Ahwatukee Adult Care III.

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

© Google Street View
Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.
Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
2 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
2 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
1 inspection in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.
2024-10-18Annual Compliance VisitA.A.C. · 2 findings
“Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that before or at the time of acceptance of an individual, the individual submitted documentation dated within 90 calendar days before the individual was accepted by an assisted living facility, and, if an individual was requesting or expected to receive supervisory care services, personal care, services, or directed care services, was dated and signed by a Physician, Registered nurse practitioner, Registered nurse, or Physician assistant, for one of three residents sampled. Findings include: 1. A review of R2's medical record revealed a document titled, "Determination Letter," which did not state if R2 was requesting or expected to receive supervisory care services, personal care, services, or directed care services. The document was signed dated by a Physician. No other documentation dated within 90 calendar days before R2 was accepted by an assisted living facility and signed by a Physician, Registered nurse practitioner, Registered nurse, or Physician assistant which stated if R2 was requesting or expected to receive supervisory care services, personal care, services, or directed care services was available for review. 2. In an interview, E3 acknowledged R2's "Determination Letter" form did not state if R2 was requesting or expected to receive supervisory care services, personal care, services, or directed care services.”
“Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure medications stored by the facility were stored in a locked area. The deficient practice posed a health and safety risk to residents with access to the medications. Findings include: 1. During the environmental inspection of the facility, the Compliance Officer observed an unlocked medication cabinet in the common area. The unlocked medication cabinet contained medication for six residents. 2. In an interview, E2 And E3 acknowledged the medications were not stored in a locked area and were accessible to residents.”
Other facilities in Phoenix.
Other memory care facilities near Phoenix with similar care offerings.
Full Inspection Record
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience



