Arcadia Woods Assisted Living LLC.

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

© Google Street View
Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.
Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
5 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
5 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
3 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.
2026-06-25Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-09-19Complaint InvestigationA.A.C. · 3 findings
“Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident had a written service plan that accurately included the amount, type, and frequency of assisted living services being provided to the resident, for three of three sampled residents. Findings include: 1. A review of R1's medical record revealed a service plan dated May 17, 2024. R1's service plan stated R1 required assistance grooming and dressing daily. However, R1's service plan did not state the amount of services R1 was expected to receive. 2. A review of R2's medical record revealed a service plan dated July 5, 2024. R2's service plan stated R2 required assistance grooming and dressing daily. However, R2's service plan did not state the amount of services R2 was expected to receive. 3. A review of R3's medical record revealed a service plan dated July 22, 2024. R3's service plan stated R3 required assistance grooming and dressing daily. However, R3's service plan did not state the amount of services R3 was expected to receive. 4. In an interview, E1 acknowledged R1's, R2's, and R3's service plans did not reflect the amount of services R1, R2, and R3 were expected to receive.”
“Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure for a facility authorized to provide directed care services, there was a means of exiting the facility for a resident who does not have a key, special knowledge for egress, or the ability to expend increased physical effort and provided access to an outside area which allowed the resident to be at least 30 feet away from the facility and controlled or alerted employees of the egress of a resident from the facility. Findings include: 1. A review of Department documentation revealed the facility was authorized to provide directed care services. 2. During a facility tour with E2, one of three patio doors leading to the backyard, did not have a alarm, alert, or control to notify an employee of a resident's egress from the facility. 3. In an interview, E2 acknowledged one of three patio doors did not alert employees of the egress of a resident from the facility at the time of inspection.”
“Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure the premises and equipment were free from a condition or situation that may cause a resident or other individual to suffer physical injury. Findings include: 1. During the environmental inspection of the facility, the compliance officer observed R4 in a geriatric chair with an attached table. R4 was observed being wheeled to and from the kitchen area, and out of R4's bedroom while in the geriatric chair. . In an interview, E2 reported R4 could not get out of the chair unless the tray was removed. E2 reported R4 was ambulatory and could not remove the tray without staff's assistance. E2 reported could only walk around with staff supervision, and would speak with R4's family regarding another solution to monitor R4's whereabouts in the facility.”
2024-04-24Complaint InvestigationA.A.C. · 2 findings
“Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a personnel record for each employee or volunteer included documentation of evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB), if required for the individual according to subsection (A)(8), for four of four sampled personnel members. The deficient practice posed a potential TB exposure risk to residents. Findings include: 1. A review of E1's, E2's, E3's and E4's personnel records revealed documentation of freedom from infectious tuberculosis. However, documentation of a baseline symptom screening was not available for review. 2. In an interview, E3 acknowledged E1's, E2's, E3's, and E4's personnel records did not include all required documentation of evidence of freedom from TB.”
“Based on documentation review, record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver or an assistant caregiver documented the services provided to a resident in the resident's medical record, for one of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a health and safety risk as services could not be verified as provided against a service plan. Findings include: 1. A review of facility documentation revealed a policy titled "Provision of Services." The policy stated "A manager shall ensure that a caregiver or assistant caregiver provides a resident with the assisted living services in the resident's service plan; Documents the services provided in the resident's ADL (Activities of Daily Living), MAR (Medication Administration Record) or Service Notes..." 2. A review of R1's medical record revealed a service plan. The service plan indicated R1 required assurance checks daily and nightly every 30 minutes. However, documentation of assurance checks completed every 30 minutes for R1 was not available for review. 3. In an interview, E3 acknowledged R1's medical record did not include documentation of "assurance checks" provided to R1. This is a repeat citation from the compliance and complaint inspection conducted on August 11, 2023.”
1 older inspection from 2023 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Other facilities in Phoenix.
Other memory care facilities near Phoenix with similar care offerings.
Facility Watch · Premium
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience



