Moldaw Family Residences at 899 Charleston
CCRC
A Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC) offers multiple levels of care on a single campus — typically independent living, assisted living, and skilled nursing. Residents often enter under a long-term contract and can transition between care levels as their needs change. CCRCs in California are regulated by the California Department of Social Services.
899 East Charleston Road · Palo Alto, 94303
Quick facts
Quality snapshot
Updated April 25, 2026Compared to 19 California CCRC facilities of similar size, over the last 36 months.
Source: California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing Division. View raw inspection records →
Quality grade· click to show how this was calculated
Severity50thWeighted citations per bed
Repeats100thRepeat deficiencies as share of total
Frequency50thDeficiencies per inspection
Tick mark at 50% = peer median · higher percentile = better facility
Quality grade· click to show how this was calculated
Weighted citations per bed
Repeat deficiencies as share of total
Deficiencies per inspection
Tick mark at 50% = peer median · higher percentile = better facility
Moldaw Family Residences at 899 Charleston scores B−. Better than 67% of comparable California RCFE-CONTINUING CARE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY facilities. Severity: 50th percentile. Repeats: top 0%. Frequency: 50th percentile.
Each metric is converted to a 0–100 percentile within the peer set (higher = better). The composite grade averages all four. Peer set: CA / ccrc / xl beds (19 facilities).
Citation severity over time
stableWeighted severity score per month · 24 months
Weighted score (24mo)
0
Finding distribution
1 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
The rules that apply to this facility
California Title 22 requirements for this facility, with the specific regulation and a suggested question for each.Rules this facility has been cited for are shown first.
What must this facility report to the state — and how fast?Cited Aug 202222 CCR §87211 / WIC §15630
- ImmediateElopement, fire, epidemic outbreak, or poisoningImmediately
- 2 hoursAbuse with serious bodily injury2-hour phone report + 2-hour written report — to the California Department of Social Services (CDSS), Adult Protective Services, and law enforcement
- 24 hrsAbuse without serious bodily injuryWithin 24 hours
- Next dayDeath of a residentPhone by next working day; written within 7 days
- Next dayInjury requiring medical treatment beyond first aidPhone by next working day; written within 7 days
- WrittenBankruptcy, foreclosure, eviction, or utility shutoff noticeWritten notice to CDSS and residents — $100/day penalty (max $2,000) for failure
Your enforcement lever:Incidents that aren't reported on time are themselves a separate violation. If you believe a reportable event wasn't filed, you can submit a complaint directly to the California Department of Social Services (CDSS).
What training are all staff required to complete?22 CCR §87411
All direct-care staff must complete:
- 10 hours initial training within the first four weeks of employment.
- 4 hours annual in-service every year thereafter.
- Administrator certificate from a CDSS-approved program — 80 hours for first-time, 40 hours renewal every 2 years.
Ask on tour: Ask when the last staff training was completed and how it's tracked.
How many staff must be on duty overnight?22 CCR §87415
Based on 270 licensed beds:
1 awake caregivers on duty overnight, one on-call caregiver physically on premises, and one additional on-call caregiver.
State law adds one awake caregiver for each 100 residents above 200.
Violation pattern to watch for:A facility that documents a staff member as "on call" but with that person physically off-site — when the law requires on-premises presence — is in violation of this section.
Ask on tour: Ask the facility to walk you through their overnight staffing plan and confirm whether on-call staff are on premises or off-site.
What health conditions can this facility legally accept or refuse?22 CCR §87612–87615
Restricted — allowed with physician order + care plan
- Supplemental oxygen
- Insulin and injectable medications
- Indwelling or intermittent catheters
- Colostomy / ileostomy
- Stage 1 and Stage 2 pressure injuries
- Wound care (non-complex)
- Incontinence
- Contractures
Prohibited — facility must refuse or discharge
- Stage 3 or Stage 4 pressure injuries
- Feeding tubes (PEG, NG, or J-tube)
- Tracheostomies
- Active MRSA or communicable infections requiring isolation
- 24-hour skilled nursing needs
- Total ADL dependence with inability to communicate needs
A hospice waiver (HSC §1569.73) can allow continued care for residents on hospice who would otherwise fall into a prohibited category.
