Ksc Care, LLC.

A small home, reviewed on public record.

© Google Street View
Compared to 1,661 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.
Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
4 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
4 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
1 inspection in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.
2025-04-03Annual Compliance VisitR9-10-803.C.1.a · 4 findings
“Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure policies and procedures were established, documented, and implemented to protect the health and safety of a resident which cover required skills and knowledge. Findings include: 1 . A review of facility documentation revealed a policy titled "Personnel." The policy stated, "A caregiver's or assistant caregiver's skills and knowledge are verified and documented before the caregiver or assistant caregiver provides physical health services it must follow policies and procedures." However, the policy did not state how skills and knowledge are verified and documented. 2 . In an interview, E2 acknowledged a policy describing how skills and knowledge are verified and documented was not available for review at the time of inspection.”
“Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure service plans for a resident receiving directed care services included documentation of the resident's weight, for one of two residents sampled. Findings include: 1 . A review of R1's medical record revealed a service plan dated March 4, 2025. The service plan reported R1 received directed care services. However, there was no documentation of the resident's weight on the service plan. 2 . In an interview, E2 acknowledged R1's service plan did not include documentation of the resident's weight.”
“Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure there was a means of exiting the facility for a resident who does not have a key, special knowledge for egress, or the ability to expend increased physical effort that controls or alerts employees of the egress of a resident from the facility. Findings include: 1 . During an environmental inspection of the facility, the Compliance Officers observed the front door and screen door leading to the front yard. The screen door has a double-sided key-locked deadbolt, and the front door had an alert at the top of the door. However, the screen door was unlocked, and the door alert was not functional at the time of inspection. 2 . During an environmental inspection of the facility, the Compliance Officers observed the sliding glass door leading to the backyard of the facility. The door had an alert. However, the alert was not functioning at the time of inspection. 3 . During an environmental inspection of the facility, the Compliance Officers observed a sliding glass door from an empty resident room leading to the backyard. The empty resident room door was unlocked, and the sliding glass door had no control or alert. 4 . In an interview, E2 acknowledged the doors that allow egress from the facility were not controlled or alerted.”
“Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a training program for all staff regarding fall prevention and fall recovery included initial training and competency training. Findings include: 1 . A review of facility documentation revealed a policy titled "Fall Prevention." However, the policy did not cover when initial training and competency training would be conducted for all employees. 2 . In an interview, E2 acknowledged a program for all staff regarding initial and competency training for fall prevention and fall recovery was not available for review.”
1 older inspection from 2023 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Other facilities in Phoenix.
Other memory care facilities near Phoenix with similar care offerings.
Contract Decoder
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

