Aegis Assisted Living of Moraga
RCFE · Memory Care
A Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) is a non-medical residential care home licensed by California CDSS under Health & Safety Code §1560. Residents receive help with daily living activities such as bathing, dressing, and medication management. An RCFE with a Memory Care designation is additionally required by California Title 22 (§87705 and §87706) to provide specialized staff training in dementia care, individualized care plans for residents with cognitive impairment, and appropriate supervision protocols — requirements that go beyond a standard RCFE license.
950 Country Club Drive · Moraga, 94556
Quick facts
Quality snapshot
Updated April 25, 2026Compared to 25 California RCFE memory care facilities of similar size, over the last 36 months.
Source: California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing Division. View raw inspection records →
Quality grade· click to show how this was calculated
Severity79thWeighted citations per bed
Repeats100thRepeat deficiencies as share of total
Frequency62thDeficiencies per inspection
Tick mark at 50% = peer median · higher percentile = better facility
Quality grade· click to show how this was calculated
Weighted citations per bed
Repeat deficiencies as share of total
Deficiencies per inspection
Tick mark at 50% = peer median · higher percentile = better facility
Aegis Assisted Living of Moraga scores A−. Better than 80% of comparable California RESIDENTIAL CARE ELDERLY facilities. Severity: 79th percentile. Repeats: top 0%. Frequency: 62th percentile.
Each metric is converted to a 0–100 percentile within the peer set (higher = better). The composite grade averages all four. Peer set: CA / rcfe_memory_care / large beds (25 facilities).
Citation severity over time
stableWeighted severity score per month · 24 months
Weighted score (24mo)
9
Last citation
Jan 26
Finding distribution
3 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
The rules that apply to this facility
California Title 22 requirements for this facility, with the specific regulation and a suggested question for each.Rules this facility has been cited for are shown first.
What must this facility report to the state — and how fast?Cited Oct 202522 CCR §87211 / WIC §15630
- ImmediateElopement, fire, epidemic outbreak, or poisoningImmediately
- 2 hoursAbuse with serious bodily injury2-hour phone report + 2-hour written report — to the California Department of Social Services (CDSS), Adult Protective Services, and law enforcement
- 24 hrsAbuse without serious bodily injuryWithin 24 hours
- Next dayDeath of a residentPhone by next working day; written within 7 days
- Next dayInjury requiring medical treatment beyond first aidPhone by next working day; written within 7 days
- WrittenBankruptcy, foreclosure, eviction, or utility shutoff noticeWritten notice to CDSS and residents — $100/day penalty (max $2,000) for failure
Your enforcement lever:Incidents that aren't reported on time are themselves a separate violation. If you believe a reportable event wasn't filed, you can submit a complaint directly to the California Department of Social Services (CDSS).
What dementia-care training must staff complete?22 CCR §87705 / HSC §1569.625
Because this facility markets dementia or Alzheimer's care, state law mandates higher training standards:
- 12 hours initial dementia training — 6 hours before a staff member works independently with residents, 6 more within the first 4 weeks.
- 8 hours annual dementia in-service — required every year thereafter.
- Administrator CE — the administrator must include 8 hours of dementia-specific continuing education in every 2-year recertification cycle.
Training must cover individualized care plans, behavioral expressions, appropriate supervision, and the facility's dementia care philosophy.
Ask on tour: Ask how dementia training records are kept — families may request documentation.
How many staff must be on duty overnight?22 CCR §87415
Based on 100 licensed beds:
One awake caregiver must be on duty, plus one additional caregiver on call who can respond within 10 minutes.
Violation pattern to watch for:A facility that documents a staff member as "on call" but with that person physically off-site — when the law requires on-premises presence — is in violation of this section.
Ask on tour: Ask the facility to walk you through their overnight staffing plan and confirm whether on-call staff are on premises or off-site.
What health conditions can this facility legally accept or refuse?22 CCR §87612–87615
Restricted — allowed with physician order + care plan
- Supplemental oxygen
- Insulin and injectable medications
- Indwelling or intermittent catheters
- Colostomy / ileostomy
- Stage 1 and Stage 2 pressure injuries
- Wound care (non-complex)
- Incontinence
- Contractures
Prohibited — facility must refuse or discharge
- Stage 3 or Stage 4 pressure injuries
- Feeding tubes (PEG, NG, or J-tube)
- Tracheostomies
- Active MRSA or communicable infections requiring isolation
- 24-hour skilled nursing needs
- Total ADL dependence with inability to communicate needs
A hospice waiver (HSC §1569.73) can allow continued care for residents on hospice who would otherwise fall into a prohibited category.
Ask on tour: Ask whether your loved one's specific care needs are restricted or prohibited, and what the facility's process is if needs change after admission.
How does CDSS enforce these rules?22 CCR §87755–87777 / HSC §1569.58
- 1Notice of DeficiencyWritten citation with a correction deadline. Facility must submit a Plan of Correction.
- 2Civil PenaltyStarts at $50/day for non-serious; $150/day for serious deficiencies — immediately, with no grace period. Repeats escalate to $150 first day + $50/day, then $1,000 first day + $100/day.
- 3Suspension of AdmissionsFacility cannot accept new residents until violations are corrected.
- 4Temporary Suspension or RevocationEmergency suspension for imminent danger; full revocation after administrative hearing.
- 5Exclusion OrderAdministrator and operator can be barred from all CDSS-licensed facilities — not just this one.
See how these rules have been applied to this specific facility:
View state inspection record and citationsState records
California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing- License number
- 075601424
- License type
- RESIDENTIAL CARE ELDERLY
- License status
- LICENSED
- License expires
- Not yet indexed
- Licensed beds
- 100
- Operator
- Aegis Senior Communities, Llc
Inspections & citations
17
reports on file
7
total deficiencies
InspectionJanuary 21, 2026Type B1 deficiency
Plain-language summary
On January 21, 2026, inspectors visited the facility to investigate a self-reported incident in which a resident walked out the front door and across the street to a nearby store on January 20, 2026; a staff member who was on lunch break at the store saw the resident and brought them back safely. The facility was found to have violated regulations related to resident supervision and has since retrained staff and assigned one-on-one supervision to the resident. The facility may face civil penalties if it does not correct the violation.
View full inspector notes
On 01/21/2026 at 3:00 PM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) David Doidge arrived unannounced to conduct a Case Management visit in regards to a self-reported elopement from the facility. LPA met with General Manager Tianna Henderson and explained the purpose of the visit. It was reported to the LPA that on 01/20/2026 a resident (R1) eloped from the facility. R1 had walked out the front door and across the street to a store. S1 was in the store while on lunch and saw the resident. S1 was able to assist R! back to the facility safely. Staff has been retrained with in-service training and R1 now has a one-on-one. The deficiencies were observed (see LIC 809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulation, Title 22. Failure to correct the deficiency may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted with Dolly Rizvi appeal rights and a copy of this report provided.
Regulation
o care, supervision, and ...meet their individual needs...by staff that are sufficient in numbers, qualifications, and competency... This requirement was not met as evidence by
Inspector finding
Based on self report, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not having resident supervision which posed a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.
Other visitJanuary 21, 2026No deficiencies
Plain-language summary
A state inspector conducted an unannounced annual inspection on January 21, 2026, and found no violations. The facility met all safety standards checked, including adequate lighting and temperature control, locked medications and supplies, working smoke and carbon monoxide detectors, complete resident and staff records, and sufficient food supplies on hand.
View full inspector notes
On 01/21/2026 at 12:30 PM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) David Doidge arrived unannounced to conduct 1-Year Annual Required inspection. LPA met with General Manager Tianna Henderson and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility including but not limited to, bedrooms, bathrooms, multiple activity rooms, kitchen, and common area. LPA observe lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. Hallway temperature was maintained at 72 degrees Fahrenheit. The hot water temperature in a common bathroom was measured at 113 degrees Fahrenheit. There is a minimum of one week supply of nonperishable and 2-day of perishable foods. Centrally stored medications, sharps are locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were in operating condition during visit. Fire extinguisher was last serviced on 12/30/2025. Emergency disaster drills are conducted monthly, with the last one conducted on XXX. First aid kit was observed to be complete. LPA reviewed five (5) resident records and five (5) staff records, all were complete. No deficiencies observed or cited during this visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided
Other visitOctober 7, 2025Type B1 deficiency
Plain-language summary
A licensing analyst visited the facility on October 7, 2025 to investigate a complaint and found that a 2023 incident in which emergency medical services responded to a resident was never reported to the state as required by law. Staff said they were not aware the incident had occurred and did not file the required incident report with the Department. The facility was cited for this failure to report.