Ask on tour: Ask whether your loved one's specific care needs are restricted or prohibited, and what the facility's process is if needs change after admission.
How does CDSS enforce these rules?22 CCR §87755–87777 / HSC §1569.58
- 1Notice of DeficiencyWritten citation with a correction deadline. Facility must submit a Plan of Correction.
- 2Civil PenaltyStarts at $50/day for non-serious; $150/day for serious deficiencies — immediately, with no grace period. Repeats escalate to $150 first day + $50/day, then $1,000 first day + $100/day.
- 3Suspension of AdmissionsFacility cannot accept new residents until violations are corrected.
- 4Temporary Suspension or RevocationEmergency suspension for imminent danger; full revocation after administrative hearing.
- 5Exclusion OrderAdministrator and operator can be barred from all CDSS-licensed facilities — not just this one.
See how these rules have been applied to this specific facility:
View state inspection record and citationsState records
California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing- License number
- 435294340
- License type
- RCFE-CONTINUING CARE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY
- License status
- LICENSED
- License expires
- Not yet indexed
- Licensed beds
- 270
- Operator
- 899 Charleston; Life Care Services, Llc
Inspections & citations
11
reports on file
4
total deficiencies
1
Type A (actual harm)
Other visitOctober 21, 2025No deficiencies
Plain-language summary
On October 21, 2025, an annual inspection found the facility in compliance with state requirements. The inspector reviewed the 193-unit facility's physical plant, safety systems, food storage, medication management, and resident and staff records, and found no violations.
View full inspector notes
On 10/21/2025, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) John Calandra arrived at the facility to conduct the Annual 1-year required inspection. LPA Calandra was greeted by Karen Lerner, Health and Wellness Navigator and explained the purpose of the visit. Layana Santos, Director of Health Services and Mark Baddas, Executive Director arrived later during the visit. LPA toured the physical plant. This is a 13-building, 4 floor, 193-unit facility, with a combination of memory care, assisted living, and independent living residents. All bedrooms had the required furniture and sufficient lighting. No accessible bodies of water or hazards were observed. The facility's hot water temperature was measured between 105-120 degrees Fahrenheit. The facility's Fire Extinguishers were observed to be fully charged. According to building maintenance, the facility's fire alarms and Carbon Monoxide detectors are directly connected to the Palo Alto Fire Department. The facility had the required 7 days of non perishables and 2 days of perishables on hand. No food was expired. The facility's first aid kit had the required items. All sharp objects, soap, poisons, and detergents were observed to be locked and in-accessible to persons in care. LPA reviewed 5 resident files and 6 staff files. All were observed to be complete. A review of Centrally Stored Medications indicated that medications for residents were properly labeled with instructions on dosage and times of day and matched the Centrally Stored Medication Records(CSMR) kept at the facility. LPA received a copy of the facility's Liability Insurance and requested a copy of their updated LIC 500 be sent to the Department by 10/23/2025. No deficiencies cited during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted. This report was reviewed with facility representative and a copy provided.
ComplaintSeptember 23, 2025· UnsubstantiatedNo deficiencies
Inspector: Komal Curley
Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.
Plain-language summary
A complaint alleged that staff lacked proper training and equipment for lifting and transferring residents who cannot move on their own. The facility provided training records showing staff received instruction in proper lifting techniques in March 2025 and catheter care training multiple times, and inspectors observed a lift device on-site, but there was not enough evidence to confirm or deny the complaint.
View full inspector notes
Based on training records reviewed, in-service trainings were provided to staff by Suncrest Hospice on 12/12/25, 3/21/25, and 4/30/25 in regards to catheter care. According to the Director of Health Services and the Wellness Nurse Supervisor, R1 goes to the doctor when his/her tubing needs to be changed and LVNs assist with emptying R1's foley catheter. Regarding the allegation, staff do not have proper training, according to the reporting party, facility staff does not have proper equipment to lift residents who are not mobile and they do not have proper lifting training. During the investigation, LPA interviewed the Director of Health Services and Wellness Nurse Supervisor, reviewed training records, and reviewed resident files. Based on records reviewed, there are 3 residents who are two persons assist, however the residents do not require hoyer lifts currently. Based on observations, LPA did observe a hoyer lift at the community. According to training records, an in-service training for proper body mechanics/transfers was completed by the facility's in-house therapy, Empower Me vendor on 3/27/25. According to Director of Health Services and Wellness Nurse Supervisor, besides the Relias training that are being done in regards to proper lifting, Empower me vendor will being conducting quarterly trainings for proper lifting/body mechanics, in addition to as needed training when there is a change in condition. Based on information collected, and records reviewed, the department has determined that although the above allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Report is reviewed with Director of Health Services, Layana Santos and a copy is provided.
Other visitApril 16, 2025No deficiencies
Plain-language summary
On April 16, 2025, the state investigated a medication error that occurred on April 6, 2025, when a resident received another resident's medications. The resident experienced no adverse effects, staff immediately notified the nurse and doctor, the resident was monitored hourly, the family was informed, and the medication technician received retraining; the facility also implemented additional checks and audits to prevent future errors. No violations were cited.
View full inspector notes
On April 16, 2025, at 11:50 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kiran Jain arrived unannounced at the facility to conduct a Case Management – Incident visit regarding a medication error incident that occurred on 04/06/2025 when the resident (R1) was given medications of another resident. Upon arrival, the LPA was greeted by the Director of Health Services (DHS) Layana Santos. The LPA disclosed the purpose of the visit. The Executive Director (ED) Mark Baddas joined shortly after. LPA interviewed one (1) resident (R1) and three (3) staff members: Director of Health Services (DHS), Medication Technician (S1) and LVN Community Nurse (S2). R1 stated they were not bothered about the medication error, but this could happen was disturbing. R1 stated they always asked what medicines were given to them and thought more training could help to prevent such errors in the future. R1 confirmed they had no adverse side effects of the wrong medications given. S1 stated they felt the work overload caused the medication error and they were honest about the error and made sure the resident was doing ok and hence they followed the process of informing the nurse on duty. S1 stated they have been retrained on the med training on 04/09/2025. S2 stated that S1 came to them and informed about the medication error. S2 followed the procedure by taking resident vitals, told the doctor and the family. S2 checked on R1 every hour after that to make sure there are no side effects. DHS stated they were putting more checks in place, more frequent audits, added additional layers to make sure the med techs were properly dispensing medications. The facility followed the protocols by frequently checking R1 for change of condition, informed their doctor and the family member. DHS stated that the med tech had been given additional training to ensure that they do not make the medication error again. Continued on LIC809-C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LPA reviewed R1’s Alert charting notes for 04/06/2025, which showed R1 was monitored for medication adverse reactions, if R1 was feeling dizziness. R1’s vitals were checked, noted and was put on hourly check for the day. R1’s vitals were noted with BP reading 137/75, Heart rate 70, Temperature 97.3 and Oxygen saturation levels at 97.3%. LPA reviewed R1’s Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Records. LPA reviewed the message sent from R1’s PCP office regarding the follow up on the wrong medications given to R1. The nurse advised that wrong medications taken should not be harmful for R1 and advised the facility to report any changes in R1’s condition. No deficiencies were cited during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted with the Executive Director. A copy of this report was provided to the Executive Director, Mark Baddas, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of the report.
InspectionJanuary 29, 2025No deficiencies
Inspector: David Marrufo
Plain-language summary
During a routine office meeting, facility administrators presented renovation plans to state inspectors, including upgrades to dining rooms, carpeting, lighting, and painting over four to six months. The facility plans to continue dining services to residents in other areas during construction and was asked to submit a written plan describing how they will maintain services and minimize disruption. No violations were found during this inspection.
View full inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo, Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Romeo Manzano, and Regional Manager (RM) Vivien Helbling had an office meeting with facility representatives Administrator Mark Baddas, Manager of Operations Manny Lopez, and Legal Counsel Pam Kaufmann. During the meeting, the facility representatives discussed the plans to renovate the facility and presented diagrams and renovation plans to the Department. Administrator Baddas stated that the renovations will primarily include the facility dinning rooms and will also include changes to the carpeting, lighting, and painting of other areas in the facility. He stated there are plans to utilize other portions of the facility to continue dining services to the residents. He stated that the renovation of the Independent Living dining room is expected to take four to six months. RM requested a written Plan of Operation that will explain the renovation plans and the plans to mitigate the interruption of services to residents during construction. No deficiencies were cited at this time as per California Code of Regulations Title 22. This report was reviewed with Administrator Mark Baddas and a copy of this report was provided.
Other visitSeptember 25, 2024No deficiencies
Inspector: Kiran Jain
Plain-language summary
This was the facility's annual required inspection on September 25, 2024, and no violations were found. Inspectors observed clean, well-maintained buildings with secure memory care areas, safe temperatures and hot water, properly stored medications and chemicals, complete resident and staff records, and residents engaged in activities. The facility was asked to submit updated administrative paperwork by early October.
View full inspector notes
On September 25, 2024, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kiran Jain and Komal Charitra arrived at the facility at 09:15 AM to conduct the Annual 1-year required inspection. LPAs met with Layana Santos, Director of Health Services and explained the purpose of the visit. Mark Baddas, Executive Director joined shortly after. This is a multi-building, multi-floor 193-unit facility, with a combination of memory care (9 residents), assisted living (14 residents), and independent living (184 residents). LPAs toured the physical plant and observed it as clean, orderly, in good repair, well furnished, and at a comfortable temperature. Assisted living units are one or two bedrooms with private bathrooms. The memory care unit has its own common areas, secure courtyard, and activity rooms. The facility has outdoor spaces, dining rooms, and recreational rooms such as activity rooms, fitness centers, and wellness spaces. The residents have access to the Oshman Family Jewish Community Center for pools, cultural events, and other activities. All common areas were observed to be free from obstructions, and hallways were well-lit. The fire extinguishers were fully charged and last serviced on February, 2024. Emergency exit routes were clear and evacuation plans were posted at multiple locations throughout the facility. The facility’s emergency disaster plan was reviewed. No accessible bodies of water or hazards were observed. LPAs observed that the facility was equipped with keypad access security features. Auditory alarm on exit doors in memory care unit were observed to be operational. The smoke detector and carbon monoxide detector were fully operational. LPAs inspected resident’s rooms and bathrooms at random in the Memory care and Independent Living units. Rooms were observed to be clean with the required furniture and sufficient lighting. The hot water temperature was measured in the residents’ units between 113.6°F and 117.2°F. Sharp objects, detergents, poisons, and chemicals were observed to be locked and inaccessible to persons in care. The residents were seen actively engaged in recreational programs and activities. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LPAs observed the dining room and the main kitchen. The kitchen was observed to be clean and well-organized and had the required 7 days of non-perishables and 2 days of perishables. LPAs toured three walk-in refrigerators, 1 freezer, and 1 pantry for the dry food. Food items was wrapped, dated and no expired food items were observed. LPAs reviewed five resident records and six staff records. All were observed to be complete. The resident’s medications are securely stored in a locked room. Medication administration records (MARs) were reviewed and found to be complete, and no expired medications were observed. The First Aid kit was checked and observed to be complete. Emergency drills are conducted monthly with the last drill documented on 08/30/2024. The following updated forms are requested to be submitted to CCLD by 10/02/2024: · LIC 500: Personnel Report · LIC 308: Designation of Facility Responsibility · Administrator Certificate(s) · Liability Insurance No deficiencies were cited during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted. This report was reviewed with Mark Baddas, Executive Director, and Layana Santos, Director of Health Services, and a copy of this report was left at the facility.
ComplaintMay 18, 2023· MixedType A1 deficiency
Inspector: David Marrufo
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that staff member pulled residents' blankets and pants roughly during care routines, including pulling one resident's buttoned jeans without unbuttoning them first while that resident appeared to be in pain; multiple staff members reported witnessing this conduct. A separate allegation about injury was unsubstantiated because there was no clear evidence connecting any observed bruising to the pulling incidents.
View full inspector notes
S2’s Internal Incident Report states while making rounds with S1, S1 began to pull R1’s comforter back while R1 was still on the bed. S2 described the way S1 pulled the comforter as “very rough.” S2 stated that S1 and S2 then went to R2’s bedroom. There, S1 began pulling on R2’s jeans while they were still buttoned on R2. S2 stated to have observed R2 to look as if R2 was in pain while S1 was pulling on R2’s jeans. S2 then told S1 that that was not the correct way to pull down the jeans but S1 ignored S2 and said the resident was fine. S2 then stayed with R2 to check on the resident and then reported the incidents to S2’s supervisor, S4. S3’s Internal Incident Report states that S1 grabbed R1’s blanket and tossed R1 over and yanked on R1’s pants to take them off. S3 states S1 then went to R2’s room and yanked on R2’s yellow blanket. Then, S1 yanked on R2’s pants without unbuttoning R2’s pants. S3 stated S2 told S1 to unbutton the pants because S1 was hurting R2. S4’s Internal Report states that S4 observed S1 pulling on R2’s jeans. During interviews, S1 stated that R1 and R2 were not properly placed on their draw sheets by the morning shift staff, so S1 did not attempt to turn over R1 and R2. S1 stated to have not pulled on R1 or R2's pants and that S2 already had denim pants pulled down R2's waist when S1 arrived. During interviews, S2 and S3 stated to have observed S1 pull on the blankets that R1 and R2 were resting on to turn them over. S2 and S3 stated to have observed S1 pulling on R1’s and R2’s pants to check them during rounds. S2 and S3 stated that S1 pulled on R2’s pants while they were still buttoned. Based on records review and interviews, there is preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did occur. Therefore, the allegation is substantiated. See 9099-D for deficiencies cited per the California Code of Regulations, Title 22. This report was reviewed with Karen Lerner and a copy of the report and appela rights were provided. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 S3 stated during interview to have not observed any bruising on R1 or R2. S5’s written report from 05/09/2023 states that there is a “noted discoloration on left lower posterior leg” of R1. During interview, S5 stated to have not observed S1 when S1 was conducting rounds and checking on S1 and S2. Based on information from interviews conducted with staff, and records reviewed, although the allegation listed above may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. No Deficiencies cited under California Code of Regulations Title 22 This report was reviewed with Karen Lerner and a copy of the report was provided.
Regulation
87468.1(a)(3) Personal Rights: (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (3) To be free from punishment, humiliation, intimidation, abuse, or other actions of a punitive nature, such as withholding
Inspector finding
residents’ money or interfering with daily living functions such as eating, sleeping, or elimination. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Licensee did not ensure that staff S1 did not handle residents R1 and R2 in a rough manner by pulling on their blankets and pants, which poses an immediate safety risk to residents in care.
InspectionOctober 27, 2022No deficiencies
Inspector: David Marrufo
Plain-language summary
This was a routine annual inspection of the facility. The inspector found the facility met requirements, including adequate supplies of protective equipment, food for emergencies, water, and bathroom essentials, with no violations cited.
View full inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo conducted an unannounced Required 1 Year visit and met with Elyse Gerson and Assistant Executive Director Preet Kaur. During visit, LPA Marrufo toured the facility. The facility entrance had a visitor screening area. LPA Marrufo observed a 30-day supply of PPEs. LPA Marrufo observed a perishable food supply of at least 2 days and a non-perishable food supply of at least 7 days. LPA Marrufo also observed emergency water supplies. LPA Marrufo observed the facility bathroom had available soap and paper towels. No deficiencies were cited at this time as per California Code of Regulations - Title 22. This report was reviewed with Assistant Executive Director Preet Kaur and a copy of the report was provided.
InspectionOctober 27, 2022No deficiencies
Inspector: David Marrufo
Plain-language summary
A quarterly follow-up inspection found that the facility had completed required staff training on seven areas including recognizing changes in residents' health, managing residents with dementia who wander, and coordinating care with outside agencies like hospice. The training sessions were held in August and October 2022, and no violations were found.
View full inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo conducted a quarterly non-compliance visit and met with Administrator Elyse Gerson and Assistant Executive Director Preet Kaur. LPA Marrufo reviewed the facility training logs that are part of the following facility non-compliance plan: 1. Licensee shall develop a plan in writing describing the training of facility staff on identifying and reporting residents’ change in conditions for timely appropriate medical attention. 2. Licensee shall develop a plan in writing describing the training of facility staff on observation and assessment of residents for any changes in physical, mental, emotional and social functioning to develop a plan of care to meet the resident’s needs. 3. Licensee shall develop a plan in writing describing training of facility staff on identifying prohibited and restricted health conditions and on submitting exception requests to the Department for residents with prohibited or restricted health conditions. Staff should be trained on when to retain a resident, when to request an exception request for the resident, and when to seek a higher level of care for the resident. 4. Licensing shall develop a plan in writing describing the facility protocol when readmitting residents to the facility from the hospital or skilled nursing facility. The plan should include re-appraisals of the resident and developing a new plan of care to meet the resident's needs. 5. Licensee shall develop a plan in writing describing how the personal rights of residents are not violated when resident exhibits wandering behavior, particularly for residents diagnosed with dementia. 6. Licensee shall develop a plan in writing describing the facility protocol to collaborate with other agencies such as hospice agencies and home health agencies to ensure that doctors' orders in the care of the resident are met. 7. Licensee shall develop a plan in writing describing the duties and responsibilities of the Administrator to ensure that resident's health conditions and needs area addressed. The plan shall include staff meetings to communicate resident health conditions and needs. See LIC809-C for more information. Page 1 of 2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LPA Marrufo observed training for the non-compliance plans were conducted on 08/16/2022, 08/30/2022, 10/11/2022, and 10/13/2022. No deficiencies were cited at this time as per California Code of Regulations Title 22. This report was reviewed with Assistant Executive Director Preet Kaur and a copy of the report was provided.
InspectionAugust 12, 2022Type B3 deficiencies
Inspector: David Marrufo
Plain-language summary
An unannounced case management visit found deficiencies at the facility that were discovered during a previous complaint investigation but had not been cited at that time. The facility's Associate Executive Director was informed of the citations and provided a copy of the report and information about appeal rights. No additional details about the specific deficiencies are included in this summary.
View full inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo conducted an unannounced Case Management visit and met with Preet Kaur, Associate Executive Director. The purpose of the visit was to issue citations for deficiencies that were found to have occurred during a complaint investigation but were not included as part of the original allegations. Deficiencies were cited as per California Code of Regulations Title 22. See LIC809-D for more information. This report was reviewed with Preet Kaur and a copy of the report and appeal rights were provided.
Regulation
87609(b)(4) Allowable Health Conditions and the Use of Home Health Agencies The licensee and home health agency agree in writing on the responsibilities of the home health agency, and those of the licensee in caring for the resident’s medical condition(s). This requirement
Inspector finding
was not met as evidenced by: Licensee did not ensure that a written agreement was made between the facility and R1’s home health agency regarding the responsibilities of the home health agency for R1, which posed a potential health risk to residents in care.
