Merrill Gardens at Lafayette
RCFE · Memory Care
A Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) is a non-medical residential care home licensed by California CDSS under Health & Safety Code §1560. Residents receive help with daily living activities such as bathing, dressing, and medication management. An RCFE with a Memory Care designation is additionally required by California Title 22 (§87705 and §87706) to provide specialized staff training in dementia care, individualized care plans for residents with cognitive impairment, and appropriate supervision protocols — requirements that go beyond a standard RCFE license.
1010 2nd St · Lafayette, 94549
Quick facts
Quality snapshot
Updated April 25, 2026Compared to 25 California RCFE memory care facilities of similar size, over the last 36 months.
Source: California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing Division. View raw inspection records →
Quality grade· click to show how this was calculated
Severity100thWeighted citations per bed
Repeats100thRepeat deficiencies as share of total
Frequency100thDeficiencies per inspection
Tick mark at 50% = peer median · higher percentile = better facility
Quality grade· click to show how this was calculated
Weighted citations per bed
Repeat deficiencies as share of total
Deficiencies per inspection
Tick mark at 50% = peer median · higher percentile = better facility
Merrill Gardens at Lafayette scores A. Better than 100% of comparable California RESIDENTIAL CARE ELDERLY facilities. Severity: top 0%. Repeats: top 0%. Frequency: top 0%.
Each metric is converted to a 0–100 percentile within the peer set (higher = better). The composite grade averages all four. Peer set: CA / rcfe_memory_care / large beds (25 facilities).
Citation severity over time
stableWeighted severity score per month · 24 months
Weighted score (24mo)
0
Finding distribution
none · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
The rules that apply to this facility
California Title 22 requirements for this facility, with the specific regulation and a suggested question for each.
What dementia-care training must staff complete?22 CCR §87705 / HSC §1569.625
Because this facility markets dementia or Alzheimer's care, state law mandates higher training standards:
- 12 hours initial dementia training — 6 hours before a staff member works independently with residents, 6 more within the first 4 weeks.
- 8 hours annual dementia in-service — required every year thereafter.
- Administrator CE — the administrator must include 8 hours of dementia-specific continuing education in every 2-year recertification cycle.
Training must cover individualized care plans, behavioral expressions, appropriate supervision, and the facility's dementia care philosophy.
Ask on tour: Ask how dementia training records are kept — families may request documentation.
How many staff must be on duty overnight?22 CCR §87415
Based on 100 licensed beds:
One awake caregiver must be on duty, plus one additional caregiver on call who can respond within 10 minutes.
Violation pattern to watch for:A facility that documents a staff member as "on call" but with that person physically off-site — when the law requires on-premises presence — is in violation of this section.
Ask on tour: Ask the facility to walk you through their overnight staffing plan and confirm whether on-call staff are on premises or off-site.
What health conditions can this facility legally accept or refuse?22 CCR §87612–87615
Restricted — allowed with physician order + care plan
- Supplemental oxygen
- Insulin and injectable medications
- Indwelling or intermittent catheters
- Colostomy / ileostomy
- Stage 1 and Stage 2 pressure injuries
- Wound care (non-complex)
- Incontinence
- Contractures
Prohibited — facility must refuse or discharge
- Stage 3 or Stage 4 pressure injuries
- Feeding tubes (PEG, NG, or J-tube)
- Tracheostomies
- Active MRSA or communicable infections requiring isolation
- 24-hour skilled nursing needs
- Total ADL dependence with inability to communicate needs
A hospice waiver (HSC §1569.73) can allow continued care for residents on hospice who would otherwise fall into a prohibited category.
Ask on tour: Ask whether your loved one's specific care needs are restricted or prohibited, and what the facility's process is if needs change after admission.
What must this facility report to the state — and how fast?22 CCR §87211 / WIC §15630
- ImmediateElopement, fire, epidemic outbreak, or poisoningImmediately
- 2 hoursAbuse with serious bodily injury2-hour phone report + 2-hour written report — to the California Department of Social Services (CDSS), Adult Protective Services, and law enforcement
- 24 hrsAbuse without serious bodily injuryWithin 24 hours
- Next dayDeath of a residentPhone by next working day; written within 7 days
- Next dayInjury requiring medical treatment beyond first aidPhone by next working day; written within 7 days
- WrittenBankruptcy, foreclosure, eviction, or utility shutoff noticeWritten notice to CDSS and residents — $100/day penalty (max $2,000) for failure
Your enforcement lever:Incidents that aren't reported on time are themselves a separate violation. If you believe a reportable event wasn't filed, you can submit a complaint directly to the California Department of Social Services (CDSS).
How does CDSS enforce these rules?22 CCR §87755–87777 / HSC §1569.58
- 1Notice of DeficiencyWritten citation with a correction deadline. Facility must submit a Plan of Correction.
- 2Civil PenaltyStarts at $50/day for non-serious; $150/day for serious deficiencies — immediately, with no grace period. Repeats escalate to $150 first day + $50/day, then $1,000 first day + $100/day.
- 3Suspension of AdmissionsFacility cannot accept new residents until violations are corrected.
- 4Temporary Suspension or RevocationEmergency suspension for imminent danger; full revocation after administrative hearing.
- 5Exclusion OrderAdministrator and operator can be barred from all CDSS-licensed facilities — not just this one.
See how these rules have been applied to this specific facility:
View state inspection record and citationsState records
California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing- License number
- 079200597
- License type
- RESIDENTIAL CARE ELDERLY
- License status
- LICENSED
- License expires
- Not yet indexed
- Licensed beds
- 100
- Operator
- Shi-iii Mg Gp, Shi-iii Lafayette; Merrill Gardens
Inspections & citations
8
reports on file
0
total deficiencies
Other visitApril 23, 2025No deficiencies
Plain-language summary
An unannounced annual inspection was conducted on April 23, 2025, and found no violations. The facility met all safety standards, including adequate lighting, proper temperature control, functioning smoke and carbon monoxide detectors, secured medications, and stocked emergency supplies; staff and resident records were also complete.
View full inspector notes
On 04/23/2025 at 10:20 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Doidge arrived unannounced to conduct 1-Year Annual Required inspection. LPA met with General Manager Kamal Singh and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility including but not limited to residents’ apartments, bathrooms, multiple activity rooms, kitchen, common area and courtyard. There are no bodies of water observed. LPA observed lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. Hallway temperature was maintained at 71 degrees F. The hot water temperature is set at 116 degrees Fahrenheit for the whole building. Residents’ bathrooms are equipped with grab bars and non-skid mats. There is a minimum of one week supply of nonperishable and 2-day of perishable foods. Centrally stored medications, sharps and toxic are locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were in operating condition during visit. Fire extinguisher was last serviced on 09/16/2024. Emergency Disaster Plan was last posted on 4/03/2025. First aid kit was observed to be complete. Emergency disaster drill was last conducted on 04/17/2025. LPA reviewed five (5) residents records and five (5) staff records, and all were complete. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.
ComplaintNovember 14, 2024· UnsubstantiatedNo deficiencies
Inspector: Gregory Clark
Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that on November 14, 2023, staff responded appropriately when a resident fell in his room—a medical technician assessed him, found no obvious injuries, and asked multiple times if he wanted emergency services called, which he declined. The resident was found the next morning seriously injured with rib fractures and internal bleeding and was taken to the hospital; however, the department could not find sufficient evidence to prove that staff failed to provide timely medical attention or wrongfully evicted him. The investigation concluded both complaints were unsubstantiated.
View full inspector notes
Continued from 9099 On the night of 11/14/23 S2 responded to a pull cord alarm from R1's living unit. When S2 arrived, she found R1 sitting in a chair at his desk with his legs crossed, not showing any signs of confusion or dizziness. S2 asked R1 if everything was aright and R1 replied “I’m okay.” R1 then told S2 that he fell. S2 called for the med tech. S3, the med tech arrived and checked R1 and found no signs of injury. S3 asked R1 if he bumped his head and needed 911 assistance. R1 said he did not hit his head and only fell to the floor. At least three times S3 asked R1 if he wanted them to call 911, but he declined every offer, stating he was okay. R1 then requested Tylenol from his cabinet for pain he was feeling in his back. R1 is diagnosed with chronic back pain. On the morning of 11/15/2023, W1 received a phone call from R1. R1 directed W1 to go see him and when W1 arrived at the facility, R1 was pale and in pain. R1 was unable to move. W1 went downstairs and directed facility staff to call 911. R1 was taken to John Muir Health Walnut Creek and diagnosed with acute right posterolateral eight, ninth, tenth and eleventh rib fractures, trace right and small left pleural effusions and hemoperitoneum; intraperitoneal and retroperitoneal hemorrhage identified. R1 was discharged from John Muir (date unknown) to a SNF for rehabilitation. R1 did not return to the facility. R1 was interviewed at his current Assisted Living community. R1 was asked if he could explain what happened to him while he lived at Merrill Gardens that resulted in his hospitalization and R1 replied, “I can’t say. I was unconscious.” According to witnesses R1 never lost conscious. R1 only knows about what occurred between the night of 11/14/2023 and the morning of 11/15/2023 from what “people told me.” W1 provided R1 the details of the fall. W1 gathered information about the fall incident by talking with staff at the facility as he was not present during the incident. W1 stated that he was told R1 fell out of bed and was put back in bed by facility staff after he fell. R1 hit a corner wall and was knocked unconscious. R1 does not remember who found him, when he was found, or where he was found by facility staff and W1 did not provide further details. R1 was unable to provide a