StarlynnCare

California · San Bruno

Ismaela's Home Care, Inc.

RCFE

A Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) is a non-medical residential care home licensed by California CDSS under Health & Safety Code §1560. Residents receive assistance with daily living activities such as bathing, dressing, meals, and medication management in a home-like setting. RCFEs are not hospitals or skilled nursing facilities — they do not provide round-the-clock medical care.

468 Hazel Avenue · San Bruno, 94066

Quick facts

Licensed beds6
Memory careNot listed
Last inspectionAug 2025
Last citationJul 2025
Operated byIsmaela's Home Care, Inc.
Map showing location of Ismaela's Home Care, Inc.

Quality snapshot

Updated April 25, 2026

Compared to 214 California RCFE facilities of similar size, over the last 36 months.

Source: California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing Division. View raw inspection records →

Quality grade· click to show how this was calculated

Severity
15th

Weighted citations per bed

Repeats
100th

Repeat deficiencies as share of total

Frequency
18th

Deficiencies per inspection

Tick mark at 50% = peer median · higher percentile = better facility

Ismaela's Home Care, Inc. scores C−. Better than 44% of comparable California RESIDENTIAL CARE ELDERLY facilities. Severity: bottom 15%. Repeats: top 0%. Frequency: bottom 18%.

Each metric is converted to a 0–100 percentile within the peer set (higher = better). The composite grade averages all four. Peer set: CA / rcfe_general / small beds (214 facilities).

Citation severity over time

stable

Weighted severity score per month · 24 months

May 24peer medianApr 26

Weighted score (24mo)

23

Last citation

Jul 25

Finding distribution

8 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

IsolatedPatternWidespreadJKLG4HID4EFABCSev 4 · IJSev 3Sev 2Sev 1

View inspections & citations

The rules that apply to this facility

California Title 22 requirements for this facility, with the specific regulation and a suggested question for each.

What training are all staff required to complete?22 CCR §87411

All direct-care staff must complete:

  • 10 hours initial training within the first four weeks of employment.
  • 4 hours annual in-service every year thereafter.
  • Administrator certificate from a CDSS-approved program — 80 hours for first-time, 40 hours renewal every 2 years.

Ask on tour: Ask when the last staff training was completed and how it's tracked.

How many staff must be on duty overnight?22 CCR §87415

Based on 6 licensed beds:

One qualified staff member must be on call and physically on premises at all times overnight.

Violation pattern to watch for:A facility that documents a staff member as "on call" but with that person physically off-site — when the law requires on-premises presence — is in violation of this section.

Ask on tour: Ask the facility to walk you through their overnight staffing plan and confirm whether on-call staff are on premises or off-site.

What health conditions can this facility legally accept or refuse?22 CCR §87612–87615

Restricted — allowed with physician order + care plan

  • Supplemental oxygen
  • Insulin and injectable medications
  • Indwelling or intermittent catheters
  • Colostomy / ileostomy
  • Stage 1 and Stage 2 pressure injuries
  • Wound care (non-complex)
  • Incontinence
  • Contractures

Prohibited — facility must refuse or discharge

  • Stage 3 or Stage 4 pressure injuries
  • Feeding tubes (PEG, NG, or J-tube)
  • Tracheostomies
  • Active MRSA or communicable infections requiring isolation
  • 24-hour skilled nursing needs
  • Total ADL dependence with inability to communicate needs

A hospice waiver (HSC §1569.73) can allow continued care for residents on hospice who would otherwise fall into a prohibited category.

Ask on tour: Ask whether your loved one's specific care needs are restricted or prohibited, and what the facility's process is if needs change after admission.

What must this facility report to the state — and how fast?22 CCR §87211 / WIC §15630
  • ImmediateElopement, fire, epidemic outbreak, or poisoningImmediately
  • 2 hoursAbuse with serious bodily injury2-hour phone report + 2-hour written report — to the California Department of Social Services (CDSS), Adult Protective Services, and law enforcement
  • 24 hrsAbuse without serious bodily injuryWithin 24 hours
  • Next dayDeath of a residentPhone by next working day; written within 7 days
  • Next dayInjury requiring medical treatment beyond first aidPhone by next working day; written within 7 days
  • WrittenBankruptcy, foreclosure, eviction, or utility shutoff noticeWritten notice to CDSS and residents — $100/day penalty (max $2,000) for failure

Your enforcement lever:Incidents that aren't reported on time are themselves a separate violation. If you believe a reportable event wasn't filed, you can submit a complaint directly to the California Department of Social Services (CDSS).

