Arizona · Phoenix

Pleasant Stay Care Home.

Care Facility10 bedsDementia-trained staff(480) 295-6786
Limited Inspection History · fewer than 4 records in 3 years
Peer rank
Top 28% of Arizona memory care
See full peer rank →
Facility · Phoenix
A 10-bed Care Facility with 6 citations on file.
Licensed beds
10
Last inspection
Last citation
Apr 2025
Operated by
Snapshot

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

Pleasant Stay Care Home

© Google Street View

Map showing location of Pleasant Stay Care Home
© Mapbox · OpenStreetMap
Peer Comparison

Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.

Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.

Severity rank
43rd%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
No routine inspections
on file.
Deficiencies per inspection.

Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

6 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 1 · dashed
Last citation: APR 2025. Compared against peer median (dashed).
peer median
APR 2025
Sep 2024as of Aug 2026

Finding distribution

6 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J
K
L
Sev 3
G
H
I
Sev 2
D6
E
F
Sev 1
A
B
C
Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

2 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.

2
reports on file
6
total deficiencies
2025-11-18
Complaint Investigation
No findings

Facility Watch · Premium

Monitor this facility.

We'll notify you if anything changes.

Official inspection and license-record changes for Pleasant Stay Care Home, plus news, public reviews, and complaint mentions across the web — usually within a day of appearing online. Nothing is swept under the rug.

  • Official inspection and license-record alerts (included)
  • Broader web mentions: news, enforcement, lawsuits, closures
  • Public review and complaint mentions online
  • Source-linked alerts, usually within a day

$9/month or $59/year · Cancel anytime

Payment is processed by Stripe. Monitoring is activated within one business day. Web and review mentions are best-effort from what we can find publicly. Cancel anytime from your billing link.

2025-04-11
Complaint Investigation
R9-10-113.A · 6 findings
R9-10-113.AA.A.C. § RR9-10-113.A
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-113.A

Based on documentation review and interview, the health care institution failed to establish, document, and implement tuberculosis (TB) infection control activities including annually assessing the health care institution's risk of exposure to infectious TB. The deficient practice posed a TB exposure risk to residents and staff.   Findings include:   1. A review of facility documentation revealed no documentation of annually assessing the health care institution's risk of exposure to infectious TB was available.   2. In an interview, E4 and E5 acknowledged that an assessment of the health care institution's risk of exposure to infectious TB was not available for review during the inspection.

R9-10-803.A.5A.A.C. § RR9-10-803.A.5
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-803.A.5

Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to review and evaluate the effectiveness of the quality management program at least once every 12 months. The deficient practice posed a risk as a quality management program documents the necessary information required to effectively manage services provided.   Findings include:    1. A review of facility documentation revealed a quality management program reviewed in 2023. However, there was no documentation that the quality management program was reviewed and evaluated at least once every 12 months.   2. In an interview, E4 and E5 acknowledged that the facility did not have documentation of a review or evaluation of the effectiveness of the quality management program at least once every 12 months.

R9-10-811.A.5A.A.C. § RR9-10-811.A.5
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-811.A.5

Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident's medical record was protected from loss, damage, or unauthorized use. The deficient practice posed a risk of protected and sensitive resident health information being disclosed without the resident's consent or knowledge.  Findings include: 1. A.R.S. § 12-2291(6) "Medical records" means all communications related to a patient's physical or mental health or condition that are recorded in any form or medium and that are maintained for purposes of patient diagnosis or treatment, including medical records that are prepared by a health care provider or by other providers. 2. During the environmental tour, the Compliance Officer observed that as soon as you enter the house, there was an unlocked office area with medical records for R1, R2, R3, and other residents stored on top of a bookshelf. Multiple ambulatory residents and visitors were observed walking through the area, posing a risk to the confidentiality of resident information. 3. In an interview, E4 and E5 acknowledged that resident medical records were not protected from loss, damage, or unauthorized use.

R9-10-818.A.4A.A.C. § RR9-10-818.A.4
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-818.A.4

Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that an employee disaster drill was conducted on each shift at least once every three months and documented. The deficient practice posed a risk if employees were unable to implement the disaster plan. Findings include: 1. A review of the April 2025 personnel schedule revealed two shifts: 7 AM - 7 PM and 7 PM - 7 AM. 2. A review of the facility's personnel disaster drills revealed the following drills;  - March 18, 2025, 2nd shift - February 24, 2025, 2nd shift - August 05, 2024, both shifts 3. In an interview, E4 and E5 acknowledged that the employee disaster drills were not conducted on each shift at least once every three months.

R9-10-819.A.1.bA.A.C. § RR9-10-819.A.1.bRepeat
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-819.A.1.b

Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure the premises at the assisted living facility were free from a condition or situation that may cause a resident or other individual to suffer physical injury. The deficient practice posed potential dangers to residents. Findings include: 1. A review of Department records revealed the facility was licensed to provide directed care services. 2. The Compliance Officer observed one ambulatory resident. 3. During the environmental tour with E3, the Compliance Officer observed multiple safety hazards in the backyard, including: - Large piles of wood and metal debris were stacked loosely against a wall - Two unsecured window screens were leaning on the pile - Scattered construction debris, such as rocks, garden tools, and an overturned planter - Multiple mobility devices and medical equipment, including wheelchairs and walkers, were stored on the patio and around walkways - A garden hose stretched across the walking path 4. In an interview, E3, E4, and E5 acknowledged that the items in the backyard presented conditions that could cause a resident or other individual to suffer physical injury. This is a repeat deficiency from the on-site compliance inspection conducted on April 4, 2023.

R9-10-819.A.10A.A.C. § RR9-10-819.A.10
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-819.A.10

Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure an oxygen container was secured in an upright position. The deficient practice posed a potential explosion or leak of a compressed gas.   Findings include:   1. During the environmental tour, the Compliance Officer observed one large oxygen container in a resident's closet. The oxygen container was upright but not secured.   2. In an interview, E4 and E5 acknowledged that the oxygen container was not secured in an upright position.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.