View full inspector notes
On 10/07/2025 at 1:30 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) L. Alexander arrived unannounced to conduct a Case Management visit. LPA met with General Manager, Tianna Henderson and explained the purpose of the visit. While conducting complaint investigation #15-AS-20241022215724, LPA L. Alexander observed during record review and interviews that an incident involving a 911 EMT response for Resident (R1) on 07/03/2023 was not reported to the Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) as required. Staff (S1) stated they were unaware of the incident involving emergency medical services responding to R1. S1 confirmed that no LIC624 (Unusual Incident Report) was submitted to the Department. Based on information obtained, the facility failed to report an incident involving emergency medical response for a resident to the Department within the required timeframe. The deficiencies were observed (see LIC809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulation, Title 22. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report and Appeal Rights (LIC9058) were provided to General Manager, Tianna Henderson.
Regulation
87211(a)(1)(D) Reporting Requirements (a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as the Department may require, including, but not limited to, the following: (1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence of any of the even…
Inspector finding
Based on record review and interviews the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in by not submitting a written report within 7 days of the occurences of any of the events for residents in care. Specifically there were no incident report submitted on around 07/03/23 for when R1 had a EMT response which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
ComplaintOctober 7, 2025· UnsubstantiatedNo deficiencies
Inspector: Lori Alexander-Washington
Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.
Plain-language summary
A complaint alleged the facility billed a resident for services not provided and failed to follow a do-not-resuscitate order; investigators found no evidence to support either claim. Regarding billing, records showed the resident's care plan was reassessed, the rate was updated accordingly, and a credit of $6,654.96 was issued to the account. Regarding the DNR allegation, emergency responders were called for a syncope episode on July 3, 2023, but the fire district report documented that the resident was conscious and alert, declined hospital transport, and no resuscitation was performed.
View full inspector notes
LIC9099-C (Page 2) Allegation: Staff billed resident for services not being rendered by staff. Finding: Unsubstantiated On 10/30/2024, LPA L. Alexander interviewed Witness (W1). W1 stated that R1’s care plan increased from $15,000.00 to $20,000.00. W1 reported that they were billed for 30 days but only paid for 5 days, at approximately $6,000.00. W1 stated that facility only discussed points but never discussed the money. On 10/31/2024, LPAs Alexander and Doidge interviewed Staff (S1, S2 and S3). S2 stated that R1’s Individualized Service Assessment dated 03/18/2024 totaled 324 points. S2 reported completing a reassessment on 08/06/2024, which resulted in 447 points. S2 explained that once the assessment is completed, the billing department calculates the rate. S2 stated they contacted W1 via email to discuss the new assessment and requested a care conference, but W1 did not respond. S3 reported that they complete resident billing each month. S3 explained that when a new assessment is completed, they enter the total points into the billing system, which calculates the updated rate. S3 stated that they attempted to explain the charges to W1 by phone, but W1 became upset and disconnected the call. S3 further reported that the Responsible Party (RP) removed R1 from the facility on 08/26/2024. S3 also stated: The August billing statement dated 07/18/2024 totaled $15,498.76. A new assessment completed on 08/22/2024 changed the rate to $353.13 per day. This rate applied to the period 08/22/2024 through 09/30/2024 (40 days). Adjustments were made to the account, resulting in a credit of ($6,654.96). Based on interviews and records reviewed, the allegation that staff billed the resident for services not being rendered is unsubstantiated . LIC9099-C Continued... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LIC9099-C (Page 3) Allegation: Staff did not follow resident's care plan (DNR). Finding: Unsubstantiated On 10/30/2024, LPA Alexander interviewed Witness (W1), who stated that on July 3, 2023, R1 was under hospice care with Suncrest Hospice and had a “Do Not Resuscitate” (DNR) order in effect. W1 stated that an Aegis Moraga night care staff member summoned paramedics rather than contacting the hospice team. W1 reported being contacted by paramedics who stated that R1 had been resuscitated. W1 further stated that a hospice representative also contacted them immediately and expressed concern regarding a breach of protocol by facility staff. On 10/31/2024, LPAs Alexander and Doidge interviewed Staff (S1, S2 and S4) regarding allegations that CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation) was rendered to R1, who had a DNR on file, around 07/03/2023. S1 stated they were not aware of this incident and reviewed facility records for any corresponding incident report. S1 stated that no LIC624 (Unusual Incident Report) was found in R1’s file. S2 stated that they were not working at the facility during that time period. S4 was interviewed by phone and stated that if any such incident had occurred, it would have been documented in facility records. S4 stated they do not recall any incident involving R1 that required 911 response or CPR being rendered. On 11/04/2024, LPA Alexander contacted Suncrest Hospice and spoke with W2. W2 confirmed that R1 was discharged from hospice services on 03/14/2023 and re-admitted on 05/26/2023. W2 stated there were hospice notes dated 07/03/2023 for an assessment but nothing in their records indicating a 911 call or CPR performed by emergency personnel. LIC9099-C Continued... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LIC9099-C (Page 4) LPA reviewed the Moraga-Orinda Fire District “Patient Care Report” dated 07/03/2023, which documented an EMT response to the facility at approximately 2135 hours. The report indicated that R1 experienced a syncope episode, was conscious, awake, and alert upon EMT arrival, and had no medical complaints. The report revealed that R1 declined transport to the hospital, and the EMT contacted R1’s Power of Attorney, who also declined transport. Based on interviews and records reviewed, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation that staff failed to follow R1’s care plan or disregarded a DNR order. Records reviewed indicate that while emergency medical services were contacted, no resuscitation efforts were performed, and R1 remained stable at the scene. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report were provided to General Manager, Tianna Henderson.
InspectionMay 9, 2025No deficiencies
Plain-language summary
On May 9, 2025, inspectors visited to follow up on an incident reported on April 25 in which a resident received two medication tablets instead of one due to a pharmacy error in the electronic record, though the physical medication package showed the correct amount of one tablet. The medication care manager caught the error before it could cause harm, the pharmacy corrected its records, and the resident was monitored with no adverse effects. No violations were found during the inspection, and staff retraining on medication administration was completed.
View full inspector notes
On 05/09/2025 at approximately 1:30 PM License Program Analyst (LPA) David Doidge arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit regarding an Unusual incident report (UIR) that was reported to CCLD on 04/25/2025. LPA met with Tianna Henderson General Manager (GM) and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Spoke with General Manager and the Medication Care Manager (S1). The UIR stated that the resident was given two (2) tabs instead of one tab as directed on the bubble pack. The incorrect dosage given was caused by an error from the pharmacy. The Pharmacy entered two (2) tabs as the dosage in the Electronic Medication Administrator Record (EMAR) and the bubble pack showed one (1). The Medication Care Manager (S1) caught the error when administering the dose and informed the pharmacy to have EMAR updated. Correct dosage has since been administered. Per GM retraining on medication was also performed. Resident’s spouse and PCP were updated. Resident was monitored with no negative side effects. No deficiencies observed or cited during this visit. . Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided
ComplaintJanuary 14, 2025· UnsubstantiatedNo deficiencies
Inspector: James Sampair
Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.
InspectionJanuary 14, 2025No deficiencies
Inspector: David Doidge
Plain-language summary
A routine annual inspection was conducted on January 14, 2025, which included a tour of the facility's bedrooms, bathrooms, activity rooms, kitchen, and common areas, along with a review of resident and staff records. Inspectors found adequate lighting, proper temperature controls, secure medication and sharp storage, current fire safety equipment, and monthly emergency drills. No violations were found.
View full inspector notes
On 01/14/2025 at 08:15 AM, Licensing Program Analysst (LPAs) David Doidge and James Sampair arrived unannounced to conduct an annual required inspection. LPAs met with General Manager Angeles Sticka and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility including but not limit to, bedrooms, bathrooms, multiple activity rooms, kitchen, and common area. LPA observe lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. Hallway temperature was maintained at 72 degrees Fahrenheit. The hot water temperature in a common bathroom was measured at 120 degrees Fahrenheit. There is a minimum of one week supply of nonperishable and 2-day of perishable foods. Centrally stored medications, sharps are locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Fire extinguisher was last serviced on 12/18/2024. Emergency disaster drill are conducted monthly, last conducted on 12/20/2024. LPA reviewed five (5) resident records and five (5) staff records, all were complete. No deficiencies observed or cited during this visit. . Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided
Other visitSeptember 26, 2024Type B1 deficiency
Inspector: Carol Fowler
Plain-language summary
On September 14, 2024, three residents with dementia left the facility unassisted by pushing open an alarmed side gate from the memory care courtyard; two were found a few blocks away by police and one was found near the front of the facility. State inspectors conducted a follow-up case management visit and found deficiencies related to how the facility secured its exits and prevented residents from leaving unassisted. The facility must submit a plan to correct these deficiencies by the deadline set by the state.
View full inspector notes
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) D. Doidge and C. Fowler arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit in response to the Unusual Incident Report (UIR) for three residents (R1, R2 and R3), that AWOLed, submitted by the facility to the Department. LPAs met with and informed, Angeles Sticka, General Manager, of the purpose of visit. UIR received indicated on September 14. 2024, R1, R2 and R3 AWOLed from facility by opening an alarmed side gate from the memory care's courtyard and walked out. R2 pushed on the door until it opened, R1 and R3 followed. R2 headed left toward the front of the facility and was found by staff in front of the facility. R2 and R3 had walked straight out and were later found a few blocks away by the police. LPAs reviewed of Physician's Report for all three residence that showed dementia and unable to leave the facility unassisted. LPAs toured the facility, observed auditory signals on outer gates for the memory care courtyard. Deficiencies are cited per Title 22 California Code of Regulations and listed on LIC9099D. Failure to submit proof of corrections (POC) by plan of correction due dates and/or any repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. Appeal Rights, were provided.
Regulation
(a) In addition to the rights listed in Section 87468.1, .residents...for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights:(4) To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs and are delivered by staff that are sufficient in numbers, qualifications, and competency to meet their needs.
Inspector finding
This requirement is not met as evidence by: based on record review, residence R! R2 and R3 are not able to leave facility unassisted due to diagnosis. Residence AWOLed due to lack of supervision and timely response to alarms.
Other visitJanuary 26, 2024No deficiencies
Inspector: Daisy Panlilio
Plain-language summary
This was a routine annual inspection conducted on January 26, 2024. The inspector toured the 64-bed facility (including 24 memory care residents on the first floor), reviewed staff and resident files, interviewed residents and staff, and found no deficiencies—the facility met all inspection standards. The facility had screening procedures in place at entry, adequate food and supplies, working safety equipment, and proper documentation on file.
View full inspector notes
On 01/26/24 at 12PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) D Panlilio arrived unannounced to conduct an annual required inspection. LPA met with co-administrator (Co-ADM) and explained the purpose of the visit. Co-ADM has a current administrator certificate # 6041047740 which expires 06/15/2024. At 1:30PM, LPA toured the facility with Co-ADM including but not limited to the front entrance, screening station, kitchen, bathrooms, bedrooms and common areas. There is one central entry point for universal screening for staff, residents and visitors. An electronic sign-in policy, digital scanner temperature device, additional face masks and hand sanitizers were observed at the front desk screening station. LPA observed 2 memory care units located on the first floor with 24 memory care residents. LPA also observed 40 assisted living residents located on the second floor. Emergency Disaster Plan, Complaint poster, Personal rights, Cough/sneeze etiquette, proper hand-washing signs were observed posted in common areas. Facility has a sufficient 2-day perishable and 7-day non-perishable food supply. Facility has a 30-day supply of PPEs, paper, medications locked in cabinets. Comfortable temperature is maintained at 72 deg F. Hot water temperature was measured at 118 deg F. Facility has a mitigation plan in place and the infection control leader is the administrator. Inside and outside pathways were free of obstruction and fire hazards. Smoke and Carbon monoxide detectors were operational. LPA reviewed 5 staff and 5 resident files. LPA also conducted 5 staff and 5 resident interviews during visit. Continue on next page, LIC 9099-C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 At 3:45PM, LPA obtained updated copies of the following documents for facility file: LIC500- Personnel Report Residents Roster LIC308- Designation of Facility Responsibility LIC610E- Emergency/Disaster Plan including infection control plans Evidence of Liability Insurance No deficiencies observed during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report provided.
InspectionDecember 14, 2023No deficiencies
Inspector: Kelly Nguyen
Plain-language summary
On December 14, 2023, the state conducted an unannounced visit following a self-reported incident on December 7 in which one resident hit another resident in the community. The facility investigated the incident, found the first resident was being treated for a urinary tract infection that may have contributed to the behavior, assigned one-on-one care, notified both families, and evaluated the second resident for injuries with none found. No deficiencies were cited.
View full inspector notes
On 12/14/2023 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Nguyen conducted an unannounced case management visit regarding a SOC 341 self-reported incident that occurred on 12/7/23. LPA spoke with Amria Angeles Sticka, Executive Director and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA received an SOC 341 self-reported regrading a resident hitting another resident well in the community. LPA interviewed S1 regrading the incident. S1 stated that the situation has been resolved. S1 spoke with the victim family members and explained the situation. R1 was being treated for UTI and now is calmed. S1 had the following plan implement. - R1 was being evaluated by the physician. - Internal investigation of the caused of R1 irritation. - R1 was assigned a one on one after that incident. - LVN did an assessment on R2 for any injury (found no injury) LPA reviewed: - Physician Notification - PCP notification of R1 behavior - Change in medication. - S1 Communication between R1 family member regrading R1 change in behavior. - S1 Communication with R2 family member No deficiencies cited. Exit Interview conducted and a copy of this report provided via email.