timeline of the events as a result of his injuries. R1 stated that he had no concerns regarding the care he was receiving at Merrill Gardens because he did not receive any care. R1 was an independent resident. If R1 required assistance from facility staff, he would push his pendant but never needed to while living at the facility. Continued on 9099C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Continued from 9099C Staff interviews that were conducted revealed that all staff were well trained in fall protocols of the facility. Since R1 lived in the independent unit NOC staff reported that they only check on those residents twice during their shift. Staff reported that they were trained to take the following steps in regard to a resident fall: non-witnessed falls require calling the Med Tech (MT). The assessment determines if the resident needs to be sent to the hospital. Independent living residents are alert and able to communicate coherently. If the resident declines an ambulance, as R1 did, staff respect the decision. On the night of the incident staff followed procedures, the MT (S2) was called and assessed R1. MT found R1 to be alert. The MT asked R1 if he wanted her to call an ambulance for him and he replied “No, I’m fine.” Interviews with residents found that all the residents were happy living at the facility. R2 stating that she “feels safe” at the facility and describes the staff as friendly and helpful. R3 and R4 expressed similar feelings and thoughts. On 11/14/2024, LPAs interviewed R1 at his new facility. LPAs also interviewed S4.. R1 stated that while at the SNF he was evaluated by S4. R1 further stated that S4 informed W1 that R1 would need a higher level of care if R1 returned to the facility resulting in a significant increase in cost. W1 and R1 interpreted this to mean paying more or seeking another facility. W1 consulted with R1 and they decided to seek another facility. LPAs interviewed S4 who stated that he spoke with W1 about R1 needed a higher level of care, that results in higher cost. S4 further stated that he was concern about R1's safety if R1 did not have 1:1 supervision during waking hours. S4 provided W1 with a list of resources for private companions. S4 was unaware that R1 was not returning to facility until he saw W1 removing R1's private property form the facility. The department has investigated the complaint alleging staff did not seek medical attention for resident in a timely manner resulting in injuries. LPAs investigated the complaint alleging staff unlawfully evicted R1. We have found that the complaints were unsubstantiated. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted, a copy of this report provided
InspectionJune 3, 2024No deficiencies
Inspector: Gregory Clark
Plain-language summary
Inspectors conducted a health and safety inspection on June 3, 2024, following a priority complaint and found no violations. The facility had adequate food supplies, secure medication storage, working smoke and carbon monoxide detectors, a complete first-aid kit, and safe water temperature and passageways.
View full inspector notes
On 6/03/24 at 10:45 a.m., Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Greg Clark and Ardalan Gharachorloo conducted a Health & Safety inspection as a result of a priority 1 complaint. LPA met with Troy Beaton, Resident Care Director and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured facility including but not limited to resident's apartments, bathrooms, common area, kitchen, and outdoor area. Hot water temperature was measured at 117.2 degrees F in a resident's apartment. 7-day of non-perishable and 2-day of perishable food supplies were sufficient. Resident's medications were kept locked in the med room. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detector were observed to be operational. First-aid kit was complete. Fire extinguisher was observed to be full and last serviced on 9/14/23. There are no accessible bodies of water observed. Indoor and outdoor passageways are free of obstruction. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.
Other visitMay 21, 2024No deficiencies
Inspector: Gregory Clark
Plain-language summary
On May 21, 2024, inspectors conducted a routine annual inspection and found no violations. The facility maintained safe conditions including proper lighting, temperature control, secured medications, working smoke detectors, adequate food supplies, and complete resident and staff records. Emergency drills and safety equipment were current.
View full inspector notes
On 5/21/24 at 10:15 AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Greg Clark and A. Gharachorloo arrived unannounced to conduct 1-Year Annual Required inspection. LPA met with Aubrey Goo, Interim Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. LPAs toured the facility including but not limited to 3 residents’ apartments, bathrooms, multiple activity rooms, kitchen, common area and courtyard. There are no bodies of water observed. LPAs observed lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. Hallway temperature was maintained at 71 degrees F. The hot water temperature in a resident bathroom was measured at 115.5 degrees Fahrenheit. Residents’ bathrooms are equipped with grab bars and non-skid mats. There is a minimum of one week supply of nonperishable and 2-day of perishable foods. Centrally stored medications, sharps and toxic are locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were in operating condition during visit. Fire extinguisher was last serviced on 9/14/23. Emergency Disaster Plan was last posted on 4/03/24. First aid kit was observed to be complete. Emergency disaster drill was last conducted on 5/16/24. LPAs reviewed 5 residents records and 5 staff records, and all were complete. LPAs also reviewed a sample of resident’s medications. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.