How does CDSS enforce these rules?22 CCR §87755–87777 / HSC §1569.58
  1. 1Notice of DeficiencyWritten citation with a correction deadline. Facility must submit a Plan of Correction.
  2. 2Civil PenaltyStarts at $50/day for non-serious; $150/day for serious deficiencies — immediately, with no grace period. Repeats escalate to $150 first day + $50/day, then $1,000 first day + $100/day.
  3. 3Suspension of AdmissionsFacility cannot accept new residents until violations are corrected.
  4. 4Temporary Suspension or RevocationEmergency suspension for imminent danger; full revocation after administrative hearing.
  5. 5Exclusion OrderAdministrator and operator can be barred from all CDSS-licensed facilities — not just this one.

See how these rules have been applied to this specific facility:

View state inspection record and citations

State records

California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing
License number
415600162
License type
RESIDENTIAL CARE ELDERLY
License status
LICENSED
License expires
Not yet indexed
Licensed beds
6
Operator
Ismaela's Home Care, Inc.

Inspections & citations

6

reports on file

9

total deficiencies

4

Type A (actual harm)

InspectionAugust 6, 2025
No deficiencies

Plain-language summary

On August 6, 2025, regulators conducted an unannounced visit to confirm that the facility was closing. No residents were present at the facility, and the licenseeholder confirmed they no longer wished to operate. The facility has been closed as of this inspection.

View full inspector notes

On August 6, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced case management visit to confirm facility closure. LPA met with Licensee, Florinda Guinto and explained the purpose of the visit. On 5/6/25, CCL was notified by the Licensee of facility closure. During the visit today, LPA observed the kitchen, living room, dining room, resident rooms, and backyard. LPA observed that there are currently no residents at the facility. LPA did not observe any residents and did not observe evidence of care and supervision In the home. CCLD will be proceeding with the closure as the Licensee is no longer interested in maintaining a license. A forfeiture letter will be sent to licensee and the facility number 410600162 shall be closed. This report is reviewed, and discussed with the Licensee, and a copy is provided.

ComplaintJuly 1, 2025· MixedType A
1 deficiency

Inspector: Murial Han

Plain-language summary

A complaint investigation found that staff told two residents "Bye Bye" in a threatened manner after a visit from regulators—this allegation was substantiated. A separate allegation that staff yelled at a resident over medication questions was substantiated, though the resident later acknowledged the staff member was knowledgeable and did explain the medication changes after consulting with the hospital nurse. A third allegation of staff yelling at residents during dinner could not be proven and was deemed unsubstantiated.

View full inspector notes

LPA interviewed resident #1(R1) and resident #2 (R2) who stated that after a visit from the LPA and the Ombudsman, they were told by staff in a threatened manner, "Bye Bye". In addition, both of these residents related this information to a State Official. After the investigation, this allegation is deemed to be substantiated. Regarding to the allegation of- staff member yelled at resident in care- the reporting party stated that when resident #1 (R1) asked the staff about the medication, the staff telling R1 "I am busy" and yelled at R1. As part of the investigation, LPA interviewed staff #1 (S1), and R1 and another resident. According to S1, they never yelled at R1 and other residents. S1 stated that R1 was recently hospitalized and returned to the facility with a lot of new medication and changes with the current ones. R1 was persistent and asked about the changes of all the medications before S1 had a chance to review them with the hospital nurse so S1 told R1 to wait but never yelled at R1. . LPA interviewed R1 who stated that he/she was afraid of S1 and S1 yelled at R1 and other residents. LPA interviewed R2 who stated that S1 got angry one day during dinner and yelled at R1. Residents also reported to a State Official that S1 got angry and yelled at them. After the investigation, this allegation is deemed to be substantiated. Based on interviews, record reviews, and observations during the investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, this allegation was determined to be substantiated. Deficiencies of the California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC9099-D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Report was discussed with the licensee; a copy is provided with Appeal Rights provided. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LPA interviewed R1 who stated that S1 initially got angry and yelled at S1 when S1 asked about the medication changes (this was addressed on LIC 9099) but later S1 explained it to R1 after speaking to the hospital nurse. R1 also stated that S1 is very knowledgeable with R1's medication. Based on these observations, and interviews the above allegation is deemed to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegations are unsubstantiated. The report is reviewed and discussed with the Licensee. A copy is provided.

Type ACCR §87468.1(a)(3)

Regulation

87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (3) To be free from punishment, humiliation, intimidation, abuse, or other actions of a punitive nature,...

Inspector finding

This requirement is not met as evidenced by based on observation and interviews.. R1 and R2 reported that they were being threatened and yelled at by facility staff which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

InspectionMarch 5, 2025Type A
2 deficiencies

Inspector: Murial Han

Plain-language summary

This was a routine annual inspection conducted in March 2025, during which inspectors found the facility clean, safe, and properly maintained, with secure medication storage, appropriate food supplies, and comfortable living conditions throughout the building. One deficiency was cited regarding a regulatory requirement, and the facility was asked to submit proof of current liability insurance by the deadline provided. Inspectors reviewed resident and staff files and found no safety hazards in the building or grounds.

View full inspector notes

On March 6, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced annual inspection. LPA met with licensee, Florinda Guinto and explained the purpose of the visit. The administrator, Charito Rafael arrived at the end of the inspection. The Licensee provide a toured of the facility and grounds. No accessible bodies of water or fire safety hazards observed. LPA toured the facility inside and outside including all of resident rooms, common areas, and kitchen area. The indoor and outdoor passageways were free of obstruction. Comfortable temperature is maintained and lighting is sufficient for comfort. On the main floor, LPA observed total of 5 bedrooms (2 staff rooms and 3 shared resident rooms) and on the lower level, LPA observed a big bedroom with a bath/shower room inside. Hot water temperature in the kitchen, and bathroom was measured at 105-136 degree F. Extra linen was present. Medications were locked and inaccessible to residents. 2 days for perishables and & 7 days non-perishable were observed to be present. A review of (5) resident files was conducted and noted on the LIC 858. A review of (2) staff files was conducted and noted on the LIC 859. The following information/form is requested to be submitted to CCLD BY 3/7/2025: - Proof of current Liability Insurance Based on observation, deficiency is cited under California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC 809D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. This report is reviewed and discussed with licensee and administrator. A copy of this report and the appeal rights were provided.

Type ACCR §87303(e)(2)

Regulation

(e) Water supplies and plumbing fixtures shall be maintained as follows: (2) Faucets used by residents for personal care such as shaving and grooming shall deliver hot water. Hot water temperature controls shall be maintained to automatically regulate the temperature of hot water used by residents to attain a temperature of not less than 105 degre…

Inspector finding

Based on [(observation) (interview) (record review)], the licensee did not comply with the section cited above the hot water temperatures in the resident's bathroom were measured at 136 degrees which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 03/06/2025 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 The administrator/licensee will submit a plan in writing to ensure that hot water temperature is within the range of 105-120. The administrator/Licensee will submit a c…

Type B

Regulation

(2) In addition to paragraph (1), training requirements shall also include an additional 20 hours annually, eight hours of which shall be dementia care training, as required by subdivision (a) of Section 1569.626, and four hours of which shall be specific to postural supports, restricted health conditions, and hospice care, as required by subdivisi…

Inspector finding

Based on [(observation) (interview) (record review)], the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as 2 staff members did complete the annual required training which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 03/13/2025 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 The administrator/licensee will provide a plan to ensure all staff will complete the required training and the administrator/licensee will provide a copy of the training records for the…

Other visitMarch 26, 2024Type A
5 deficiencies

Inspector: Murial Han

Plain-language summary

During a routine annual inspection on March 26, 2024, inspectors found that toxins and sharp objects were unlocked and accessible to residents, which is a violation. The facility otherwise maintained appropriate medication storage, safe temperatures, adequate lighting, and proper grab bars in bathrooms, and the inspector requested documentation of the administrator's certification and liability insurance by March 28, 2024.

