StarlynnCare

California · Burlingame

Burlingame Villa, Inc.

RCFE

A Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) is a non-medical residential care home licensed by California CDSS under Health & Safety Code §1560. Residents receive assistance with daily living activities such as bathing, dressing, meals, and medication management in a home-like setting. RCFEs are not hospitals or skilled nursing facilities — they do not provide round-the-clock medical care.

1117 Rhinette Avenue · Burlingame, 94010

Quick facts

Licensed beds27
Memory careNot listed
Last inspectionJan 2026
Last citationNov 2025
Operated byBurlingame Villa, Inc.
Map showing location of Burlingame Villa, Inc.

Quality snapshot

Updated April 25, 2026

Compared to 15 California RCFE facilities of similar size, over the last 36 months.

Source: California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing Division. View raw inspection records →

Quality grade· click to show how this was calculated

Severity
50th

Weighted citations per bed

Repeats
100th

Repeat deficiencies as share of total

Frequency
57th

Deficiencies per inspection

Tick mark at 50% = peer median · higher percentile = better facility

Burlingame Villa, Inc. scores B−. Better than 69% of comparable California RESIDENTIAL CARE ELDERLY facilities. Severity: 50th percentile. Repeats: top 0%. Frequency: 57th percentile.

Each metric is converted to a 0–100 percentile within the peer set (higher = better). The composite grade averages all four. Peer set: CA / rcfe_general / medium beds (15 facilities).

Citation severity over time

↑ worsening

Weighted severity score per month · 24 months

May 24peer medianApr 26

Weighted score (24mo)

10

Last citation

Nov 25

Finding distribution

1 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

IsolatedPatternWidespreadJKLG1HIDEFABCSev 4 · IJSev 3Sev 2Sev 1

View inspections & citations

The rules that apply to this facility

California Title 22 requirements for this facility, with the specific regulation and a suggested question for each.

What training are all staff required to complete?22 CCR §87411

All direct-care staff must complete:

  • 10 hours initial training within the first four weeks of employment.
  • 4 hours annual in-service every year thereafter.
  • Administrator certificate from a CDSS-approved program — 80 hours for first-time, 40 hours renewal every 2 years.

Ask on tour: Ask when the last staff training was completed and how it's tracked.

How many staff must be on duty overnight?22 CCR §87415

Based on 27 licensed beds:

One awake caregiver must be on duty, plus one additional caregiver on call who can respond within 10 minutes.

Violation pattern to watch for:A facility that documents a staff member as "on call" but with that person physically off-site — when the law requires on-premises presence — is in violation of this section.

Ask on tour: Ask the facility to walk you through their overnight staffing plan and confirm whether on-call staff are on premises or off-site.

What health conditions can this facility legally accept or refuse?22 CCR §87612–87615

Restricted — allowed with physician order + care plan

  • Supplemental oxygen
  • Insulin and injectable medications
  • Indwelling or intermittent catheters
  • Colostomy / ileostomy
  • Stage 1 and Stage 2 pressure injuries
  • Wound care (non-complex)
  • Incontinence
  • Contractures

Prohibited — facility must refuse or discharge

  • Stage 3 or Stage 4 pressure injuries
  • Feeding tubes (PEG, NG, or J-tube)
  • Tracheostomies
  • Active MRSA or communicable infections requiring isolation
  • 24-hour skilled nursing needs
  • Total ADL dependence with inability to communicate needs

A hospice waiver (HSC §1569.73) can allow continued care for residents on hospice who would otherwise fall into a prohibited category.

Ask on tour: Ask whether your loved one's specific care needs are restricted or prohibited, and what the facility's process is if needs change after admission.

