StarlynnCare

California · Danville

Brookdale Diablo Lodge

RCFE · Memory Care

A Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) is a non-medical residential care home licensed by California CDSS under Health & Safety Code §1560. Residents receive help with daily living activities such as bathing, dressing, and medication management. An RCFE with a Memory Care designation is additionally required by California Title 22 (§87705 and §87706) to provide specialized staff training in dementia care, individualized care plans for residents with cognitive impairment, and appropriate supervision protocols — requirements that go beyond a standard RCFE license.

950 Diablo Road · Danville, 94526

Quick facts

Licensed beds128
Memory careYes
Last inspectionNov 2025
Last citationOct 2023
Operated byEmeritus Corporation
Map showing location of Brookdale Diablo Lodge

Quality snapshot

Updated April 25, 2026

Compared to 33 California RCFE memory care facilities of similar size, over the last 36 months.

Source: California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing Division. View raw inspection records →

Quality grade· click to show how this was calculated

Severity
75th

Weighted citations per bed

Repeats
100th

Repeat deficiencies as share of total

Frequency
81th

Deficiencies per inspection

Tick mark at 50% = peer median · higher percentile = better facility

Brookdale Diablo Lodge scores A−. Better than 85% of comparable California RESIDENTIAL CARE ELDERLY facilities. Severity: 75th percentile. Repeats: top 0%. Frequency: top 19%.

Each metric is converted to a 0–100 percentile within the peer set (higher = better). The composite grade averages all four. Peer set: CA / rcfe_memory_care / xl beds (33 facilities).

Citation severity over time

stable

Weighted severity score per month · 24 months

May 24peer medianApr 26

Weighted score (24mo)

0

Finding distribution

1 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

IsolatedPatternWidespreadJKLG1HIDEFABCSev 4 · IJSev 3Sev 2Sev 1

View inspections & citations

The rules that apply to this facility

California Title 22 requirements for this facility, with the specific regulation and a suggested question for each.

What dementia-care training must staff complete?22 CCR §87705 / HSC §1569.625

Because this facility markets dementia or Alzheimer's care, state law mandates higher training standards:

  • 12 hours initial dementia training — 6 hours before a staff member works independently with residents, 6 more within the first 4 weeks.
  • 8 hours annual dementia in-service — required every year thereafter.
  • Administrator CE — the administrator must include 8 hours of dementia-specific continuing education in every 2-year recertification cycle.

Training must cover individualized care plans, behavioral expressions, appropriate supervision, and the facility's dementia care philosophy.

Ask on tour: Ask how dementia training records are kept — families may request documentation.

How many staff must be on duty overnight?22 CCR §87415

Based on 128 licensed beds:

One awake caregiver on duty, one on-call caregiver physically on premises, and one additional on-call caregiver.

Violation pattern to watch for:A facility that documents a staff member as "on call" but with that person physically off-site — when the law requires on-premises presence — is in violation of this section.

Ask on tour: Ask the facility to walk you through their overnight staffing plan and confirm whether on-call staff are on premises or off-site.

What health conditions can this facility legally accept or refuse?22 CCR §87612–87615

Restricted — allowed with physician order + care plan

  • Supplemental oxygen
  • Insulin and injectable medications
  • Indwelling or intermittent catheters
  • Colostomy / ileostomy
  • Stage 1 and Stage 2 pressure injuries
  • Wound care (non-complex)
  • Incontinence
  • Contractures

Prohibited — facility must refuse or discharge

  • Stage 3 or Stage 4 pressure injuries
  • Feeding tubes (PEG, NG, or J-tube)
  • Tracheostomies
  • Active MRSA or communicable infections requiring isolation
  • 24-hour skilled nursing needs
  • Total ADL dependence with inability to communicate needs

A hospice waiver (HSC §1569.73) can allow continued care for residents on hospice who would otherwise fall into a prohibited category.

Ask on tour: Ask whether your loved one's specific care needs are restricted or prohibited, and what the facility's process is if needs change after admission.

