StarlynnCare

California · Pleasant Hill

Chateau Pleasant Hill

RCFE

A Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) is a non-medical residential care home licensed by California CDSS under Health & Safety Code §1560. Residents receive assistance with daily living activities such as bathing, dressing, meals, and medication management in a home-like setting. RCFEs are not hospitals or skilled nursing facilities — they do not provide round-the-clock medical care.

2726-2770 Pleasant Hill Rd. · Pleasant Hill, 94523

Quick facts

Licensed beds165
Memory careNot listed
Last inspectionNov 2025
Last citationOct 2025
Operated byCarlton Senior Living, Llc
Map showing location of Chateau Pleasant Hill

Quality snapshot

Updated April 25, 2026

Compared to 10 California RCFE facilities of similar size, over the last 36 months.

Source: California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing Division. View raw inspection records →

Quality grade· click to show how this was calculated

Severity
22th

Weighted citations per bed

Repeats
100th

Repeat deficiencies as share of total

Frequency
11th

Deficiencies per inspection

Tick mark at 50% = peer median · higher percentile = better facility

Chateau Pleasant Hill scores C−. Better than 44% of comparable California RESIDENTIAL CARE ELDERLY facilities. Severity: 22th percentile. Repeats: top 0%. Frequency: bottom 11%.

Each metric is converted to a 0–100 percentile within the peer set (higher = better). The composite grade averages all four. Peer set: CA / rcfe_general / xl beds (10 facilities).

Citation severity over time

stable

Weighted severity score per month · 24 months

May 24peer medianApr 26

Weighted score (24mo)

42

Last citation

Oct 25

Finding distribution

7 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

IsolatedPatternWidespreadJKLG3HID4EFABCSev 4 · IJSev 3Sev 2Sev 1

View inspections & citations

The rules that apply to this facility

California Title 22 requirements for this facility, with the specific regulation and a suggested question for each.Rules this facility has been cited for are shown first.

What must this facility report to the state — and how fast?Cited Feb 202522 CCR §87211 / WIC §15630
  • ImmediateElopement, fire, epidemic outbreak, or poisoningImmediately
  • 2 hoursAbuse with serious bodily injury2-hour phone report + 2-hour written report — to the California Department of Social Services (CDSS), Adult Protective Services, and law enforcement
  • 24 hrsAbuse without serious bodily injuryWithin 24 hours
  • Next dayDeath of a residentPhone by next working day; written within 7 days
  • Next dayInjury requiring medical treatment beyond first aidPhone by next working day; written within 7 days
  • WrittenBankruptcy, foreclosure, eviction, or utility shutoff noticeWritten notice to CDSS and residents — $100/day penalty (max $2,000) for failure

Your enforcement lever:Incidents that aren't reported on time are themselves a separate violation. If you believe a reportable event wasn't filed, you can submit a complaint directly to the California Department of Social Services (CDSS).

What training are all staff required to complete?22 CCR §87411

All direct-care staff must complete:

  • 10 hours initial training within the first four weeks of employment.
  • 4 hours annual in-service every year thereafter.
  • Administrator certificate from a CDSS-approved program — 80 hours for first-time, 40 hours renewal every 2 years.

Ask on tour: Ask when the last staff training was completed and how it's tracked.

How many staff must be on duty overnight?22 CCR §87415

Based on 165 licensed beds:

One awake caregiver on duty, one on-call caregiver physically on premises, and one additional on-call caregiver.

Violation pattern to watch for:A facility that documents a staff member as "on call" but with that person physically off-site — when the law requires on-premises presence — is in violation of this section.

Ask on tour: Ask the facility to walk you through their overnight staffing plan and confirm whether on-call staff are on premises or off-site.

What health conditions can this facility legally accept or refuse?22 CCR §87612–87615

Restricted — allowed with physician order + care plan

  • Supplemental oxygen
  • Insulin and injectable medications
  • Indwelling or intermittent catheters
  • Colostomy / ileostomy
  • Stage 1 and Stage 2 pressure injuries
  • Wound care (non-complex)
  • Incontinence
  • Contractures

Prohibited — facility must refuse or discharge

  • Stage 3 or Stage 4 pressure injuries
  • Feeding tubes (PEG, NG, or J-tube)
  • Tracheostomies
  • Active MRSA or communicable infections requiring isolation
  • 24-hour skilled nursing needs
  • Total ADL dependence with inability to communicate needs

A hospice waiver (HSC §1569.73) can allow continued care for residents on hospice who would otherwise fall into a prohibited category.

Ask on tour: Ask whether your loved one's specific care needs are restricted or prohibited, and what the facility's process is if needs change after admission.

How does CDSS enforce these rules?22 CCR §87755–87777 / HSC §1569.58
  1. 1Notice of DeficiencyWritten citation with a correction deadline. Facility must submit a Plan of Correction.
  2. 2Civil PenaltyStarts at $50/day for non-serious; $150/day for serious deficiencies — immediately, with no grace period. Repeats escalate to $150 first day + $50/day, then $1,000 first day + $100/day.
  3. 3Suspension of AdmissionsFacility cannot accept new residents until violations are corrected.
  4. 4Temporary Suspension or RevocationEmergency suspension for imminent danger; full revocation after administrative hearing.
  5. 5Exclusion OrderAdministrator and operator can be barred from all CDSS-licensed facilities — not just this one.

See how these rules have been applied to this specific facility:

View state inspection record and citations

State records

California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing
License number
071440541
License type
RESIDENTIAL CARE ELDERLY
License status
LICENSED
License expires
Not yet indexed
Licensed beds
165
Operator
Carlton Senior Living, Llc

Inspections & citations

13

reports on file

7

total deficiencies

3

Type A (actual harm)

InspectionNovember 19, 2025· Unsubstantiated
No deficiencies

Inspector: Lori Alexander-Washington

Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.

Plain-language summary

This was a routine inspection that investigated three complaints about care for one resident: whether staff were following the resident's incontinence care plan, special diet, and hospital bed setup. The investigator reviewed service plans, medical orders, care documentation from July 2025, and staffing schedules, and found no evidence that any of these complaints had merit—staff were performing the required incontinence checks every two hours, offering foods matching the prescribed pureed diet with thin liquids, and the hospital bed mattress was set up after delivery in April 2025.

View full inspector notes

LIC9099-C (Page 2) Allegation: Staff are not following resident’s incontinent plan Finding: Unsubstantiated LPA reviewed R1’s Service Plan dated 05/08/25, which indicates that R1 requires Continence Care six (6) times per day, with care partners completing brief checks every two (2) hours to ensure R1 remains clean and dry. Review of chart notes dated 07/13/25 – 07/17/25 indicates that care partners were performing checks every two hours to reposition R1 and ensure they were clean and dry, as documented. In addition, the staffing schedule confirmed caregiver coverage for the required six-times-per-day continence care schedule. Allegation: Staff are not following resident’s special diet Finding: Unsubstantiated LPA reviewed R1’s Physician’s Order dated 07/02/25, which prescribes a pureed diet with thin liquids. Review of chart notes dated 07/13/25 – 07/17/25 reflects that staff offered R1 foods and liquids consistent with the ordered diet, including soup, yogurt, pudding, mashed potatoes, Cream of Wheat, cranberry juice, and water. Documentation indicates that R1 would eat or drink at times and would occasionally refuse food, which is within resident rights. LIC9099-C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LIC9099-C (Page 3) Allegation: Staff did not ensure resident’s hospital bed was set up for resident Finding: Unsubstantiated S1 stated that once they knew that the mattress was delivered they put the mattress in place. LPA reviewed records that showed delivery of DME including mattress was completed on 04/25/25. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations is UNSUBSTANTIATED . Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.

ComplaintNovember 19, 2025· Unsubstantiated
No deficiencies

Inspector: Lori Alexander-Washington

Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.