ComplaintDecember 4, 2023· UnsubstantiatedNo deficiencies
Inspector: Paris Watson
Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation looked into four allegations: inadequate incontinence care, improper medication assistance, poor facility cleanliness, and pest control issues. Inspectors found incontinence supplies readily available in multiple locations with staff checking residents every 2 hours, the facility was clean without odor, and a pest control contract with monthly inspections was in place; however, there was not enough evidence to confirm or deny that the alleged problems actually occurred. The complaint was found to be unsubstantiated.
View full inspector notes
It was alleged that Staff do not provide proper incontinence care to residents in care Based on observations, LPA observed incontinence supplies in the memory care wings, LPA observed a sufficient amount of diapers, wipes and gloves. Based on interviews with staff (S1, S4 and S5), incontinence residents are checked on and changed every 2 hours. When asked about incontinence supplies, S4 and S5 stated that supplies can be low with Hospice residents due to limited supplies and wrong sizes. Based on interview with Care Director (CD), Hospice agencies send incontinence supplies weekly without CD needing to request. Other incontinence supplies are restocked by CD and placed in four different locations (in an unlocked cabinet in the Wellness Center, in a locked area/closet in each memory care wing and in an overstock closet that CD has access to). It was alleged that Staff do not provide proper medication assistance to residents in care Based on interview with CD, med techs (Medication Care Manager), the Associate Care Director, the Wellness Nurse and CD themselves dispense medication. There are seven med techs on staff, and five work during the day (two during AM shifts, two during PM shifts and one during NOC shifts). Based on interview with resident (R1), R1 has not experienced any issues with their medications. R1 stated that staff knocks on their door and dispenses their medications without issues. It was alleged that Facility is not kept clean Based on observations, LPA observed the facility to be clean and without odor. Housekeeping staff were observed cleaning the facility during the initial visit. Based on interviews with staff (S3, S4 and S5), the facility is kept clean. S4 stated that on average they observe housekeeping sanitation three times per their shift. Based on interview with Executive Director (ED), resident apartments are cleaned once a week, unless they have an accident and/or need it to be cleaned more frequently. The whole facility is cleaned every day by housekeeping. Report continues on 9099 C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 It was alleged that Facility is not kept free of pests Based on observations, LPA did not observe any pests during the initial visit. Based on interviews with staff (S1 and S4), spiders are common in the memory care unit. S4 stated that they have observed spiders, roaches and stated that for some time there was a cricket in one of the hallways in the memory care wing. Based on interviews with Executive Director (ED) and Maintenance Manager (MM), the facility has a contract with Western Exterminator Company, the facility is inspected every month and treated as needed. Staff can report to MM when they observe pest, MM contacts the exterminator and the facility gets treated with the best mode to eliminate pest (such as traps and sprays). Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there are not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED . Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.
InspectionJanuary 17, 2023No deficiencies
Inspector: Catherine Lin
Plain-language summary
On January 17, 2023, inspectors conducted an unannounced infection control inspection and found the facility in compliance with all requirements. The facility had proper screening procedures at entry, adequate supplies of personal protective equipment and food, staff wearing appropriate protective gear, and documented infection control and emergency plans in place. No violations were cited.
View full inspector notes
On 1/17/2023 starting at 11:50 a.m., Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Catherine Lin arrived unannounced to conduct Infection Control Inspection. LPA met with the Administrator and disclosed the purpose of the visit. Upon entry, LPA observed Accushield machine was in place for check-in. LPA toured facility including but not limited to front entrance, screening station, hand washing stations, bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, common areas, and outdoor areas. There is one central entry point for universal screening for staff, residents, and visitors. A sign-in policy, thermometer and hand sanitizer were observed at screening station. Cough/sneeze etiquette and hand washing posters were observed. Facility staff were observed to be wearing proper PPE. Facility has a sufficient 2-day perishable and one-week non-perishable food supply. Facility has a 30-day supply of PPEs maintained at central location and easily accessible for staff. Facility has Infection Control Plan, Emergency Disaster Plan, and maintains record of routine screening for residents, staff, and visitors. No deficiency cited during visit. Exit interview conducted with Director of Resident Services, and a copy of this report provided.
Other visitNovember 10, 2022Type B3 deficiencies
Inspector: Catherine Lin
Plain-language summary
During a follow-up visit on November 10, 2022, inspectors found that the facility had not corrected problems identified in a June investigation: staff had not properly worn protective equipment when caring for a COVID-positive resident and did not follow isolation procedures, and staff were assigned to work with both COVID-positive and COVID-negative residents despite being told by public health officials to keep them separate. The facility also self-reported a medication error in early November, which was a repeat violation within 12 months, resulting in a $250 penalty.
