Arizona · Phoenix

Tbi Care, Inc..

Care Facility10 bedsDementia-trained staff(913) 206-7999
Limited Inspection History · fewer than 4 records in 3 years
Peer rank
Top 20% of Arizona memory care
See full peer rank →
Facility · Phoenix
A 10-bed Care Facility with 3 citations on file.
Licensed beds
10
Last inspection
Last citation
Oct 2025
Operated by
Snapshot

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

Tbi Care, Inc.

© Google Street View

Map showing location of Tbi Care, Inc.
© Mapbox · OpenStreetMap
Peer Comparison

Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.

Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.

Severity rank
59th%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
No routine inspections
on file.
Deficiencies per inspection.

Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

3 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 1 · dashed
Last citation: OCT 2025. Compared against peer median (dashed).
peer median
OCT 2025
Sep 2024as of Aug 2026

Finding distribution

3 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J
K
L
Sev 3
G
H
I
Sev 2
D3
E
F
Sev 1
A
B
C
Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

1 inspection in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.

1
reports on file
3
total deficiencies
2025-10-22
Complaint Investigation
R9-10-806.A.8 · 3 findings

Facility Watch · Premium

Monitor this facility.

We'll notify you if anything changes.

Official inspection and license-record changes for Tbi Care, Inc., plus news, public reviews, and complaint mentions across the web — usually within a day of appearing online. Nothing is swept under the rug.

  • Official inspection and license-record alerts (included)
  • Broader web mentions: news, enforcement, lawsuits, closures
  • Public review and complaint mentions online
  • Source-linked alerts, usually within a day

$9/month or $59/year · Cancel anytime

Payment is processed by Stripe. Monitoring is activated within one business day. Web and review mentions are best-effort from what we can find publicly. Cancel anytime from your billing link.

R9-10-806.A.8A.A.C. § RR9-10-806.A.8
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-806.A.8

Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a manager, a caregiver, assistant caregiver, or a volunteer provide documentation of freedom from infectious Tuberculosis (TB) as specified in R9-10-113. The deficient practice posed a potential TB exposure risk to residents.   Findings include:   1. A record review of E3’s personnel record revealed, E3 provided one negative TB test on May 13, 2025. A second negative TB skin test was not available for review.   2. A documentation review of the facility's Policies and Procedure titled, "Amendment to Policy and Procedure" stated, “we are modifying the policy and procedures effective 01/01/2025. Our annual TB screening for new hires and current employees will be per state guidelines code R9-10-113-(B)(1)."   3. In an interview, E1 acknowledged documentation of freedom from infectious Tuberculosis (TB) was not provided for E3.

R9-10-807.B.1A.A.C. § RR9-10-807.B.1
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-807.B.1

Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that before or at the time of acceptance of an individual, the individual submits documentation that is dated within 90 calendar days before the individual is accepted by an assisted living facility and: If an individual is requesting or is expected to receive supervisory care services, personal care services, or directed care services: includes whether the individual requires: continuous medical services, continuous or intermittent nursing services, or restraints; and is dated and signed by a: Physician, Registered nurse practitioner, Registered nurse, or Physician assistant. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unable to meet a resident's needs.   Findings include:   1. A record review of R1's medical records revealed, based on the resident's admission dates, the initial or continuation medical authorization form was required. However, it was not provided. 2. A documentation review of the facility's Policies and Procedures titled "Facility Acceptance and Termination of Residency and Resident Rights Policies and Procedures, stated, "The admission process will be completed by the Manager or designee (as appropriate) This process includes: f. Appropriate placement statement signed by a Physician, Physician's assistant, Nurse Practitioner, or Registered Nurse." 3. In an interview, E1 acknowledged an initial physician statement was not available for R1 that indicated if the resident was eligible for assisted living services and if the resident received supervisory care services, personal care services, or directed care services.

R9-10-815.CA.A.C. § RR9-10-815.C
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-815.C

Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that the service plan for a resident receiving directed care services included documentation of the resident's weight, or a statement from a medical practitioner stating that weighing the resident is contraindicated. The deficient practice posed a risk as the service plan to direct services was not followed.   Findings include:   1. A record review of R1's service plan revealed, the resident received Directed Care services. Page six of R1's service plan revealed , the section titled “Recent Weights” was blank. A physician statement indicating weighing the resident would be contraindicated was not available for review. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged the manager did not ensure R1's service plan contained the resident's weight as required for Directed Care residents.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.
Tbi Care, Inc. · Top 20% of Arizona Memory Care