Plain-language summary

A complaint about cockroaches at the facility was investigated on two occasions in 2025. Staff reported that pest control treatments were conducted multiple times starting in May 2025, and workers stated they had not seen cockroaches recently, though the facility's records of work orders are kept only temporarily. The state could not find enough evidence to substantiate the complaint.

View full inspector notes

LIC9099-C (Page 2) On 07/31/2025, LPA G. Luk interviewed S1, who provided the following information: S1 stated that the facility is in the process of replacing the mulch with the landscaping crew. The facility has a contract with a pest control company (Eco Lab), and Eco Lab sprayed all first-floor apartments approximately 2–3 months prior. S1 reported that the facility takes cleanliness seriously. When reports regarding roaches are submitted, a work order is created in the facility’s internal system; however, these work orders are retained only for a limited period. S1 stated that the pest issue began around May 2025. On 11/03/2025, LPA L. Alexander interviewed W1 and W2 regarding the pest concerns. W1 stated that the facility is taking appropriate action regarding the cockroaches and reported not having seen a roach in approximately one week. W2 stated that they observed cockroaches in one of the apartments around May/June, but have not seen any recently. W2 confirmed that the facility conducted pest treatment in the apartment where cockroaches had been seen. LPA Alexander reviewed Eco Lab invoices for service dates 05/16/25, 05/22/25, 06/23/25, 07/10/25, and 07/28/25, which documented treatment services for interior insects throughout the building, including resident apartments. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED . Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.

Other visitOctober 8, 2025Type A
2 deficiencies

Plain-language summary

On October 8, 2025, inspectors made an unannounced annual visit and found the facility's living spaces, bathrooms, temperature, lighting, and food supply in acceptable condition, but identified two violations: two staff members did not have required health screening and tuberculosis test documentation on file, and medication was found unlocked in a resident's room. The facility has been given time to correct these issues.

View full inspector notes

On 10/08/2025 at 10:00 AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) L. Alexander and K. Nguyen arrived unannounced to conduct the Required Annual Inspection. Upon entry, LPAs stated the purpose of the visit to front desk. Administrator Jon McCraw certification 7012974740 expires on 12/04/2026, joined later at around 11:00 AM. LPAs toured the facility with Jon including but not limited to 8 resident’s apartments, bathrooms, multiple activity rooms, kitchen, common area and courtyard. LPAs observe lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. Hallway temperature was maintained at 74 degrees F. LPAs observed lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. The hot water temperature in a sample of residents’ bathrooms were measured at 109.6, 104.6, 105.1, and 110-degrees Fahrenheit. Residents’ bathrooms are equipped with grab bars and non-skid mats. There is a minimum of one week supply of nonperishable and 2-day of perishable foods. Sharps are locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Fire Extinguisher dated 07/23/2025. Emergency disaster last update on 9/10/2025. Fire drill was last conducted on 08/27/2025. Liability Insurance effective from 7/1/25 to 7/1/26. Report Continue on LIC 809c... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 At 11:45 AM, LPAs reviewed 8 residents records. At 2:02 PM, LPAs reviewed 9 staff records and 9 of 9 are associated with the facility. The following deficiencies were observed: - At around 1:00PM LPAs conducted staff files reviews show S1 and S2 do not have health screen and TB on files. - At around 2:20PM LPAs observed R1 room contained unlocked medication (Mucinex) The following deficiencies were observed (see LIC 809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and/or Health and Safety Code Failure to correct deficiencies by POC date may result in additional Civil Penalties. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report and appeal right is provided.

Type ACCR §87465(h)(1)(C)

Regulation

(h) The following requirements shall apply to medications which are centrally stored: (1) Medications shall be centrally stored under the following circumstances: (C) Because of potential dangers related to the medication itself, or due to physical arrangements in the facility and the condition or the habits of other persons in the facility, the …

Inspector finding

Based on observation, interview, and record review the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in by having R1 medication left unlocked in bathroom sink counter which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 10/09/2025 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 Administrator (ADM) agree to check all residents room to make sure there no other medication left unlocked.ADM agree to condoct an inserve training to staff on medication storage and send …

Type BCCR §87411(f)

Regulation

(f) All personnel, including the licensee and administrator, shall be in good health, and physically and mentally capable of performing assigned tasks. Good physical health shall be verified by a health screening, including a chest x-ray or an intradermal test, performed by a physician not more than six (6) months prior to or seven (7) days after e…

Inspector finding

Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not having S1 and S2 health screening and TB clearance on files which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 10/24/2025 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 Administrator agree to have S1 and S2 complete their health screening and TB test clearance and send via email documents of S1 and S2 complete their health screening and TB test clearnace by POC date.

