Iocam Assisted Living Home.

A small home, reviewed on public record.

© Google Street View
Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.
Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
4 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
4 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
2 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.
2025-08-05Annual Compliance VisitR9-10-819.A.2 · 2 findings
“Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a disaster plan was reviewed at least once every 12 months. The deficient practice posed a risk as a disaster plan reinforces and clarifies standards expected of employees. Findings include: 1 . A review of facility documentation revealed a document titled "Disaster Plan, Relocation, Records, Medication, Food and Water." However, the last disaster plan review was conducted on May 5, 2023 and signed by E1. 2 . In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E2, and no additional information was added.”
“Based on observation and interview, a manager failed to ensure that a rechargeable fire extinguisher was serviced at least once every 12 months, and had a tag attached to the fire extinguisher that specified the date of the last servicing and the identification of the person who serviced the fire extinguisher. The deficient practice posed a risk if safety measures were not in place to protect residents in a fire. Findings include: 1 . During an environmental inspection of the facility, the Compliance Officers observed a fire extinguisher that contained no inspection tag, and the proof of purchase receipt was dated July 9, 2023. 2 . In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E2, and no additional information was added.”
2024-01-23Annual Compliance VisitA.A.C. · 2 findings
“Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a medication administered to a resident was documented in the resident's medical record, for two of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if a resident experienced a change in condition due to improper administration of medication. Findings include: 1. A review of facility documentation revealed a policy titled "Medications including opioids and narcotics." The policy stated "The trained caregiver will initial in the MAR (Medical Administration Record) and include the date and time the medicene was given to the resident and the medications that were taken." 2. A review of R1's and R2's medical records revealed R1 and R2 received medication administration services. 3. A review of R1's medical record revealed a MAR for January 2024. R1's January 2024 MAR did not indicate the following medications were administered on January 22, 2024 at the following times: -"Acetaminophen" at 8:00 PM; -"Carbidopa-Levodopa" at 12:00 PM, 6:00 PM, and 12:00 AM; -"Famotidine" at 8:00 PM; and -"Trazodone" at 8:00 PM. 4. A review of R2's medical record revealed a MAR. R2's January 2024 MAR did not indicate the following medications were administered on January 22, 2024 at the following times -"Quetiapine" at 10:00 PM; -"Trazodone" at 10:00 PM; -"Acetaminophen" at 2:00 PM and 8:00 PM; -"Busiprone" at 8:00 PM; -"Ferrous Sulfate" (from January 19, 2024 through January 22, 2024) at 8:30 AM; -"Hydroxychloroquine" at 8:00 PM; -"Ipratropium and Albuterol" at 8:00 PM; and -"Diclofenac" at 10:00 PM. 5. In an interview, E1 reported the medication was administered and staff must have forgotten to document in the MARs. E1 acknowledged medication administered to a resident was not documented in the resident's medical record.”
“Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure medication stored by the facility was stored in a locked area. The deficient practice posed a risk to the physical health and safety of residents with access to the medication. Findings include: 1. During the environmental inspection of the facility, the Compliance Officer ovserved a glass container of "Lorazepam 2 MG" (milligrams) sitting on a tray in the refrigerator in the kitchen. The refrigerator was not locked. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged the aforementioned medication stored by the facility was not stored in a locked area.”
Other facilities in Phoenix.
Other memory care facilities near Phoenix with similar care offerings.
Full Inspection Record
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience



