StarlynnCare

California · Belmont

Vista Terrace of Belmont

RCFE

A Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) is a non-medical residential care home licensed by California CDSS under Health & Safety Code §1560. Residents receive assistance with daily living activities such as bathing, dressing, meals, and medication management in a home-like setting. RCFEs are not hospitals or skilled nursing facilities — they do not provide round-the-clock medical care.

900 Sixth Avenue · Belmont, 94002

Quick facts

Licensed beds68
Memory careNot listed
Last inspectionJan 2026
Last citationDec 2025
Operated byGahc4 Belmont Ca Trs Sub, Llc;cogir Sl Belmont Llc
Map showing location of Vista Terrace of Belmont

Quality snapshot

Updated April 25, 2026

Compared to 247 California RCFE facilities, over the last 36 months. Bed-size filter relaxed due to small peer set.

Source: California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing Division. View raw inspection records →

Quality grade· click to show how this was calculated

Severity
46th

Weighted citations per bed

Repeats
100th

Repeat deficiencies as share of total

Frequency
42th

Deficiencies per inspection

Tick mark at 50% = peer median · higher percentile = better facility

Vista Terrace of Belmont scores B−. Better than 63% of comparable California RESIDENTIAL CARE ELDERLY facilities. Severity: 46th percentile. Repeats: top 0%. Frequency: 42th percentile.

Each metric is converted to a 0–100 percentile within the peer set (higher = better). The composite grade averages all four. Peer set: CA / rcfe_general (247 facilities).

Citation severity over time

↓ improving

Weighted severity score per month · 24 months

May 24peer medianApr 26

Weighted score (24mo)

98

Last citation

Dec 25

Finding distribution

18 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

IsolatedPatternWidespreadJKLG9HID9EFABCSev 4 · IJSev 3Sev 2Sev 1

View inspections & citations

The rules that apply to this facility

California Title 22 requirements for this facility, with the specific regulation and a suggested question for each.Rules this facility has been cited for are shown first.

What must this facility report to the state — and how fast?Cited Aug 202522 CCR §87211 / WIC §15630
  • ImmediateElopement, fire, epidemic outbreak, or poisoningImmediately
  • 2 hoursAbuse with serious bodily injury2-hour phone report + 2-hour written report — to the California Department of Social Services (CDSS), Adult Protective Services, and law enforcement
  • 24 hrsAbuse without serious bodily injuryWithin 24 hours
  • Next dayDeath of a residentPhone by next working day; written within 7 days
  • Next dayInjury requiring medical treatment beyond first aidPhone by next working day; written within 7 days
  • WrittenBankruptcy, foreclosure, eviction, or utility shutoff noticeWritten notice to CDSS and residents — $100/day penalty (max $2,000) for failure

Your enforcement lever:Incidents that aren't reported on time are themselves a separate violation. If you believe a reportable event wasn't filed, you can submit a complaint directly to the California Department of Social Services (CDSS).

What training are all staff required to complete?22 CCR §87411

All direct-care staff must complete:

  • 10 hours initial training within the first four weeks of employment.
  • 4 hours annual in-service every year thereafter.
  • Administrator certificate from a CDSS-approved program — 80 hours for first-time, 40 hours renewal every 2 years.

Ask on tour: Ask when the last staff training was completed and how it's tracked.

How many staff must be on duty overnight?22 CCR §87415

Based on 68 licensed beds:

One awake caregiver must be on duty, plus one additional caregiver on call who can respond within 10 minutes.

Violation pattern to watch for:A facility that documents a staff member as "on call" but with that person physically off-site — when the law requires on-premises presence — is in violation of this section.

Ask on tour: Ask the facility to walk you through their overnight staffing plan and confirm whether on-call staff are on premises or off-site.

What health conditions can this facility legally accept or refuse?22 CCR §87612–87615

Restricted — allowed with physician order + care plan

  • Supplemental oxygen
  • Insulin and injectable medications
  • Indwelling or intermittent catheters
  • Colostomy / ileostomy
  • Stage 1 and Stage 2 pressure injuries
  • Wound care (non-complex)
  • Incontinence
  • Contractures

Prohibited — facility must refuse or discharge

  • Stage 3 or Stage 4 pressure injuries
  • Feeding tubes (PEG, NG, or J-tube)
  • Tracheostomies
  • Active MRSA or communicable infections requiring isolation
  • 24-hour skilled nursing needs
  • Total ADL dependence with inability to communicate needs

A hospice waiver (HSC §1569.73) can allow continued care for residents on hospice who would otherwise fall into a prohibited category.

Ask on tour: Ask whether your loved one's specific care needs are restricted or prohibited, and what the facility's process is if needs change after admission.

How does CDSS enforce these rules?22 CCR §87755–87777 / HSC §1569.58
  1. 1Notice of DeficiencyWritten citation with a correction deadline. Facility must submit a Plan of Correction.
  2. 2Civil PenaltyStarts at $50/day for non-serious; $150/day for serious deficiencies — immediately, with no grace period. Repeats escalate to $150 first day + $50/day, then $1,000 first day + $100/day.
  3. 3Suspension of AdmissionsFacility cannot accept new residents until violations are corrected.
  4. 4Temporary Suspension or RevocationEmergency suspension for imminent danger; full revocation after administrative hearing.
  5. 5Exclusion OrderAdministrator and operator can be barred from all CDSS-licensed facilities — not just this one.

See how these rules have been applied to this specific facility:

View state inspection record and citations

State records

California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing
License number
415601080
License type
RESIDENTIAL CARE ELDERLY
License status
LICENSED
License expires
Not yet indexed
Licensed beds
68
Operator
Gahc4 Belmont Ca Trs Sub, Llc;cogir Sl Belmont Llc

Inspections & citations

43

reports on file

24

total deficiencies

11

Type A (actual harm)

Other visitJanuary 28, 2026
No deficiencies

Plain-language summary

On January 19, 2026, a resident reported that a housekeeper took $40 from their purse; the facility notified police, the ombudsman, and the resident's family, and the housekeeper (an agency worker on their first shift) left the facility before being interviewed. During a follow-up visit on January 28, the licensing analyst reviewed the incident, confirmed the housekeeper had passed a background check, but was unable to speak with the resident or complete a full investigation. No violations were cited, though the investigation is ongoing.

View full inspector notes

On January 28, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced case management visit in relation to an incident that occurred on 1/19/26. LPA met with Administrator, Jim Sidoti and explained the purpose of the visit. The Licensee reported on 1/19/26, the concierge reported an alleged theft of $40.00 cash from Resident 1's (R1's) purse located in R1's room. R1 stated that he/she saw the housekeeper (S1) take the money out of his/her purse. R1 confirmed it was $40. Police department, ombudsman, and R1's responsible party was notified. During the visit, LPA discussed the incident with the administrator and business office manager and obtained S1's personnel records. According to Administrator, S1 is an agency staff who has only worked at the facility once. Administrator indicated when he was on his way to the facility to have a conversation with S1 regarding the incident, S1 clocked out and left. The agency was notified about the incident. Records reviewed showed that S1 is fingerprint cleared. LPA was unable to interview R1 during the visit as R1 was out of the community. No citations are being issued during the visit today. Further investigation is required. Report is reviewed with administrator and a copy is provided.

ComplaintDecember 11, 2025· MixedType B
2 deficiencies

Inspector: Murial Han

Plain-language summary

A complaint investigation found that furniture and personal belongings were missing from a resident's apartment after a facility relocation in early 2025, and though management promised reimbursement in writing, the resident has not been paid as of the investigation date. The investigation also found that the facility increased the resident's monthly charges for a higher level of care without providing written notice or explanation, even though the resident's care plan from December 2024 showed no care needs; the resident reported feeling pressured to pay the increase to avoid eviction. A third allegation about phone access for private calls was not substantiated, as the facility provided reasonable access to phones for resident use.

View full inspector notes

The Regional Vice President of Operations stated she has seen photos of the missing furniture in R1's room before and after the relocation but she stated that she did not have any specific details because it was handled by the previous management company, Integral Senior Living (ISL) and they did a major clean up before the residents returned. According to R1, many furniture and other personal belongings were missing from the apartment after returning to the facility. R1 also stated that a laptop was missing, many garbage bags that were packed with personal items were thrown away without his/her permission. According to R1's family member, they made a police report after discovering the furniture and other items were missing from R1's apartment and they have photos to proof. R1's family member stated that they have shared these photos with Cogir management, and they were told that they would be reimbursed when the police report was finalized. Based on the before and after photos of R1's apartment, it revealed that many furniture was missing such as a bookshelf, table, chairs, entry furniture, etc. Based on the written communication dated February 4, 2025, the Regional Vice President of Operations stated that the facility will reimburse R1's family member for the missing items when the police report was finalized. However, a copy of the police report dated 2/18/2025 was provided but the reimbursement was not issued. After the investigation, this allegation is deemed to be substantiated because there was photos to proof that furniture and other items were missing from R1's apartment after R1's returned to the facility, and there was a written communication in February 2025 from the Regional Vice President stating that R1 will be reimbursed but as of today, R1 and R1's family member has yet been reimbursed. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Regarding the allegation of - illegal rate increase, the reporting party stated that the facility increased R1's rent and charged for the administrative work. As part of the investigation, LPA interviewed R1, R1's family member, the State Official, the Director Of Health Services, the Administrator, the Business Office Director, and the Regional Vice President Of Operations. According to R1, the facility increased the rate for level of care and it was based on an assessment but R1 did not remember having any type of assessments. In addition, R1 stated that R1's family member was forced to pay for the increase as R1's family member did not want the facility to evict R1 due to non-payment. According to R1's family member, initially the facility stated that the level of care increased was a mistake as the billing was done by an outside company and it would be corrected. However, in February 2025, the facility informed them that there would be a level of care increase starting March 2025 due to extra care. R1's family member stated that R1 did not require any extra care, and they have never gotten a written notice of the level of care increase and an explanation of the increase. LPA interviewed the Administrator and the Director Of Health Services, and neither could provide any details as they were both new to the facility. LPA interviewed the Business Office Director who did not have any details pertaining to the level of care increase but stated that R1's family member has been paying the additional level of care increase since April 2025. LPA interviewed the Regional Vice President of Operations who stated that the monthly rent was increase due to R1's behaviors. LPA interviewed the State Official who stated that he/she was invited to a meeting in February 2025 with the Regional Vice President of Operations and R1's family member to discuss the level of care increase but during the meeting, there was no conversation about the care, it was about R1's behaviors that triggered the level of care. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Based on R1's care plan detail dated 12/30/2024, R1 was independent and did not require care. In addition, the care plan detail was not signed by the resident, the party responsible and facility representative to proof that it was reviewed and discussed accordingly. After the investigation, this allegation is deemed to be substantiated as the facility increased R1's level of care but based on R1's care plan detail dated 12/30/2024, R1 did not have any care needs. In addition, R1 and R1's family member did not receive a written notice with details explaining the level of care increase. Based on interviews and record reviews during the investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, this allegations were determined to be substantiated. Deficiencies of the California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC9099-D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Report was discussed with Administrator, and Appeal Rights provided. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Regarding the phone services, the Administrator and the Business Office Manager stated that the phone on the 3rd floor is always available for residents to use. They also stated that R1 utilized that phone as well as the phone in S3's office to make confidential calls. According to R1, there is a phone of the 3rd floor, and he/she has been using that phone, but it is not always available. R1 also stated that he/she has been using the phone in S3's office to make confidential calls and R1 stated that he/she has a cell phone. According to S3, R1 has been going to S3's office very often to use the phone and S3 would leave the office to private privacy. S3 reported that there were times when R1 spent a long time on the phone where S3 needed to tell R1 that she needed to do something in the office. According to the State Official, the facility has been accommodating R1 with providing a phone services. Regarding S1 staying in the lobby and talking to the receptionist and/or other staff after S1 clocked out for work, LPA interviewed S1, the Administrator, S2, and other residents. According to S1, he/she stayed after work to decompress after a long day of work by talking to different people. S1 stated that he/she did not bother anyone by doing that. According to the Administrator, the lobby area is not a private space to have any private conversation. The administrator stated lobby is a common space for everyone to use including S1, other staff members, visitors, residents, etc. The Administrator stated that when a resident wants to have a private conversation with a staff, it will be conducted at a private space. LPA interviewed other residents and all of them reported that their privacy was honored by the facility. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Regarding hiring professional movers to assist with moving residents back to the facility due to the emergency evacuation except for R1, R1 stated that the other residents were provided with a company credit card to pay for the movers except for R1. According to the State Official, R1 was very particular of the transportation arrangement and R1 arranged for a friend who has a van to drive R1 back to the facility. The State Official stated that some other residents moved their furniture to their temporary location but R1 did not, so the van was big enough to fit all of R1's belongings. According to the Regional Vice President of Operations, the relocation arrangements were made by the previous management, ISL and she did not have the details. After the investigation, this allegation is deemed to be unsubstantial. Regarding the allegation of - facility provided false assessment to CCL to support the eviction, the reporting party stated that the facility provided false unusual incident reports concerning to R1 to CCL of the events that never happened. As part of the investigation, LPA interviewed R1, the Administrator, and reviewed unusual incident reports. According to R1, the facility reported false incidents to CCL, for example, he/ she was yelling and screaming, wearing inappropriate attire in the public area, and the facility provided accurate information to the mobile crisis team that resulted in R1 being hospitalized. According to the Administrator, the facility was following the reporting requirement by reporting the incidents that were observed. The Administrator stated that there were a couple of events that triggered a call to a local community outreach support agency and R1 was taken to the hospital for further evaluation based on their assessment of the situation. Based on the incident reports submitted by the facility, each of them indicated an unusual incident that happened at the facility which triggered the facility to report it to the Department as part of the Reporting Requirement under Title 22. After the investigation, this allegation is deemed to be unsubstantiated. Although the above investigations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Based on the eviction letter, it indicated the reasons supporting the eviction, and other required resources. In addition, a copy of the letter was provided to CCL. After the investigation, this allegation is deemed to be unfounded as the facility provided proper notification to R1 and to the Department according to Title 22 Regulation- Eviction Procedures. Based on interviews, record review, and observations, the department has determined that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis, theref

Type BCCR §87217(b)

Regulation

87217 Safeguards for Resident Cash, Personal Property, and Valuables(b) Every facility shall take appropriate measures to safeguard residents' cash resources, personal property and valuables which have been entrusted to the licensee or facility staff.

Inspector finding

This requirement is not met as evidenced by based on interview, records review and observation, R1 was evacuated to another facility due to an electrical issue at the facility and upon returned, R1 and R1's responsible party discovered many items were missing that were there before which posed a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.

Type BCCR §1569.657(a)

Regulation

§1569.657Rate increase due to change in level of resident care; notice(a) For any rate increase due to a change in the level of care of the resident, the licensee shall provide the resident and the resident’s representative,.. written notice of the rate increase.. The notice shall include a detailed

Inspector finding

explanation.. This requirement is not met as evidenced by based on record review, and interview R1 and R1's responsible party was not provided a written notice of the level of care increase which poses a potential health and safety risk to resident in care.

Other visitDecember 4, 2025
No deficiencies

Plain-language summary

On December 4, 2025, staff conducted an unannounced follow-up visit after a resident reported missing jewelry on November 26, 2025. The resident showed jewelry to a staff member at some point but did not remember when or who, and had not formally documented the items as required by the facility's personal property log. No violation was found.

View full inspector notes

On December 4, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced case management visit in relation to an incident that occurred on 11/26/25. LPA met with Administrator, Jim Sidoti and explained the purpose of the visit. The Licensee reported on 11/26/25, Resident 1 (R1) and R1's responsible party reported to the administrator that there were items missing from R1's room. Belmont Police Department and LTCO was notified. During the visit today, LPA reviewed R1's file and interviewed R1. According to R1, he/she wanted to wear his/her earrings for Thanksgiving, however when R1's responsible party went to get them, R1's responsible party observed all of R1's jewelry missing. R1 remembers talking to a staff member and showing a staff member the jewelry, however does not remember when and who it was. R1 indicated he/she did not notify staff about bringing his/her jewelry into the facility. Based on R1's personal property and valuables log signed by R1's daughter, R1 declined to record any items on the log. No citations are issued during the visit. Report is reviewed with Administrator and a copy is provided.

Other visitNovember 20, 2025
No deficiencies

Inspector: Komal Curley

Other visitNovember 13, 2025
No deficiencies

Plain-language summary

On November 13, 2025, a state inspector made an unannounced visit to deliver an exclusion letter, which means a staff member was prohibited from working at the facility. The inspector met with the administrator to explain the action and provide documentation.

View full inspector notes

On November 13, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced case-management visit. LPA met with Administrator, Jim Sidoti and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of today's visit is to deliver an immediate exclusion letter to exclude a Staff 1 (S1) from the facility. The letter was given to the Administrator. This report is reviewed and discussed with the Administrator and a copy is provided.

Other visitNovember 13, 2025
No deficiencies

Plain-language summary

On November 4, 2025, a resident left the facility without permission after becoming aggressive toward his one-on-one caregiver, who then left the room; the resident was found outside by police and brought back. The facility had hired a private caregiver through an agency for this resident, who has Parkinson's disease and a history of unsafe wandering, and the caregiver did not report the conflict to facility staff before the resident went missing. No violations were cited during the follow-up visit.

View full inspector notes

On November 13, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced case management visit in relation to an incident that occurred on 11/4/25. LPA met with Administrator, Jim Sidoti and explained the purpose of the visit. The Licensee reported on, 11/4/25 at 7:45pm, Resident 1 (R1) eloped from the facility. According to the Licensee, prior to the elopement, R1 became verbally and physically aggressive towards his/her one-on-one caregiver, instructing the caregiver not to enter his/her room. The one-on-one caregiver left R1's room, leaving R1 alone. R1 then exited the facility without authorization. Police department was immediately notified. R1 was located on the street in front of the community and was escorted back to the facility. During the visit, LPA interviewed the administrator, staff and reviewed R1's file. According to staff interviewed, R1 left through the third floor exit doors and was found outside around the bushes by the first floor entrance. According to staff interviewed, at around 8:15pm, the one-on-one caregiver noticed R1 was not in his/her room and notified the med-tech on shift. Based on file reviewed, R1 has a Parkinson's Disease, is unable to leave the facility unsupervised, has unsafe wandering behaviors, and is at risk for elopement, therefore, the facility worked with the family and the family decided to hire a private caregiver through a third party agency. According to Health and Wellness Director, when a private caregiver starts working with residents at the facility, the Health and Wellness provide orientation and let the private caregivers know that if there is an incident that occurs while assisting a resident, to notify the med-tech on shift. According to the staff interviewed, the one-on-one caregiver did not endorse or notify the facility med-tech that R1 and the caregiver got into an argument and was not with R1 until the one-on-one caregiver noticed R1 was missing. No citations are issued during the visit. Report is reviewed with Administrator and a copy is provided.

InspectionNovember 4, 2025
No deficiencies

Plain-language summary

On November 4, 2025, state licensing staff conducted an unannounced visit and delivered an exclusion letter to the facility, prohibiting a staff member from working there. The exclusion letter was given to the Maintenance Director. No details about the reason for the exclusion were provided in this report.

View full inspector notes

On November 4, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced case-management visit. LPA met withMaintenance Director, Alan Harris and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of today's visit is to deliver an immediate exclusion letter to exclude a Staff 1 (S1) from the facility. The letter was given to the Maintenance Director. This report is reviewed and discussed with the Maintenance Director and a copy is provided.

Other visitSeptember 16, 2025Type A
1 deficiency

Plain-language summary

On September 16, 2025, inspectors conducted a follow-up visit to investigate two incidents from late August and early September: a nurse failed to give one resident his prescribed evening medication (15mg Mirtazapine), and a caregiver rummaged through another resident's nightstand drawer, threw the resident's pajamas at him, and told him not to call for help again—the facility immediately removed the caregiver and reported the incident to police. The facility was cited for violations and issued a $1,000 civil penalty for a repeat violation within the prior 12 months.

View full inspector notes

On September 16, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced case management visit to follow up on two incidents that occurred on 8/28/25 and 9/3/25. LPA met with Administrator, Jim Sidoti and explained the purpose of the visit. On 8/28/25, the Licensee reported that the agency nurse failed to provide Resident 1 (R1) his/her PM medications. During the visit, LPA reviewed R1's file, including but not limited to; physician's orders for medication, medication list, medication administration record (MAR), and R1's medication bottles. Based on R1's medication list, R1 is required to receive his/her one 15mg tablet of Mirtazapine daily at 8:00pm, however the facility did not provide R1 his/her medication. The facility failed to provide R1's medication as prescribed by the physician. On 9/3/25, the Licensee reported that an agency CNA (S1) was attempting to assist Resident 2 (R2) with changing his/her brief and started rummaging through R2's nighstand drawer. R2 refused assistance and S1 threw R2's pajamas at R2 and told R2 to not call for assistance again. All required parties were notified, including the Belmont Police Department. Regional Sales Specialist, Jessica Wiggins ended S1's shift and immediately walked the S1 out. S1 is no longer allowed in the community. During the visit, LPA reviewed the facility's internal investigation, attempted to interview R2, discussed the incident with the administrator, and reviewed R2's file. Based on R2's file reviewed, R2 has a diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease. Based on R2's service plan, R1 is independent and does not require assistance with toileting and dressing. According to staff interviewed, although R2 is independent, due to his/her Parkinson's disease, facility staff check in on R2 and offer assistance. Based on the facility's internal investigation, R2 was not missing any personal belongings and R2 was not injured. LPA was unable to interview R2 during the visit. A statement was provided to facility by S1 indicating, he/she was only trying to assist R2 with changing R2's pants and diaper. Deficiencies of the California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC809-D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. A civil penalty of $1,000.00 is issued today for a repeat violation within the last 12 months for CCR 87465(a)(4). Report is reviewed with the administrator and a copy is provided with appeal rights. A copy of civil penalty is provided.

Type ACCR §87465(a)(4)

Regulation

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care: (a) A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility... (4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement is not met as evidenced by:

Inspector finding

Based on R1's medication list, R1 is required to receive his/her one 15mg tablet of Mirtazapine daily at 8:00pm, however the facility did not provide R1 his/her medication as prescribed by the physician which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

ComplaintAugust 26, 2025· MixedType A
3 deficiencies

Inspector: Komal Charitra

Plain-language summary

This was a complaint investigation into three separate allegations. The facility was found to have failed to maintain one resident's bed in good repair, which caused the mattress to collapse when the resident sat on it; the call button response complaint was unsubstantiated; and the facility was cited for medication errors that occurred on four dates in 2025 and failed to report two medication errors that occurred in August 2025, even though staff had caught and corrected them. The facility was issued a $250 civil penalty for a repeat violation within the last 12 months.

