StarlynnCare

California · Morgan Hill

Primavera Gardens

RCFE

A Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) is a non-medical residential care home licensed by California CDSS under Health & Safety Code §1560. Residents receive assistance with daily living activities such as bathing, dressing, meals, and medication management in a home-like setting. RCFEs are not hospitals or skilled nursing facilities — they do not provide round-the-clock medical care.

16095 Church Street · Morgan Hill, 95037

Quick facts

Licensed beds20
Memory careNot listed
Last inspectionOct 2025
Last citationSep 2025
Operated byChurch Street Assisted Living Inc.
Map showing location of Primavera Gardens

Quality snapshot

Updated April 25, 2026

Compared to 214 California RCFE facilities of similar size, over the last 36 months.

Source: California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing Division. View raw inspection records →

Quality grade· click to show how this was calculated

Severity
50th

Weighted citations per bed

Repeats
100th

Repeat deficiencies as share of total

Frequency
47th

Deficiencies per inspection

Tick mark at 50% = peer median · higher percentile = better facility

Primavera Gardens scores B−. Better than 66% of comparable California RESIDENTIAL CARE ELDERLY facilities. Severity: 50th percentile. Repeats: top 0%. Frequency: 47th percentile.

Each metric is converted to a 0–100 percentile within the peer set (higher = better). The composite grade averages all four. Peer set: CA / rcfe_general / small beds (214 facilities).

Citation severity over time

↓ improving

Weighted severity score per month · 24 months

May 24peer medianApr 26

Weighted score (24mo)

26

Last citation

Sep 25

Finding distribution

5 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

IsolatedPatternWidespreadJKLG3HID2EFABCSev 4 · IJSev 3Sev 2Sev 1

View inspections & citations

The rules that apply to this facility

California Title 22 requirements for this facility, with the specific regulation and a suggested question for each.

What training are all staff required to complete?22 CCR §87411

All direct-care staff must complete:

  • 10 hours initial training within the first four weeks of employment.
  • 4 hours annual in-service every year thereafter.
  • Administrator certificate from a CDSS-approved program — 80 hours for first-time, 40 hours renewal every 2 years.

Ask on tour: Ask when the last staff training was completed and how it's tracked.

How many staff must be on duty overnight?22 CCR §87415

Based on 20 licensed beds:

One awake caregiver must be on duty, plus one additional caregiver on call who can respond within 10 minutes.

Violation pattern to watch for:A facility that documents a staff member as "on call" but with that person physically off-site — when the law requires on-premises presence — is in violation of this section.

Ask on tour: Ask the facility to walk you through their overnight staffing plan and confirm whether on-call staff are on premises or off-site.

What health conditions can this facility legally accept or refuse?22 CCR §87612–87615

Restricted — allowed with physician order + care plan

  • Supplemental oxygen
  • Insulin and injectable medications
  • Indwelling or intermittent catheters
  • Colostomy / ileostomy
  • Stage 1 and Stage 2 pressure injuries
  • Wound care (non-complex)
  • Incontinence
  • Contractures

Prohibited — facility must refuse or discharge

  • Stage 3 or Stage 4 pressure injuries
  • Feeding tubes (PEG, NG, or J-tube)
  • Tracheostomies
  • Active MRSA or communicable infections requiring isolation
  • 24-hour skilled nursing needs
  • Total ADL dependence with inability to communicate needs

A hospice waiver (HSC §1569.73) can allow continued care for residents on hospice who would otherwise fall into a prohibited category.

Ask on tour: Ask whether your loved one's specific care needs are restricted or prohibited, and what the facility's process is if needs change after admission.

What must this facility report to the state — and how fast?22 CCR §87211 / WIC §15630
  • ImmediateElopement, fire, epidemic outbreak, or poisoningImmediately
  • 2 hoursAbuse with serious bodily injury2-hour phone report + 2-hour written report — to the California Department of Social Services (CDSS), Adult Protective Services, and law enforcement
  • 24 hrsAbuse without serious bodily injuryWithin 24 hours
  • Next dayDeath of a residentPhone by next working day; written within 7 days
  • Next dayInjury requiring medical treatment beyond first aidPhone by next working day; written within 7 days
  • WrittenBankruptcy, foreclosure, eviction, or utility shutoff noticeWritten notice to CDSS and residents — $100/day penalty (max $2,000) for failure

Your enforcement lever:Incidents that aren't reported on time are themselves a separate violation. If you believe a reportable event wasn't filed, you can submit a complaint directly to the California Department of Social Services (CDSS).

