LPA Ramirez conducted an exit interview with ED Ayala, and a copy of this report was provided to the facility.

2023-06-29
Other Visit
No findings
Inspector · Claudia Gutierrez

Plain-language summary

During a follow-up visit to investigate an incident from June 2023, inspectors found that a resident fell and reported back pain and vomiting, which staff reported to the doctor, but when the resident's family took him to urgent care days later during an outing, he was diagnosed with rib fractures. The facility initially tried to contact the resident's responsible party by phone but did not attempt further contact after the call was not returned. Inspectors were unable to complete their investigation as the resident had not returned to the facility following the urgent care visit.

Read raw inspector notes

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Claudia Gutierrez and Dwayne Mason made an unannounced case management visit to follow-up on an incident report received by Community Care Licensing on 6/21/2023. LPAs met with Executive Director (ED) Rosa Ayala and explained the reason for the visit. Incident report dated 6/21/2023 indicated that on 6/13/2023 at about 3:00 a.m., Staff 1 (S1) and Staff 2 (S2) reported to Staff 3 (S3) that Resident 1 (R1) had redness to their back side. S3 assessed resident, they was able to move extremities with pain, and reported a 3 on a 1-10 pain scale. Resident stated he fell but could not recall details or timing. Primary Care Physician (PCP) was contacted via email and community was advised to monitor. During interviews, ED stated that on 6/13/23, R1 had one episode of vomiting and that was also reported to PCP. A record review of emails dated same date, confirm PCP was notified and inquired whether R1 was able to take a deep breath without severe pain. Staff 4 (S4) confirmed via email that R1 was able to take a deep breath without severe pain and was also “able to walk to lunch just fine” and ate breakfast and lunch with “no more episodes of throwing up.” Per ED, R1’s Responsible Party (RP) was contacted by phone, and a general voicemail was left. RP did not return facility’s call and facility staff did not make an additional attempt to contact RP. On 6/17/23, R1 was picked up for an outing with family. During outing discoloration was observed to R1’s lower back on right hand side. Family took R1 to urgent care and it was determined R1 had sustained rib fractures. During today’s visit, LPAs were unable to interview R1. R1 has not returned to facility following urgent care visit. LPAs interviewed four residents and four out of four were unable to recall observing or hearing R1 fall, and stated they had no concerns regarding falls or staff. Residents are able to call for help with a pendant or pull cord in their bedroom, should they need assistance. Per residents, staff is responsive to their needs. (Cont. LIC809-C) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LPAs reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as R1’s Physician Report (LIC 602) dated 6/06/23, progress notes for R1 dated 6/6-18/23, email correspondence between facility staff and PCP on 6/13/23, and a picture of R1’s injury taken on 6/13/23. LPA Gutierrez also obtained contact information for S1, S2, S3, and S4 who were not currently present at the facility to be interviewed. LPAs informed ED that subsequent visits and document requests could be required regarding the incident and ED stated they understood. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was left at the facility.

9 older inspections from 2022 are not shown in the free view.

9 older inspections from 2022 are not shown in the free view.

Nearby

Other facilities in Orange County.

Other memory care facilities in Orange County with similar care offerings.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Nearby cities · same county

More options in neighboring cities

Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.
Editorial Independence

StarlynnCare receives no referral commissions, lead fees, or paid placement from any operator. Rankings are derived solely from state inspection records and verified family reviews.