What must this facility report to the state — and how fast?22 CCR §87211 / WIC §15630
  • ImmediateElopement, fire, epidemic outbreak, or poisoningImmediately
  • 2 hoursAbuse with serious bodily injury2-hour phone report + 2-hour written report — to the California Department of Social Services (CDSS), Adult Protective Services, and law enforcement
  • 24 hrsAbuse without serious bodily injuryWithin 24 hours
  • Next dayDeath of a residentPhone by next working day; written within 7 days
  • Next dayInjury requiring medical treatment beyond first aidPhone by next working day; written within 7 days
  • WrittenBankruptcy, foreclosure, eviction, or utility shutoff noticeWritten notice to CDSS and residents — $100/day penalty (max $2,000) for failure

Your enforcement lever:Incidents that aren't reported on time are themselves a separate violation. If you believe a reportable event wasn't filed, you can submit a complaint directly to the California Department of Social Services (CDSS).

How does CDSS enforce these rules?22 CCR §87755–87777 / HSC §1569.58
  1. 1Notice of DeficiencyWritten citation with a correction deadline. Facility must submit a Plan of Correction.
  2. 2Civil PenaltyStarts at $50/day for non-serious; $150/day for serious deficiencies — immediately, with no grace period. Repeats escalate to $150 first day + $50/day, then $1,000 first day + $100/day.
  3. 3Suspension of AdmissionsFacility cannot accept new residents until violations are corrected.
  4. 4Temporary Suspension or RevocationEmergency suspension for imminent danger; full revocation after administrative hearing.
  5. 5Exclusion OrderAdministrator and operator can be barred from all CDSS-licensed facilities — not just this one.

See how these rules have been applied to this specific facility:

View state inspection record and citations

State records

California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing
License number
079200382
License type
RESIDENTIAL CARE ELDERLY
License status
LICENSED
License expires
Not yet indexed
Licensed beds
128
Operator
Emeritus Corporation

Inspections & citations

15

reports on file

3

total deficiencies

1

Type A (actual harm)

InspectionNovember 5, 2025· Mixed
No deficiencies

Inspector: Alona Gomez

Mixed — CDSS found some allegations substantiated and others unsubstantiated during this investigation.

Plain-language summary

A routine inspection found that a resident with a documented fall risk sustained a hip fracture requiring surgery when they fell in their room on March 25, 2024, and the facility had not updated the resident's care plan or added safety measures despite five previous falls over several years—staff checked on the resident about four times per shift rather than the required 30-minute intervals, the resident often left their emergency pendant on the nightstand instead of wearing it, and the facility stated it had no fall prevention equipment in place. The inspection also found the facility properly reported the incident to the resident's doctor and family and to licensing authorities. Two allegations—that the room was cluttered and that reporting requirements were not followed—were not substantiated by the evidence.