How does CDSS enforce these rules?22 CCR §87755–87777 / HSC §1569.58
  1. 1Notice of DeficiencyWritten citation with a correction deadline. Facility must submit a Plan of Correction.
  2. 2Civil PenaltyStarts at $50/day for non-serious; $150/day for serious deficiencies — immediately, with no grace period. Repeats escalate to $150 first day + $50/day, then $1,000 first day + $100/day.
  3. 3Suspension of AdmissionsFacility cannot accept new residents until violations are corrected.
  4. 4Temporary Suspension or RevocationEmergency suspension for imminent danger; full revocation after administrative hearing.
  5. 5Exclusion OrderAdministrator and operator can be barred from all CDSS-licensed facilities — not just this one.

See how these rules have been applied to this specific facility:

View state inspection record and citations

State records

California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing
License number
435202754
License type
RESIDENTIAL CARE ELDERLY
License status
LICENSED
License expires
Not yet indexed
Licensed beds
20
Operator
Church Street Assisted Living Inc.

Inspections & citations

11

reports on file

5

total deficiencies

3

Type A (actual harm)

InspectionOctober 2, 2025
No deficiencies

Plain-language summary

A resident left the facility unattended on August 20, 2025, and was found disoriented about 500 feet away; the resident was taken to the hospital where an infection was diagnosed but no injuries from the elopement were found. The facility determined the resident exited through an unlocked main entrance during the day, and the resident had no history of elopement. After the incident, the facility updated the resident's care plan, provided staff training on elopement and behavior management, assigned staff to supervise the main entrance, and plans to install an electronic gate; a technical violation was noted but no regulatory deficiencies were cited.

View full inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christine Kabariti arrived unannounced to conduct a case management – incident visit. The purpose of this visit it deliver the final report on a case management that was initiated on 08/25/2025 regarding an elopement that occurred on 08/20/2025. LPA met with Administrator, Lisa Lanford. On 08/21/2025, the Department received a verbal report regarding resident (R1) who eloped from the facility on 08/20/2025. It was reported that R1 was found by a neighbor around the corner of the facility (about 450-500 feet away) around 2:00PM. The neighbor called 911 and when 911 arrived, R1 was observed disoriented and was taken to the hospital where it was found that R1 was diagnosed with an infection. It was stated that R1 did not sustain any injuries during the elopement. Based on interview with staff (S1), around 4:15PM it was reported by another staff (S2) that R1 was missing when they were gathering all the residents for dinner time. Staff immediately went to look for R1 in all the rooms, interior and exterior of the facility but was unable to location him/her. Around 4:25PM, S1 called 911 and reported a missing resident. S1 states that while walking around the neighborhood, the police was driving by and informed S1 that R1 was found after 2:04PM and was found with no injuries. S1 states that R1 was sent to the hospital by the police due to confusion and unable to describe what happened. S1 stated that R1 returned to the facility on the same day. Page 1 of 2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 S1 stated to believe that R1 exited through the main entrance which is unlocked and does not alarm during the day. S1 stated that this was the first time this happened with R1, as R1 does not have any history of elopement. S1 denied any other residents having a history of elopement. LPA observed that there are cameras throughout the common areas. S1 stated to have went through all the camera footage and did not find footage of R1 leaving the facility. Based on record review, R1 diagnosed with a neurocognitive disorder and is not able to leave the facility unassisted. After the incident, the Administrator updated R1's appraisal/needs and services plan to include the change of behaviors after the elopement. The Administrator also provided staff with an in-service training on topics of elopement and behavior management. Going forward, the Administrator will always have a staff standing in the common areas which is facing the main entrance to supervise the residents and main entrance. Administrator states the main entrance door will continue to be unlocked and not alarmed because they have many visitors throughout the day going in and out of the facility. The Administrator states future plans to install an electric gate that will require a code to enter. Based on the facility's compliance history, the facility does not have any reported history of resident's eloping. No deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. A technical violation was provided per Title 22 Section 87219(i). This report was reviewed with Administrator, Lisa Lanford and a copy of the report was provided. Page 2 of 2.

Other visitSeptember 17, 2025Type A
2 deficiencies

Plain-language summary

During an unannounced annual inspection in September 2025, inspectors found two violations: hot water in two bedrooms exceeded safe temperatures (133.7°F and 126.5°F, above the 120°F limit), and a wooden plank in the dining room sliding door blocked it from opening freely. The facility addressed some issues immediately during the inspection, including fixing a clogged sink and replacing a non-working door alarm battery, and the administrator committed to posting caution signs at hot water sinks while arranging for a plumber to adjust the water temperature.

View full inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christine Kabariti arrived unannounced to conduct the facility's required 1 year annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator, Lisa Lanford. The facility is currently undergoing a change of ownership and the new owner has submitted an application to the Department which is currently pending. All residents, family and staff were made aware of the upcoming change. During visit, LPA toured the facility with ADM to include all resident bedrooms, bathrooms, shower room, staff lounge, dining room, living room, kitchen, and laundry room. Facility temperature maintained at 70 degrees F. Emergency exit doors observed with door alarms. 1 out of 3 of the door alarms which was next to bedroom #1 observed not operable. During visit, the maintenance personnel replaced the battery of the door alarm in which LPA observed the door alarm was operable. Fire extinguisher last serviced on 10/24/2024. Facility equipped with carbon monoxide detectors in the kitchen and hallways. All resident bedrooms equipped with beds, linens, night stands, dressers, lidded trash bins, and adequate lighting. Residents whose beds are equipped with half rails has a physician order on file for the use of half rails. Page 1 of 3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LPA measured the hot water temperature in bedroom #1. LPA observed the sink in bedroom #1 was not properly draining causing the sink to be clogged. The maintenance personnel fixed the sink drainage during visit. The hot water temperature was measured at 119 degrees F. The hot water temperature in bedroom #9 measured at 133.7 degrees F. Hot water temperature in bedroom #10 measured at 126.5 degrees F. During visit, the maintenance personnel attempted to lower the hot water temperature but then states the knob to adjust the water temperature is broken. The maintenance personnel states to have called a plumber in which the plumber is scheduled to come to the facility the morning of 09/18/2025. In the meantime, the ADM states a plan to measure the hot water temperature in all bathroom sinks and shower room and place caution signs next to the sinks whose hot water temperature exceeds more than 120 degrees F, while the facility is waiting to lower the hot water temperature. A Type A deficiency is being cited today per Title 22 Section 87303(e)(2) for the hot water temperature exceeding more than 120 degrees F in bedroom #9 and #10. LPA toured the kitchen area. LPA observed a perishable food supply of at least 2 days and a nonperishable food supply of 7 days. Toxins and chemicals are stored separately from the food supply. LPA observed the pilot light of the gas stove is left continuously on. ADM states the brand of the stove is designed to have the pilot light left of on continuously. LPA advised of safety concerns as there were plastic seasoning containers above the stove where the pilot light was on. ADM stated understanding. During visit, the maintenance personnel placed a carbon monoxide detector in the kitchen area. Refrigerator temperatures maintained at 36 degrees F. Freezer temperature maintained at 0 degrees F. LPA toured the resident dining area. LPA observed a wooden plank in the track of the sliding glass door obstructing the sliding glass door in the dining room. The sliding door leads out to front of facility. A Type A deficiency is being cited today per Title 22 Section 87307(d)(6) wherein the sliding door track in the dining room which leads to the front of the facility was obstructed by a wooden plank which did not allow the sliding door to open freely. Page 2 of 3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 5 residents records were reviewed. 5 out of 5 resident records observed complete and up-to-date. ADM states the needs and services plans are verbally reviewed with the resident and families however the new forms that were developed are not being signed. ADM states a plan to revise the needs and services plan to include a signature portion as acknowledgement that the plan was reviewed and agreed upon. 5 residents centrally stored medications and records were reviewed and no issues were noted. 3 staff files were reviewed and the staff files were complete to include a 1st aid certification, health screening, TB result, personnel record and staff training. Emergency drills are completed quarterly and the last drill was completed on 09/07/2025. Documents were requested to update the facility file to include by 09/24/2025: Lease agreement, LIC308, liability insurance, LIC500, administrator certificates, and surety bond (if applicable). Licensee was informed that the annual licensing fee has not been paid as of 09/17/2025. Deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. See LIC809-D. This report was reviewed with ADM Lisa Lanford and a copy of the report and appeal rights was provided. Page 3 of 3.

Type ACCR §87303(e)(2)

Regulation

(e) Water supplies and plumbing fixtures shall be maintained as follows: (2) Faucets used by residents for personal care such as shaving and grooming shall deliver hot water. Hot water temperature controls shall be maintained to automatically regulate the temperature of hot water used by residents to attain a temperature of not less than 105 degre…

Inspector finding

Based on observation and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above wherein the hot water temperature was measured at 133 and 126 degrees F which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 09/18/2025 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 The maintanence personnel called the plumber and the plumber is scheduled to come the morning of 09/18/2025 to inspect the water heater. In the meantime, ADM states a plan to post caution signs at …

Type ACCR §87307(d)(6)

Regulation

(d) The following space and safety provisions shall apply to all facilities: (6) All outdoor and indoor passageways and stairways shall be kept free of obstruction.

Inspector finding

Based on observation and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above wherein the sliding door in the dining room was obstructed by a wooden plank preventing the sliding door to open freely which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 09/18/2025 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 ADM immediately removed the wooden plank from the sliding door track. ADM will submit a written plan to ensure all exit routes are clear of obstructi…

InspectionAugust 25, 2025
No deficiencies

Plain-language summary

A state inspector visited the facility on August 25, 2025, to investigate an elopement (resident leaving the facility without permission) that occurred on August 20, 2025; the resident was found outside the facility the same day and returned without injury. The facility had not yet submitted required incident reports to the state at the time of the visit, and the inspector requested these be submitted by August 27, 2025. No violations were cited during this visit, though the inspector indicated the case would need further investigation.

View full inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marcella Tarin arrived unannounced to conduct a Case Management-Incident visit regarding an elopement that occurred on 8/20/2025. LPA met with Resident Care Supervisor (RCS) Lisa Lanford and stated the purpose of the visit. On 8/21/2025 RCS called the Department and spoke with LPA Christine Kabariti to report the elopement of Resident R1 on 8/20/2025. RCS stated R1 was located outside of the facility on 8/20/2025. RCS stated R1 returned back to the facility that same day and did not sustain injuries during this incident. RCS stated the facility has not submitted an LIC624 Unusual Incident Report/Injury Report and the SOC341 to the Department as of 8/25/2025. LPA requested RCS to submit the LIC624 and SOC341 to the Department on or before 8/27/2025. LPA interviewed 3 staff and toured 1 resident room. LPA requested pertinent documentation to include but not limited to physician's reports, service plans, and resident emergency contacts. LPA determined this case management needs further investigation. No deficiencies cited during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted with RCS Lisa Lanford and a copy of this report was provided.

ComplaintMay 7, 2025· Unsubstantiated
No deficiencies

Inspector: Jaime Vado

Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.

InspectionSeptember 5, 2024Type B
2 deficiencies

Inspector: Marcella Tarin

Plain-language summary

During this routine annual inspection, inspectors found the facility's food storage, refrigeration, resident rooms, and bathrooms in good condition, with medication records and resident files complete; however, they cited deficiencies including a wooden plank blocking a dining room exit door (a fire safety hazard that was ordered removed), two staff files missing health screening and TB test results, and inability to access emergency drill logs and the administrator's file because they were locked in an office the resident care supervisor couldn't open. Inspectors also noted that only one out of five staff members had current First Aid certification and requested updated liability insurance and administrator certification documents.

View full inspector notes

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Marcella Tarin and Christine Dolores conducted a required unannounced 1 year visit and met with Resident Care Supervisor (RCS), Lisa Lanford. During the visit LPAs toured the facility inside and out. LPAs toured the kitchen area. LPAs observed a perishable food supply of at least 2 days and a nonperishable food supply of 7 days. Refrigerator temperatures maintained at 35 degrees F. Freezer temperature maintained at -6 degrees F. LPAs toured the resident dining area. LPAs observed a wooden plank in the track of the sliding glass door obstructing the sliding glass door in the dining room. Sliding door leads out to front of facility. Licensee was advised to ensure all exit passageways are free and clear of obstruction. Licensee was advised to remove wooden plank in the track of the sliding glass door due to fire safety hazard. LPAs toured 6 resident rooms. LPAs observed 5 resident rooms (Rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) to have half-bed rails. LPAs observed Rooms 1, 2, 4 and 5 had half-bed rails, and Room 2 had full bed rails. RCS obtained orders for 3 resident's half-rails. LPAs observed the physician's order for the full-bed rails. LPAs recorded bathroom water temperature 120 degrees F in all resident bathrooms. LPAs observed all resident bathrooms had functioning lights and available soap and paper towels. LPAs observed each resident room had available bedding and clothing storage areas. LPAs tested the carbon monoxide detector to be functioning properly. The fire extinguisher last serviced on 7/26/2024. LPAs reviewed 5 resident Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Record (CSMDR). 5 out of 5 reviewed CSMDR were complete during visit. LPAs reviewed 5 out of 5 resident records to be complete. LPAs were unable to review fire drill logs. RCS states she believes the emergency drills are locked in the office, which RCS is unable to access. See LIC809C. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LPAs observed 2 out of 5 staff files are missing health screening and TB result. RCS states files may be locked in the front office which RCS is unable to access. LPAs advised that all personnel files should be available to Licensing agency for reviewing. LPAs were unable to review the administrators file. RCS states the file is locked in the front office, which RCS is unable to access. 5 out of 5 staff obtained fingerprint clearance. 1 out 5 staff have First Aid certification. Annual staff training records were reviewed. Documents were requested to update the facility file: liability insurance, administrator certification. Deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations Title 22 see LIC809D. This report was reviewed with RCS Lisa Lanford and a copy of the report and appeal rights were provided.

Type BCCR §87412(g)

Regulation

(g) All personnel records shall be maintained at the facility and shall be available to the licensing agency for review.

Inspector finding

Based on observation, record review and interview, the licensee did not ensure 3 out of 5 staff records to include the administrator's records and 2 staff members health screening and TB results were available for review due to being locked in the office, which staff do not have access to, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 09/12/2024 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 Licensee states she submit a written plan stating she will make he…

Type B

Regulation

(c) A facility shall conduct a drill at least quarterly for each shift. The type of emergency covered in a drill shall vary from quarter to quarter, taking into account different emergency scenarios. An actual evacuation of residents is notrequired during a drill. While a facility may provide an opportunity for residents to participate in a drill, …

Inspector finding

Based on observation and interview, the licensee did not ensure emergency drills are being documented and available for licensing review which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 09/12/2024 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 Licenses states she will submit a written plan stating that she conducted emergency drills quarterly and ensure that drills are being documented. Licensee will submit POC to LPA Tarin by POC due date.

Other visitOctober 12, 2023Type A
1 deficiency

Inspector: Christine Dolores

Plain-language summary

During a follow-up inspection in September 2023, inspectors found that one staff member worked at the facility for about six months without required criminal background clearance, having been hired in February 2023 and working one to two shifts per week until being immediately removed on September 29, 2023. The facility was cited and assessed a $500 civil penalty for this violation. The facility's resident care supervisor was provided with a copy of the report and information about appeal rights.

