Arizona · Yuma

Tata&nana Place LLC.

Care Facility6 bedsDementia-trained staff(928) 248-9888
Peer rank
Top 28% of Arizona memory care
See full peer rank →
Facility · Yuma
A 6-bed Care Facility with 2 citations on file.
Licensed beds
6
Last inspection
Aug 2024
Last citation
Oct 2025
Operated by
Snapshot

A small home, reviewed on public record.

Tata&nana Place LLC

© Google Street View

Map showing location of Tata&nana Place LLC
© Mapbox · OpenStreetMap
Peer Comparison

Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.

Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.

Severity rank
55th%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
60th%
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

2 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 1 · dashed
Last citation: OCT 2025. Compared against peer median (dashed).
peer median
OCT 2025
Sep 2024as of Aug 2026

Finding distribution

2 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J
K
L
Sev 3
G
H
I
Sev 2
D2
E
F
Sev 1
A
B
C
Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

4 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.

4
reports on file
2
total deficiencies
2026-06-23
Complaint Investigation
No findings

Facility Watch · Premium

Monitor this facility.

We'll notify you if anything changes.

Official inspection and license-record changes for Tata&nana Place LLC, plus news, public reviews, and complaint mentions across the web — usually within a day of appearing online. Nothing is swept under the rug.

  • Official inspection and license-record alerts (included)
  • Broader web mentions: news, enforcement, lawsuits, closures
  • Public review and complaint mentions online
  • Source-linked alerts, usually within a day

$9/month or $59/year · Cancel anytime

Payment is processed by Stripe. Monitoring is activated within one business day. Web and review mentions are best-effort from what we can find publicly. Cancel anytime from your billing link.

2026-04-02
Complaint Investigation
No findings
2025-10-27
Complaint Investigation
R9-10-113.A.2 · 2 findings
R9-10-113.A.2A.A.C. § RR9-10-113.A.2
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-113.A.2

Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a personnel record for each employee included documentation of annually providing training and education related to recognizing the signs and symptoms of tuberculosis (TB) to individuals employed by or providing volunteer services for the health care institution, for two of two personnel sampled. The deficient practice posed a potential TB exposure risk to residents.   Findings include:     1. A review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website revealed a web page titled, "Guidelines for Preventing the Transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Health-Care Settings, 2005." The web page stated, "All health-care workers (HCWs) should receive training on the prevention, transmission, and symptoms of TB disease that is appropriate to their work responsibilities and setting. Initial training should be provided to all new employees, with annual refresher training thereafter." 2. A review of E1's and E2's personnel records revealed no documentation of training and education related to recognizing the signs and symptoms of TB. 3. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1, and no additional information was provided.

R9-10-120.F.4A.A.C. § RR9-10-120.F.4
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-120.F.4

Based on documentation review, record review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure an individual authorized to administer opioids identified the resident's need for an opioid before administering the opioid and the effect of the opioid administered. The deficient practice posed a risk to the physical health and safety of a resident. Findings include:  1. Review of the facility's policy and procedures revealed a policy titled, “POLICY: Medications, Opioids, Narcotics, Controlled Substances, and Preventing Drug Diversion,” which stated, “ 6. When an opioid is administered, the manager or caregiver who is assisting the will: A. Identify the resident’s pain prior to administration (Using pain level to identify 1-10 scale or face expression, upper limb movements, for non-vocal patient assessment will be: body movements, muscle tensions, change in behavior. These will help identify the pain level in a resident. B. Monitor the effect of the medication. C. Identify the results/ effectiveness 30-60 minutes after administration, and D. Document both (a),(b),(c), in the resident’s medical records.” 2. Review of R3’s current service plan, dated July 2025 revealed R5 was not receiving end of life care or had an active malignancy. The service plan also revealed that R3 was receiving medication administration.  3. Review of R3’s signed medication orders revealed, “Methadone 5 mg tab, take 1 tab by mouth 2 times a day.” 4. Review of R3’s medication administration record revealed Methadone 5 mg was administered twice a day from October 1, 2025 to present day.  5. In a medication review, the Compliance Officers observed the blister packs of Methadone 5 mg were empty.  6. Review of R3’s controlled substance count sheet documented the count of the Methadone. 7. Documentation was not available showing R3's need for an opioid before administering the opioid and the effect of the opioid administered. 8. In an interview, E1 reported documenting the pain level of a scheduled opioid was not needed. 9. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1, and no additional information was provided.

2024-08-19
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.