View full inspector notes
On this day 11/10/22, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) C. Lin conducted a case management visit and met with General Manager (GM). LPA explained to GM the purpose of the visit. During an investigation conducted by the Department on 6/3/2022, the following deficiencies were observed · Staff S6 did not wear full PPE while providing care to Covid-19 positive resident. LPA and former Administrator (S1) observed that S6 walked out from an isolation room 104 with surgical mask and gloves only, and S6 didn’t perform PPE donning and doffing properly. · Staff S2 admitted that “Staff are working crossover for both Covid-19 positive and negative residents due to staff shortage”. S2 stated that it was permitted by the Contra Costa Public Health (W3). LPA contacted W3, W3 stated that S2 was instructed to designate staff for Covid-19 positive residents only, staff was not allowed crossover working between positive and negative residents. Continue on LIC809-C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 In addition, facility self-reported an incident regarding medication error to resident (R1) and submitted incident report (LIC624) to CCL on 11/4/2022. It’s a repeating violation within 12-months, a $250 civil penalty is assessed today. The above deficiencies were observed (see LIC809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulation, Title 22. Failure to correct the deficiency may result in civil penalty. Exit interview conducted with GM. A copy of this report and Appeal Rights were provided.
Regulation
87470 Infection Control Requirements (b)...residents in the facility are diagnosed with a communicable disease, the following shall apply: (2) All staff and volunteers...shall wear appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) to prevent.... This requirement is not met as evidenced by…
Inspector finding
Based on observation the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. LPA observed staff did not wear full PPE while providing care to Covid-19 positive resident which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Regulation
87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (2) To be accorded safe, healthful... This requirement is not met as evidenced by…
Inspector finding
Based on observation the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. LPA observed staff crossover working between Covid-19 positive and negative residents which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Regulation
87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (a)...The plan shall encourage routine medical and dental care and provide for assistance in obtaining such care, by compliance with the following: (5) Facility staff, except those authorized by law..Assistance with self-administered medications shall be limited to the following: (A) Medications usually pres…
Inspector finding
Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. Medication error incident occurred to resident on 11/2/2022 which poses a potential health and safety concern to persons in care.
ComplaintNovember 10, 2022· UnsubstantiatedNo deficiencies
Inspector: Catherine Lin
Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found no evidence that residents were being left in soiled diapers, that showers were being delayed, or that falls were caused by understaffing. Residents and staff reported that diaper changes and showers happened as scheduled, and that staff responded quickly when residents called for help. No violations were cited.
View full inspector notes
Allegation: Residents are being left in soiled diapers – Unsubstantiated. The Department has investigated this allegation and per records review and interviews and found that no resident was identified being left in soiled diapers. 6 residents (R3, R5, R6, R7, R9, and R10) and 2 witnesses (W1 and W4) stated that residents were assisted with changing diapers as needed. Allegation: Residents are not being showered timely – Unsubstantiated. The Department has investigated this allegation and per records review and interviews and found that residents on shower schedules were assisted with showering on time. 5 residents (R3, R5, R6, R7 and R10) and 1 witness (W4) stated that residents got showers 2-3 times per week. Allegation: Residents are falling due to insufficient staffing – Unsubstantiated. The Department has investigated this allegation and per records review and interviews and found that 2 residents (R1 and R2) were reported unwitnessed fall in subject time period, R1 didn’t remember fall had happened. R2 was not alert, R2’s family member W2 stated that R2 has been cared well by staff and has not observed staffing shortage issue. No additional information is obtained to allege falling due to insufficient staffing. 5 residents (R5, R6, R7 R9 and R10) and 1 witnessed (W1) stated that staff showed up as quickly as within 5-10 minutes when residents pressed their call button. Based on observation, records reviewed, and interview conducted, the above allegations are unsubstantiated. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. No deficiency cited, exit interview conducted with GM, and a copy of this report provided.
Other visitAugust 11, 2022Type B1 deficiency
Inspector: Catherine Lin
Plain-language summary
On August 11, 2022, the state conducted an unannounced inspection after the facility self-reported two medication dosing errors within three months — one resident received the wrong dose of Lorazepam in April and another received the wrong dose of Hydrocodone in July, though neither resident was harmed. The facility trained the staff members involved and later retrained all medication technicians, but because two errors occurred within 90 days, the state cited a deficiency. The facility must submit a plan to prevent future errors or face civil penalties.