View full inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christine Dolores arrived unannounced to conduct a case management – deficiencies visit. LPA met with Resident Care Supervisor, Lisa Lanford. During visit, the facility had 4 staff members working who are all fingerprint cleared and associated to the facility. On 09/29/2023, the Department received two letters from the facility requesting a Criminal Record Exemption for staff (S1) and (S2). Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Romeo Manzano called and spoke with staff (S3) who states S1 had started working in the facility on-call for the past 6 months. The review of records shows S1’s criminal background clearance was pending, therefore, S1 was not fingerprint cleared to be working facilities. Based on interview, S1 is no longer employed at the facility. S3 states, S1 was hired in February 2023 and worked at least once to twice a week. On 09/29/2023, S1 was immediately released from work for not obtaining a fingerprint clearance from the Department. LPA obtained S1's Guardian information, hire date, and facility's LIC500 via email from S3. A deficiency was cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. See LIC 809-D. A civil penalty is being assessed for the amount of $500 ($100 per day x 5 days = $500), for staff (S1) working at the facility without fingerprint clearance. Please see LIC-421BG. This report was reviewed with Resident Care Supervisor, Lisa Lanford and a copy of the report and appeal rights were provided.

Type ACCR §87355(e)(1)

Regulation

(e) All individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1569.17(b) shall prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility: (1) Obtain a California clearance or a criminal record exemption as required by the Department or ... This requirement is not met as evidenced by:

Inspector finding

Based on interview, record review and observation the licensee did not ensure staff (S1) received a fingerprint clearance from the Department pior to starting work which poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to persons in care

ComplaintAugust 22, 2023· Unsubstantiated
No deficiencies

Inspector: Manuel Monter

Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.

Plain-language summary

A complaint investigation in August 2023 looked into allegations about cleanliness, pests, staffing levels, and medication record-keeping at the facility. Inspectors toured the building, interviewed residents and staff, and reviewed records; they found no evidence that any of these problems actually occurred—residents reported being satisfied with cleanliness and care, staff said there were no pests or medication issues, and medication records checked out correctly when reviewed. No violations were cited.

View full inspector notes

On 08/22/2023 LPA Monter toured the facility including resident bedrooms. LPA observed all facility bathrooms in good condition. LPA observed facility kitchen in good condition. LPA did not observe the facility in disrepair. LPA Monter interviewed 9 residents and 4 staff regarding the allegations. 6 out of 9 residents were happy with the facility's cleanliness and had no complaints. 1 spouse of a non verbal resident did not have complaints regarding the facility's cleanliness. 3 out of the 9 residents are not verbal and could not answer LPA's questions. 4 out of 4 staff stated the facility maintains the bathrooms clean based on shift; AM, PM, & NOC. Staff also stated they have a bathroom cleaning schedule. Based on the interviews conducted with clients & staff and based on observation and records review, although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the above allegations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Licensee does not prevent the presence of pests in the facility On 01/18/2023, LPA Dolores toured the facility, including resident bedrooms and kitchen during a complaint investigation. LPA did observe pests in the facility. ADM provided LPA with pest control invoices. On 08/22/2023 LPA Monter toured the facility including resident bedrooms and kitchen. LPA did not observe pests during the tour of the facility. LPA Monter interviewed 9 residents and 4 staff regarding the allegations. 5 out of 9 residents stated the facility had no pests such as cockroaches and had no complaints. 1 spouse of a non verbal resident stated he/she has not seen pests such as cockroaches. 3 out of the 9 residents are not verbal and could not answer LPA's questions. 1 out of 9 residents could not remember and answer LPA's questions. 4 out of 4 staff stated the facility does not have a pests such as cockroaches. Based on the interviews conducted with clients & staff and based on observation and records review, although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the above allegations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Page 2 out of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 On 08/22/2023 LPA Monter toured the facility including resident bedrooms, bathrooms, dinning area and kitchen. LPA did not observe residents disheveled or unattended. Residents rooms were well maintained. LPA did not observe the facility in disrepair. LPA Monter interviewed 9 residents and 4 staff regarding the allegations. 6 out of 9 residents stated the facility has enough staff to attend to their needs and had no complaints. 1 spouse of a non verbal resident stated he/she is happy with the care being provided. 3 out of the 9 residents interviewed are not verbal and could not answer LPA's questions. 4 out of 4 staff stated the facility has sufficient staff to meet the residents needs. The Department has completed the investigation of the above allegations. Based on observation & interviews conducted, the department has found that the above allegations were UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or are without a reasonable basis. Licensee does not ensure that medication records are accurate On 01/18/2023, LPA Dolores observed residents Medication Administrator Record (MAR). LPA observed the PM medications were already signed off by staff. Staff S1 stated if a resident refuses medication, then the staff are supposed to circle their pre-signed initial and write what happened in the nurses note located on the back of the MAR. S1 states the facility does not have any issues with residents refusing their medication. LPA Monter interviewed S1. S1 stated the procedure is the medtech on duty will pre-pour the meds for that day and signs off on the mars once they are given. If the residents refuse then he/she will take it back to med room and re-try again. S1 stated the facility's residents don't refuse their medication. S1 stated if they still refuse he/she will document it on the nurses note section. Page 2 out of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 On 08/22/2023, LPA Monter reviewed medication records for 3 residents. LPA did not observe any discrepancies when cross referencing the medications and the log for the 3 residents reviewed. The Department has completed the investigation of the above allegations. Based on observation & interviews conducted, the department has found that the above allegations were UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or are without a reasonable basis. No deficiencies cited at this time. Page 3 out of 3.

InspectionAugust 22, 2023
No deficiencies

Inspector: Chihhsien Chang

Plain-language summary

An unannounced annual inspection was conducted on this date, during which inspectors reviewed resident and staff files, interviewed staff and residents, and toured the facility including bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, and outdoor areas. The facility had appropriate safety features in place, including locked medication and supply closets, window screens, fire safety equipment, smoke and carbon monoxide detectors, and adequate food and water supplies at proper temperatures. No violations were found.

View full inspector notes

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Steve Chang and Emanuel Monter conducted an unannounced annual inspection visit, and met with Administrator Assistant (AA) NICK ELSOUSOU. LPAs checked 3 residents files and 3 staff files. LPA's interviewed 4 staff and 8 residents. LPAs toured the facility inside out with AA. License and Personal Rights posters were observed at the main entrance. Living room, dining room, kitchen, 13 resident bedrooms, 1 staff room, i office, 4 restrooms, and laundry room were inspected. Nonskid pads were observed in the restrooms. Medication closet, detergent closet, and knives closet were observed locked. All the bedrooms were observed with window screens. First Aid kit was observed in facility. Two day perishable food supplies and Seven day nonperishable food supplies were observed sufficient. Room temperature was observed at 78 degree F. Hot water temperature was measured to range from 118-119 degree F. Refrigerator temperature was observed at 40 degree F. Freezer temperature was observed at 0 degree F. Fire extinguisher was serviced on 05/08/2023. The facility was equipped with fire alarm system, smoke and carbon monoxide detectors. LPAs toured backyard and front yard with AA. There is no obstruction to block exit at the backyard. No deficiencies were noted today. Exit interview was conducted with AA. The report was provided to AA for signature. A copy of the report was provided to AA.

InspectionSeptember 15, 2022
No deficiencies

Inspector: Christine Dolores

Plain-language summary

An annual inspection focusing on infection control practices was conducted at the facility. Inspectors found that the facility maintains good hygiene standards, including regular cleaning and disinfection, hand sanitizer availability, symptom screening at entry, and staff training on infection control procedures. The facility was advised to maintain a 30-day supply of protective equipment and to provide N95 fit-testing for staff, but no violations were cited.

View full inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christine Dolores arrived unannounced to conduct the facility's annual inspection to focus on infection control and met with Lead Supervisor, Lisa Lanford. During visit, LPA toured the facility to include the living room, dining room, resident rooms, bathrooms, and exterior. Toxins and sharp objects observed secured. All staff observed to be wearing a face mask. Facility has a designated entry point for symptom screening and temperature check for all visitors and staff. LPA advised to include the full list of symptoms for the visitor symptom screening log. Hand sanitizer made available at entry. Bathrooms supplied with hygiene products, paper supplies, and hand washing signs. LPA observed the facility's Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) supplies. LPA advised to obtain a 30 day supply of PPE. Staff have been provided training on infection control. Staff clean and disinfect multiple times daily and as needed. The facility has procedures to isolation, testing, and visitation. Staff have not been provided N95 fit-testing. The following posters observed to include feeling ill, special visitors, social distancing, cough etiquette, and cleaning for COVID. No deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Advisory notes provided. This report was reviewed with Lisa Lanford and a copy of the report was provided.