View full inspector notes

On March 26, 2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced annual inspection. LPA met with licensee, Florinda Guinto and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured facility and grounds. On the main level, 3 bedrooms are occupied by 5 residents--one has a private bathroom--and 2 rooms are occupied by staff with one bed in each--one has a private bathroom. There is a common bathroom for residents and another common bathroom for staff. In the backyard, there is a room used by staff and another room for the former administrator which is level with the backyard. No accessible bodies of water or fire safety hazards observed. Medications is stored appropriately and inaccessible to resident. Toxins and sharps are observed to be unlocked and accessible to residents. A comfortable temperature is maintained, and lighting is sufficient for comfort and safety. Toilet and bathing facilities are equipped with grab bars and nonskid flooring material. There are 5 residents present, and 2 staff. LPA reviewed 4 resident and 4 staff files. Hot water temperature is measured at 108- 115 degrees F. Fire extinguisher was last checked on 5/9/2023. Charito Rafael is a certified RCFE administrator for the facility. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 The following information/forms are requested to be submitted to CCLD BY 3/28/24: - A written letter from the Licensee appointing Charito Rafael as the administrator - Proof of the renewal Administrator Certification application submitted for Charito Rafael - Proof of current Liability Insurance - Designation of Facility Responsibility (LIC308) Based on observation, deficiency is cited under California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC 809D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. This report is reviewed and discussed with licensee. A copy of this report and the appeal rights were provided.

Type ACCR §87305(a)

Regulation

Prior to construction or alterations, all facilities shall obtain a building permit.

Inspector finding

Based on [(observation) (interview) (record review)], the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as LPA observed the storage room on the facility sketch behind the laundry has been altered to a staff room which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 03/27/2024 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 The administrator/licensee will remove all the furniture in the storage room by 3/27/2024 and provide photos to CCL. In addition, the administr…

Type ACCR §87309(a)

Regulation

(a) Disinfectants, cleaning solutions, poisons, firearms and other items which could pose a danger if readily available to clients shall be stored where inaccessible to clients.

Inspector finding

Based on [(observation) (interview) (record review)], the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as LPA observed chemical stored underneath the sink were unlocked which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 03/27/2024 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 The administrator/licensee will develop a plan to ensure compliance and the plan shall include staff education. The administrator will provide proof that chemicals are locked and inacce…

Type BCCR §87412(b)(3)(B)

Regulation

(b) Personnel records shall be maintained for all volunteers and shall contain the following: (3) For volunteers that are required to be fingerprinted pursuant to Section 87355, Criminal Record Clearance: (B) Documentation of either a criminal record clearance or a criminal record exemption as required by Section 87355(e).

Inspector finding

Based on [(observation) (interview) (record review)], the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as 3 out of 4 staff did not have criminal clearance record in the personnel records which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 04/08/2024 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 The administrator/licensee will develop a plan to ensure compliance and will provide a copy of the plan to CCL by 4/8/2024.

Type B

Regulation

(c) A facility shall conduct a drill at least quarterly for each shift. The type of emergency covered in a drill shall vary from quarter to quarter, taking into account different emergency scenarios. An actual evacuation of residents is not required during a drill. While a facility may provide an opportunity for residents to participate in a drill,…

Inspector finding

Based on [(observation) (interview) (record review)], the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as the facility was not able provide proof that drills were conducted in 2023 to present which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 04/08/2024 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 The administrator/licensee will develop a plan to ensure compliance and on the plan, it shall indicate when the drills will be conducted. The administrator/l…

Type BCCR §87303(a)

Inspector finding

87303 Maintenance and Operation (a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Deficient Practice Statement 1 2 3 4 Based on [(observation) (interview) (record review)], the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as LPA observed fruit flies in the resident bathroom, dining room, kitchen, hallway, etc. and the overall facility (resident rooms, staff rooms, kitchen, dining room) appeared to be cluttered with files, paperwork, clothes, fruits, plasti…

InspectionDecember 22, 2022
No deficiencies

Inspector: Audrey Jeung

Plain-language summary

This was a routine inspection where the licensing agency met with facility staff to discuss the administrator's status and the facility's future viability. The inspector reviewed personnel requirements and governance accountability with management, and requested an updated health screening for the licensee to be submitted by December 28, 2022. Staff acknowledged a previously cited deficiency from November 2022.

