StarlynnCare

California · Redwood City

Brookdale Redwood City

RCFE · Memory Care

A Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) is a non-medical residential care home licensed by California CDSS under Health & Safety Code §1560. Residents receive help with daily living activities such as bathing, dressing, and medication management. An RCFE with a Memory Care designation is additionally required by California Title 22 (§87705 and §87706) to provide specialized staff training in dementia care, individualized care plans for residents with cognitive impairment, and appropriate supervision protocols — requirements that go beyond a standard RCFE license.

485 Woodside Rd · Redwood City, 94061

Quick facts

Licensed beds130
Memory careYes
Last inspectionJan 2025
Last citationJan 2025
Operated byBlc-woodside Terrace Lp
Map showing location of Brookdale Redwood City

Quality snapshot

Updated April 25, 2026

Compared to 33 California RCFE memory care facilities of similar size, over the last 36 months.

Source: California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing Division. View raw inspection records →

Quality grade· click to show how this was calculated

Severity
78th

Weighted citations per bed

Repeats
100th

Repeat deficiencies as share of total

Frequency
88th

Deficiencies per inspection

Tick mark at 50% = peer median · higher percentile = better facility

Brookdale Redwood City scores A−. Better than 89% of comparable California RESIDENTIAL CARE ELDERLY facilities. Severity: 78th percentile. Repeats: top 0%. Frequency: top 12%.

Each metric is converted to a 0–100 percentile within the peer set (higher = better). The composite grade averages all four. Peer set: CA / rcfe_memory_care / xl beds (33 facilities).

Citation severity over time

stable

Weighted severity score per month · 24 months

May 24peer medianApr 26

Weighted score (24mo)

10

Last citation

Jan 25

Finding distribution

1 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

IsolatedPatternWidespreadJKLG1HIDEFABCSev 4 · IJSev 3Sev 2Sev 1

View inspections & citations

The rules that apply to this facility

California Title 22 requirements for this facility, with the specific regulation and a suggested question for each.

What dementia-care training must staff complete?22 CCR §87705 / HSC §1569.625

Because this facility markets dementia or Alzheimer's care, state law mandates higher training standards:

  • 12 hours initial dementia training — 6 hours before a staff member works independently with residents, 6 more within the first 4 weeks.
  • 8 hours annual dementia in-service — required every year thereafter.
  • Administrator CE — the administrator must include 8 hours of dementia-specific continuing education in every 2-year recertification cycle.

Training must cover individualized care plans, behavioral expressions, appropriate supervision, and the facility's dementia care philosophy.

Ask on tour: Ask how dementia training records are kept — families may request documentation.

How many staff must be on duty overnight?22 CCR §87415

Based on 130 licensed beds:

One awake caregiver on duty, one on-call caregiver physically on premises, and one additional on-call caregiver.

Violation pattern to watch for:A facility that documents a staff member as "on call" but with that person physically off-site — when the law requires on-premises presence — is in violation of this section.

Ask on tour: Ask the facility to walk you through their overnight staffing plan and confirm whether on-call staff are on premises or off-site.

What health conditions can this facility legally accept or refuse?22 CCR §87612–87615

Restricted — allowed with physician order + care plan

  • Supplemental oxygen
  • Insulin and injectable medications
  • Indwelling or intermittent catheters
  • Colostomy / ileostomy
  • Stage 1 and Stage 2 pressure injuries
  • Wound care (non-complex)
  • Incontinence
  • Contractures

Prohibited — facility must refuse or discharge

  • Stage 3 or Stage 4 pressure injuries
  • Feeding tubes (PEG, NG, or J-tube)
  • Tracheostomies
  • Active MRSA or communicable infections requiring isolation
  • 24-hour skilled nursing needs
  • Total ADL dependence with inability to communicate needs

A hospice waiver (HSC §1569.73) can allow continued care for residents on hospice who would otherwise fall into a prohibited category.

Ask on tour: Ask whether your loved one's specific care needs are restricted or prohibited, and what the facility's process is if needs change after admission.

