Arizona · Peoria

Salter Springs Assisted Living LLC.

Care Facility10 bedsDementia-trained staff(623) 399-9191
Peer rank
Top 42% of Arizona memory care
See full peer rank →
Facility · Peoria
A 10-bed Care Facility with 3 citations on file.
Licensed beds
10
Last inspection
Mar 2026
Last citation
Mar 2026
Operated by
Snapshot

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

Salter Springs Assisted Living LLC

© Google Street View

Map showing location of Salter Springs Assisted Living LLC
© Mapbox · OpenStreetMap
Peer Comparison

Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.

Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.

Severity rank
24th%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
50th%
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

3 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 1 · dashed
Last citation: MAR 2026. Compared against peer median (dashed).
peer median
MAR 2026
Sep 2024as of Aug 2026

Finding distribution

3 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J1
K
L
Sev 3
G
H
I
Sev 2
D2
E
F
Sev 1
A
B
C
Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

4 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.

4
reports on file
3
total deficiencies
2026-03-24
Annual Compliance Visit
R9-10-817.F.1 · 1 finding

Facility Watch · Premium

Monitor this facility.

We'll notify you if anything changes.

Official inspection and license-record changes for Salter Springs Assisted Living LLC, plus news, public reviews, and complaint mentions across the web — usually within a day of appearing online. Nothing is swept under the rug.

  • Official inspection and license-record alerts (included)
  • Broader web mentions: news, enforcement, lawsuits, closures
  • Public review and complaint mentions online
  • Source-linked alerts, usually within a day

$9/month or $59/year · Cancel anytime

Payment is processed by Stripe. Monitoring is activated within one business day. Web and review mentions are best-effort from what we can find publicly. Cancel anytime from your billing link.

R9-10-817.F.1A.A.C. § RR9-10-817.F.1
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-817.F.1

Based on observation, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure medication was stored in a separate locked room, closet, cabinet, or self-contained unit used only for medication storage. The deficient practice posed a risk to the resident’s health and safety. Findings include: 1. During an environmental tour of the facility, the Compliance Officer observed an unlocked cabinet containing resident medications. The cabinet was located in a laundry room. The Compliance Officer observed that the door leading into the laundry room was also unlocked. The cabinet contained a variety of medications in bags and boxes, including Metoprolol, Amlodipine, Cephalexin, Sertraline, Lorazepam, Olanzapine, Pantoprazole, Albuterol Sulfate, Oxybutynin, and numerous other medications.  2. A review of the facility’s policies and procedures revealed a policy titled, “Medication and Medication Services Policies and Procedures” which stated the following: · “The policy for storing medications is that the facility will store medications for residents in a locked area. · The procedures for discarding medications are: a. When a resident has terminated residency or the mediations have expired, medications purchased by the resident’s representative or family, [sic] will be offered back to the resident’s representative or family and as follows: 1) If the family refuses to accept the medications, the medications will be returned to the pharmacy where the medications were purchased; 2) If the medications are not able to be returned to the pharmacy or it is impractical to return medications, the facility will dispose of the medications; 3) The facility will dispose of the medications by mixing the medications with hydrogen peroxide and kitty litter. The mixture of medications, hydrogen peroxide and kitty litter will be bagged and put in the trash. If kitty litter and hydrogen peroxide are not available, the medications will be placed in water until they are partially dissolved, then bagged and place [sic] in the trash; 4) Disposal of medications will be documented on the Medication Disposal Log and signed and dated by the person disposing of the medications and whenever possible, signed and dated by a witness.” 2. In an interview, E1 reported the medications were stored in the laundry room for disposal. E1 also reported the laundry room door was always locked. 3. In the exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1, and no additional information was provided.

2025-04-15
Complaint Investigation
High Risk · 1 finding
High RiskA.A.C. § RR9-10-803.J
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-803.J

Based on documentation review and interview, after the manager had a reasonable basis, according to Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) § 46-454, to believe abuse, neglect, or exploitation had occurred on the premises, the manager failed to report the suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation, initiate an investigation of the alleged abuse, neglect, or exploitation, and maintain documentation including all requirements of this rule for at least 12 months after the date the investigation was initiated. The deficient practice posed a risk if a resident was not protected from abuse, neglect, or exploitation.   Findings include:   1. In an interview, E1 reported being aware of an incident involving R1 on March 18, 2025. E1 stated that on the morning of the incident, R1 had a hospice nurse give R1 a bed bath. The hospice nurse observed bruises on R1's chest and arms, and the nurse mentioned it to the caregivers. The caregivers checked up on R1 and saw the bruises. The caregiver contacted the manager, but the incident was not reported in compliance with A.R.S. § 46-454.    2. A review of facility incident reports revealed a report created for the incident involving R1 on March 18, 2025. However, the report did not indicate that the manager or any other employee reported the suspected abuse according to A.R.S. § 46-454.   3. In an interview, E1 acknowledged the incident was not reported as required.

2025-02-13
Complaint Investigation
No findings
2024-11-06
Complaint Investigation
A.A.C. · 1 finding
A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure poisonous or toxic materials were maintained in a locked area and inaccessible to residents. The deficient practice posed a risk to the physical health and safety of a resident. Findings include: 1. The Compliance Officer observed ambulatory residents. 2. The Compliance Officer observed toxic materials stored in an unlocked cabinet located in a bedroom. This cabinet did not have a locking mechanism and was accessible to residents. The following toxic materials that were observed: - Disinfecting wipes; - A bottle of Pine-Sol multi surface cleaner; - A bottle of Great Value Toilet Bowl Cleaner; and - A spray bottle of Odoban disinfectant. 3. In an interview, E1 acknowledged the toxic materials listed above were not locked and were accessible to residents.

1 older inspection from 2023 are not shown above.

Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.