Arizona · Phoenix

Best Care Home of Moon Valley LLC.

Care Facility5 bedsDementia-trained staff(602) 296-5596
Limited Inspection History · fewer than 4 records in 3 years
Peer rank
Top 24% of Arizona memory care
See full peer rank →
Facility · Phoenix
A 5-bed Care Facility with 2 citations on file.
Licensed beds
5
Last inspection
Apr 2025
Last citation
Apr 2025
Operated by
Snapshot

A small home, reviewed on public record.

Best Care Home of Moon Valley LLC

© Google Street View

Map showing location of Best Care Home of Moon Valley LLC
© Mapbox · OpenStreetMap
Peer Comparison

Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.

Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.

Severity rank
54th%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
73rd%
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

2 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 1 · dashed
Last citation: APR 2025. Compared against peer median (dashed).
peer median
APR 2025
Sep 2024as of Aug 2026

Finding distribution

2 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J
K
L
Sev 3
G
H
I
Sev 2
D2
E
F
Sev 1
A
B
C
Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

2 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.

2
reports on file
2
total deficiencies
2025-04-17
Annual Compliance Visit
R9-10-815.F.2 · 2 findings

Facility Watch · Premium

Monitor this facility.

We'll notify you if anything changes.

Official inspection and license-record changes for Best Care Home of Moon Valley LLC, plus news, public reviews, and complaint mentions across the web — usually within a day of appearing online. Nothing is swept under the rug.

  • Official inspection and license-record alerts (included)
  • Broader web mentions: news, enforcement, lawsuits, closures
  • Public review and complaint mentions online
  • Source-linked alerts, usually within a day

$9/month or $59/year · Cancel anytime

Payment is processed by Stripe. Monitoring is activated within one business day. Web and review mentions are best-effort from what we can find publicly. Cancel anytime from your billing link.

R9-10-815.F.2A.A.C. § RR9-10-815.F.2
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-815.F.2

Based on observation, documentation review and interview the manager failed to ensure there was a means of exiting the facility to control or alert employees of the egress of a resident from the facility for 3 of 3 doors.  The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unaware of the general or specific whereabouts of a resident. Findings include: 1. The facility was licensed at the Directed Care level of services. 2. During the facility tour the Compliance officers observed doors leading to the outside area were not secured or alarmed.   There were alarms on 3 of 3 doors that were turned off.   The door leading to the backyard had a  door alarm with batteries that were not functioning. 3. During document review the Compliance Officer revealed a policy and procedure titled “Wandering Residents” which stated, “... if alarms are being used on doors and /or windows, the caregiver will check them daily for operation and security;  a. Alarms that are triggered will be investigated immediately by the caregiver on duty”. 4. In an interview, E1 acknowledged that a means of exiting the facility to control or alert employees of the egress of a resident from the facility was not functioning.

R9-10-817.C.4.aA.A.C. § RR9-10-817.C.4.a
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-817.C.4.a

Based on observation, documentation and interview the manager failed to ensure that food is obtained, and stored as follows; Potentially hazardous foods requiring refrigeration are maintained at 41° F or below.  The deficient practice posed a risk for potential food borne illnesses. Findings include: 1. During the facility tour the Compliance Officers observed the temperature of the refrigerator was above 41 degrees.   The refrigerator had two thermometers which read 48 degrees and 52 degrees. 2. In a review of facility policy and procedure a policy, the Compliance Officers revealed a policy titled “Food Service” which stated,   “Food stored in the refrigerator shall maintain a temperature of 41 degrees Fahrenheit or below”. 3. During an interview, E1 acknowledged that food was not stored per the policy which read food stored in the refrigerator shall maintain a temperature of 41 degrees Fahrenheit or below.

2023-09-06
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.