Scottsdale North Inc. a L.

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

© Google Street View
Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.
Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
2 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
2 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
2 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.
2025-06-05Annual Compliance VisitR9-10-811.C.17 · 1 finding
“Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident's medical record contained documentation of the resident's notification of the availability of vaccination for influenza (flu) and pneumonia, according to A.R.S. § 36-406(1)(d), for one of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a potential illness risk to residents. Findings include: 1. A.R.S. § 36-406(1)(d) states, "The department shall: Require as a condition of licensure that nursing care institutions and assisted living facilities make vaccinations for influenza and pneumonia available to residents on site on a yearly basis. The department shall prescribe the manner by which the institutions and facilities shall document compliance with this subdivision, including documenting residents who refuse to be immunized. The department shall not impose a violation on a license for not making a vaccination available if there is a shortage of that vaccination in this state as determined by the director." 2. A review of R1's medical record revealed R1 was offered the flu and pneumonia vaccines on August 12, 2023. However, documentation of additional offers was not available for review. 3. In an interview, E1 acknowledged R1's medical record did not contain documentation of R1's notification of the availability of vaccinations according to A.R.S. § 36-406(1)(d).”
2024-04-24Annual Compliance VisitA.A.C. · 1 finding
“Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, for a facility authorized to provide directed care services, the manager failed to ensure there was a means of exiting the facility that provided access to an outside area from which a resident could exit to a location at least 30 feet away from the facility and controlled or alerted employees of the egress of a resident from the facility. The deficient practice posed a risk if facility staff were unaware of the egress of a resident from the facility. Findings include: 1. A review of Department records revealed the facility was licensed to provide directed care services. 2. During the environmental tour, the Compliance Officer observed a door located in the resident dining area leading to the back porch. However, the door was not secured and the door chime was not activated. 3. During the environmental tour, the Compliance Officer observed multiple doors between the kitchen and living room area, one of the doors leading to the front of the facility and two doors leading to the back porch. However, the doors were not secured and the door chimes were not activated. 4. Throughout the inspection, the Compliance Officer observed residents exiting the facility to the back porch without alerting the employees. 5. In an interview, E1 acknowledged a means of exiting the facility to an outside area allowing a resident to be at least 30 feet away from the facility did not control or alert employees of the egress of a resident from the facility.”
Other facilities in Scottsdale.
Other memory care facilities near Scottsdale with similar care offerings.
Contract Decoder
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

