Obsidian Homes Ral.

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

© Google Street View
Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.
Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
2 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
2 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
4 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.
2026-07-17Complaint InvestigationNo findings
2025-11-24Complaint InvestigationR9-10-814.B · 2 findings
“Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure the facility did not retain a resident who was confined to a bed or chair without meeting the requirements of R9-10-814(B)(2), for one of three residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unable to meet a resident's needs. Findings include: 1. A review of R1's medical record revealed the following: A current written service plan dated July 1, 2025. The service plan indicated that R1 was bedbound. A document “Initial Physician Recommendation Form” dated 1/1/2025 and signed by E3. No documentation indicating R1's medical practitioner examined R1 upon acceptance and every six months thereafter, signed and dated a determination that stated R1's needs could be met by the facility, and reviewed the facility's scope of services was available. 2. In an interview, E3 acknowledged that R1 was non-ambulatory and did not have the required documentation. 3. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E2, and no additional information was provided.”
“Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure that toxic materials were stored in a locked area and inaccessible to residents. The deficient practice posed a risk to the physical health and safety of a resident. Findings include: 1. During an environmental inspection of the facility, the Compliance Officer observed an open shelf at the end of the kitchen. The Compliance Officer observed “Great Value Bleach,” “Clorox Disinfectant Wipes - Lemon,” and “Windex - Glass Cleaner.” 2. In an interview, E2 acknowledged that cleaning supplies were not locked up. 3. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E2, and no additional information was provided.”
2025-01-03Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-09-16Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Other facilities in Phoenix.
Other memory care facilities near Phoenix with similar care offerings.
Facility Watch · Premium
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

