Arizona · Yuma

Maxi's Loving Place.

Care Facility8 bedsDementia-trained staff(928) 259-7318
Limited Inspection History · fewer than 4 records in 3 years
Peer rank
Top 37% of Arizona memory care
See full peer rank →
Facility · Yuma
A 8-bed Care Facility with 5 citations on file.
Licensed beds
8
Last inspection
Apr 2026
Last citation
Apr 2026
Operated by
Snapshot

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

Maxi's Loving Place

© Google Street View

Map showing location of Maxi's Loving Place
© Mapbox · OpenStreetMap
Peer Comparison

Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.

Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.

Severity rank
38th%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
52nd%
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

5 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 1 · dashed
Last citation: APR 2026. Compared against peer median (dashed).
peer median
APR 2026
Sep 2024as of Aug 2026

Finding distribution

5 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J
K
L
Sev 3
G
H
I
Sev 2
D5
E
F
Sev 1
A
B
C
Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

3 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.

3
reports on file
5
total deficiencies
2026-04-20
Annual Compliance Visit
R9-10-113.A.2 · 1 finding

Facility Watch · Premium

Monitor this facility.

We'll notify you if anything changes.

Official inspection and license-record changes for Maxi's Loving Place, plus news, public reviews, and complaint mentions across the web — usually within a day of appearing online. Nothing is swept under the rug.

  • Official inspection and license-record alerts (included)
  • Broader web mentions: news, enforcement, lawsuits, closures
  • Public review and complaint mentions online
  • Source-linked alerts, usually within a day

$9/month or $59/year · Cancel anytime

Payment is processed by Stripe. Monitoring is activated within one business day. Web and review mentions are best-effort from what we can find publicly. Cancel anytime from your billing link.

R9-10-113.A.2A.A.C. § RR9-10-113.A.2
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-113.A.2

Based on document review and interview, the health care institution's chief administrative officer failed to implement tuberculosis (TB) infection control activities, which included annually assessing the health care institution's risk of exposure to infectious TB. The deficient practice posed a potential risk of illness to residents. Findings include: 1. A review of the facility’s documentation revealed that no annual facility risk of exposure to infectious TB was completed. 2. In an interview, E4 reported that no annual facility risk assessment was completed. 3. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E4, and no additional information was provided.

2024-10-07
Other Visit
No findings
2024-01-29
Complaint Investigation
A.A.C. · 4 findings
A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the health care institution failed to administer a training program for all staff regarding fall prevention and fall recovery. The deficient practice posed a risk as organized instruction and information related to resident care and safety was not implemented. Findings include: 1. Review of the staff personnel records revealed that E6, who was hired on December 16, 2023, had no documentation of completing fall prevention and fall recovery training as required. 2. During an interview, E1 and E2 acknowledged that E6 had not completed the required fall prevention and fall recovery training.

A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure each caregivers' skills and knowledge were verified and documented before providing physical health services and according to policies and procedures, for five of five sampled caregiver personnel records reviewed, which posed a health and safety risk. Findings include: 1. Reviewed the personnel records of E1 started November 4, 2019, E2's start date December 1, 2019. E4's start date March 10, 2022, E5's start date March 18, 2022, and E6's started December 16, 2023. These sampled caregivers' records contained no verified documentation that they had skills and knowledge to care for R1's peg-tube, and R5's catheter and wound care. 2. In an interview, E1 and E2 acknowledged there was no verified documentation available for review of the caregivers' skills and knowledge for providing peg-tube care, catheter care, and R5's wound care.

A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident's written service plan was reviewed and updated at least once every three months, for one of two sampled residents receiving directed care services which posed a health and safety risk to the resident. Findings include: 1. Review of R1's medical record revealed a written service plan for directed care services that had been completed on April 19, 2023, July 21, 2023, and November 9, 2023. Based on the date of acceptance, there were no other service plans available for review for the past 12 months. 2. During an interview, E1 and E2 acknowledged R1 who had been receiving directed care services for the past 12 months did not have R1's service plan updated at least once every three months.

A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on records review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that two of two sampled residents who were unable to ambulate even with assistance, the residents' primary care provider (PCP) or other medical practitioner signed a determination stating that the residents' needs were being met. This determination was to be completed at least once every six months throughout the duration of the residents' condition to determine if the resident's needs could be met. Based upon a current resident examination and the assisted living facility's scope of services which posed a health and safety risk for two of three residents' records reviewed. The facility is licensed to provided directed care services. Findings include: 1. During an interview, E2 reported that R1 and R4 have been unable to ambulate even with assistance for the past 12 months. 2. Review of R1's and R4's medical records revealed a documented determination dated November 1, 2023 during the past 12 months. There were no updated determination completed at least once every six months throughout the duration of the residents' condition to determine if the resident's needs could be met. The determination should have been based on a current resident examination and the facility's scope of services that the resident's needs could be met. 3. In an interview, E1 and E2 acknowledged there was no determination completed as required for R1 and R3 who were unable to ambulate even with assistance.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.