Arizona · Phoenix

Hacienda Granada.

Care Facility10 bedsDementia-trained staff(602) 952-1582
Limited Inspection History · fewer than 4 records in 3 years
Peer rank
Top 23% of Arizona memory care
See full peer rank →
Facility · Phoenix
A 10-bed Care Facility with 4 citations on file.
Licensed beds
10
Last inspection
Last citation
Mar 2025
Operated by
Snapshot

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

Hacienda Granada

© Google Street View

Map showing location of Hacienda Granada
© Mapbox · OpenStreetMap
Peer Comparison

Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.

Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.

Severity rank
54th%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
No routine inspections
on file.
Deficiencies per inspection.

Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

4 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 1 · dashed
Last citation: MAR 2025. Compared against peer median (dashed).
peer median
MAR 2025
Sep 2024as of Aug 2026

Finding distribution

4 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J
K
L
Sev 3
G
H
I
Sev 2
D4
E
F
Sev 1
A
B
C
Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

3 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.

3
reports on file
4
total deficiencies
2025-05-14
Complaint Investigation
No findings

Facility Watch · Premium

Monitor this facility.

We'll notify you if anything changes.

Official inspection and license-record changes for Hacienda Granada, plus news, public reviews, and complaint mentions across the web — usually within a day of appearing online. Nothing is swept under the rug.

  • Official inspection and license-record alerts (included)
  • Broader web mentions: news, enforcement, lawsuits, closures
  • Public review and complaint mentions online
  • Source-linked alerts, usually within a day

$9/month or $59/year · Cancel anytime

Payment is processed by Stripe. Monitoring is activated within one business day. Web and review mentions are best-effort from what we can find publicly. Cancel anytime from your billing link.

2025-03-25
Complaint Investigation
A.A.C. · 2 findings
A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

C. A manager shall ensure that a personnel record for each employee or volunteer: 1. Includes: c. Documentation of: ix. Documentation of compliance with the requirements in A.R.S. § 36-411(A) and (C);

A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

F. A manager of an assisted living facility authorized to provide directed care services shall ensure that: 2. There is a means of exiting the facility for a resident who does not have a key, special knowledge for egress, or the ability to expend increased physical effort that meets one of the following: a. Provides access to an outside area that: i. Allows the resident to be at least 30 feet away from the facility, and ii. Controls or alerts employees of the egress of a resident from the facility;

2025-01-29
Complaint Investigation
A.A.C. · 2 findings
A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a personnel record for each employee included documentation of compliance with the requirements in Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) \'a7 36-411(A), for one of three employees sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if E2 was a danger to a vulnerable population. Findings include: 1. A.R.S. \'a7 36-411(A) states: "A. Except as provided in subsection F of this section, as a condition of licensure or continued licensure of a residential care institution, a nursing care institution or a home health agency and as a condition of employment in a residential care institution, a nursing care institution or a home health agency, employees and owners of residential care institutions, nursing care institutions or home health agencies, contracted persons of residential care institutions, nursing care institutions or home health agencies or volunteers of residential care institutions, nursing care institutions or home health agencies who provide medical services, nursing services, behavioral health services, health-related services, home health services or direct supportive services and who have not been subject to the fingerprinting requirements of a health professional's regulatory board pursuant to title 32 shall have valid fingerprint clearance cards that are issued pursuant to title 41, chapter 12, article 3.1 or shall apply for a fingerprint clearance card within twenty working days of employment or beginning volunteer work or contracted work." 2. A review of E2's personnel record revealed a fingerprint clearance card. However, the fingerprint clearance card expired April 2011. 3. A review of department documentation revealed technical assistance was provided for E2 on December 7, 2022 for renewing E2's fingerprint clearance card. 4. In an interview, E2 acknowledged E2 had no documentation of a current fingerprint clearance card.

A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure the means of exiting the facility for a resident who does not have a key, special knowledge for egress, or the ability to expend increased physical effort, controlled or alerted employees of the egress of a resident from the facility. The deficient practice posed a risk if staff were unaware of the egress of a resident from the facility. Findings include: 1. A review of Department documentation revealed the facility was authorized to provide directed care services. 2. During an environmental inspection of the facility, the Compliance Officers observed the following doorways exiting the facility: -Two glass sliding doors leading from separate resident rooms to the backyard of the facility. Both had alerts, however the alerts were turned off; - One door leading from a resident room to the backyard of the facility. The door had neither a control or alert; - One glass sliding door leading from the main walkway to the backyard. The door had an alert, however the alert was turned off; - One door leading from a resident room to the front yard of the facility. The door had neither a control or alert; and - One door leading to an outdoor garage area. The door had a control and an alert, however the control was not engaged and the alert was turned off. 3. In an interview, E2 acknowledged the doors mentioned previously had either no control or alerts, or the alerts were turned off and could pose a risk to the residents.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.
Hacienda Granada · Top 23% of Arizona Memory Care