View full inspector notes

Pg 2 On 3/25/2024, R1, a known fall risk according to care plan dated 10/13/2023, had a fall in their room while attempting to change into their pajamas. S1 reported hearing R1 call for help and found them on the floor near their bed. S1 stated, “R1 said they lost their balance and fell. I usually remind them to press the pendant, but I didn’t see them before they fell.” S3 and S4 responded to the radio call and assisted R1. S4 reported that R1 said, “It hurts. It hurts. I fell,” and also, “Get me off this floor.” S1 and S4 helped R1 into a recliner, after which S4 called 911. Medical records obtained confirmed that R1 sustained a left hip fracture requiring surgical intervention. W1 expressed dissatisfaction with staff supervision and stated, “R1 had told me before that no one checked on them as much as they should. This isn’t the first time R1 has fallen, and it shouldn’t have happened.” R1 experienced multiple falls before 3/25/2024, including incidents on 8/7/2019, 1/1/2020, 1/15/2021, 6/11/2022 and 9/1/2023. Despite these incidents, the facility failed to revise R1’s care plan or implement additional safety measures. S1 stated, “I usually remind them to press the pendant.” S1 also reported that R1 would place their walker by the door, and that they typically checked on R1 four times per shift. S2 stated that R1 required help with showers, dressing, toileting, blood sugar checks, and escort assistance. S2 added, “R1 was changing into their pajamas when they fell and did not press their pendant for help.” Report Continues on LIC9099-C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Pg. 3 S3 confirmed that residents at risk of falling are required to be checked every 30 minutes, minimize environmental clutter, and use call pendant for assistance. S3 noted, “The facility does not have any real fall prevention methods in place for residents.” S3 added, “R1 began losing their balance but refused staff’s help. They had a walker but refused to use it and held onto rails in the facility for balance.” S4 reported that staff check call pendants monthly for functionality and all residents are expected to wear them 24/7. S4 stated, “The facility does not have other fall prevention equipment such as fall mats as not a lot of residents are considered a fall risk.” Interviews revealed that R1’s pendant was often left on their nightstand rather than worn or kept within reach. Incident reports for R1’s prior falls, including the fall on 1/15/2021, without follow-up details or documentation of corrective actions. Facility records provided did not show that R1s previous falls resulted in a reassessment of R1’s care needs or adjustment to their supervision. Staff, including S1 and S3, noted that R1 had become increasingly withdrawn in the month prior to the incident. S1 shared, “In the last month or so before R1 left the facility, they became very withdrawn, sad, and cried all the time. R1 told me that their son was sick.” However, there was no evidence of additional emotional support being provided, nor documentation of care planning to address R1’s reduced help-seeking behavior. Records and interviews overall did not have proactive, consistent strategies to mitigate R1’s known fall risk despite repeated incidents and observed decline. ****An immediate civil penalty of $500 is being assessed on today’s date. Civil penalty determination related to serious bodily injury is pending. **** Based on LPAs observations and interviews which were conducted and record reviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED . California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.Exit interview conducted with Executive Director. A copy of this report and appeal rights was provided. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Pg. 2 On the allegation “Staff did not ensure reporting requirements were followed.” The fall involving R1 on 3/25/2024 was reported via LIC 624 to Community Care Licensing and documented in the facility’s records. Staff interviews confirmed that after the incident, notifications were made to R1’s physician, responsible party, and emergency services in accordance with regulatory requirements. Specifically, records show that R1’s physician was notified via facsimile at 20:00 hours, and their POA was contacted via telephone at 16:20 hours. Although the reporting party stated they were initially told that the incident had been reported to Licensing when it had not, the Department verified that a report was submitted by the facility within the appropriate timeframe. On the allegation “Staff did not ensure resident room was free from obstruction” The Department reviewed photographs of R1’s room submitted by W1 and conducted a review of the facility’s safety practices regarding environmental hazards. While W1 expressed concern regarding clutter in R1’s unit, staff interviews revealed that fall prevention strategies included reminders to reduce clutter and arrange furniture to allow for safe walkways. The Personal Service Plan dated 10/13/2023 stated, "Encourage R1 on reducing environmental clutter and arrange furniture for adequate walkways." Interviews with staff who responded to the fall did not indicate that obstructions or clutter directly caused or contributed to the incident on 3/25/2024. S3 stated that R1 was found close to their bed, and S4 confirmed that R1’s room did not appear to be cluttered during the response. Based on observations, photographs, interviews and file review the allegations above are unsubstantiated . Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED . Exit interview conducted and copy of report provided.

ComplaintNovember 5, 2025
No deficiencies

Plain-language summary

An investigator visited the facility on November 5, 2025 to look into a complaint and found that after a resident fell multiple times (in June 2022, January 2023, and March 2024), the facility did not update the resident's care plan to address the falls or changing health needs. The facility was cited for failing to update care plans when residents' conditions change.

View full inspector notes

On 11/05/2025 at 5:00 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) A. Gomez arrived unannounced to conduct a case management review related to complaint 15-AS-20240514173549. Upon arrival, LPA met with Executive Director, Rachel Davis, and explained the purpose of the visit. During the course of the investigation, The Department conducted interviews, and reviewed files. It was discovered R1 had several falls while at the facility occurring on 3/25/2024, 1/9/2023, and 6/10/2022 and that the facility did not update R1 care plan after subsequent falls to address R1’s change of condition and care needed. THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCIES WERE OBSERVED DURING INVESTIGATION: Facility did not update residents care plan when there was a change in condition The following deficiencies were observed (see LIC 809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and/or Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct deficiencies by POC date may result in additional Civil Penalties. Exit interview conducted. Appeal Rights and a copy of this report provided.

Other visitJuly 9, 2025
No deficiencies

Plain-language summary

On July 9, 2025, inspectors conducted the facility's annual required inspection and found no violations. The inspector toured the building, reviewed staff and resident records, checked safety features like fire extinguishers and smoke detectors, and verified that medications and hazardous materials were properly stored and locked. All staff had current first-aid training, food storage temperatures were appropriate, and emergency drills were up to date.

View full inspector notes

On 07/9/2025 at 8:00 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) A. Gomez arrived unannounced to conduct 1-Year Annual Required inspection. LPA met with Executive Director, Rachael Davis and explained the purpose of the visit. The facility's fire clearance was approved for all may be non-ambulatory of which 8 may be bedridden. LPA toured the facility with Executive Director including but not limited to 6 residents apartments, bathrooms, activity room, kitchen, common area and courtyard. There are no bodies of water observed. LPA observe lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. Hallway temperature was maintained at 73 degrees F. The hot water temperature in a sample of residents’ shared bathroom were measured between 105-120 degrees Fahrenheit. Residents’ bathrooms are equipped with grab bars and non-skid mats. There is a minimum of one week supply of nonperishable and 2-day of perishable foods. Centrally stored medications, sharps and toxic are locked and inaccessible to residents in care. The freezer temperature measured at 0 degrees F and the refrigerator 40 degrees F. Fire extinguisher was last serviced on 2/06/2025. Disaster Drill was last conducted 5/12/2025. Emergency Disaster plan last reviewed 4/21/2025. Smoke detectors and sprinklers are interconnected and observed throughout facility. First aid kit observed complete. LPA reviewed 6 staff records and 6 of 6 are associated and have current first-aid training. LPA reviewed 6 residents records and a sample of medications reviewed. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.

ComplaintJune 5, 2025· Unsubstantiated
No deficiencies

Inspector: Alona Gomez

Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.

InspectionAugust 7, 2024
No deficiencies

Inspector: Alona Gomez

Plain-language summary

On August 7, 2024, licensing staff conducted a routine health and safety inspection and found no violations. The facility had adequate food supplies, proper water temperatures, working fire safety equipment, secure medication storage, and clear passageways throughout the building.

View full inspector notes

On 08/07/24 at 5:50 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) A. Gomez conducted a Health & Safety inspection as a result of a priority 1 complaint. LPA met with Executive Director, Rachael Davis and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured facility including but not limited to the bedrooms, bathrooms, common area, kitchen, and outdoor area. Hot water temperature in random resident apartments was measured at 110.8, 113.2, and 109.4 degrees F. 7-day of non-perishable and 2-day of perishable food supplies were sufficient. Facility orders food supplies on a weekly basis. The freezer temperature measured at 0 degrees F and the refrigerator 36 degrees F. Resident's medications were kept locked in the med room. Smoke detectors are interconnected with the sprinkler system. Carbon monoxide detector observe. First-aid kit was complete. Fire extinguisher was observed to be full and last serviced on 02/06/2024. There are no accessible bodies of water observed. Indoor and outdoor passageways are free of obstruction. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.

InspectionJuly 19, 2024
No deficiencies

Inspector: Alona Gomez

Plain-language summary

An unannounced annual inspection was conducted on July 19, 2024, and no violations were found. The inspector verified that the facility maintains safe water temperatures, proper food storage, secured medications, working fire safety systems, and current staff first-aid training, with adequate lighting and grab bars throughout resident areas.

View full inspector notes

On 07/19/2024 at 9:20 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) A. Gomez arrived unannounced to conduct 1-Year Annual Required inspection. LPA met with Executive Director, Rachael Davis and explained the purpose of the visit. The facility's fire clearance was approved for all may be non-ambulatory of which 8 may be bedridden. LPA toured the facility with Executive Director including but not limited to 6 residents apartments, bathrooms, activity room, kitchen, common area and courtyard. There are no bodies of water observed. LPA observe lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. Hallway temperature was maintained at 74 degrees F. The hot water temperature in a sample of residents’ shared bathroom were measured at 112.6, 109.2, 108.9 degrees Fahrenheit. Residents’ bathrooms are equipped with grab bars and non-skid mats. There is a minimum of one week supply of nonperishable and 2-day of perishable foods. Centrally stored medications, sharps and toxic are locked and inaccessible to residents in care. The freezer temperature measured at 0 degrees F and the refrigerator 36 degrees F. Fire extinguisher was last serviced on 2/06/2024. Disaster Drill was last conducted 7/18/2024. Emergency Disaster plan last reviewed 10/19/2023. Smoke detectors and sprinklers are interconnected and observed throughout facility. LPA reviewed 6 staff records and 6 of 6 are associated and have current first-aid training. LPA reviewed 5 residents records . No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.

ComplaintNovember 1, 2023· Unsubstantiated
No deficiencies

Inspector: Lizette Francisco

Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.

Plain-language summary

A complaint investigation looked into five allegations about care for a resident, including whether staff properly managed a change in medical condition, reported falls, followed the care plan, and provided adequate supervision—the investigator found no evidence to substantiate these claims. The resident had four unwitnessed falls between January and August 2022 with no injuries documented, and the facility notified the responsible party of each fall and held a care conference to discuss increased supervision needs. An allegation that the resident's death was related to facility neglect was found to be unfounded; the death certificate attributed the death to heart failure, and the resident was under hospice care at the time.

View full inspector notes

Allegation: Personal Rights - Staff did not address a resident change in medical condition However, based on interview with staff and W1, hospice was notified whenever staff observed a change in condition and nurse from hospice was requested by facility to assess resident. R1 was admitted to facility on January of 2022 and AGPA observed Personal Service Plan was updated, 3/4/22, and 8/22/2022 to address R1’s change in condition. Allegation: Personal Rights - Resident sustained injuries from multiple falls while in care Based on record review of incident report and progress notes, R1 had multiple unwitnessed falls on 1/28/22, 3/17/22, 8/12/22, and 8/14/22. However, no injuries were noted. R1 was admitted to ER on 3/17/22 and xray was completed, but no fractures were sustained from the fall. Allegation: Personal Rights - Staff did not follow a resident's care plan while in care Based on interview with W1, facility was following resident’s care plan and was in communication with hospice. W1 did not feel that there was any neglect by the facility according to the records from the nurses in charge during the time R1 was under hospice care. Allegation: Personal Rights - Staff did not properly report incidents involving a resident Based on record review, responsible party was notified of R1’s multiple falls that occurred on 1/28/22, 3/17/22, 8/12/22, and 8/14/22. Allegation: Personal Rights - Staff did not provide adequate care and supervision to a resident Based on record review, facility addressed the concern with R1’s responsible party regarding R1’s multiple falls. A care conference was held on 8/15/2022 where facility recommended a 1:1 companion for R1 due to increased agitation. However, R1’s responsible party refused. R1 was being checked by staff every 2 hours. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there are not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED . Exit interview conducted and a copy of report provided to Life Enrichment Manager. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Allegation: Personal Rights - Questionable Death The Department obtained a copy of R1’s death certificate where it indicates that the cause of death was due to chronic congestive heart failure and coronary artery disease. R1 was admitted to hospice on July 25, 2022 and was diagnosed with heart failure and not related due to neglect of the facility. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging questionable death. We have found that the complaint was UNFOUNDED , meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided to Life Enrichment Manager.

