Sky Vista.

A large home, reviewed on public record.

© Google Street View
Compared to 116 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.
Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.
among peers to rank.
on file.
Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
4 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
4 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
6 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.
2026-05-12Complaint InvestigationNo findings
2026-02-24Complaint InvestigationR9-10-806.A.8 · 1 finding
“Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure an employee provided documentation of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB) as specified in R9-10-113, for one of seven employees sampled. The deficient practice posed a potential TB exposure risk to residents. Findings include: 1. R9-10-113.A states "If a health care institution is subject to the requirements of this Section, as specified in an Article in this Chapter, the health care institution's chief administrative officer shall ensure that the health care institution establishes, documents, and implements tuberculosis infection control activities that...2. Include: a. For each individual who is employed by the health care institution, provides volunteer services for the health care institution, or is admitted to the health care institution and who is subject to the requirements of this Section, screening, on or before the date specified in the applicable Article of this Chapter, that consists of: i. Assessing risks of prior exposure to infectious tuberculosis, ii. Determining if the individual has signs or symptoms of tuberculosis, and iii. Obtaining documentation of the individual's freedom from infectious tuberculosis according to subsection (B)(1)..." 2. A review of E4's personnel record revealed a TB blood test that was dated after E4's date of hire. The test stated "Result Name: T-SPOT.TB Result: Borderline Comments Normal Value: Negative the patient's test result cannot be definitively as positive or negative. Retesting of the patient is recommended although there is no set guideline established for the time interval between an initial borderline result and a retest. The T-SPOT.TB is a diagnostic aid. If the test result remains borderline upon retesting, other diagnostics and/or epidemiologic information should be used to help to determine the Mycobacterium infectious tatus of the patient. The T-SPOT.TB test is qualitative and results are reported as positive, borderline or negative, given that the test controls perform as expected. In line with the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention's 2010 recommendation to report quantitative measurements along side the qualitative result, the laboratory provides spot counts for informational purposes only. The T-SOT.TB test should not be interpreted as as a quantitative test." No further documentation of freedom from infectious TB was available. 3. Documentation review revealed that E4 was on the facility's active employee roster. 4. In an exit interview, findings were reviewed with E1, E7, O1 and O2, and no additional information was provided.”
2025-03-27Complaint InvestigationR9-10-113.A · 2 findings
“Based on record review and interview, the health care institution's chief administrative officer failed to ensure training and education related to recognizing the signs and symptoms of tuberculosis (TB) was provided annually to individuals employed by the health care institution for seven of seven personnel sampled. The deficient practice posed a potential illness risk to residents. Findings include: 1. A review of E1's, E2's, E3's, E4's, E5's, E6's, and E7's personnel records revealed documentation of initial training and education related to recognizing the signs and symptoms of TB. However, documentation of annual training and education related to recognizing the signs and symptoms of TB, which is required at least once every 12 months, was not available for review for 2023 and 2024. 1. In an interview, E1 acknowledged that E1's, E2’s, E3’s, E4’s, E5’s, E6’s, and E7's documentation of annual training and education related to recognizing the signs and symptoms of TB at least once every 12 months was not available for review for 2023 and 2024.”
“Based on the record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident medical record contained documentation showing the pneumonia vaccination was offered every 12 months to three of the three residents reviewed. The deficient practice posed a potential illness risk to residents. Findings include: 1. A review of R2's and R4's records revealed no documentation showing that the pneumonia vaccination was offered or received. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged that R2's and R4's records did not include current documentation showing that the pneumonia vaccination was offered or received.”
2024-05-13Complaint InvestigationA.A.C. · 1 finding
“Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure the health care institution developed and administered a training program for all staff regarding fall prevention and fall recovery. The deficient practice posed a risk to the physical health and safety of a resident. Findings include: 1. Review of facility documentation revealed a policy and procedure titled "Fall Reduction Program". This policy listed annual training on "Falls overview; Back Safety; Assistive Devices; Transfer and Ambulation; Competency Checklist". However, this document did not list training in fall recovery. 2. Review of E1's, E2's, E3's, E4's, and E5's personnel records revealed no documentation showing completion of fall recovery training. 3. In an interview, E5 reported that not all staff received training on fall recovery, and that some get it during orientation. E5 acknowledged E1's, E2's, E3's, E4's, and E5's personnel records did not contain documentation that showed the health care institution had administered a training program for all staff regarding fall recovery. 4. This is a repeat deficiency from the complaint investigation conducted June 22, 2023.”
2024-02-12Complaint InvestigationNo findings
2023-12-26Complaint InvestigationNo findings
1 older inspection from 2023 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Other facilities in Mesa.
Other memory care facilities near Mesa with similar care offerings.
Tour Prep
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