What must this facility report to the state — and how fast?22 CCR §87211 / WIC §15630
  • ImmediateElopement, fire, epidemic outbreak, or poisoningImmediately
  • 2 hoursAbuse with serious bodily injury2-hour phone report + 2-hour written report — to the California Department of Social Services (CDSS), Adult Protective Services, and law enforcement
  • 24 hrsAbuse without serious bodily injuryWithin 24 hours
  • Next dayDeath of a residentPhone by next working day; written within 7 days
  • Next dayInjury requiring medical treatment beyond first aidPhone by next working day; written within 7 days
  • WrittenBankruptcy, foreclosure, eviction, or utility shutoff noticeWritten notice to CDSS and residents — $100/day penalty (max $2,000) for failure

Your enforcement lever:Incidents that aren't reported on time are themselves a separate violation. If you believe a reportable event wasn't filed, you can submit a complaint directly to the California Department of Social Services (CDSS).

How does CDSS enforce these rules?22 CCR §87755–87777 / HSC §1569.58
  1. 1Notice of DeficiencyWritten citation with a correction deadline. Facility must submit a Plan of Correction.
  2. 2Civil PenaltyStarts at $50/day for non-serious; $150/day for serious deficiencies — immediately, with no grace period. Repeats escalate to $150 first day + $50/day, then $1,000 first day + $100/day.
  3. 3Suspension of AdmissionsFacility cannot accept new residents until violations are corrected.
  4. 4Temporary Suspension or RevocationEmergency suspension for imminent danger; full revocation after administrative hearing.
  5. 5Exclusion OrderAdministrator and operator can be barred from all CDSS-licensed facilities — not just this one.

See how these rules have been applied to this specific facility:

View state inspection record and citations

State records

California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing
License number
410508825
License type
RESIDENTIAL CARE ELDERLY
License status
LICENSED
License expires
Not yet indexed
Licensed beds
27
Operator
Burlingame Villa, Inc.

Inspections & citations

13

reports on file

1

total deficiencies

1

Type A (actual harm)

InspectionJanuary 6, 2026
No deficiencies

Plain-language summary

On January 6, 2026, inspectors followed up on an incident from December 14, 2025, when a resident appeared to be choking while eating; staff performed the Heimlich maneuver and called 911, and the resident recovered without hospitalization. The resident's physician ordered a change to a softer diet with smaller bites, speech therapy, and a swallowing assessment, which the facility confirmed it had implemented. No violations were found.

View full inspector notes

On January 6, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted a Case Management visit to follow-up on an incident that was reported by the facility. LPA met with the administrator and explained the purpose of today's visit. On December 23, 2025, the facility report an incident that happened on December 14, 2025 concerning resident #1 (R1) who appeared to be choking while eating in the dining room. Sequently, staff performed Heimlich Maneuver and called 911. When the paramedics arrived, R1 appeared to be back to baseline and R1 was not transferred to the hospital. During today's visit, the administrator stated that R1's physician and responsible party were notified of the incident. The administrator stated that the physician changed R1's diet to mechanical soft with small bites and ordered speech therapy and swallowing assessment test. The administrator stated that the facility has followed the physician's order and changed R1's diet and the responsible party will arrange for the swallowing assessment test and speech therapy. During today's LPA interviewed the kitchen staff who was able to report that they were serving R1 mechanical soft diet with small bites. LPA observed R1 eating lunch in the dining and the administrator confirmed that the consistency of the lunch was mechanical soft diet. No deficiency is cited today. This report is reviewed and discussed with the administrator. A copy is provided.

Other visitJanuary 6, 2026
No deficiencies

Plain-language summary

A state licensing analyst visited the facility on January 6, 2026, to follow up after the resident reported a spine compression fracture that was discovered in mid-December 2025. The facility stated there was no incident at the facility that caused the injury, and the resident's hospital records indicated a pre-existing condition that could have contributed to the fracture. No violations were found during the visit.

View full inspector notes

On January 6, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted a Case Management visit to follow up on an incident that was reported by the facility. LPA met with the administrator and explained the purpose of today's visit. On December 15, 2025, the facility reported an incident that happened on December 12, 2025, concerning resident 1 (R1) who was complaining of having back pain and was diagnosed with compression fracture in the spine at the hospital. R1 returned to the facility on the same day. During today's visit, LPA observed R1 in the room on a recliner sofa and appeared to be comfortable. R1 did not remember going to the hospital but stated that he/she was comfortable and did not have any pain. R1 stated that everyone at the facility took well care of him/her. Based on the hospital records, R1 has a diagnosis that could have contributed to the compression fracture. LPA interviewed the administrator who stated that there were no incidents that happened in which could have resulted in the injury. The administrator stated that R1 is doing well and is being seen by the home health team. No deficiency is cited today. This report is reviewed and discussed with the administrator. A copy is provided.

Other visitNovember 13, 2025Type A
1 deficiency

Plain-language summary

On November 13, 2025, inspectors conducted a follow-up visit after the facility reported that on November 6, 2025, a staff member gave one resident medication intended for another resident because she became distracted when the first resident unexpectedly entered the dining room; the staff member had received training on proper medication administration procedures but did not follow them. The inspector cited a violation because the staff member failed to verify the correct resident and correct medication before administering the dose. The facility was notified that failure to correct this issue may result in civil penalties.

View full inspector notes

On 11/13/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) conducted an unannounced case management visit to follow- up on an incident that was reported by the facility. LPA met with Resident Coordinator, Madeline Tigno and explained the purpose of today's visit. On 11/10/2025, CCL received an unusual incident/injury report from the facility reporting an incident that occurred on 11/6/2025 in which staff #1 (S1) gave resident #1 (R1) medication that was intended for resident #2 (R2). During today visit, LPA interviewed S1 who stated that when she returned from her lunch break, R1 usually sits in the dining room so she would give R1 medication. However, on the day of the incident, she noticed R1 was not in the dining room so she asked staff to get R1 to the dining room while preparing medication for R2. When she was about to give R2's medication to R2, R1 came into the dining room and she got distracted so she gave R2's medication to R1. S1 acknowledged that she did not ensure it was the Right Resident and the Right Medication prior to giving the medication to R1. Based on training records, S1 was trained in September 2023, September 2024 and on 11/6/2025 on Medications/ Medication Errors/Narcotics and S1 stated that the training covered " The Six Rights" of medication administration. Based on interview, records review and observation, deficient is cite for this incident because the S1 was trained on " The Six Rights" of Medication Administration, however, it was not followed while giving medication to R1 resulting in R1 received medication that was intended for R2. Based on observation, record review, and interviews deficiency is cited under California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC 809D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. This report is reviewed and discussed with the Resident Coordinator; A copy is provided with appeal rights.

Type ACCR §87411(a)

Regulation

87411 Personnel Requirements - General (a)Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs. This requirment is not met as evidenced by while giving medication, S1 did not ensure it

Inspector finding

was right the medicaiton and the right resident which resulted in R1 who was giving medication that was intended for R2 which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

ComplaintJune 18, 2025· Unsubstantiated
No deficiencies

Inspector: Murial Han

Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.

Plain-language summary

A complaint investigation found no evidence that a private caregiver employed by a resident's family spoke inappropriately to residents or staff, or that the caregiver interfered with residents' activities by hiding the television remote. The administrator, facility staff, and the family member who hired the caregiver all reported not witnessing these behaviors.

View full inspector notes

According to the administrator, she has never observed the private caregiver speaking inappropriately to residents and staff and no one has brought it to her attention as well. The administrator also stated that the responsible party who hired the private caregiver visited the resident almost daily and is very satisfied with the services that the private caregiver is providing. According to the person who hired the private caregiver, he/she stated that they visited the resident almost daily and has not witnessed any inappropriateness from the private caregiver to the residents. They also stated that they trust the private caregiver and they have worked with this person for many years. According to the facility staff, they have not witnessed the private caregiver speaking inappropriately to the residents and they reported that there was one time the private caregiver attempted to assist them with calming down a resident who was yelling and screaming but he/she was not rude and/or disrespectful to the resident. After the investigation, this allegation is deemed to be unsubstantiated. Regarding to the allegation of - staff do not prevent private caregiver from interfering with residents' activities, the reporting party stated the private caregiver takes the television remote, turns off the television and hides the remote, resulting in residents not able to watch television as an activity. As part of the investigation, LPA interviewed the administrator and the facility staff. The administrator denied the allegation and stated that she has not observed this behavior from the private caregiver nor it was reported to her. LPA interviewed the facility staff from different shifts and all of them stated that they have not witnessed such behavior from the private caregiver. Based on these observations, and interviews the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegations are unsubstantiated. The report is reviewed and discussed with the administrator. A copy is provided.

