Arizona · Phoenix

Md Care Homes, LLC.

Care Facility10 bedsDementia-trained staff(480) 280-6837
Limited Inspection History · fewer than 4 records in 3 years
Peer rank
Top 24% of Arizona memory care
See full peer rank →
Facility · Phoenix
A 10-bed Care Facility with 2 citations on file.
Licensed beds
10
Last inspection
Jun 2025
Last citation
Jun 2025
Operated by
Snapshot

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

Md Care Homes, LLC

© Google Street View

Map showing location of Md Care Homes, LLC
© Mapbox · OpenStreetMap
Peer Comparison

Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.

Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.

Severity rank
68th%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
60th%
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

2 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 1 · dashed
Last citation: JUN 2025. Compared against peer median (dashed).
peer median
JUN 2025
Sep 2024as of Aug 2026

Finding distribution

2 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J
K
L
Sev 3
G
H
I
Sev 2
D2
E
F
Sev 1
A
B
C
Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

1 inspection in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.

1
reports on file
2
total deficiencies
2025-06-19
Annual Compliance Visit
R9-10-803.A.9 · 2 findings

Facility Watch · Premium

Monitor this facility.

We'll notify you if anything changes.

Official inspection and license-record changes for Md Care Homes, LLC, plus news, public reviews, and complaint mentions across the web — usually within a day of appearing online. Nothing is swept under the rug.

  • Official inspection and license-record alerts (included)
  • Broader web mentions: news, enforcement, lawsuits, closures
  • Public review and complaint mentions online
  • Source-linked alerts, usually within a day

$9/month or $59/year · Cancel anytime

Payment is processed by Stripe. Monitoring is activated within one business day. Web and review mentions are best-effort from what we can find publicly. Cancel anytime from your billing link.

R9-10-803.A.9A.A.C. § RR9-10-803.A.9
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-803.A.9

Based on documentation review, observation, record review, and interview, the governing authority failed to ensure compliance with A.R.S. § 36-411 for two of the three personnel sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if E1 and E2 were a danger to a vulnerable population. Findings include:  1. A.R.S. § 36-411(C)(2) states, "Each residential care institution, nursing care institution and home health agency shall make documented, good faith efforts to: 2. Verify the current status of a person’s fingerprint clearance card." 2. A review of the Arizona Department of Public Safety website revealed E1's and E2's fingerprint clearance cards were valid. 3. During the on-site compliance inspection, the Compliance Officers observed E1 and E2 at the facility, providing services to residents. 4. A review of E1's and E2's personnel records revealed documentation of a valid FPCC dated prior to E1's and E2's hire date. However, the records did not include documentation of the facility's verification of E1's and E2's FPCC. 5. In an interview, E1 acknowledged that E1's and E2's FPCC cards were not verified, and the governing authority failed to ensure compliance with A.R.S. § 36-411(C)(2).

R9-10-816.D.2A.A.C. § RR9-10-816.D.2
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-816.D.2

Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure there was a current toxicology reference guide that was available for use by personnel members. This posed a health and safety risk to the resident if the caregiver was unable to reference a toxic material. Findings include: 1. The Compliance Officer requested the current toxicology reference guide. However, the toxicology reference guide was not provided to the department for review.  2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged that the facility did not have a toxicology reference guide available for use by personnel members.

1 older inspection from 2023 are not shown above.

Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.