Other visitJuly 31, 2025Type B
1 deficiency

Plain-language summary

During an unannounced case management visit on July 31, 2025, inspectors found that an eviction notice issued to a resident in October 2024 did not follow state requirements for how evictions must be carried out. The facility was cited for this deficiency and told that failure to correct it could result in civil penalties.

View full inspector notes

On 7/31/2025 at 1:45PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) G. Luk arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit. LPA met with Executive Director , John McCraw and explained the purpose for the visit. During the complaint investigation (#15-AS-20241025150045) conducted by LPA L. Alexander-Washington, the following deficiency was observed. Eviction letter dated 10/14/2024 issued to R1 did not ensure eviction notice is in compliance with regulation under “Eviction Procedures”. The deficiency was observed (see LIC 809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Failure to correct deficiency may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights provided.

Type BCCR §87224(d)(1)

Regulation

Eviction Procedures.(d)The licensee shall set forth in the notice to quit the reasons relied upon for the eviction with specific facts to permit determination of the date, place, witnesses, and circumstances concerning those reasons. (1)The notice to quit shall include the following information: This requirement is not met as evidence by:

Inspector finding

Based on record review, licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not ensuring eviction notice is in compliance with regulation which poses a potential health and safety risk to the persons in care.

InspectionJuly 17, 2025
No deficiencies

Plain-language summary

During a follow-up visit on July 17, 2025, inspectors reviewed the death of a resident who passed away on July 14, 2025 with an unknown cause of death. Staff found the resident slouched over a walker at the dining table that morning, initiated CPR, and paramedics arrived but could not determine the cause of death. No violations were found during the inspection.

View full inspector notes

On 07/17/2025 at 12:00pm Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) L. Alexander and K. Nguyen arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit to follow-up on a death report received by Community Care Licensing that was faxed on 07/14/2025. LPAs met with Executive Director, Jon McCraw and explained the purpose of the visit. Resident (R), R1, passed away on 07/14//2025 with an unknown cause of death. LPAs interviewed Staff (S), S1, that stated S1 saw R1 earlier in the morning approximately 7:45 am on 07/14/2025 to deliver R1 breakfast. S1 stated that R1 was up and when asked R1 stated R1 felt ok. S1 stated S1 returned back to R1's room just to check in and observed R1 sitting at R1 dining room table and slouched over R1 walker. S1 called the Med Tech to R1's room and Medtech started cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) on R1. LPA's reviewed LIC 624, and Death Report indicated that the cause of death was unknown declared by the paramedics when they arrived. During today's visit LPAs obtained additional information pertaining to R1's death: Physician's Report S2 will obtain death certificate and will send to LPA No deficiencies issued during the visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was provided.

ComplaintJune 19, 2025· SubstantiatedType A
1 deficiency

Inspector: Alicia Delmundo

Plain-language summary

A complaint investigation found that trash and recycling bins were stored in stairwells on the second and third floors, creating a fire hazard and blocking emergency escape routes—a violation that the facility removed during the inspection. The investigation also identified gaps around doors that the facility said were being addressed by a contractor but had not yet been fixed due to circumstances beyond their control. The facility was cited for this violation.