What must this facility report to the state — and how fast?22 CCR §87211 / WIC §15630
  • ImmediateElopement, fire, epidemic outbreak, or poisoningImmediately
  • 2 hoursAbuse with serious bodily injury2-hour phone report + 2-hour written report — to the California Department of Social Services (CDSS), Adult Protective Services, and law enforcement
  • 24 hrsAbuse without serious bodily injuryWithin 24 hours
  • Next dayDeath of a residentPhone by next working day; written within 7 days
  • Next dayInjury requiring medical treatment beyond first aidPhone by next working day; written within 7 days
  • WrittenBankruptcy, foreclosure, eviction, or utility shutoff noticeWritten notice to CDSS and residents — $100/day penalty (max $2,000) for failure

Your enforcement lever:Incidents that aren't reported on time are themselves a separate violation. If you believe a reportable event wasn't filed, you can submit a complaint directly to the California Department of Social Services (CDSS).

How does CDSS enforce these rules?22 CCR §87755–87777 / HSC §1569.58
  1. 1Notice of DeficiencyWritten citation with a correction deadline. Facility must submit a Plan of Correction.
  2. 2Civil PenaltyStarts at $50/day for non-serious; $150/day for serious deficiencies — immediately, with no grace period. Repeats escalate to $150 first day + $50/day, then $1,000 first day + $100/day.
  3. 3Suspension of AdmissionsFacility cannot accept new residents until violations are corrected.
  4. 4Temporary Suspension or RevocationEmergency suspension for imminent danger; full revocation after administrative hearing.
  5. 5Exclusion OrderAdministrator and operator can be barred from all CDSS-licensed facilities — not just this one.

See how these rules have been applied to this specific facility:

View state inspection record and citations

State records

California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing
License number
415600874
License type
RESIDENTIAL CARE ELDERLY
License status
LICENSED
License expires
Not yet indexed
Licensed beds
130
Operator
Blc-woodside Terrace Lp

Inspections & citations

24

reports on file

2

total deficiencies

1

Type A (actual harm)

ComplaintMarch 13, 2025
No deficiencies

Inspector: John Calandra

Plain-language summary

A complaint was investigated regarding physical plant conditions at the facility. Investigators determined the allegations were unfounded—meaning they found no evidence the problems described actually occurred. The facility was notified of the findings.

View full inspector notes

Since the allegations are alleged to have occurred in areas our agency has no jurisdiction or inspection authority over, these allegations are determined to be unfounded due to being unable to investigate because of no inspection authority. The Department has investigated the complaint allegations of possible physical plant violations. It was determined the allegations are unfounded, meaning the allegations are false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis and therefore dismissed. This report is reviewed and discussed with facility representative and exit interview conducted.

Other visitJanuary 9, 2025
No deficiencies

Inspector: John Calandra

Plain-language summary

On January 9, 2025, a state licensing analyst visited the facility to follow up on a deficiency that had been cited the previous day. The analyst found that the facility had corrected the deficiency and no new problems were identified during this visit.

View full inspector notes

On 1/9/2025, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) John Calandra arrived at the facility to conduct a Plan of Correction visit in regards to the deficiency cited on 1/8/2025. LPA Calandra was greeted by Monica Ceron-Tapia and explained the purpose of the visit. No deficiencies were cited during today's visit. This report was reviewed with Monica Ceron-Tapia, Executive Director and a copy of the report along with the Plan of Correction(POC) clearance letter were left at the facility.

InspectionJanuary 9, 2025
No deficiencies

Inspector: John Calandra

Plain-language summary

On January 9, 2025, state inspectors conducted the facility's annual inspection and found no violations. The inspector reviewed resident records and medications, checked water temperature, and toured the building—all met requirements. The facility was asked to send a copy of its liability insurance to the state by January 16, 2025.

View full inspector notes

On 1/9/2025, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) John Calandra arrived at the facility at 9:00 AM to continue the 1-year required Annual Inspection. LPA was greeted by Monica Ceron-Tapia, Executive Director and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the physical plant. Hot water temperature was measured within the 105-120 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA Calandra reviewed 6 resident records. All were observed to be complete. A review of Centrally stored medications indicated that medications for residents were properly labeled with instructions on dosage and times of day and matched the Centrally Stored Medication records kept at the facility. LPA requested copies of the following documents be sent to the Department by 1/16/2025: Current LIC 500 Liability Insurance No deficiencies were cited during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of the report was left at the facility.

Other visitJanuary 8, 2025Type A
1 deficiency

Inspector: John Calandra

Plain-language summary

An annual inspection was conducted on January 8, 2025, which included a tour of the facility's three-story building with 108 rooms, review of resident and staff files, and checks of fire safety systems, food storage, temperature control, and furnishings—all of which were found to be in order. The inspection is ongoing and will be completed at a later date, with any deficiencies to be cited under state regulations.

View full inspector notes

On 1/8/2025, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) John Calandra arrived at the facility at 12:30 PM to conduct the Annual 1-year required inspection. LPA Calandra was greeted by Patricia Melara, Assistant Executive Director and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Calandra toured the physical plant. This is a 3-story building with 108 bedrooms and bathrooms, a library, kitchen, dining room, lobby, and offices. Per interview with the Assistant Executive Director, the facility's fire alarm system is directly connected to the fire department. The facility's fire alarm panel was observed to be in working order. All bedrooms had the required furniture and sufficient lighting. The facility was maintained at a comfortable temperature. The facility had the required 7 days of non perishables and 2 days of perishables on hand. No food was expired. During the visit, LPA collected the following documents: Administrator Certificate LPA Calandra reviewed 2 resident files and 6 staff files. The Annual inspection will be completed at a later date. Deficiencies are cited under the California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Failure to correct the deficiencies by the due date may result in civil penalties . An exit interview was conducted. This report was reviewed with Patricia Melara, Assistant Executive Director and a copy of the report left at the facility.

Type A

Regulation

§1569.311: Carbon Monoxide Detectors Required; inspection: Every residential care facility for the elderly shall have one or more carbon monoxide detectors in the facility that meet the standards established in Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 13260) of Part 2 of Division 12. The department shall account for the presence of these detectors during…

Inspector finding

Based on observation and interview of facility's maintenance director, the facility does not have carbon monoxide detectors, which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 01/09/2025 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 Administrator/Licensee to purchase and install one or more Carbon Monoxide detectors in the facility and submit a plan of correction by the POC due date.

InspectionJanuary 31, 2024
No deficiencies

Inspector: Jaime Vado

Plain-language summary

During a follow-up visit on January 31, 2024, inspectors reviewed an incident from January 27, 2024 in which a family member yelled at a resident in their room while visiting; a caregiver witnessed the incident and attempted to help, but the family member did not allow staff assistance. The facility spoke with the resident about what happened, monitored the resident for any changes, and worked toward resolving the situation between the family member and resident. No violations were found.

View full inspector notes

On 01/31/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaime Vado conducted an unannounced case management - incident visit. LPA met with administrator and explained the purpose of this visit. Per SOC341 received on this day during an annual inspection, LPA and administrator discussed this incident. SOC341 was being submitted and incident report report to the Department on this day regarding a family member yelling at a resident over the weekend on 01/27/2024 who is their sibling that resides in the facility. Caregiver witnessed this in response to a call light to the resident's room. Caregiver tried to de-escalate the incident as the resident's health and safety was in jeopardy. The family member did not allow staff to assist the resident and the report was made regarding the incident to appropriate staff and the Department. Facility spoke with the resident to understand what happened and a resolution is being worked out between family member and resident. Resident has been monitored for any changes in condition. SOC341 was received in person on this day. Incident report will be sent to the Department on this day. No citations issued. Report discussed with administrator.

Other visitJanuary 31, 2024
No deficiencies

Inspector: Jaime Vado

Plain-language summary

During a routine annual inspection on January 31, 2024, inspectors found the facility's resident rooms, food supplies, medications, fire safety equipment, and general maintenance to be in order, with no violations noted. The administrator's certificate had expired but the renewal application was already submitted and pending approval. Staff files and resident files were scheduled for review at a later date.

View full inspector notes

On 01/31/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaime Vado conducted an unannounced 1 year annual inspection visit. LPA met with residential social worker James Murch and later met with large program administrator Crystal Hutchinson via telephone to discuss facility plans. LPA explained the purpose of today's visit to both Crystal and James. LPA toured the facility inside and outside with administrator Monica. While touring the facility LPA tested the water one bathroom in two resident rooms #1353 and #1305. Water is tested at 108F. Resident rooms observed at random are maintained and include the required furniture and lighting per regulations. Residents have an adequate amount of linens and incontinence supplies, incidental supplies, as well as PPE as needed. Two fire extinguishers were checked within the facility. Tagged inspection is dated as 07/03/2023. Extinguishers observed are charged and within operating range including the kitchen's fire extinguisher. Carbon monoxide detectors are present. Facility is hardwired with smoke detectors. 7 day non-perishable food supply and 2 day fresh food supply is observed as in place. Main kitchen is on the ground floor of the building. Food deliveries are made daily for fresh food items. Longer lasting food supplies such as frozen goods, canned goods, dry goods, etc is delivered two times a week. Residents with modified diet plans or prescription diets are posted and reviewed as in place. Medications are stored and inaccessible in a locked medication room on the 3rd floor. Medications are stored in secured medication carts that are used to disperse medications through out the facility. Double locking is in place for controlled medications. 5 of 5 resident medications are reviewed to be in place and accurately marked. Medication administration record is observed as current for clients reviewed including centrally stored medication log. First aid items are observed in medication room. Additional first aid kits are available outside of medication room through out the facility. On site laundry is available and functioning per observations made. Residents can wash their own laundry in the laundry rooms if they wish, but staff do the laundry regularly for residents. Facility does not handle resident monies. Cleaning supplies are stored in janitor closets observed and are locked in the independent living building. Resident menus are posted as well as activity calendar and daily calendar. Facility files, including staff files and resident files, are to be reviewed on a later date. Monica informed LPA that her administrator indicated that her administrator certificate is expired as of January 17, 2024 but did submit the required renewal documents and credits to the appropriate department for renewal in December 2023 and is awaiting a new certificate to be sent. Report is reviewed with Monica. No citations issued.

ComplaintNovember 15, 2023
No deficiencies

Inspector: Jaime Vado

ComplaintAugust 29, 2023· Unsubstantiated
No deficiencies

Inspector: Jaime Vado

Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.

ComplaintAugust 29, 2023
No deficiencies

Inspector: Jaime Vado

ComplaintJuly 3, 2023· Unsubstantiated
No deficiencies

Inspector: Jaime Vado

Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.

ComplaintMay 31, 2023· Unsubstantiated
No deficiencies

Inspector: Jaime Vado

Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.

ComplaintMay 31, 2023· Unsubstantiated
No deficiencies

Inspector: Jaime Vado

Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.

ComplaintMay 3, 2023· Unsubstantiated
No deficiencies

Inspector: Jaime Vado

Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.

Plain-language summary

A complaint investigation found no violation regarding response times to a resident's calls for assistance. Staff confirmed they respond when called, though response times vary depending on the needs of other residents, and the facility's night staff are available.

View full inspector notes

Page 2 - 9099C Response times again vary determinate on the needs of other residents as well as R1. Residents confirm on response times being adequate or satisfactory based on their needs. Review of the current staffing show night staff are available. Based on staff interviews R1 calls for assistance and based on history and the facility knowing his behaviors, they do not check unless R1 calls for assistance. Staff do respond but the times vary. These allegations are unsubstantiated. Based on these observations, the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegations are unsubstantiated at this time. Report is reviewed with the administrator.

Other visitMay 3, 2023
No deficiencies

Inspector: Jaime Vado

Plain-language summary

During an unannounced case management visit, inspectors met with the administrator to review the care plan and assessments for a resident who had recently returned from a two-week stay with family and had experienced falls. The facility manages the resident's medications and has arranged for a private caregiver to be in the resident's room; the caregiver also ensures the resident's wife's medications are kept locked and out of reach. No violations were found during this visit.

View full inspector notes

On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaime Vado conducted an unannounced case management visit in conjunction with a complaint visit made on this day. LPA met with the administrator and explained purpose of today's visit. LPA met with and discussed the assessments and appraisals for R1 upon return to the facility after being out of the facility and with family for approximately two weeks. According to the administrator the care plan and needs of the resident was communicated to the responsible party accordingly. Medications for R1 are handled by the facility not the wife of the resident. R1 has a private care giver from an outside agency that is now stationed in the room of R1 due to the decline in his health and the falls that have occurred. The private caregiver also ensures that the medications of R1's wife is locked and inaccessible to R1. According to the administrator the wife refuses to be assessed. Physician's report for the wife of R1 is dated in 2022 and confirms she is able to self manage her medication. LPA collected pertinent documents in person on this day from the facility. Report is reviewed with the administrator Monica.

Other visitMay 3, 2023
No deficiencies

Inspector: Jaime Vado

Plain-language summary

During an unannounced visit, the inspector reviewed the facility's medication management policy and why the care plan for one resident changed to include medication handling by staff, which resulted in a fee increase. The facility provided medical documentation showing that the resident had been able to manage their own medications when admitted but could no longer do so after a medical issue, and the facility's policy requires staff to manage medications for residents unable to self-manage. No violations were found.

View full inspector notes

On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaime Vado conducted an unannounced case management visit in conjunction with a complaint visit made on this day. LPA met with the administrator and explained purpose of today's visit. LPA discussed with Monica the medications administration policy at the facility and the basis for adding medication handling to the care plan of R1 which did incur an increase in fees. It was determined that upon entry to the facility R1 was able to self manage medications but due to R1 suffering a medical issue R1 is no longer able to self manage medications. Due to this change the facility assumed the responsibility as it is facility policy that if a resident cannot self manage medications the facility will store and manage the medications. LPA received past and current physician's reports for R1 to show the change in ability to mange medications as well as the policy the facility follows regarding such handling of medications. Report is reviewed with the administrator Monica.

InspectionMarch 13, 2023
No deficiencies

Inspector: Jaime Vado

Plain-language summary

A licensing inspector visited the facility following a burglary that occurred in the early morning hours when someone jumped a fence and entered a resident's room in the independent living building, taking some items. The burglar did not enter the main assisted living building and no residents were injured; police were contacted and reviewed video evidence of the incident. No violations were found.

View full inspector notes

On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaime Vado conducted an unannounced case management visit regarding a break in that happened over the weekend. LPA met with administrator Monica Tapia regarding this incident. According to her the break in happened on 03/12/2023 at around 1:30 am the suspect jumped a fence and entered the independent living building and burglarized a resident's room. Resident discovered the missing items and reported to facility staff in the early morning hours. According to Monica Redwood City Police Department was alerted and a formal report was taken. Video evidence was reviewed by RWCPD and staff of the burglary. No residents were injured. No other reports of missing items by residents in independent living were reported. Burglary suspect never entered the assisted living main building as video footage was able to confirm that the suspect exited the same route he entered. Incident report is to be received on this day per the administrator. A police report number will also be provided. No citations issued. Report is reviewed with Monica.

ComplaintJanuary 25, 2023· Unsubstantiated
No deficiencies

Inspector: Jaime Vado

Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.

ComplaintJanuary 25, 2023· SubstantiatedType B
1 deficiency

Inspector: Jaime Vado

Type BCCR §87224(a)(4)

Regulation

Eviction Procedures - If, after admission, it is determined that the resident has a need not previously identified and a reappraisal has been conducted pursuant to Section 87463, and the licensee and the person who performs the reappraisal believe that the facility is not appropriate for the resident.

Inspector finding

Regulation is not met as evicenced by: upon review of the eviction notice the basis for eviction requires more information to support the reason for eviction. The reappraisal does not state or support basis for eviction as well as it does not identify any new behaviors or conditions for eviction. The LIC602 shows that the resident is able to leave on his own, able to communicate needs, and other items suggesting independence.

ComplaintJanuary 25, 2023· Unsubstantiated
No deficiencies

Inspector: Jaime Vado

Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.

Plain-language summary

Investigators looked into a complaint about how a private caregiver was stationed outside a resident's room. They found the caregiver sat in a chair near the door only when the resident went on walks outside his room, did not supervise him while inside, and the resident had declined additional in-room assistance; the facility said this arrangement provided extra supervision, and investigators found no violation.

View full inspector notes

Page 2 - LIC9099C The hired agency staff person sits outside in a chair positioned adjacent to the room door of the resident. The chair does not block the door of the resident's room. LPA observed this chair on two occasions, one time the private caregiver was sitting in the chair, and another time the chair was there but the private caregiver was not present. According to staff interviewed, this private caregiver only assists and supervises the resident when he leaves the room to go on walks outside of his room. The private caregiver does not assist the resident in his room despite that option being made available. The resident has declined this service of assistance. The caregiver does not interfere with the resident when he is in his room and does not sit or supervise the resident while he is in his room. The facility insists that this extra measure of supervision is in place to provide additional care and supervision to the resident. Based on these observations, the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegations are unsubstantiated at this time. No citations are issued. This report is reviewed with executive director Monica Tapia.

Other visitJanuary 25, 2023
No deficiencies

Inspector: Jaime Vado

Plain-language summary

This was an unannounced annual COVID infection control inspection. The facility met infection control requirements, with staff and residents fully vaccinated and boosted, proper personal protective equipment in place, and appropriate screening procedures at entry; the inspector noted the daily temperature log for residents was not current and advised the facility to maintain it consistently. No violations were found.

View full inspector notes

On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaime Vado conducted an unannounced annual required 1 year inspection visit focused on COVID infection control. LPA met with executive director Monica Ceron Tapia during today's visit and explained the purpose of today's Upon entry LPA was COVID screened and had temperature taken. LPA did observe COVID some signs posted a the exterior of the facility but LPA suggested to add more. LPA toured facility's building and grounds with Monica and assistant executive director Patty Malera. No accessible bodies of water or fire safety hazards observed. Infection control practices are reviewed: entry procedures, staff training and policies, resident monitoring, containment strategies, environmental preparation and cleaning. Resident and staff daily temperature log is not current but facility has a policy in place to take temperatures of resident's who exhibit cold/flu symptoms. LPA advised on continuing the daily temperature check log of residents. Staff are screened via temperature check and COVID symptoms upon entry to facility. PPE supply is observed as in place in the assistant executive director's office. Medications, toxins and sharps are stored appropriately and inaccessible to clients. Fire extinguishers are observed through out the facility as fully charged. Inspection date noted on one extinguisher on the 3rd floor as inspected on 06/19/2022. Facility has fire sprinklers in place through out the facility. Facility lighting is sufficient for residents and staff safety. Water temperature is tested at 110F in a resident bedroom on the 3rd floor. Non-skid floor or non-skid shower mats are in place in resident rooms. Liquid soap is available and paper towels are available in resident bathrooms. Resident rooms are observed and they are equipped with the required furniture and light fixtures. First-aid kit is complete. A Disaster and Mass Casualty Plan is posted. Staff are observed wearing masks. Criminal record clearances or exemptions for facility staff or other individuals who have client contact is reviewed. Administrator certificate is current. All staff and residents are fully vaccinated and boosted. Continued on attached LIC809-C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Page 2 - Required 1 Year Annual The following updated forms are requested to be submitted to CCLD by 02/01/2023 : • LIC 308 Designation of Facility Responsibility • LIC 500 Personnel Report • LIC 610E Emergency Disaster Plan • Copy of updated administrator certificate No citations issued. Report is reviewed with Monica Tapia.