Regulation
87463(a)(3) Reappraisals: The pre-admission appraisal shall be updated, in writing as frequently as necessary to note significant changes and to keep the appraisal accurate. The reappraisals shall document changes in the resident's physical, medical, mental, and social
Inspector finding
condition. Significant changes shall include but not be limited to: (3) Any illness, injury, trauma, or change in the health care needs of the resident that results in a circumstance or condition specified in Sections 87455(c) or 87615, Prohibited Health Conditions. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Licensee did not ensure that R1’s appraisal needs and services plan was updated to address R1’s catheter care plan, which posed a potential health risk to residents in care.
Regulation
87211 (a)(1)(B) Reporting Requirements Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as the Department may require, including, but not limited to, the following: (1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident
Inspector finding
within seven days of the occurrence of any of the events specified in (A) through (D) below. This report shall include the resident's name, age, sex and date of admission; date and nature of event; attending physician's name, findings, and treatment, if any; and disposition of the case. (B) Any serious injury as determined by the attending physician and occurring while the resident is under facility supervision. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Licensee did not ensure that a writte…
Other visitOctober 22, 2021No deficiencies
Inspector: David Marrufo
Plain-language summary
A licensing analyst conducted an unannounced annual inspection and found the facility in compliance with all regulations. The facility had adequate supplies of personal protective equipment (at least 30 days) and food (at least 3 days of perishable and 7 days of non-perishable items), maintained visitor screening at the entrance, and had staff wearing face coverings. Common areas in both the assisted living and memory support sections had appropriate COVID-19 signage and socially distanced seating.
View full inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo conducted an unannounced annual Required 1 Year visit and met with Karen Lerner. During visit, LPA Marrufo toured the facility. The facility entrance had a visitor screening area. LPA observed the facility bathroom had signs related to COVID-19 and hand washing guidelines. LPA Marrufo observed the facility PPE supply and found the facility had a PPE supply of at least 30-days. LPA Marrufo observed the common areas in the Assisted Living and Memory Support sections of the facility and observed there to be socially distanced seating and COVID-19 related signs posted. LPA Marrufo observed the dinning areas in the Assisted Living and Memory Support areas. LPA Marrufo observed the facility kitchen and found there to be a perishable food supply of at least 3 days and a non-perishable food supply of at least 7 days. LPA Marrufo observed facility staff to be wearing face coverings. No deficiencies were cited as per California Code of Regulations Title 22. This report was reviewed with Karen Lerner and a copy of the report was provided.
ComplaintSeptember 3, 2021No deficiencies
Inspector: David Marrufo
Plain-language summary
State regulators conducted a technical assistance visit to help the facility manage a COVID-19 outbreak, during which eight residents and four staff members tested positive. The regulators recommended several infection control improvements, including better labeling of cleaning supplies, limiting elevator capacity, and reinforcing staff training on protective equipment and surface disinfection. No violations were found.
View full inspector notes
Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Jackie Jin, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo, and Nurse Cristina Wong conducted a tele-visit via Zoom to provide technical assistance to prevent and mitigate the spread of COVID-19 at the facility and met with Administrator Elyse Gerson and Wellness Director Gabriella Brigham. The Administrator reports that there are currently 8 COVID-19 positive residents and 4 COVID-19 positive staff. During today's tele-visit, the following recommendations were made to the facility by Nurse Cristina Wong: 1. Remind staff to label cleaning spray bottles with expiration dates 2. Ensure no more than 2 households in an elevator at a time 3. Continue training staff regarding donning and doffing of PPEs 4. Continue training staff regarding wiping down surfaces No deficiencies were cited as per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. This report was reviewed with Wellness Director Gabriella Brigham. A copy of the report will be sent to her for it to be signed and returned to CCL.
Federal summary
CMS Care CompareNot a CMS-certified facility
California RCFEs (residential care facilities for the elderly) are licensed by the state, not by CMS. CMS data only applies to skilled nursing facilities or to CCRCs that operate a licensed SNF wing.
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
No published reviews yet. Use the button above to share your experience.