View full inspector notes

R1 stated there were 2 fire issues – the gaps on the doors and trash in the stairwell. The ED stated the facility doors were upgraded and the lock system were checked. The issue about the gaps on the doors were brought to the vendor's (contractor) attention; however, there were circumstances that were beyond the facility’s control and fixing the gaps was not fixed as scheduled. The ED also stated there were trash and recycle bins in the stairwell which the fire marshal asked them to remove. Inspection Notice showed trash can and recycling bin from stairwell 2nd and 3rd floors were removed. FDI stated the trash is a fire hazard because it is combustible and was in a protected space. FDI further stated that the trash was in obstruction in the path of egress and considered an immediate risk.Therefore, the allegation is substantiated. Deficiency is cited from Title 22 California Code of Regulations and listed on 9099D. Deficiency was discussed with ED. Exit interview conducted. Appeals Rights and copy of this report provided.

Type ACCR §87203

Regulation

87203 Fire Safety All facilities shall be maintained in conformity with the regulations adopted by the State Fire Marshal for the protection of life and property against fire and panic. -This requirement is not met as evidenced by:

Inspector finding

-Based on interviews and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section above in trash and recycle bins in the stairwells which posed an immediate safety risks to the persons in care.

ComplaintApril 10, 2025
No deficiencies

Inspector: Lori Alexander-Washington

Plain-language summary

The facility received a complaint that staff unlawfully evicted a resident. An investigation found the eviction notice met all legal requirements, and staff continues to provide care to the resident despite the resident's refusal of assistance. No violations were found.

View full inspector notes

LIC9099-C (Page 2) Allegation: Staff unlawfully evicted a resident Finding: Unfounded It was alleged staff unlawfully evicted R1. Based on information obtained, R1 was issued a second eviction on 12/14/24. However, LPA reviewed a copy of the eviction notice and confirmed that the letter meets the requirements of the eviction procedure (CCR 87224). Based on interview with staff (S1), Although R1 refuses help with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), the facility continues to provide care to R1. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging Staff unlawfully evicted a resident. We have found that the complaint was UNFOUNDED , meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.

ComplaintApril 10, 2025Type B
1 deficiency

Plain-language summary

On April 10, 2025, inspectors investigated complaints and reviewed records for a resident who made sexual advances toward staff on multiple occasions between September 2023 and October 2024. The facility had not updated the resident's medical assessment and care plan to address these new behaviors until November 2024 and January 2025, well after they first occurred. The facility was cited for violations of state regulations and given notice that failure to correct these deficiencies could result in civil penalties.

View full inspector notes

On 04/10/2025 at 2:30 PM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) L. Alexander arrived unannounced to conduct a Case Management concurrently with Complaint investigation (15-AS-20250121113617) visit. LPA met with Executive Director, Jon McCraw, and explained the purpose of visit. During a complaint investigation ( 15-AS-20241025150045 ), LPA obtained and reviewed the following records for Resident (R1): Preplacement dated 8/30/2023, Appraisal dated 8/30/2023 and Physician's Report dated 08/28/2023 with an diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). Additionally, LPA reviewed multiple incident reports where R1 made sexual advances towards two (2) staff (S1 and S2) on 9/28/2023, 12/18/2023, 1/22/2024, 3/12/2024, and 10/11/2024. However, based on record review, LPA did not observe an updated appraisals and medical assessment to address these new behaviors. There is no indication in the preplacement and reappraisal from 8/30/2023 that resident has a history of these behaviors. LPA obtained a copy of an updated medical assessment dated 11/18/2024 where it indicated R1 was diagnosed with dementia. LPA received an Individual Service Plan (appraisal) from ED on 01/02/2025 for R1. The deficiencies were observed (see LIC809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulation, Title 22. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights provided

Type BCCR §87463(e)

Regulation

87463 Reappraisals (e) The licensee shall immediately...bring any significant change in condition...to the attention of the appropriate licensed medical professional...other specialized care provider. Documentation of such communication shall be added to the resident's record and shall include:... This requirement is not met as evidence by:

Inspector finding

Based on interview and record review the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in by performing reappraisals in significant changes of condition which poses a potential health, safety and personal rights risk to persons in care.

Other visitFebruary 11, 2025Type B
1 deficiency

Inspector: Lori Alexander-Washington

Plain-language summary

During an unannounced case management visit on February 11, 2025, inspectors found that the facility failed to notify the licensing division when a resident was hospitalized, as required by law. Staff had completed an incident report but did not document when it was sent to the licensing division. The facility was cited for this violation and told that failure to correct it could result in civil penalties.