Other visitMay 5, 2025
No deficiencies

Plain-language summary

An inspector visited the facility on May 5, 2025 for a routine annual inspection and found no violations. The facility has 24 beds across two floors with private and shared rooms, adequate bathrooms with safety features like grab bars, proper temperature controls, working call systems, locked medications, and current fire safety equipment. Staff records and resident medical records were reviewed and found to be in order.

View full inspector notes

On May 5, 2025 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced annual inspection. LPA was met with the administrator, Ana and LPA explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured facility and grounds. No accessible bodies of water or fire safety hazards observed. LPA toured inside and outside including all of resident rooms, common areas, and kitchen area. The indoor and outdoor passageways were free of obstruction. Comfortable temperature is maintained and lighting is sufficient for comfort. LPA observed residents were participating in activities in the dining room. This is a two story facility. On the 1st floor, there are 10 resident private rooms with their own bathrooms, one common bath/shower room, dining/activity room, and linen room. On the 2nd floor, there are 14 resident rooms(shared and private rooms), 5 shower/bathrooms in the hallways, staff lounge, and housekeeping room. LPA observed the bathrooms and showers are equipped with paper towels, soap, grab bars, and non-skid mats. Hot water temperatures were measured at 107- 110 degrees F. 2 days for perishables and & 7 days non-perishable food were observed to be present. Facility is equipped with call system in the resident rooms, resident bathrooms, common shower rooms and common bathrooms. Fire extinguishers were last inspected on 4/26/2025, Fire drill records were reviewed to be adequate. A review of (5) facility resident records was conducted. A review of (5) facility staff records was conducted. Medications, chemicals and toxic were observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents in care. No deficiency cited today; a copy is provided.

InspectionOctober 9, 2024
No deficiencies

Inspector: Murial Han

Plain-language summary

During a follow-up visit on October 9, 2024, inspectors reviewed two medication errors that occurred in September and October: one resident received another resident's medication mixed in food, and another resident received both their morning and evening medications at once in the morning shift. In both cases, the facility reported the errors immediately, monitored the residents for adverse reactions (none were found), and notified the residents' doctors and families; no violations were cited, though the facility completed additional medication administration training for its staff.

View full inspector notes

On October 9, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted a Case Management visit to follow-up on two incidents that were reported by the facility. LPA met with the administrator and explained the purpose of today's visit. On September 19, 2024 , the facility reported an incident that happened on 9/ 17/2024 that resident #1(R1) received medication that was intended for another resident. On October 7, 2024, the facility reported an incident that happened on 10/06/2024 that resident #2 (R2) received both AM and PM medications during the AM shift. During today's visit, LPA interviewed the administrator, the resident care coordinator, staff members and reviewed training records. In regards to the incident that happened on 9/17/2024, the resident care coordinator stated that the shift manager/ Medication Technician (S1) placed R1's medication in R1's food and a caregiver (S2) mistakenly feed another resident's food that also consisted of medication. According to S2, on the day of the incident, S2 was orienting a new staff who started to feed R1 and when S2 discovered that there was medication in the dessert, S2 instructed the new staff to stop feeding and immediately reported it to S1 which resulted S1 realizing that R1 was given another resident's medication. In addition, S2 stated that they have not observed medication in resident's food in the past, and this incident was the first time that they discovered medication in resident's food. According to the administrator and resident care coordinator, S1 made a mistake and it was corrected immediately. They also stated that the caregivers were not suppose to administer medication as they were not trained. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LPA interviewed 4 caregivers and all of them reported that they do not give medication to residents, the shift managers do. After the incident, the facility completed a change of condition for R1 which consisted of reporting it to R1's provider, responsible party, CCL and Ombudsman. The facility monitored R1 and there was no adverse reaction noted. In regards to the incident that happened on 10/6/2024, the administrator stated that the shift manager/med tech (S3) made a medication error by administering R2's AM and PM medications on the AM shift. After the incident, the facility completed a change of condition for R2 that consisted of reporting it to R2's provider, responsible party, CCL and Ombudsman. The facility monitored R2 and there was no adverse reaction noted. Based on the training records provided by the facility, LPA observed the annual training was completed by the shift managers and training was conducted after the incident that happened on 9/17/2024. In addition, the administrator reported that the facility will have another training provided by an outside consultant company to ensure shift managers/med techs are educated on medication administration. No deficiency cited today. This report is reviewed and discussed with the administrator and a copy is provided.