ComplaintJune 5, 2023No deficiencies
Inspector: Jill Clancy-Czuleger
Plain-language summary
An investigator looked into a complaint about this facility and found no violation—the allegation was not supported by evidence. The complaint has been dismissed, and facility management was notified of the findings.
View full inspector notes
...Continued from 9099 We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without reasonable basis. We have therefore dismissed the complaint. Exit interview conducted with General Manager and a copy of this report provided.
ComplaintJanuary 26, 2023· UnsubstantiatedNo deficiencies
Inspector: Leslie Ibo
Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.
Plain-language summary
A complaint about staff availability was investigated, and inspectors found no violation. The facility had adequate staffing across all shifts with trained medication technicians and support staff, residents appeared calm and comfortable, and those interviewed reported being happy with care and staff responsiveness. The complaint could not be substantiated with evidence.
View full inspector notes
LPA reviewed staff schedule , facility has Med Tech, support staff available on schedule for Assisted living and memory care unit. Facility has sufficient staffing for all three (3) shifts. Residents were observed calm and comfortable in their surroundings. LPA conducted interview with residents and residents reported that they are happy living at the facility and had no issues around staff availability to meet their needs. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted Jilian Hunter, Executive Director and Troy Beaton, Resident care director. A copy of this report provided.
InspectionAugust 29, 2022No deficiencies
Inspector: Catherine Lin
Plain-language summary
On August 29, 2022, licensing conducted an unannounced visit after a staff member was reported for a privacy violation on August 18, 2022. The facility immediately took action by deactivating the staff member's access, canceling their credit card, and terminating them on August 16, 2022, and the police department recovered most items; the facility reported no health or safety impact to residents. No violations were found during the inspection.
View full inspector notes
On 08/29/22 at 9:45AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) C. Lin conducted an unannounced case management visit as a result of receiving self-reported SOC341 dated 08/18/22 submitted to CCLD regarding staff member (S1) was in violation of HIPPA. LPA explained the purpose of the visit with staff, Administrator (ADM) Jillian Hunter arrived at a later time. During the course of investigation, LPA observed that the incident had been reported to police department on 8/15/22. Police department involved and requested S1 to return properties including but not limited to laptop, keys, credit card, and photos to facility. S1 returned everything except photo albums to police department on 8/22/22. S1 told police officer that all paper photos had been threw away to a dumpster, police officer brought properties back to facility on 8/26/22. In additional, ADM immediately took action of deactivating S1's key fobs, changing all access codes in facility for security purpose on 8/13/22, cancelled S1's company credit card on 8/15/22, and terminated S1 on 8/16/22. As of now, the incident has not resulted health and safety impacts to residents. No deficiency during visit. Exit interview conducted with ADM, and a copy of this report provided.
ComplaintMay 17, 2022No deficiencies
Inspector: Catherine Lin
Plain-language summary
An unannounced infection control inspection was conducted on May 17, 2022, and found no violations. The facility had proper screening procedures at its entrance, staff wore appropriate protective equipment, hand washing stations were in place, and adequate supplies of food and protective equipment were maintained.
View full inspector notes
On 5/17/2022 starting at 3:10 p.m., Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Catherine Lin arrived unannounced to conduct Infection Control Inspection. LPA met with Administrator Aubrey Goo and disclosed the purpose of the visit. Upon entry, LPA’s temperature was checked and asked to fill out Covid-19 questionnaire by the staff . LPA toured facility including but not limited to front entrance, screening station, hand washing stations, bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, common areas, and outdoor areas. There is one central entry point for universal screening for staff, residents, and visitors. A sign-in policy, thermometer and hand sanitizer were observed at screening station. Cough/sneeze etiquette and hand washing posters were observed. Facility staff were observed to be wearing proper PPE. Facility has a sufficient 2-day perishable and one-week non-perishable food supply. Facility has a 30-day supply of PPEs maintained at central location and easily accessible for staff. Facility has Mitigation Plan, Emergency Disaster Plan, and maintains record of routine screening for residents, staff, and visitors. No deficiency cited during visit. Exit interview conducted with Administrator, and a copy of this report provided.
Federal summary
CMS Care CompareNot a CMS-certified facility
California RCFEs (residential care facilities for the elderly) are licensed by the state, not by CMS. CMS data only applies to skilled nursing facilities or to CCRCs that operate a licensed SNF wing.
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
No published reviews yet. Use the button above to share your experience.