Countryside Senior Living.

A large home, reviewed on public record.

© Google Street View
Compared to 72 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.
Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
6 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
6 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
3 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.
2025-06-05Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-08-13Complaint InvestigationA.A.C. · 4 findings
“Based on documentation review and interview, the assisted living center failed to provide the required documentation to an emergency responder when an emergency responder had been contacted. Findings include: 1. A review of facility documentation revealed a "Transfer/Move Out Report" dated July 16, 2024. The documentation included all information required except the reason the emergency responder was requested on behalf of the resident. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged documentation to an emergency responder when an emergency responder had been contacted had not included the reason the emergency responder was requested on behalf of the resident.”
“Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident's service plan included the amount, type, and frequency of assisted living services being provided to the resident, including medication administration or assistance in the self-administration of medication, for one of three residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if a resident's service plan did not include the services to be provided. Findings include: 1. A review of R1's medical record revealed a service plan dated August 1, 2023 (sic). The service plan stated "Independent" on the first page for medication services. However, on the third page of the service plan, under additional instructions, it states "as of 6/14 resident will receive assistance with med management. Medications are stored." 2. In an interview, E1 reported the service plan was actually for June 14, 2024. E1 reported instead of filling out a new service plan, E1 made a copy of R1's previous service plan and added the note under additional instructions. 3. Further review of R1's service plan revealed signatures of the resident and manager. However, the date the resident signed the service plan was not available on the service plan. 4. In an interview, E1 acknowledged R1's service plan had not included clear indication of medication services being provided to R1.”
“Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident had a written service plan signed and dated by the resident or resident's representative, for one of three residents sampled. Findings include: 1. A review of R1's medical record revealed a service plan dated August 1, 2023 (sic). The service plan revealed signatures of the resident and manager. However, the date the resident signed the service plan was not available on the service plan. 2. In an interview, E1 reported the service plan was actually for June 14, 2024. E1 reported instead of filling out a new service plan, E1 made a copy of R1's previous service plan and added the note under additional instructions. 3. In an interview, E1 acknowledged R1's service plan had not been dated when signed by the resident.”
“Based on record review, documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure service plans for residents included documentation of the resident's weight or documentation from a medical practitioner stating weighing the resident was contraindicated, for one of two residents receiving directed care services. Findings include: 1. A review of R3's personnel record revealed a service plan. However, the service plan did not include documentation of the resident's weight. 2. A review of facility documentation revealed a document titled "Monthly Weight Report." The document revealed weights taken for all residents during the months of June and July 2024. 3. In an interview, E1 acknowledged R3's service plan had not included documentation of the resident's weight.”
2024-06-11Complaint InvestigationA.A.C. · 2 findings
“Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the assisted living facility failed to provide the required documentation to an emergency responder, for one of one sampled resident for whom an emergency responder had been contacted. Findings include: 1. A review of facility documentation revealed an incident report dated May 6, 2024 for an unwitnessed fall. The documentation stated 911 was called. The incident report indicated R2 had been transported to the hospital after being found on the floor. 2. In an interview, E1 was asked for documentation of the required documentation given to the responders. E1 reported it was not done.”
“Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure when a resident had an accident, emergency, or injury resulting in the resident needing medical services, a caregiver or assistant caregiver documented the action taken to prevent the accident, emergency, or injury from occurring in the future which posted a health and safety risk. Findings include: 1. A review of the facility's documentation revealed a report dated May 6, 2024 regarding R2's fall. The report stated R2 had an unwitnessed fall. However, the documentation of any action taken to prevent the accident, emergency, or injury from occurring in the future was not available for review. Documentation stated that 911 was called. 2. Review of R2's medical record revealed that R2 required directed care and medication administration services and was ambulatory. 3. In an interview, E1 acknowledged the facility failed to document action taken to prevent the injury from reoccurring in the future”
Other facilities in Queen Creek.
Other memory care facilities near Queen Creek with similar care offerings.
Contract Decoder
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
A Caring Manor I
Queen Creek
Arden Villa LLC
Queen Creek
Arizona Sunset Assisted Living
Queen Creek
Athome Senior Care Services LLC
Queen Creek
Az Assisted Living, LLC
Queen Creek
Circles of Life Residential Care and Memory Care L
Queen Creek
East Valley Mansion Assisted Living
Queen Creek
A Caring Manor
Queen Creek