ComplaintOctober 9, 2024· Unsubstantiated
No deficiencies

Inspector: Murial Han

Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.

Plain-language summary

An investigation of four complaints found no violations: staffing levels were adequate though residents sometimes waited briefly for help; the facility documented and responded appropriately to a resident's accident with bruises; the facility sought medical attention promptly when a potential urinary tract infection was reported; and the facility had adequate personal protective equipment during a COVID-19 outbreak and posted appropriate notifications to visitors.

View full inspector notes

LPA interviewed the administrator who denied the allegation and stated that the facility has sufficient staff to care for the residents and the facility just hired several new staff members. In addition, the administrator stated that she has good communication with R1's responsible party and this allegation was not brought up by the responsible party who visited R1 on a regular basis. LPA interviewed R1's responsible party who stated that for the most part, the facility has sufficient staff to care for R1 but there were times when R1 had to wait a little longer for assistance as the staff was busy with other residents. LPA interviewed R1's family member who visited R1 regularly and stated that this facility is the best place for R1 and he/she has not observed R1 to have unpleasant odor and/or unkempt during the visits. After the investigation, this allegation is deemed to be unsubstantiated. Regarding to the allegation of- facility staff failed to observe resident for physical changes, the reporting party stated that during a visit in Oct 2023, R1 had black and blue bruises all over R1's face. As part of the investigation, LPA interviewed the responsible party, the family member, and reviewed documents. According to R1's responsible party and a family member, the facility was aware of the black and blue bruises on R1's face because in Oct 2023, they were notified by the facility that R1 had an accident which resulted black and blue bruises on R1's face. They stated that after the accident, the facility implemented safety measures to ensure R1's safety. Based on the documents provided by the facility, there was an incident report completed by the facility in Oct 2023 reporting R1's accident and the report indicated that it was reported to the responsible party. After the investigation, this allegation is deemed to be unsubstantiated. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Regarding to the allegation of- facility staff failed to seek timely medical attention for resident, the reporting party stated that during a visit in Oct 2023, he/she noticed R1 had classic signs of Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) and the facility did not notice it. As part of the investigation, LPA interviewed the administrator and R1's responsible party. According to the Administrator, R1 has recurrent UTI and R1 is on a routine medication for it. The administrator stated that when the facility was notified by R1's responsible party that R1 may have UTI, the facility took action right away and R1 was prescribed a medication for UTI. LPA interviewed R1's responsible party who validated the information that was provided by the administrator and stated that the facility did seek for medical attention right away when they were notified that R1 may have UTI. In addition, the responsible party stated the facility has always kept him/her in the loop of communication with R1's condition. After the investigation, this allegation is deemed to be unsubstantiated. Regarding to the allegation of - facility failed to follow infection control plan, the reporting party stated that R1 had COVID-19 but there was no signs, and no PPE supplies indicating that R1 had COVID-19. As part of the investigation, LPA toured the facility, interviewed the administrator, R1's responsible party, and R1's family member. During the visit on 8/27/2024, LPA observed a sign by the door alerting visitors of facility's COVID-19 status but LPA did not observe any PPE supplies set-up inside the facility. The administrator stated that PPE isolation carts were removed after everyone tested negative, however, they were placed in the hallway during outbreak. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 During the tour, LPA also observed facility has adequate PPE supplies. LPA interviwed R1's responsible party and R1's family member and they stated that the facility have adequate PPE supplies during the outbreak and there was a sign on the door informing the visitors. The responsible party stated that the facility informed him/her that R1 tested positive for COVID-19 and he/she informed the people who visited R1 on a regular basis. After the investigation, this allegation is deemed to be unsubstantiated. Based on these observations, the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegations are unsubstantiated. The report is reviewed and discussed with the administrator. A copy is provided.