View full inspector notes

On 02/11/2025 at 2:00 PM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) L. Alexander arrived unannounced to conduct a Case Management visit. LPA met with Executive Director, Jon McCraw, and explained the purpose of visit. While LPA L. Alexander was conducting a complaint investigation (15-AS-20250205123313 ) on 02/11/2025. During record review LPA observed that facility did not notify Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) of Resident's (R1) hospitalization. LPA interviewed Staff (S1) and S1 stated that S2 completed an incident report but did not have the receipt of date and time incident report was faxed to CCLD. LPA obtained a copy of an Incident Report that was generated by S2. The deficiencies were observed (see LIC809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulation, Title 22. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights provided

Type BCCR §87211(a)

Regulation

87211 Reporting Requirements (a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as the Department may require, including, but not limited to, the following: This requirement is not met as evidence by:

Inspector finding

Based on interview and record review the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in by notifying CCLD of R1's hospitalization (LIC624) which poses a potential health, safety and personal rights risk to persons in care.

ComplaintFebruary 11, 2025
No deficiencies

Inspector: Lori Alexander-Washington

Plain-language summary

A complaint alleged that staff were refusing to readmit a resident returning from the hospital. The investigation found this allegation was unfounded—the staff had actually submitted a formal request for approval to readmit the resident due to a health condition and received that approval from the state on February 6, 2025.

View full inspector notes

LIC9099-C (Page 2) Allegation: Staff are not accepting resident back for re-entry. Finding: Unfounded On 02/06/2025 LPA interviewed Witness (W1). W1 stated that R1 was treated for an infection that they got while they were in the hospital and was ready to be discharged back to the facility. W1 stated that they received phone calls from R1’s responsible party and that they were told that Staff (S1) was not accepting R1 back to the facility. W1 stated that R1’s responsible party told them that they did not know if R1 was colonized with an prohibited health condition. On 01/31/2025 S1 submitted a formal exception request (CCR 87616) to accept and retain R1 whom has a prohibited health condition (CCR 87615(a)(4)). The Department granted approval of an exception to accept R1 on 02/06/2025. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging “Staff are not accepting resident back for re-entry.” We have found that the complaint was UNFOUNDED , meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.

InspectionNovember 1, 2024Type A
1 deficiency

Inspector: David Doidge

Plain-language summary

A routine annual inspection was conducted on November 1, 2024, and the facility was found to meet standards for lighting, temperature, bathroom safety equipment, food storage, medication security, and fire safety. The facility was asked to submit updated documentation for its administrative files by November 8, 2024, but no violations were cited.

View full inspector notes

On 11/01/2024 at 02:00 PM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) D. Doidge and L. Alexander arrived unannounced to conduct the Required Annual Inspection. Upon entry, LPAs stated the purpose of the visit to Ruth Hernandez-Saleh Resident Liaison at 02:10PM. Administrator Jon McCraw certification 6042869740 expires on 12/04/2024, joined later. LPAs toured the facility with including but not limited to 6 residents apartments, bathrooms, multiple activity rooms, kitchen, common area and courtyard. LPAs observe lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. Hallway temperature was maintained at 76 degrees F. LPAs observed lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. The hot water temperature in a sample of residents’ bathrooms were measured at 110, 107.9, 108.4, 106, and 105 degrees Fahrenheit. Residents’ bathrooms are equipped with grab bars and non-skid mats. There is a minimum of one week supply of nonperishable and 2-day of perishable foods. Centrally stored medications, sharps are locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Fire Extinguisher dated 07/24/2024. The following deficiencies were observed (see LIC 809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and/or Health and Safety Code Failure to correct deficiencies by POC date may result in additional Civil Penalties. Updated copies of the following documents were requested for facility file and are to be submitted to CCL by 11/08/2024: LIC 308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility LIC 309 Administrative Organization LIC 500 Personnel Report Liability Insurance Reviewed: LIC 610E Emergency Disaster Plan Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.