InspectionOctober 19, 2023Type A
1 deficiency

Inspector: Alona Gomez

Plain-language summary

This was a routine annual inspection conducted in October 2023. The facility passed the inspection with no violations found in areas including fire safety, staff first-aid certification, medication storage, food supplies, water temperature, and cleanliness. The facility was asked to submit updated administrative documents to the licensing agency by the deadline.

View full inspector notes

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) A. Gomez and Associate Governmental Program Analyst (AGPA) L. Francisco arrived unannounced to conduct a 1-Year Annual Required visit on this date starting at 10:40AM. Upon arrival, LPA and AGPA met with Executive Director, Rachael Davis. The facility's fire clearance was approved for all may be non-ambulatory of which 8 may be bedridden. LPA and AGPA toured the facility inside and out with Executive Director including but not limited to facility hallways, activity room, dining room, kitchen, resident rooms and medicine room. Indoor and outdoor passageways were kept free of obstruction. There are no bodies of water observed. Hot water temperature in random resident's bedroom was maintained at 113.6 degrees F. In another Residents room, hot water temperature was maintained at 114.1 degrees F. A comfortable room temperature was maintained at 73 degrees F in the hallway. Facility was equipped with a minimum of one week supply of non-perishable and 2-day supply of perishable food. Medication carts were observed locked. LPA's reviewed a sample of medication. Fire extinguisher was last serviced on 09/12/2023. Smoke detectors and sprinklers are interconnected and observed throughout facility. LPA and AGPA reviewed 5 staff records and 5 of 5 are associated and have current first-aid training. LPA reviewed 5 residents records. The following deficiencies were observed At 12:17PM LPA's observed Miralax in R4's apartment. At 12:35PM LPA's observed TUMS in R5's apartment. REPORT CONTINUES ON 809C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Updated copies of the following documents were requested for facility file and are to be submitted to CCLD by 11/02/2023: LIC 308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility LIC 500 Personnel Report LIC 610E Emergency Disaster Plan Liability Insurance Current Administrator’s Certificate The following deficiencies were observed (see LIC 809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and/or Health and Safety Code Failure to correct deficiencies by POC date may result in additional Civil Penalties. Exit interview conducted with Executive Director. Appeal Rights and a copy of this report provided.

Type ACCR §87465(h)(2)

Regulation

87465(h)(2) INCIDENTAL MEDICAL AND DENTAL CARE (h)The following requirements shall apply to medications which are centrally stored: (2)Centrally stored medicines shall be kept in a safe and locked place that is not accessible to persons other than employees responsible for the supervision of the centrally stored medication.

Inspector finding

Based on observation and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by R4 having Miralax in apartment and R5 having TUMS in apartment. Physician's report for R4 and R5 indicates that both residents are not able to store PRN medications which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 10/20/2023 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 By POC date Administrator agrees to remove all PNR medications from R4 & R5 apartment and submit…

ComplaintJuly 10, 2023· Unsubstantiated
No deficiencies

Inspector: James Sampair

Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.

Plain-language summary

This was a complaint investigation about the facility's elevator backup power system and staff emergency procedures during a power outage. The investigator reviewed facility records, interviewed staff and management, and found no evidence to support the complaints—the elevator meets backup power requirements, staff followed proper emergency procedures during the July 2023 power outage, and staff had received extensive training on emergency procedures.

View full inspector notes

(...Continued from LIC9099) Facility elevator does not meet backup power requirements. Based on a review of regulations, facility records, and interview of ED the facility elevator does meet the existing backup power requirements. Staff did not follow emergency procedures during a power outage. Based on interviews of R1, ED, HWD, S1, S3, and facility records, staff did follow emergency procedures during the power outage of 07/01/2023. Staff not trained on emergency procedures during a power outage. Based on interviews of ED, HWD, S1, S3, and facility records, staff was trained extensively on emergency procedures. Although the allegations may have happened, or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED . Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report emailed to ED.

