Arizona · Phoenix

Jmj Adult Care Home LLC.

Care Facility10 bedsDementia-trained staff(619) 316-5779
Peer rank
Top 58% of Arizona memory care
See full peer rank →
Facility · Phoenix
A 10-bed Care Facility with 11 citations on file.
Licensed beds
10
Last inspection
Mar 2024
Last citation
Oct 2024
Operated by
Snapshot

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

Jmj Adult Care Home LLC

© Google Street View

Map showing location of Jmj Adult Care Home LLC
© Mapbox · OpenStreetMap
Peer Comparison

Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.

Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.

Severity rank
7th%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
20th%
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

11 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 1 · dashed
Last citation: OCT 2024. Compared against peer median (dashed).
peer median
OCT 2024
Sep 2024as of Aug 2026

Finding distribution

11 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J2
K
L
Sev 3
G
H
I
Sev 2
D9
E
F
Sev 1
A
B
C
Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

7 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.

7
reports on file
11
total deficiencies
2026-07-22
Complaint Investigation
No findings

Facility Watch · Premium

Monitor this facility.

We'll notify you if anything changes.

Official inspection and license-record changes for Jmj Adult Care Home LLC, plus news, public reviews, and complaint mentions across the web — usually within a day of appearing online. Nothing is swept under the rug.

  • Official inspection and license-record alerts (included)
  • Broader web mentions: news, enforcement, lawsuits, closures
  • Public review and complaint mentions online
  • Source-linked alerts, usually within a day

$9/month or $59/year · Cancel anytime

Payment is processed by Stripe. Monitoring is activated within one business day. Web and review mentions are best-effort from what we can find publicly. Cancel anytime from your billing link.

2026-05-29
Complaint Investigation
No findings
2024-10-24
Complaint Investigation
A.A.C. · 3 findings
A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a personnel record included documentation of compliance with the requirements in Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) \'a7 36-411(A), for one of five personnel members sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the individual was a danger to a vulnerable population. Finding include: 1. A.R.S. \'a7 36-411(A) states: "A. Except as provided in subsection F of this section, as a condition of licensure or continued licensure of a residential care institution, a nursing care institution or a home health agency and as a condition of employment in a residential care institution, a nursing care institution or a home health agency, employees and owners of residential care institutions, nursing care institutions or home health agencies, contracted persons of residential care institutions, nursing care institutions or home health agencies or volunteers of residential care institutions, nursing care institutions or home health agencies who provide medical services, nursing services, behavioral health services, health-related services, home health services or direct supportive services and who have not been subject to the fingerprinting requirements of a health professional's regulatory board pursuant to title 32 shall have valid fingerprint clearance cards that are issued pursuant to title 41, chapter 12, article 3.1 or shall apply for a fingerprint clearance card within twenty working days of employment or beginning volunteer work or contracted work." 2. A review of E3's personnel record revealed a fingerprint clearance card with an expiration date of February 12, 2024. 3. A review of the Arizona Department of Public Safety's website revealed E3's fingerprint clearance card was no longer valid. 4. In an interview, E2 confirmed there was no other documentation available for review to reflect E3 had a valid fingerprint clearance card at the time of the inspection.

A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a residency agreement included whether the manager or a caregiver was awake during nighttime hours, for one of three sampled residents. Findings include: 1. A review of R3's residency agreements revealed the agreement did not include whether the manager or a caregiver was awake during nighttime hours. 2. In an interview, E2 acknowledged the residency agreement for R3 did not include whether the manager or a caregiver was awake during nighttime hours at the assisting living home.

A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure for a facility authorized to provide directed care services, there was a means of exiting the facility for a resident who did not have a key, special knowledge for egress, or the ability to expend increased physical effort that controlled or alerted employees of the egress of a resident from the facility. The deficient practice posed a risk if employees were unaware of the egress of a resident from the facility. Findings include: 1. A review of Department documentation revealed the facility was authorized to provide directed care services. 2. A review of facility documentation revealed a policy titled "Wandering" which stated "5. Exit doors in the facility that are not wired for wander guard system may be equipped with delayed egress with an alarm that will sound if a resident exits through the door." 3. In an interview, E2 reported R1 left the facility from the front door, while E3 was taking out the trash. E1 and E2 acknowledged at the time of the incident, the exit did not have a working control or alert to notify an employee of the egress of a resident from the facility.

2024-06-10
Complaint Investigation
A.A.C. · 1 finding
A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure the central heating system maintained the facility's temperature between 70 \'b0F and 84 \'b0F at all times. The deficient practice posed a risk to the physical health and safety of residents. Findings include: 1. During the environmental inspection of the facility, the Compliance Officer observed R4's and R5's shared bedroom. Using a Department-issued infared thermometer, the Compliance Officer observed the temperature to be between 89.9 \'b0F and 92.1 \'b0F in various areas of the room. E1 was observed adjusting the window blinds and adding an additional fan to cool R4's and R5's bedroom. After E1's intervention, R4's and R5's bedroom temperature read 83.8 \'b0F 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged R4's and R5's room temperature was not maintained between 70 \'b0F and 84 \'b0F at all times.