Type ACCR §87555(b)(25)

Regulation

(b) The following food service requirements shall apply: (25) Soaps, detergents, cleaning compounds or similar substances shall be stored in areas separate from food supplies.

Inspector finding

Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as Comet cleaner was found unlocked in kitchen were food was being prepared, which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 11/02/2024 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 LPAs observed kitcehn staff removed cleaner and stored in locked pantry. Defeciency cleared during visit.

InspectionOctober 27, 2023
No deficiencies

Inspector: Lori Alexander-Washington

Plain-language summary

On October 27, 2023, inspectors conducted the facility's annual required inspection and found no deficiencies. They toured both buildings, reviewed resident and staff records, and confirmed that lighting and temperature were adequate, grab bars and safety mats were in place, medications were locked and secure, and all staff had current first aid training. The facility was asked to submit updated administrative documents by November 3, 2023.

View full inspector notes

On 10/27/2023 at 12:20 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) L. Alexander arrived unannounced to conduct 1-Year Annual Required inspection. LPA met with Executive Director, Jon McCraw and explained the purpose of the visit. The facility’s fire clearance was approved for 2770 Pleasant Hill Rd. 50 Clients May Be All Non-Ambulatory First Floor Only. 2726 Pleasant Hill Rd, 76 Clients May Be All Non-Ambulatory First and Second Floor. Hospice Waiver for Six (6) Residents. LPA toured the facility with Jon including but not limited to 4 residents apartments, bathrooms, multiple activity rooms, kitchen, common area and courtyard. There are no bodies of water observed. LPA observe lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. Hallway temperature was maintained at 72 degrees F. LPA observed lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. The hot water temperature in a sample of residents’ shared bathroom were measured at 105, 106, 108 degrees Fahrenheit. Residents’ bathrooms are equipped with grab bars and non-skid mats. There is a minimum of one week supply of nonperishable and 2-day of perishable foods. Centrally stored medications, sharps and toxic are locked and inaccessible to residents in care. At 2:50 PM, LPA reviewed 7 residents records. At 4:30 PM, LPA reviewed 10 staff records and 10 of 10 have current first aid training and associated to the facility. LIC 809C...Continued 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LIC809 Continued.... Updated copies of the following documents were requested for facility file and are to be submitted to CCL by 11/03/2023: LIC 308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility LIC 309 Administrative Organization LIC 500 Personnel Report LIC 610E Emergency Disaster Plan Liability Insurance No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.

ComplaintNovember 10, 2022
No deficiencies

Inspector: Lori Alexander-Washington

Plain-language summary

On November 10, 2022, state inspectors conducted a routine annual inspection and found no violations. Inspectors toured the facility and checked lighting, temperature, water safety, bathrooms, food supplies, and medication storage—all met requirements.

View full inspector notes

On 11/10/2022 at 10:15 AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) L. Alexander and C. Fowler arrived unannounced to conduct 1-Year Annual Required inspection. LPAs met with Executive Director, Jon McCraw and explained the purpose of the visit. LPAs toured the facility with Jon including but not limited to 2 residents apartments, bathrooms, multiple activity rooms, kitchen, common area and courtyard. There are no bodies of water observed. LPAs observed lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. Hallway temperature was maintained at 73, 72.9, 73.4 degrees F. LPAs observed lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. The hot water temperature in a sample of residents’ shared bathroom were measured at 120, degrees Fahrenheit. Residents’ bathrooms are equipped with grab bars and non-skid mats. There is a minimum of one week supply of nonperishable and 2-day of perishable foods. Centrally stored medications, sharps and toxic are locked and inaccessible to residents in care. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.

Federal summary

CMS Care Compare

Not a CMS-certified facility

California RCFEs (residential care facilities for the elderly) are licensed by the state, not by CMS. CMS data only applies to skilled nursing facilities or to CCRCs that operate a licensed SNF wing.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

No published reviews yet. Use the button above to share your experience.

← Back to Pleasant Hill