Arizona · Phoenix

Christian Care Manor II, Inc..

Care Facility46 bedsDementia-trained staff(602) 443-5475
Limited Inspection History · fewer than 4 records in 3 years
Peer rank
Top 27% of Arizona memory care
See full peer rank →
Facility · Phoenix
A 46-bed Care Facility with 7 citations on file.
Licensed beds
46
Last inspection
Last citation
Sep 2025
Operated by
Snapshot

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

Christian Care Manor II, Inc.

© Google Street View

Map showing location of Christian Care Manor II, Inc.
© Mapbox · OpenStreetMap
Peer Comparison

Compared to 72 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.

Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.

Severity rank
46th%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
No routine inspections
on file.
Deficiencies per inspection.

Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

7 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 1 · dashed
Last citation: SEP 2025. Compared against peer median (dashed).
peer median
SEP 2025
Sep 2024as of Aug 2026

Finding distribution

7 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J
K
L
Sev 3
G
H
I
Sev 2
D7
E
F
Sev 1
A
B
C
Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

3 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.

3
reports on file
7
total deficiencies
2025-09-04
Complaint Investigation
A.A.C. · 6 findings

Facility Watch · Premium

Monitor this facility.

We'll notify you if anything changes.

Official inspection and license-record changes for Christian Care Manor II, Inc., plus news, public reviews, and complaint mentions across the web — usually within a day of appearing online. Nothing is swept under the rug.

  • Official inspection and license-record alerts (included)
  • Broader web mentions: news, enforcement, lawsuits, closures
  • Public review and complaint mentions online
  • Source-linked alerts, usually within a day

$9/month or $59/year · Cancel anytime

Payment is processed by Stripe. Monitoring is activated within one business day. Web and review mentions are best-effort from what we can find publicly. Cancel anytime from your billing link.

A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure the health care institution developed and administered a training program for all staff regarding fall prevention and fall recovery. The deficient practice posed a risk if a staff member was not properly trained to assist a resident who had fallen and was unable to recover independently.   Findings Include   1. A record review of E2's personnel record revealed, E2 did not receive Fall Prevention and Recovery training as required upon initial hire.   2. A documentation review of the facility's Policies and Procedures titled, "Fall Prevention and Fall Recovery programs" stated, "All staff will be initially trained and continued competency training in fall prevention and recovery."   3. In an interview, E1 acknowledged the manager did not ensure E2 received fall prevention and fall recovery training at initial hire as required.

R9-10-806.A.4A.A.C. § RR9-10-806.A.4
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-806.A.4

Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver's or assistant caregiver's skills and knowledge were verified and documented before the caregiver or assistant caregiver provided physical health services or behavioral health services.   Findings include:   1. A record review of the personnel files for E2 revealed, the employee did not have a completed orientation, Fall Prevention and Recovery, or Tuberculosis (TB) training, available for review.   2. A documentation review of the facility's Policies and Procedures titled, "Caregiver qualifications" stated, "The AL Director shall ensure documentation of the following: Individuals Qualifications, Skills, Training, and Knowledge applicable to job duties by the following: A, Caregiver Training and Orientation Checklist." A documentation review of the facility's Policies and Procedures titled, "Tuberculosis" stated, " Annual training and education related to recognizing the signs and symptoms of Tuberculosis to individuals employed by or providing volunteer services for the healthcare institution." A documentation review of the facility's Policies and Procedures titled, "Fall Prevention and Fall recovery programs" stated, "All staff will be initially trained and continued competency training in fall prevention and fall recovery."   4. In an interview, E1 acknowledged the manager did not ensure E2's caregiver skills and knowledge were verified and documented before the caregiver or assistant caregiver provided physical health services or behavioral health services, according to policies and procedures.

R9-10-806.A.8A.A.C. § RR9-10-806.A.8
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-806.A.8

Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that an employee provided documentation of freedom from infectious Tuberculosis (TB) as specified in R9-10-113, for two of four sampled employees. The deficient practice posed a potential TB exposure risk to residents.   Findings include:   1. A record review of E3's and E4’s personnel records revealed, each employee provided one negative TB test. A second TB test was not submitted for either employee.   2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged E3 nor E4 did not provided documentation of freedom from infectious Tuberculosis (TB) as specified in R9-10-113.

R9-10-819.A.2A.A.C. § RR9-10-819.A.2
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-819.A.2

Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a disaster plan was reviewed at least once every 12 months. The deficient practice posed a risk as a disaster plan reinforces and clarifies standards expected of employees.   Findings include:   1. A documentation review of the facility’s Policy & Procedures section titled “Disaster Plan Review and signature page”, showed the Disaster Plan was lasted reviewed on January 5, 2024.   2. A documentation review of the facility's Policies and Procedures titled, "Disaster Plan and Evacuation drill“ stated, "The disaster plan is reviewed and the review is documented at least once every 12 months and includes the date and time of the disaster plan review, the names of each employee or volunteer participating in the disaster plan review, a critique of the disaster plan view, and if applicable, recommendations for improvement.”   3. In an interview, E1 acknowledged the manager did not ensure the Disaster Plan was reviewed every 12 months as required.

R9-10-819.A.4A.A.C. § RR9-10-819.A.4
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-819.A.4

Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure the manager failed to ensure a disaster drill for employees was conducted on each shift at least once every three months and documented. The deficient practice posed a risk if employees were unable to implement a disaster plan.   Findings include:   1. A documentation review of the facility’s "Fire/Disaster Drill Participants” revealed, the last disaster drill was completed on December 18, 2024.   2. A documentation review of the facility's Policies and Procedures manual titled, "Fire and Disaster Drill Procedures" stated, "Drills are scheduled on a yearly calendar in general one drill per quarter per each of the 3 shifts for each type of drill.”   3. In an interview, E1 acknowledged the manager did not ensure a disaster drill for employees was conducted on each shift at least once every three months and documented.

R9-10-819.A.5.aA.A.C. § RR9-10-819.A.5.a
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-819.A.5.a

Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure an evacuation drill for employees and residents was conducted once every six months and documented. The deficient practice posed a risk if employees were unable to implement a disaster plan.   Findings include:   1. A documentation review of the facility’s "Evacuation Drill” revealed that the last evacuation drill was completed on April 17, 2024.   2. A documentation review of the facility's Policies and Procedures manual titled, "Disaster Plan and Evacuation drill" stated, “Employee and resident evacuation drills will be completed every six months.”   3. In an interview, E1 acknowledged the manager did not ensure an evacuation drill for employees and residents was conducted once every six months and documented.

2024-12-10
Complaint Investigation
No findings
2024-05-06
Complaint Investigation
A.A.C. · 1 finding
A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a fire inspection was conducted by the local fire department according to the time-frame established by the local fire department. Findings include: 1. A review of facility documentation revealed documented fire inspection reports. However, the documentation revealed the most current fire inspection from the City of Phoenix was conducted March 23, 2021 and expired March 22, 2024. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged the most current fire inspection was conducted March 23, 2021 and expired March 22, 2024.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.