Catarina's Care Home.

A small home, reviewed on public record.

© Google Street View
Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.
Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
5 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
5 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
1 inspection in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.
2025-09-25Annual Compliance VisitA.A.C. · 5 findings
“Based on record review and interview, the health care institution failed to ensure the health care institution developed and administered a training program for all staff regarding fall prevention and fall recovery that included initial training and continued competency training. The deficient practice posed a risk to the physical health and safety of a resident. Findings include: 1. Review of E1's personnel record revealed E1 had a hire date of October 1, 2024. The personnel record did not include documentation that showed E1 completed fall prevention and fall recovery training. 2. In an exit interview, findings were discussed with E1 and no additional information was provided.”
“Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure there was a means of exiting the facility for a resident who did not have a key, special knowledge for egress, or the ability to expend increased physical effort, that provided access to an outside area, and monitored or alerted employees of the egress of a resident from the facility. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unaware of the general or specific whereabouts of a resident. Findings include: 1. Review of the license issued by the Department revealed the facility was authorized to provide directed care services. 2. During the environmental inspection, the Compliance Officer observed that the back door leading to the outdoors did not alert when opened. The alert mechanism appeared to be broken and missing a piece that would make the alert sound. 3. In an exit interview, the findings were discussed with E1 and no additional information was provided.”
“Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a disaster plan was reviewed at least once every 12 months. The deficient practice posed a risk as a disaster plan reinforces and clarifies standards expected of employees. Findings include: 1. A review of the facility's Disaster Relocation Plan revealed the disaster plan was last reviewed on June 30, 2023. 2. A review of the facility's policies and procedures revealed a policy titled "Emergency and Safety" that stated, "2. The disaster required in subsection (A)(1) is reviewed and the review is documented at least once every 12 months..." 3. In an exit interview, the findings were discussed with E1 and no additional information was provided.”
“Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a disaster drill for employees was conducted on each shift at least once every three months and documented. The deficient practice posed a risk if employees were unable to implement a disaster plan. Findings include: 1. A review of the employee's work schedule revealed the facility had two shifts: day and evening. 2. A review of the facility's disaster drills revealed a drill conducted on the following dates and times: September 3, 2024 - 9:15 AM September 3, 2024 - 2:40 PM September 2, 2025 - 7:30 AM 3. In an exit interview, the findings were discussed with E1 and no additional information was provided.”
“Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a rechargeable fire extinguisher was serviced at least once every 12 months, and had a tag attached to the fire extinguisher that specified the date of the last servicing and the identification of the person who serviced the fire extinguisher. The deficient practice posed a risk if safety measures were not in place to protect residents in a fire. Findings include: 1. During an environmental inspection of the facility, the Compliance Officer observed two fire extinguishers that contained no inspection tag, and the proof of purchase receipts were dated October 5, 2021 and July 16, 2024. 2. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1 and no additional information was added.”
1 older inspection from 2023 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Other facilities in Mesa.
Other memory care facilities near Mesa with similar care offerings.
Facility Watch · Premium
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

