Arizona · San Tan Valley

Renata's Home for the Elderly 2 Inc..

Care Facility10 bedsDementia-trained staff(480) 676-3513
Peer rank
Top 40% of Arizona memory care
See full peer rank →
Facility · San Tan Valley
A 10-bed Care Facility with 5 citations on file.
Licensed beds
10
Last inspection
Last citation
May 2026
Operated by
Snapshot

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

Renata's Home for the Elderly 2 Inc.

© Google Street View

Map showing location of Renata's Home for the Elderly 2 Inc.
© Mapbox · OpenStreetMap
Peer Comparison

Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.

Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.

Severity rank
20th%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
No routine inspections
on file.
Deficiencies per inspection.

Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

5 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 1 · dashed
Last citation: MAY 2026. Compared against peer median (dashed).
peer median
MAY 2026
Sep 2024as of Aug 2026

Finding distribution

5 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J1
K
L
Sev 3
G
H
I
Sev 2
D4
E
F
Sev 1
A
B
C
Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

4 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.

4
reports on file
5
total deficiencies
2026-07-06
Complaint Investigation
No findings

Facility Watch · Premium

Monitor this facility.

We'll notify you if anything changes.

Official inspection and license-record changes for Renata's Home for the Elderly 2 Inc., plus news, public reviews, and complaint mentions across the web — usually within a day of appearing online. Nothing is swept under the rug.

  • Official inspection and license-record alerts (included)
  • Broader web mentions: news, enforcement, lawsuits, closures
  • Public review and complaint mentions online
  • Source-linked alerts, usually within a day

$9/month or $59/year · Cancel anytime

Payment is processed by Stripe. Monitoring is activated within one business day. Web and review mentions are best-effort from what we can find publicly. Cancel anytime from your billing link.

2026-05-11
Complaint Investigation
High Risk · 1 finding
High RiskA.A.C. § RR9-10-816.A.1.a
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-816.A.1.a

Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that an assisted living facility authorized to provide directed care services had policies and procedures for memory care services that were established that covered the requirements in R9-10-816.A.1. The deficient practice posed a risk as policies and procedures reinforce and clarify standards expected of employees. Findings include: 1. A review of Department documentation revealed the facility was licensed to provide directed care services. 2. A review of the facility’s documentation revealed no policies and procedures that covered the requirements in R9-10-816.A.1. 3. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E2, and no further information was provided. 4. Technical assistance was provided on this rule during the inspection conducted on August 1, 2025.

2025-08-01
Complaint Investigation
R9-10-807.A · 2 findings
R9-10-807.AA.A.C. § RR9-10-807.A
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-807.A

Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident provided evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB) as specified in R9-10-113, for two of three residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a TB exposure risk to residents.   Findings include:   1. R9-10-113.A states, "If a health care institution is subject to the requirements of this Section, as specified in an Article in this Chapter, the health care institution's chief administrative officer shall ensure that the health care institution establishes, documents, and implements tuberculosis infection control activities that...2. Include: a. For each individual who is employed by the health care institution, provides volunteer services for the health care institution, or is admitted to the health care institution and who is subject to the requirements of this Section, screening, on or before the date specified in the applicable Article of this Chapter, that consists of: i. Assessing risks of prior exposure to infectious tuberculosis, ii. Determining if the individual has signs or symptoms of tuberculosis, and iii. Obtaining documentation of the individual's freedom from infectious tuberculosis according to subsection (B)(1)..." 2. A review of R2's medical record revealed no documentation of a risk assessment of prior exposure to infectious TB or a determination if R2 had signs or symptoms of TB. Based on R2's date of acceptance, this documentation was required. 3. A review of R3's medical record revealed no documentation of a risk assessment of prior exposure to infectious TB or a determination if R3 had signs or symptoms of TB. Based on R3's date of acceptance, this documentation was required. 4. In an interview, the finding was reviewed with E2 and no additional information was provided.

R9-10-819.A.4A.A.C. § RR9-10-819.A.4
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-819.A.4

Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a disaster drill for employees was conducted on each shift at least once every three months and documented. The deficient practice posed a risk if employees were unable to implement a disaster plan. Findings include: 1. A review of the facility's personnel schedule revealed there were two shifts. 2 . A review of the facility's disaster drills revealed documentation of a disaster drill conducted on the following dates and times: -June 4, 2025 on first shift; -June 4, 2025 on second shift. However, no additional documentation of disaster drills was available for Compliance Officer review. 3. In an interview, E1 acknowledged a disaster drill for employees was not conducted on each shift at least once every three months and documented.

2023-08-28
Complaint Investigation
A.A.C. · 2 findings
A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure poisonous or toxic materials stored by the facility were stored in a locked area and inaccessible to residents. Findings include: 1. During the environmental inspection of the facility, the Compliance Officer observed an unlocked cabinet in the bathroom located in R1's and R3's shared bedroom. The cabinet contained a bottle of "Lysol All-Purpose Cleaner", a canister of "Lysol Disenfectant Spray", a bottle of "LA's Totally Awesome Bleach", and a container of "Bar Keepers Friend Cleanser". 2. The Compliance Officer observed multiple ambulatory residents on the premises. 4. In an interview, E1 and E2 acknowledged the manager failed to ensure poisonous or toxic materials stored by the facility were stored in a locked area and inaccessible to residents.

A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident bathroom contained a slip-resistant surface in the shower. Findings include: 1. During the environmental inspection of the facility, the Compliance Officer observed two shared bathrooms in the facility. Both bathrooms contained a shower. However, neither bathroom showers had a slip-resistant surface. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged the two bathroom showers in the facility did not contain slip-resistant surfaces.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.