Merrill Gardens at Lafayette.
Merrill Gardens at Lafayette is Ranked in the top 1% of California memory care with no CDSS citations on record; last inspected Apr 2025.

A large home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 61 California facilities with a similar number of beds.
RCFE memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
Be first to know if Merrill Gardens at Lafayette's inspection record changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
No citations in the last 36 months.
Finding distribution
none · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
The rules that apply to this facility.
State requirements with the exact regulation citation, plain-language explanation, and a question to ask on tour. Rules this facility has been cited for appear first.
Plain language
Because a facility markets dementia or Alzheimer's care, state law mandates higher training standards: 12 hours of initial dementia training (6 hours before a staff member works independently with residents, 6 more within the first 4 weeks), 8 hours of annual dementia in-service every year thereafter, and an administrator must include 8 hours of dementia-specific continuing education in every 2-year recertification cycle. Training must cover individualized care plans, behavioral expressions, appropriate supervision, and the facility's dementia care philosophy.
Ask on tour
“Can you show me each direct-care staffer's most recent dementia training certificate, and tell me when their next refresher is due?”
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Merrill Gardens at Lafayette's record and state requirements.
Four complaints are on file with CDSS — were any substantiated, and what remediation did the facility take in response to substantiated findings?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
The facility has zero deficiencies and zero serious citations across all inspections on file — can you provide the most recent state inspection report from April 23, 2025, so families can verify the scope of regulatory review?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
California Title 22 §87705 requires a written dementia-care program for memory-care residents — can you provide a copy of the current program document that meets this requirement?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
4 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2025-04-23Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
An unannounced annual inspection was conducted on April 23, 2025, and found no violations. The facility met all safety standards, including adequate lighting, proper temperature control, functioning smoke and carbon monoxide detectors, secured medications, and stocked emergency supplies; staff and resident records were also complete.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 04/23/2025 at 10:20 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Doidge arrived unannounced to conduct 1-Year Annual Required inspection. LPA met with General Manager Kamal Singh and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility including but not limited to residents’ apartments, bathrooms, multiple activity rooms, kitchen, common area and courtyard. There are no bodies of water observed. LPA observed lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. Hallway temperature was maintained at 71 degrees F. The hot water temperature is set at 116 degrees Fahrenheit for the whole building. Residents’ bathrooms are equipped with grab bars and non-skid mats. There is a minimum of one week supply of nonperishable and 2-day of perishable foods. Centrally stored medications, sharps and toxic are locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were in operating condition during visit. Fire extinguisher was last serviced on 09/16/2024. Emergency Disaster Plan was last posted on 4/03/2025. First aid kit was observed to be complete. Emergency disaster drill was last conducted on 04/17/2025. LPA reviewed five (5) residents records and five (5) staff records, and all were complete. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.
2024-11-14Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that on November 14, 2023, staff responded appropriately when a resident fell in his room—a medical technician assessed him, found no obvious injuries, and asked multiple times if he wanted emergency services called, which he declined. The resident was found the next morning seriously injured with rib fractures and internal bleeding and was taken to the hospital; however, the department could not find sufficient evidence to prove that staff failed to provide timely medical attention or wrongfully evicted him. The investigation concluded both complaints were unsubstantiated.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Continued from 9099 On the night of 11/14/23 S2 responded to a pull cord alarm from R1's living unit. When S2 arrived, she found R1 sitting in a chair at his desk with his legs crossed, not showing any signs of confusion or dizziness. S2 asked R1 if everything was aright and R1 replied “I’m okay.” R1 then told S2 that he fell. S2 called for the med tech. S3, the med tech arrived and checked R1 and found no signs of injury. S3 asked R1 if he bumped his head and needed 911 assistance. R1 said he did not hit his head and only fell to the floor. At least three times S3 asked R1 if he wanted them to call 911, but he declined every offer, stating he was okay. R1 then requested Tylenol from his cabinet for pain he was feeling in his back. R1 is diagnosed with chronic back pain. On the morning of 11/15/2023, W1 received a phone call from R1. R1 directed W1 to go see him and when W1 arrived at the facility, R1 was pale and in pain. R1 was unable to move. W1 went downstairs and directed facility staff to call 911. R1 was taken to John Muir Health Walnut Creek and diagnosed with acute right posterolateral eight, ninth, tenth and eleventh rib fractures, trace right and small left pleural effusions and hemoperitoneum; intraperitoneal and retroperitoneal hemorrhage identified. R1 was discharged from John Muir (date unknown) to a SNF for rehabilitation. R1 did not return to the facility. R1 was interviewed at his current Assisted Living community. R1 was asked if he could explain what happened to him while he lived at Merrill Gardens that resulted in his hospitalization and R1 replied, “I can’t say. I was unconscious.” According to witnesses R1 never lost conscious. R1 only knows about what occurred between the night of 11/14/2023 and the morning of 11/15/2023 from what “people told me.” W1 provided R1 the details