Arizona · Phoenix

Sheridan Garden Assisted Living.

Care Facility5 bedsDementia-trained staff(623) 907-4678
Limited Inspection History · fewer than 4 records in 3 years
Peer rank
Top 36% of Arizona memory care
See full peer rank →
Facility · Phoenix
A 5-bed Care Facility with 3 citations on file.
Licensed beds
5
Last inspection
Oct 2025
Last citation
Oct 2025
Operated by
Snapshot

A small home, reviewed on public record.

Sheridan Garden Assisted Living

© Google Street View

Map showing location of Sheridan Garden Assisted Living
© Mapbox · OpenStreetMap
Peer Comparison

Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.

Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.

Severity rank
43rd%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
50th%
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

3 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 1 · dashed
Last citation: OCT 2025. Compared against peer median (dashed).
peer median
OCT 2025
Sep 2024as of Aug 2026

Finding distribution

3 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J
K
L
Sev 3
G
H
I
Sev 2
D3
E
F
Sev 1
A
B
C
Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

1 inspection in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.

1
reports on file
3
total deficiencies
2025-10-30
Annual Compliance Visit
A.A.C. · 3 findings

Facility Watch · Premium

Monitor this facility.

We'll notify you if anything changes.

Official inspection and license-record changes for Sheridan Garden Assisted Living, plus news, public reviews, and complaint mentions across the web — usually within a day of appearing online. Nothing is swept under the rug.

  • Official inspection and license-record alerts (included)
  • Broader web mentions: news, enforcement, lawsuits, closures
  • Public review and complaint mentions online
  • Source-linked alerts, usually within a day

$9/month or $59/year · Cancel anytime

Payment is processed by Stripe. Monitoring is activated within one business day. Web and review mentions are best-effort from what we can find publicly. Cancel anytime from your billing link.

A.A.C.Repeat
Verbatim citation text

Based on record review and interview, the health care institution failed to administer a training program for all staff regarding fall prevention and fall recovery. The deficient practice posed a risk if facility staff were not properly trained to assist a resident who had fallen and was unable to recover independently.     Findings include:     1. A review of E1's personnel record revealed there was no documentation of fall prevention and fall recovery training.   2. In an interview, E2 reviewed and acknowledged that E1's personnel record did not include documentation of fall prevention and fall recovery training. This is a repeat deficiency from the compliance inspection conducted on June 2, 2022.

R9-10-113.A.2A.A.C. § RR9-10-113.A.2
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-113.A.2

Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the health care institution failed to implement tuberculosis infection control activities that included annually assessing its risk of exposure to infectious tuberculosis.   Findings include:   1. A review of the facility’s documentation revealed there was no documentation of an assessment of the health care institution's risk of exposure to infectious tuberculosis. 2. In an interview, E2 acknowledged that the health care institution failed to implement tuberculosis infection control activities that included annually assessing the health care institution's risk of exposure to infectious tuberculosis.

R9-10-817.B.3.bA.A.C. § RR9-10-817.B.3.bRepeat
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-817.B.3.b

Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a medication administered to a resident was administered in compliance with a medication order, for one of two sampled residents who received medication administration services. The deficient practice posed a risk if a resident experienced a change in condition due to improper administration of medication. Findings include: 1. A review of R2's medical records revealed a service plan, which reflected that R2 received medication administration services. 2. A review of R2's medical record revealed a medication order dated May 21, 2025 for Humalog (Lispro) INS 100 unit/ml pen inject as per sliding scale according to blood sugar: if below 150 administer zero units: 150 through 199 administer one unit; 200 through 249 administer two units; 250 through 299 administer four units; 300 through 349 administer six units; 350 through 399 administer eight units and blood sugar above 400 call primary physician. 3. A review of R2's medical record revealed a medication administration record dated October 2025, which reflected R2 was administered Humalog along with the following documented blood sugar: - 8 am on October 9, 2025, R2’s blood sugar was 153, and was administered two units; - 8 am on October 10, 2025, R2’s blood sugar was 156, and was administered two units; - 8 am on October 11, 2025, R2’s blood sugar was 150, and was administered two units; - 5 pm on October 12, 2025, R2’s blood sugar was 154, and was administered two units; - 5 pm on October 13, 2025, R2’s blood sugar was 181, and was administered two units; - 8 pm on October 13, 2025, R2’s blood sugar was 239, and was administered two units; - 8 pm on October 17, 2025, R2’s blood sugar was 263, and was administered two units; - 8 pm on October 18, 2025, R2’s blood sugar was 253, and was administered two units.  4. In an interview, E2 acknowledged R2’s Humalog was not administered to R2 in compliance with a medication order. This is a repeat deficiency from the compliance inspection conducted on June 2, 2022.

1 older inspection from 2023 are not shown above.

Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.