ComplaintMarch 30, 2023· Unsubstantiated
No deficiencies

Inspector: Lizette Francisco

Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.

ComplaintMarch 30, 2023· Unsubstantiated
No deficiencies

Inspector: Lizette Francisco

Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.

Plain-language summary

The facility received a complaint that the temperature in residents' apartments was too cold. During the inspection, staff showed that each apartment has its own thermostat with a range of 65 to 81 degrees Fahrenheit (typically set at 72 degrees), and residents can request staff to adjust it if needed. The complaint could not be substantiated with available evidence.

View full inspector notes

It was alleged the temperature was below the regulated limit. Based on observation, each apartments have its own air conditioner and heating. On 12/6/2021, S1 stated resident's apartments are equipped with smart thermostat where the temperature is set between 65 degrees F and 81 degrees F, but most rooms are set at 72 degrees F. S1 stated if residents are not able to set their own thermostat, residents will call concierge to have staff set temperature for residents. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there are not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED . Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided to Executive Director.

Other visitJanuary 19, 2023
No deficiencies

Inspector: Lizette Francisco

Plain-language summary

This was a health and safety inspection conducted in January 2023 following a priority complaint. Inspectors found that cleaning supplies, bug spray, bleach, and gardening tools were stored in unlocked cabinets in resident apartments, creating a poisoning hazard. Other safety features including fire protection, hot water temperature, food storage, and medication security were in proper order.

View full inspector notes

On 1/19/2023 starting at 3:30 PM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) L. Francisco and P. Watson conducted a Health & Safety inspection as a result of a Priority 1 complaint. LPAs met with Executive Director, Rachael Davis and explained the purpose of the visit. LPAs toured facility including but not limited to the random apartments, bathrooms, common areas, and kitchen. A sample of hot water temperature were maintained at 114, 115.1, and 113.8 degrees F in random residents apartments. LPAs observed an adequate one week of non-perishable and 2-day of perishable food supply. Resident's medications were kept locked in the medication cart. Smoke detectors are interconnected with the sprinkler system. Carbon monoxide detector observe. First-aid kit was complete. Fire extinguisher was observed to be fullt charged and last serviced on 8/10/2022. There are no accessible bodies of water observed. Indoor and outdoor passageways are free of obstruction. THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCIES WERE OBSERVED DURING HEALTH & SAFETY INSPECTION At 3:30 PM, LPAs observed unlocked cleaning supplies, bug spray, and bleach inside kitchen cabinet and bathroom cabinets in R1's apartment At 3:36 PM, LPAs observed unlocked gardening tools, oxyclean, and comet. The following deficiency was observed (see LICd 809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Failure to correct deficiency by POC date may result in additional Civil Penalties. Exit interview conducted. Appeal Rights and a copy of this report provided to Executive Director.

InspectionSeptember 15, 2022Type B
1 deficiency

Inspector: Lizette Francisco

Plain-language summary

This was a routine infection control inspection on September 15, 2022. Overall, the facility maintained good hygiene practices including daily disinfection of common surfaces, proper hand-washing stations, and staff health screening records; however, inspectors found two portable oxygen tanks in one resident's apartment that were not stored on a stand, which posed a safety concern. The facility was required to submit updated documentation and correct this deficiency.