View full inspector notes

LPA Jeung met with staff to obtain update on licensee/administrator Rady Peredo. LPA also discussed options for the facility moving forward, as the viability of corporation is questionable. CCR 87411 (f) Personnel Requirements and CCR 87205 Accountability of Licensee Governing Body are reviewed with Ms. Guinto. Updated health screening for licensee is requested to be submitted to CCLD by 12/28/22. Acknowledgement of corrected deficiency cited on 11/17/22 is given to staff--1 page.

ComplaintNovember 17, 2022Type B
1 deficiency

Inspector: Audrey Jeung

Plain-language summary

This was a complaint investigation where an inspector toured the facility and found the building, grounds, and safety systems in order—including proper storage of medications and hazardous materials, working grab bars and nonskid flooring in bathrooms, and a complete first-aid kit. The facility was cited for a deficiency in state regulations that required submission of specific documents by December 1, 2022. No violations related to resident care, infection control, or staff qualifications were identified during the inspection.

View full inspector notes

LPA Audrey Jeung toured facility and grounds. On the main level, 3 bedrooms are occupied by 5 clients--one has a private bathroom--and 3 rooms are occupied by staff with one bed in each--one has a private bathroom. There is a common bathroom for clients and another common bathroom for staff. One of the staff rooms is behind the laundry room. In the backyard, there is a room used by staff that is on a level lower than the backyard. The licensee/administrator's room is level with backyard and accessed from backyard. No accessible bodies of water or fire safety hazards observed. Infection control practices are reviewed: entry procedures, staff training and policies, resident monitoring, containment strategies, environmental preparation and cleaning. PPE supply is adequate. Medications, toxins and sharps are stored appropriately and inaccessible to clients, a comfortable temperature is maintained, and lighting is sufficient for comfort and safety. Toilet and bathing facilities are equipped with grab bars and nonskid flooring material. Liquid soap is available at all sinks. First-aid kit is inspected and complete. A Disaster and Mass Casualty Plan is posted. There are 5 residents present, and 2 staff, plus the live-in family member. Criminal record clearances are maintained for staff and other non-clients. Current first aid training and health screenings for staff are reviewed. Charito Rafael is a certified RCFE administrator (x 10/23) that oversees facility operations. The following information/forms are requested to be submitted to CCLD BY 12/1/22: - Proof of current Liability Insurance - Administrative Organization (LIC309) - Designation of Facility Responsibility (LIC308) - Personnel Report (LIC500) - Proof of Control of property (IE: grant deed) Deficiency of the RCFE California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 is observed and cited on a following page..

Type BCCR §87411(f)

Regulation

(f) All personnel, including the licensee and administrator, shall be in good health, and physically and mentally capable of performing assigned tasks.  Good physical health shall be verified by a health screening, including a chest x-ray or an intradermal test, performed by a physician not more than six (6) months prior to or seven (7) days after …

Inspector finding

Based on review of staff records, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above, as 2 out of 6 staff do not have health screening and TB test results on file, which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. Health screening and TB test results for Staff MG and PM are not maintained. POC Due Date: 12/01/2022 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 Copies of current health screenings and TB test results for staff PM and MG will be sent to CCLD BY DUE DATE.

Federal summary

CMS Care Compare

Not a CMS-certified facility

California RCFEs (residential care facilities for the elderly) are licensed by the state, not by CMS. CMS data only applies to skilled nursing facilities or to CCRCs that operate a licensed SNF wing.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

No published reviews yet. Use the button above to share your experience.

← Back to San Bruno