InspectionMay 2, 2024
No deficiencies

Inspector: Murial Han

Plain-language summary

During an unannounced annual inspection on May 2, 2024, inspectors found no violations at this facility. They reviewed resident and staff records, checked fire safety equipment, confirmed medications and chemicals were locked away, verified that bathrooms had proper safety equipment like grab bars, and confirmed the facility maintained appropriate temperatures and lighting throughout. The building's common areas, resident rooms, and grounds were clean and free of hazards.

View full inspector notes

On May 2, 2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced annual inspection. LPA was met with the administrator, Ana and LPA explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured facility and grounds. No accessible bodies of water or fire safety hazards observed. LPA toured inside and outside including all of resident rooms, common areas, and kitchen area. The indoor and outdoor passageways were free of obstruction. Comfortable temperature is maintained and lighting is sufficient for comfort. This is a two story facility. On the 1st floor, there are 10 resident private rooms with their own bathrooms, one common bath/shower room, dining area, and linen room. On the 2nd floor, there are 14 resident room(shared and private rooms) but the rooms do not have their own bathrooms; the bathrooms and showers rooms are located in the common area, there is also a dining room, staff lounge, and the housekeeping room. LPA observed the bathrooms and showers are equipped with paper towels, soap, grab bars, and non-skid mats. Hot water temperatures were measured at 105- 108 degrees F. 2 days for perishables and & 7 days non-perishable food were observed to be present. Facility is equipped with call system in the resident rooms, resident bathrooms, common shower rooms and common bathrooms. Fire extinguishers were last inspected on 5/30/2023, Fire drill records were reviewed to be adequate. A review of (5) facility resident records was conducted. A review of (5) facility staff records was conducted. Medications, chemicals and toxic were observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents in care. No deficiency cited today; a copy is provided.

ComplaintNovember 4, 2022· Unsubstantiated
No deficiencies

Inspector: Jaime Vado

Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.

Plain-language summary

A complaint was investigated that medications were not being given as prescribed. The facility's medication records showed that all medications were being administered according to doctor's orders, though there was a miscommunication with the resident's family when the medication frequency was increased, and some confusion occurred when the resident switched from their personal doctor to the facility's physician.

View full inspector notes

Page 2: LIC9099C - Investigation findings In regards to the medication not being administered as prescribed, it is discovered when medication administration record (MAR) were reviewed by LPA, the medication order and dosage are on record as well as on the MAR, showing medications were being administered per doctor's order. Upon admission there was a mis-communication to the resident's responsible party about the new medication order as the medication had increased in frequency. LPA did not find evidence of facility over medicating as the medication order is present and facility is administering accordingly. There was a change from PCP to the facility's normal physician they use due to the mis-communications between the PCP and facility physician which may have caused confusion as the facility had the facility physician assess and prescribe medications based on a virtual assessment. LPA could not prove or disprove any medication mismanagement. Based on these observations, the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegations are unsubstantiated at this time. No citation issued. Report is reviewed with administrator.

ComplaintJune 22, 2022· Unsubstantiated
No deficiencies

Inspector: Jaime Vado

Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.

Other visitJune 22, 2022
No deficiencies

Inspector: Jaime Vado

Plain-language summary

An unannounced infection control inspection was conducted at the facility, with the inspector observing proper storage of medications and supplies, adequate sanitation and safety equipment (including grab bars and first-aid kits), and current criminal background clearances for staff. The facility's disaster plan was reviewed and found to be in place, and the administrator's certification was current at the time of inspection. No violations were found.