Other visitSeptember 28, 2021
No deficiencies

Inspector: Christine Dolores

Plain-language summary

An unannounced annual inspection found the facility met standards for health and safety, including proper visitor screening, adequate supplies of soap and paper towels, covered trash cans, and daily disinfection of high-touch surfaces. Staff demonstrated knowledge of infection control practices and the facility had sufficient personal protective equipment on hand. Cleaning supplies that were stored unsecurely in a hallway bathroom were relocated during the inspection, and the facility was advised of this finding.

View full inspector notes

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Christine Dolores and Marybeth Donovan conducted an unannounced annual required inspection. LPAs met with Lisa Lanford, MedTech/Caregiver, and Claudia Elias, Patient Care Supervisor. During today's visit LPAs toured the facility inside and outside. LPAs observed a central entry point and screening area for all visitors and staff. Bathrooms have supplies of paper towels and soap available for staff, residents, and visitors. Trash cans were observed covered with lid. LPAs observed the following posters, cough etiquette, social distancing, visitor policy, hand washing, and COVID-19 everyday precaution. Facility has a sufficient amount of PPE supplies. Facility disinfect and sanitize high touch surfaces daily and as needed. Facility has a mitigation plan in place to prevent the spread of COVID-19. During tour LPAs observed disinfectant and cleaning supplies under bathroom sinks in the hallway. Toxins were removed and secured during time of visit. Advisory note provided. No deficiencies cited during today's visit per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. This report was reviewed with Claudia Elias, Patient Care Supervisor. Copy of this report was provided.

ComplaintAugust 17, 2021
No deficiencies

Inspector: Christine Dolores

Plain-language summary

A state licensing analyst visited the facility to provide guidance on managing COVID-19 spread, at a time when six residents and one staff member were positive. The facility was already implementing appropriate infection control measures including hand-washing stations, PPE supplies, and isolation protocols, and the analyst provided seven additional recommendations for strengthening those practices, such as keeping COVID-positive resident rooms closed at all times and monitoring asymptomatic residents every four hours. No violations were found.

View full inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christine Dolores conducted a scheduled technical assistance visit and met with Lead Staff, Claudia Elias. During visit, LPA conducted a Facetime tour of the facility with Program Clinical Coordinator (PCC) Helen Shi and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Jackie Jin. The purpose of the visit was to provide technical assistance to prevent and mitigate the spread of COVID-19 at the facility. Lead Staff, Claudia Elias reports that there are currently 6 COVID-19 positive residents and 1 COVID-19 positive staff. LPA toured the facility inside and out to include: entry point, common sitting area, dining room, resident rooms, green zone, red zone, bathrooms, and outdoor seating. LPA observed hand-washing signs in the bathrooms, visitor/staff screening logs, donning and doffing posters outside each residents room, and sufficient PPE supplies. During today's tele-visit, the following recommendations were made to the facility by PCC Helen Shi: 1. Always keep COVID-positive resident rooms closed, at all times 2. Place plastic shield/covering separating red and green zone 3. Place trash can with lid next to exit door in the red zone 4. Designate a back door for staff entrance and exit in red zone 5. Place a trash can with lid on the outside of COVID-positive room for disposal of N95 masks in green zone 6. Post COVID-19 postings throughout facility 7. Monitor residents who are asymptomatic every 4 hours 8. Monitor residents are who symptomatic more often, as needed See LIC-809C for more information. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 During visit, Lead Staff Claudia Elias closed all COVID-positive resident doors. Manager also placed trash can with lid outside the door of COVID-positive resident in green zone area. No deficiencies were cited as per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. This report was reviewed via tele-visit and email copy was provided to Lead Staff, Claudia Elias, for signature.

Federal summary

CMS Care Compare

Not a CMS-certified facility

California RCFEs (residential care facilities for the elderly) are licensed by the state, not by CMS. CMS data only applies to skilled nursing facilities or to CCRCs that operate a licensed SNF wing.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

No published reviews yet. Use the button above to share your experience.

← Back to Morgan Hill