ComplaintDecember 29, 2022· Unsubstantiated
No deficiencies

Inspector: Jaime Vado

Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.

ComplaintAugust 16, 2022
No deficiencies

Inspector: Jaime Vado

Other visitAugust 12, 2022
No deficiencies

Inspector: Jaime Vado

Plain-language summary

A case management visit investigated a security breach from August 2022 in which an unauthorized person entered through a side exit door, bypassed the front entrance, and entered residents' rooms; police were called and responded, and no items were reported stolen, though the facility's security procedures were discussed with the administrator to prevent similar incidents. Video footage confirmed how the person gained entry, and police took a report of the incident. No violations were cited.

View full inspector notes

On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaime Vado conducted an unannounced case management visit regarding an incident that took place on 8/2/2022. LPA met with administrator Monica Ceron Tapia to discuss this. According to Monica there was an incident that occurred where a person in plain clothes entered the facility through a side entrance where a family member exited from. This side entrance is not an entrance to the facility as it is marked as an exit only. The suspect bypassed the front entrance and did not sign in as per protocol. Video footage was reviewed and it was confirmed that is how the suspect gained entry into the facility. LPA observed this footage as well. A private contractor that was hired to work in the beauty salon reported to Monica that she was missing some of her personal belongings. Monica stated that she advised the contractor to contact the Police Department. While the officers were on site on the 5th floor with the contractor, R1 reported to Moncia that someone was in her room going through her belongings. When the administrator was speaking to R1 the suspect came to the office of the administrator as well and she was questioned by Monica on her identity. The suspect made up a name of someone she was visiting in the facility but the facility did not have a resident by that name. The suspect got upset with Monica and she exited the building. Monica followed the suspect to a car parked in the facility parking lot where there was another suspect sitting in the drivers seat. Monica took pictures of the suspects, of their car, and license plate. Redwood City Police was on site when the suspect was in the facility but had left by the time officers got down to the ground floor after being alerted. Monica provided the information to the officers on site. Monica found out that another resident in the room next to R1 said the same person was in her room and attempted to take the resident's blood pressure but the resident declined and the suspect left her room and went to the room of R1. Officers inspected the rooms of R1 and R2 and per Monica no items were taken according to the the residents. LPA discussed future preventative measures with Monica to prevent this from happening in the future. A police report number of the incident was received by LPA on this day. No citations issued. Report reviewed with the administrator Monica.

ComplaintApril 21, 2021
No deficiencies

Inspector: Murial Han

Plain-language summary

A complaint investigation found that the facility failed to report an incident to the state Regional Office within the required timeframe; the Executive Director said the delay occurred due to miscommunication while she was away, and stated that managers would be trained on reporting requirements. The inspection was conducted remotely by phone on April 21, 2021.

View full inspector notes

On 4/21/2021 Licensed Program Analysis (LPA) Han conducted an unannounced Case Management -COVID-19 inspection. The facility did not report an incident to the Regional Office in a timely manner. Due to the Pandemic this inspection was conducted remotely. LPA Han called and spoke to the Executive Director, Grace Ndomo and explained the purpose of the call. The Executive Director stated that this incident happened while she was on vacation and the facility took actions internally but due to some miscommunication, it was not reported to the Regional Office on time. The Executive Director will educate the managers on the Reporting Requirements. This report was reviewed and discussed with the Executive Director. This report will be emailed to the Executive Director for a signature then returned to the LPA within twenty-four hours.

Federal summary

CMS Care Compare

Not a CMS-certified facility

California RCFEs (residential care facilities for the elderly) are licensed by the state, not by CMS. CMS data only applies to skilled nursing facilities or to CCRCs that operate a licensed SNF wing.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

No published reviews yet. Use the button above to share your experience.

← Back to Redwood City