Arizona · Scottsdale

Valencia Care Homes.

Care Facility10 bedsDementia-trained staff(480) 605-4002
Limited Inspection History · fewer than 4 records in 3 years
Peer rank
Top 42% of Arizona memory care
See full peer rank →
Facility · Scottsdale
A 10-bed Care Facility with 6 citations on file.
Licensed beds
10
Last inspection
Jan 2026
Last citation
Jul 2024
Operated by
Snapshot

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

Valencia Care Homes

© Google Street View

Map showing location of Valencia Care Homes
© Mapbox · OpenStreetMap
Peer Comparison

Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.

Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.

Severity rank
43rd%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
32nd%
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

6 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 1 · dashed
No citation activity in this window.
peer median
Sep 2024as of Aug 2026

Finding distribution

6 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J
K
L
Sev 3
G
H
I
Sev 2
D6
E
F
Sev 1
A
B
C
Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

2 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.

2
reports on file
6
total deficiencies
2026-01-22
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings

Facility Watch · Premium

Monitor this facility.

We'll notify you if anything changes.

Official inspection and license-record changes for Valencia Care Homes, plus news, public reviews, and complaint mentions across the web — usually within a day of appearing online. Nothing is swept under the rug.

  • Official inspection and license-record alerts (included)
  • Broader web mentions: news, enforcement, lawsuits, closures
  • Public review and complaint mentions online
  • Source-linked alerts, usually within a day

$9/month or $59/year · Cancel anytime

Payment is processed by Stripe. Monitoring is activated within one business day. Web and review mentions are best-effort from what we can find publicly. Cancel anytime from your billing link.

2024-07-25
Complaint Investigation
A.A.C. · 6 findings
A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on a documentation review and interview, the manger failed to ensure the health care institution developed and administered a training program for all staff regarding fall prevention and fall recovery that included initial training and continued competency training. The deficient practice posed a risk to the physical health and safety of a resident. Findings include: 1. In record review, the facility had no documentation to indicate E6 (hired March 23, 2023, as a caregiver) received training on fall prevention and fall recovery. 2. During an interview, E1 and E2 reported E6 worked the night shift alone. 3. During an interview, E2 acknowledged the personnel record for E6 did not include the required training.

A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver provided documentation of completion of a caregiver training program approved by the Department or the Board of Examiners for Nursing Care Institution Administrators and Assisted Living Facility Managers (NCIA), for one of five individuals sampled who was working as a caregiver. The deficient practice posed a risk if the individual was not qualified to provide the required services. Findings include: 1. A review of E4's personnel record revealed E4 was hired as a caregiver on December 18, 2023. The record included a caregiver training certificate from Arizona Assisted Living Caregiver and Manager Training Programs, LLC., ALTP 0150, dated January 25, 2013. 2. A review of the NCIA verification of caregiver training portal revealed the training program was in operation from May 11, 2009 through July 31, 2012, which made E4's certificate invalid. 3. In an interview, E2 reported E4 worked as a caregiver three night shifts per week, alone, while employed at the facility, and acknowledged documentation was not available that showed E4 completed a caregiver training program approved by the Department or the NCIA Board.

A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on documentation review, observation, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver's skills and knowledge were verified and documented before the caregiver or assistant caregiver provided physical health services, and according to policies and procedures, for one of five sampled caregivers. The deficient practice posed a risk if the employees did not have the skills and knowledge necessary to meet a resident's needs. Findings include: 1. A review of the facility's policies and procedures revealed a policy that stated "The hiring person or manager will ensure, check and document that each caregiver or assistant caregiver providing physical health services or behavioral care services have the required skills and knowledge before providing any service." 2. The Compliance Officers observed E3 working at the facility. 3. A review of E3's personnel record revealed a hire date of May 28, 2024. E3's record revealed no documentation of verifying E3's skills and knowledge. 4. In an interview, E2 acknowledged documentation was not available showing E3's skills and knowledge were verified and documented.

A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a caregiver provided evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB) as specified in R9-10-113 for one of five personnel sampled. The deficient practice posed a potential illness risk to residents. Findings include: 1. R9-10-113.A states, "If a health care institution is subject to the requirements of this Section, as specified in an Article in this Chapter, the health care institution's chief administrative officer shall ensure that the health care institution establishes, documents, and implements tuberculosis infection control activities that...2. Include: a. For each individual who is employed by the health care institution, provides volunteer services for the health care institution, or is admitted to the health care institution and who is subject to the requirements of this Section, screening, on or before the date specified in the applicable Article of this Chapter, that consists of: i. Assessing risks of prior exposure to infectious tuberculosis, ii. Determining if the individual has signs or symptoms of tuberculosis, and iii. Obtaining documentation of the individual's freedom from infectious tuberculosis according to subsection (B)(1)..." 2. A review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website revealed a web page titled, "Guidelines for Preventing the Transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Health-Care Settings, 2005." The web page stated, "If TST (Mantoux Skin Test) is used for baseline testing, two-step testing is recommended for HCW's (Health Care Workers) whose initial TST results are negative. If the first-step TST result is negative, the second-step TST should be administered 1-3 weeks after the first TST result was read." 3. A review of E6's personnel record revealed a hire date of March 23, 2023. The personnel record did not include documentation of freedom from TB. 4. During an interview, E2 acknowledged E6 did not provide documentation of freedom from infectious TB as specified in R9-10-113. Technical assistance was provided on this Rule during the compliance inspection conducted August 15, 2023.

A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, for one of five caregivers reviewed, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver provided documentation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation training (CPR) certification specific to adults which included a demonstration. The deficient practice posed a health and safety risk to residents if caregivers did not have CPR training which included a demonstration of the employee's ability to perform CPR. Findings include: 1. In record review, E4's personnel record revealed a hire date of December 18, 2023, as a caregiver. The record included documentation of a CPR certification, dated September 11, 2022, from National CPR Foundation, which was an online training program, and did not include a demonstration. 2. In an interview, E2 reported E4 worked the night shift alone, at the facility, three days a week. 3. In documentation review, a facility policy, titled, "First Aid and CPR Training...," documented, "... 2. Method and content of CPR training which includes the ability to perform and demonstrate cardiopulmonary resuscitation... " 4. In an interview, E2 acknowledged E4 did not have current documentation of CPR training, that included a demonstration of the individual's ability to perform CPR.

A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on interview and record review, for one of five employees reviewed, the manager failed to have a personnel record for an employee, as required by this Article. The deficient practice posed a risk to resident health and safety if the facility did not obtain documentation showing an employee met the requirements to provide services for the residents. Findings include: 1. In an interview, E2 reported E5 worked as a caregiver at the facility for approximately "two weeks to a month," (hire date unknown) and worked the night shift alone. 2. In record review, the facility did not have a personnel record for E5. 3. During an interview, E1 and E2 acknowledged having no personnel record for E5.

1 older inspection from 2023 are not shown above.

Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.
Valencia Care Homes · Top 42% of Arizona Memory Care