of the fall. W1 gathered information about the fall incident by talking with staff at the facility as he was not present during the incident. W1 stated that he was told R1 fell out of bed and was put back in bed by facility staff after he fell. R1 hit a corner wall and was knocked unconscious. R1 does not remember who found him, when he was found, or where he was found by facility staff and W1 did not provide further details. R1 was unable to provide a timeline of the events as a result of his injuries. R1 stated that he had no concerns regarding the care he was receiving at Merrill Gardens because he did not receive any care. R1 was an independent resident. If R1 required assistance from facility staff, he would push his pendant but never needed to while living at the facility. Continued on 9099C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Continued from 9099C Staff interviews that were conducted revealed that all staff were well trained in fall protocols of the facility. Since R1 lived in the independent unit NOC staff reported that they only check on those residents twice during their shift. Staff reported that they were trained to take the following steps in regard to a resident fall: non-witnessed falls require calling the Med Tech (MT). The assessment determines if the resident needs to be sent to the hospital. Independent living residents are alert and able to communicate coherently. If the resident declines an ambulance, as R1 did, staff respect the decision. On the night of the incident staff followed procedures, the MT (S2) was called and assessed R1. MT found R1 to be alert. The MT asked R1 if he wanted her to call an ambulance for him and he replied “No, I’m fine.” Interviews with residents found that all the residents were happy living at the facility. R2 stating that she “feels safe” at the facility and describes the staff as friendly and helpful. R3 and R4 expressed similar feelings and thoughts. On 11/14/2024, LPAs interviewed R1 at his new facility. LPAs also interviewed S4.. R1 stated that while at the SNF he was evaluated by S4. R1 further stated that S4 informed W1 that R1 would need a higher level of care if R1 returned to the facility resulting in a significant increase in cost. W1 and R1 interpreted this to mean paying more or seeking another facility. W1 consulted with R1 and they decided to seek another facility. LPAs interviewed S4 who stated that he spoke with W1 about R1 needed a higher level of care, that results in higher cost. S4 further stated that he was concern about R1's safety if R1 did not have 1:1 supervision during waking hours. S4 provided W1 with a list of resources for private companions. S4 was unaware that R1 was not returning to facility until he saw W1 removing R1's private property form the facility. The department has investigated the complaint alleging staff did not seek medical attention for resident in a timely manner resulting in injuries. LPAs investigated the complaint alleging staff unlawfully evicted R1. We have found that the complaints were unsubstantiated. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted, a copy of this report provided
2024-06-03Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
Inspectors conducted a health and safety inspection on June 3, 2024, following a priority complaint and found no violations. The facility had adequate food supplies, secure medication storage, working smoke and carbon monoxide detectors, a complete first-aid kit, and safe water temperature and passageways.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 6/03/24 at 10:45 a.m., Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Greg Clark and Ardalan Gharachorloo conducted a Health & Safety inspection as a result of a priority 1 complaint. LPA met with Troy Beaton, Resident Care Director and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured facility including but not limited to resident's apartments, bathrooms, common area, kitchen, and outdoor area. Hot water temperature was measured at 117.2 degrees F in a resident's apartment. 7-day of non-perishable and 2-day of perishable food supplies were sufficient. Resident's medications were kept locked in the med room. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detector were observed to be operational. First-aid kit was complete. Fire extinguisher was observed to be full and last serviced on 9/14/23. There are no accessible bodies of water observed. Indoor and outdoor passageways are free of obstruction. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.
2024-05-21Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
On May 21, 2024, inspectors conducted a routine annual inspection and found no violations. The facility maintained safe conditions including proper lighting, temperature control, secured medications, working smoke detectors, adequate food supplies, and complete resident and staff records. Emergency drills and safety equipment were current.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 5/21/24 at 10:15 AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Greg Clark and A. Gharachorloo arrived unannounced to conduct 1-Year Annual Required inspection. LPA met with Aubrey Goo, Interim Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. LPAs toured the facility including but not limited to 3 residents’ apartments, bathrooms, multiple activity rooms, kitchen, common area and courtyard. There are no bodies of water observed. LPAs observed lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. Hallway temperature was maintained at 71 degrees F. The hot water temperature in a resident bathroom was measured at 115.5 degrees Fahrenheit. Residents’ bathrooms are equipped with grab bars and non-skid mats. There is a minimum of one week supply of nonperishable and 2-day of perishable foods. Centrally stored medications, sharps and toxic are locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were in operating condition during visit. Fire extinguisher was last serviced on 9/14/23. Emergency Disaster Plan was last posted on 4/03/24. First aid kit was observed to be complete. Emergency disaster drill was last conducted on 5/16/24. LPAs reviewed 5 residents records and 5 staff records, and all were complete. LPAs also reviewed a sample of resident’s medications. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.
4 older inspections from 2022 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Other facilities in Contra Costa County.
Other memory care facilities in Contra Costa County with similar care offerings.
Free · Tour Prep
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.