View full inspector notes

On 09/15/2022 at 9:45 AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) L. Francisco and P. Watson arrived unannounced to conduct Infection Control Inspection. LPAs met with Executive Director, Rachael Davis and Health and Wellness Director, Najinder Kaur, and explained the purpose of the visit. During the Infection Control Inspection, LPAs toured facility with Excutive DIrector and Health & Wellness Director including but not limited to front entrance, screening station, hand washing stations, apartments, common areas, dining room, multiple activity rooms, kitchen and courtyard. Facility has a sufficient 2-day perishable and one week non-perishable food supply. Visitors policy is posted on the front entrance. There is one central entry point for universal screening for staff, residents and visitors. A sign-in policy, thermometer and hand sanitizer were observed at screening station. Common touched surfaces are disinfected at least once daily. Bathrooms are equipped with liquid soap, paper towel and trash bin with touchless lids. Facility staff were observed to be wearing proper PPE. Facility has a 30-day supply of PPEs maintained at central location and easily accessible for staff. At approximately 12:05 PM, LPAs reviewed 5 staff records and 5 of 5 have health screening and TB test results on file. Facility has a mitigation plan and maintains record of routine screening for residents and staff. THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY WAS OBSERVED DURING VISIT: At 11:25 AM, LPAs observed two portable oxygen tanks in R1's apartment are without a stand. REPORT CONTINUES ON 809C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Updated copies of the following documents were requested for facility file and are to be submitted to CCL by 9/22/2022: LIC 308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility LIC 309 Administrative Organization LIC 500 Personnel Report LIC 610E Emergency Disaster Plan Liability Insurance Current Administrator’s Certificate The following deficiencies were observed (see LIC 809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and/or Health and Safety Code Failure to correct deficiencies by POC date may result in additional Civil Penalties. Exit interview conducted. Appeal Rights and a copy of this report provided.

Type BCCR §87618(b)(3)(E)

Regulation

(3) Ensuring that the use of oxygen equipment meets the following requirements: (E) Oxygen tanks that are not portable shall be secured in a stand or to the wall.

Inspector finding

Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not having stands for R1's portable tanks which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 09/19/2022 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 Administrator agrees to obtain additional stands for R1's oxygen tanks and provide photographic proof to CCLD by POC date

Other visitNovember 18, 2021Type B
1 deficiency

Inspector: Grace Luk

Plain-language summary

During an unannounced visit on November 18, 2021, inspectors found that a staff member was not properly associated with the facility in licensing records. The facility was informed of this deficiency and given the opportunity to correct it, or face potential penalties.

View full inspector notes

On 11/18/2021 at 1:00PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) G. Luk arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit. LPA met with Executive Director, Bill Grady. While LPA was conducting a complaint investigation to deliver findings, the following deficiency was observed. LPA observed S4 was not associated to the facility or other sister facilities. The deficiency was observed (see LIC 809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Failure to correct the deficiency may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided.

Type BCCR §87355(e)(2)

Regulation

Criminal Record Clearance. Request a transfer of a criminal record clearance as specified in Section 87355(c) or... This requirement is not met as evidence by:

Inspector finding

Based on record review, licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not associated S4 to the facility which poses a potential health and safety risk to the persons in care.

ComplaintJuly 28, 2021
No deficiencies

Inspector: Lizette Francisco

Plain-language summary

An infection control inspector visited this facility unannounced on July 28, 2021 and found no violations. The facility had adequate food and personal protective equipment supplies, a single screening station with temperature checks for all who entered, staff wearing proper masks, and records showing regular health screening of residents and staff.

View full inspector notes

On 7/28/2021 at 11:05am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) L. Francisco arrived unannounced to conduct Infection Control Inspection. LPA met with Executive Director, Bill Grady and Business Office Manager, Rachel Davis and explained the purpose of this visit.. During the Infection Control Inspection, LPA toured facility with Executive Director and Business Office Manager including but not limited to front entrance, screening station, hand washing stations, apartments, common areas, kitchen and courtyard. Facility has a sufficient 2-day perishable and one week non-perishable food supply. There is one central entry point for universal screening for staff, residents and visitors. A sign-in policy, thermometer and hand sanitizer were observed at screening station. Facility staff were observed to be wearing proper PPE. LPA observed 30-day supply of PPEs and accessible to staff. Facility has a mitigation plan and maintains record of routine screening for residents and staff. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.

Federal summary

CMS Care Compare

Not a CMS-certified facility

California RCFEs (residential care facilities for the elderly) are licensed by the state, not by CMS. CMS data only applies to skilled nursing facilities or to CCRCs that operate a licensed SNF wing.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

No published reviews yet. Use the button above to share your experience.

← Back to Danville