View full inspector notes
On 08/11/22 at 11:35 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) C. Lin conducted an unannounced case management visit as a result of receiving 2 self-reported incidents submitted to CCLD regarding mediation error. LPA explained the purpose of the visit with business manager, General Manager Angeles Sticka arrived at a later time. Based on records review, the following incident reports were submitted to CCL: On 4/28/2022, facility self-reported administered wrong dosage of medication Lorazepam to resident (R1) at 7:20am on 4/20/2022. R1 was not resulted injury or medical problem due to this incident. In-service training was provided to staff (S1) on 4/21/2022. On 7/12/2022, facility self-reported administered wrong dosage of medication Hydrocodone to resident (R2) at 5:00pm on 7/10/2022. R2 was not resulted injury or medical problem due to this incident. In-service training was provided to staff (S2) on 7/17/2022. On 8/1/2022, LPA advised LVN (S3) to retrain all med-tech. S3 submitted proof of training to CCL on 8/4/2022. Due to medication error occurred twice in 90 days, deficiency is cited per Title 22 California Code of Regulations and listed on LIC809-D. Failure to submit proofs of correction (POC) by plan of correction due date and/or repeat deficiency within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties . Exit interview conducted with General Manager. Appeal Rights and a copy of this report provided.
Regulation
87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (a)...The plan shall encourage routine medical and dental care and provide for assistance in obtaining such care, by compliance with the following: (5) Facility staff, except those authorized by law..Assistance with self-administered medications shall be limited to the following: (A) Medications usually pres…
Inspector finding
Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. Medication error incidents occurred twice in 90 days which poses a potential health and safety concern to persons in care.
ComplaintApril 4, 2022· UnsubstantiatedNo deficiencies
Inspector: Catherine Lin
Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.
Plain-language summary
The Department investigated complaints about inadequate food service and cleanliness at the facility. During the visit, inspectors found food was served warm, sufficient food was available in the kitchen, the facility was clean with no odors, and staff reported being trained in cleaning and food service practices. No violations were found.
View full inspector notes
Allegation: Staff are not providing adequate food service for resident's– Unsubstantiated The Department has investigated this allegation and per interviews, records review, and observations, 2 residents stated that food was served in nice and warm, 6 out of 7 caregivers stated that food was served in warm. 2 caregivers stated that food could become cold if residents couldn’t finish it in short period of time, caregivers microwaved it sometimes. 6 out of 7 caregivers stated that forcing residents to eat was not observed or witnessed. Sufficient food was observed in the kitchen durin g visit. Allegation: Facility is not clean– Unsubstantiated The Department has investigated this allegation and per interviews, records review and observations, facility was observed clean and has no smell during visit. 6 out of 7 caregivers stated that they have been instructed and trained to maintain facility clean, they cleaned up residents’ mess as needed when housekeeper was not scheduled. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to provide the alleged violation did occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted with Business Office Manager, and a copy of this report provided.
ComplaintFebruary 18, 2022No deficiencies
Inspector: Catherine Lin
Plain-language summary
An unannounced infection control inspection was conducted on February 18, 2022. The facility was found to have proper screening procedures at the entrance, adequate supplies of food and protective equipment, and staff wearing appropriate protective gear, with no violations noted. The administrator was notified of the findings at the end of the visit.
View full inspector notes
On 2/18/2022 starting at 11:00 a.m., Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Catherine Lin arrived unannounced to conduct Infection Control Inspection. LPA met with staff Felicided Ybona and disclosed the purpose of the visit. (Administrator, Richard Pielstick later arrived approximately 12:00pm.) Upon entry, LPA’s temperature was checked by the staff and asked to fill out Covid-19 questionnaire in the Accushield. LPA toured facility including but not limited to front entrance, screening station, hand washing stations, bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen and common areas. There is one central entry point for universal screening for staff, residents, and visitors. A sign-in policy, thermometer and hand sanitizer were observed at screening station. Cough/sneeze etiquette and hand washing posters were observed. Facility staff were observed to be wearing proper PPE. Facility has a sufficient 2-day perishable and one-week non-perishable food supply. Facility has a 30-day supply of PPEs that were accessible for staff. Facility has Mitigation Plan, Emergency Disaster Plan, and maintains record of routine screening for residents, staff, and visitors. No deficiency cited during visit. Exit interview conducted with Administrator, and a copy of this report provided.
Federal summary
CMS Care CompareNot a CMS-certified facility
California RCFEs (residential care facilities for the elderly) are licensed by the state, not by CMS. CMS data only applies to skilled nursing facilities or to CCRCs that operate a licensed SNF wing.
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
No published reviews yet. Use the button above to share your experience.