View full inspector notes

On this day at 1300hrs, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaime Vado and Kevin Varilla conducted an unannounced infection control annual inspection. LPA met with administrator Ana Medorio and explained purpose of today's inspection. No accessible bodies of water or fire safety hazards observed. Infection control practices are reviewed: entry procedures, staff training and policies, resident monitoring, containment strategies, environmental preparation and cleaning. PPE supply is observed as in place. Medications, toxins and sharps are stored appropriately and inaccessible to clients. Facility ambient temperature is warm and comfortable, and lighting is sufficient for residents and staff safety. Toilet and bathing facilities are equipped with grab bars and non-skid flooring material. Liquid soap is available. First-aid kit is inspected and is complete. A Disaster and Mass Casualty Plan is observed. Criminal record clearances or exemptions for facility staff or other individuals who have client contact have been finger print cleared and associated to the facility. Administrator certificate is viewed as current expiring 11/12/2023. Mitigation plan is reviewed with the administrator. It is current with no changes. LPA Vado reviewed the mitigation plan with the administrator and approved on this day. The following updated forms are requested to be submitted to CCLD by 06/29/2021 : • Administrator Certificate • LIC 308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility • LIC 500 Personnel Report • LIC 610E Emergency Disaster Plan No deficiencies cited today. Report is reviewed with administrator Ana.

InspectionSeptember 2, 2021
No deficiencies

Inspector: Jaime Vado

Plain-language summary

An unannounced inspection was conducted to observe staff masking practices at the facility. The inspector observed all staff members wearing masks on both floors of the facility and found no violations. The administrator confirmed that masking training had been provided to staff and that reminders were posted throughout the facility.

View full inspector notes

On this day at 1330hrs, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaime Vado conducted an unannounced case management in conjunction with opening a 10 day initial complaint investigation visit. LPA met with administrator Ana Medorio and explained purpose of today's visit which was to make observations regarding the masking of staff. During today's visit LPA toured the facility independently and made observations on the ground floor and upper floor. LPA observed all staff wearing masks on this day. LPA observed at least six staff members wearing masks. Both floors observed all staff are wearing masks. LPA advised administrator to review the newest PIN regarding masking guidelines within the facility. She notified LPA that she conducted additional masking training on 08/05/21 and 08/06/21 regarding masking and posted additional masking reminders thorough out the facility. LPA did observe these masking signs during today's tour of the facility. No citations issued. Report is reviewed with administrator.

ComplaintJuly 8, 2021
No deficiencies

Inspector: Gladys Kuizon

Plain-language summary

This was a routine annual inspection on April 25, 2026, and the facility was found to be in compliance with all requirements. Staff were wearing masks, COVID-19 safety information was posted throughout the facility, visitor screening procedures were in place, the facility had adequate supplies of protective equipment and food, and over 80% of residents and staff were vaccinated against COVID-19. No violations were found.

View full inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gladys Kuizon conducted an annual inspection today and met with Administrator Ana Medorio. At 1:05 PM, LPA entered the facility through the facility's central entry point and was screened by staff. At 1:30 PM, a tour of the facility was conducted. COVID-19 postings including hand-washing and infection control guides were observed throughout the facility including on the main entrance, hallways, staff break room and bathrooms. Staff were observed wearing face coverings. Residents were observed in their rooms and the facility's communal dining room with staff. The facility has at least 30 days' supply of personal protective equipment (PPE) including face shields, isolation gowns, gloves, and face masks. Disinfection supplies, hand sanitizers, soap, and paper supplies were observed available. At least 2 days' supply of perishable food and at least 1 week's supply on non-perishable food supply was observed in the premises. Per Administrator, the facility has reached over 80% vaccination rate against COVID-19 for both residents and staff. The facility is currently accepting visitors inside the facility. Screening procedures including sign-in and symptom checking is in place for all visitors and staff. Facility's contact information was verified current with Administrator. No deficiencies were cited. Exit interview conducted with Administrator and a copy of this report was provided during visit.

Federal summary

CMS Care Compare

Not a CMS-certified facility

California RCFEs (residential care facilities for the elderly) are licensed by the state, not by CMS. CMS data only applies to skilled nursing facilities or to CCRCs that operate a licensed SNF wing.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

No published reviews yet. Use the button above to share your experience.

← Back to Burlingame