2024-05-29
Complaint Investigation
High Risk · 3 findings
High Risk
Verbatim citation text

Based on documentation review and interview, after the manager had a reasonable basis, according to Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) \'a7 46-454, to believe abuse, neglect, or exploitation had occurred on the premises, the manager failed to initiate an investigation and document the information required in Arizona Administrative Code (A.A.C.) R9-10-803(J)(5)(a-d), within five working days. The deficient practice posed a risk to the physical health and safety of residents. Findings include: 1. A review of Department documentation revealed a document titled "Intake Information" dated May 22, 2024. The intake contained allegations of abuse and neglect regarding R1. 2. A review of facility documentation revealed there was no documentation to reflect an investigation was initiated by the facility regarding R1's allegations. 3. In an interview, E3 reported Adult Protective Services (APS) did call E1 regarding allegations of abuse and neglect made by R1, however E3 reported there was no investigation conducted by the facility regarding the allegations. This is a repeat/uncorrected deficiency from the complaint inspection conducted on April 12, 2024.

A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure before or at the time of acceptance of an individual, the individual submitted documentation dated within 90 calendar days before the individual was accepted by the assisted living facility and signed by a physician, registered nurse practitioner, registered nurse, or physician assistant to include whether the individual required continuous medical services, continuous or intermittent nursing services, or restraints, for one of two sampled residents. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unable to meet a resident's needs. Findings include: 1. A review of R1's medical record revealed no documentation indicating whether R1 required continuous medical services, continuous or intermittent nursing services, or restraints, dated and signed by a physician, registered nurse practitioner, registered nurse, or physician assistant. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged R1's medical record did not contain the required documentation.

A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a written notice of termination of residency in subsection (G) included the date of notice, the reason for termination, the policy for refunding fees, charges, or deposits, the deposition of a resident's fees, charges, and deposits, and contact information for the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. Findings include: 1. In a interview, E3 reported R1 was no longer a resident at the facility. E3 reported R1's family member was informed R1 had less than a week to move from the facility due to R1 being non-compliant with the facility's rules. 2. A review of R1's medical record revealed there was no documentation to reflect R1 or R1's representative received a required written notice of termination which included the date of notice, reason for termination the policy for refunding fees, charges, or deposits, the deposition of a resident's fees, charges, and deposits, and contact information for the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. 3. A review of facility documentation revealed there was no documentation to reflect R1 or R1's representative received a written notice of termination of residency with all required compnents. 4. In an interview, E3 reported there was no documentation of R1's written notice of termination of residency available for review.

2024-04-12
Complaint Investigation
High Risk · 2 findings
High Risk
Verbatim citation text

Based on documentation review and interview, when the manager had a reasonable basis to believe abuse, neglect, or exploitation occurred on the premises, the manager failed to initiate and document an investigation of the abuse, neglect, or exploitation within five working days. The deficient practice posed a risk if a resident was not adequately protected from abuse, neglect, or exploitation. Findings include: 1. A review of Department documentation revealed a report of an incident received on April 11, 2024. The report alleged a resident (later identified as R2) was pushed and hit by a caregiver employed at the facility. 2. A review of facility documentation revealed no documentation of an investigation initiated by the facility regarding the abuse allegation. 3. In an interview, E1 reported an investigation was initiated, however there was no documentation of the investigation. E1 reported speaking with R2 regarding the allegations, however R2 refused to discuss the allegations. E1 further reported Adult Protective Services (APS) conducted an investigation and closed the case.

A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure for a facility authorized to provide directed care services, there was a means of exiting the facility for a resident who did not have a key, special knowledge for egress, or the ability to expend increased physical effort that controlled or alerted employees of the egress of a resident from the facility. The deficient practice posed a risk if employees were unaware of the egress of a resident from the facility. Findings include: 1. A review of Department documentation revealed the facility was authorized to provide directed care services. 2. A review of facility documentation revealed a policy titled "Wandering" which stated "5. Exit doors in the facility that are not wired for wander guard system may be equipped with delayed egress with an alarm that will sound if a resident exits through the door." 3. In an interview, E1 reported R1 left the facility while the door alarms were shut off to prevent waking the residents while E1 was doing laundry. E1 and E2 acknowledged at the time of the incident, the exit did not have a working control or alert to notify an employee of the egress of a resident from the facility.

2024-03-01
Annual Compliance Visit
A.A.C. · 2 findings
A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on observation, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure documentation was maintained of the caregivers and assistant caregivers working each day, including the hours worked. The deficient practice posed a risk as there was no record to ensure shifts and tasks were covered to ensure the health and safety of residents. Findings include: 1. When the Compliance Officer arrived at the facility, E1 was the only caregiver inside the facility. E2 arrived later during the inspection. 2. A review of facility documentation revealed there was no schedule for Novemer 2023, December 2023, January 2024, or February 2024. 3. In an interview, E1 acknowledged the facility did not have an employee schedule for Novemer 2023, December 2023, January 2024, or February 2024.

A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a written order verifying a verbal order was obtained from the medical practitioner within 14 calendar days after receiving the verbal order, for one of two sampled residents. The deficient practice posed a risk if a resident experienced a change in condition due to improper medication administration or assistance in the self-administration of medication. Findings include: 1. A review of R1's medical record revealed a medication order dated December 26, 2023 for "Ropinirole 1 mg (milligram) tablet at night one hour before bed." Further review of R1's medical record revealed a medication administration record (MAR) dated January 2024. The MAR reflected R1 was administered "Ropinirole 2 mg" at 8:00 AM from January 1, 2024 through January 31, 2024. 2. In an interview, E1 reported R1's physician communicated a verbal order to the facility to change R1's dosage and time of administration for "Ropinirole." E1 acknowledged there was no documentation of R1's verbal order for "Ropinirole 2 mg."

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.