View full inspector notes

During the visit, LPA reviewed R6’s call button response log and interviewed R6. According to R6, staff are responding to his/her call button on time. In addition, R6 indicating that he/she understands and is not complaining when staff take longer to respond at times as staff are assisting other residents. Based on R6’s call button response log, staff do respond timely to R6’s calls. Based on interviews conducted and information collected, the department has determined that although the above allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Report is reviewed with Regional Sales Specialist, Jessica Wiggins and a copy is provided. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 A civil penalty of $250 is issued today for a repeat violation within the last 12 months. The facility has received a deficiency for California Code of Regulations, 87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care in relation to the med-errors on 2/27/25, 4/29/25, 5/6/25, and 7/1/25. Regarding the allegation, facility failed to report incident to CCLD, according to the reporting party, the facility is not reporting R1’s med errors to CCLD. During the visit, LPA reviewed records and interviewed staff. Based on records, it was observed that the facility has not submitted any incident reports to CCLD regarding R1’s med-errors that occurred on 8/8/25 and 8/10/25. According to staff interviewed, they believed that an incident report did not have to be submitted because although the med-errors occurred, it was caught by R2 and fixed by the med-tech. Regarding the allegation, facility failed to ensure resident's beds were in good repair, according to the reporting party, Resident 3’s (R3’s) and Resident 4's (R4’s) bed collapsed because the maintenance director did not assemble the beds correctly. During the visit, LPA interviewed staff, R3 and R4. According to R3, he/she was sitting on the side of the bed that was provided by the facility, when the bed's slate underneath the mattress slipped, causing the mattress to collapse on the floor. LPA was unable to interview R4, however according to staff interviewed, they indicated that R4's bed did not collapse, R4 just rolled out of it. In addition, according to staff interviewed, R3's bed was not able to hold his/her weight causing the slate to shift and the mattress to collapse. Although LPA was unable to interview R4, R3's bed was not in good repair, causing R3's bed mattress to collapse. Based on the interviews conducted, records reviewed and information collected, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. Deficiencies of the California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC9099-D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Report is reviewed with Regional Sales Specialist, Jessica Wiggins and a copy is provided with appeal rights. A copy of the civil penalty is provided.

Type ACCR §87465(a)(4)

Regulation

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care: (a) A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility... (4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement is not met as evidenced by:

Inspector finding

Based on interviews and records reviewed, on 8/8/25 and 8/10/25 at 8pm on both days, R1 was administered only one tablet of Gabapentin instead of three tablets by the med-tech. R2 caught the error and notified the med-tech who fixed the error. Although this incident was caught by R2 and fixed by the med-tech, the med-tech would have administered one tablet of Gabapentin to R1 at 8pm on both days if R2 did not catch this error which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

Type BCCR §87211(a)(1)

Regulation

87211 Reporting Requirements: (a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as the Department may require, including, but not limited to, the following: (1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency...within seven days of the occurrence of any of the events specified in (A) through (D) below... This requirem…

Inspector finding

Based on records, it was observed that the facility has not submitted any incident reports to CCLD regarding R1’s med-errors that occurred on 8/8/25 and 8/10/25. According to staff interviewed, they believed that an incident report did not have to be submitted because although the med-errors occurred, it was caught by R2 and fixed by the med-tech. This poses a potentional health and safety risk to residents in care.

Type BCCR §87303(a)

Regulation

87303 Maintenance and Operation: (a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times... This requirement is not met as evidenced by:

Inspector finding

Based on interviews conducted, R3 indicated he/she was sitting on the side of the bed that was provided by the facility, when the bed's slate underneath the mattress slipped, causing the mattress to collapse on the floor. ccording to staff interviewed, R3's bed was not able to hold his/her weight causing the slate to shift and the mattress to collapse which poses a potentional health and safety risk to residents in care.

Other visitJuly 1, 2025Type A
1 deficiency

Plain-language summary

On July 1, 2025, inspectors conducted an unannounced visit following two medication errors involving the same resident that occurred in late June: on June 22, a staff member gave 150mg of Lacosamide instead of the prescribed 100mg, and on June 26, a staff member gave only 1 tablet of Gabapentin instead of the prescribed 3 tablets (though another resident caught and reported the error before the resident took the wrong dose). The facility failed to ensure medications were administered as prescribed by the physician, and this was a repeat violation resulting in a $250 civil penalty.

View full inspector notes

On July 1, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced case-management visit in relation to an incident that occurred on 6/22/25. LPA met with Health and Wellness Director, Carmen Bodnar and explained the purpose of the visit. On 6/22/25, the Licensee reported that registry LVN/Med-tech administered an incorrect dose of Lacosamide medication to Resident 1 (R1) during the AM shift. R1 was supposed to receive 100mg of Lacosamide, however 150mg of Lacosamide was given. During the visit, LPA reviewed R1's file, including but not limited to; physician's orders for medication, medication list, medication administration record (MAR), and R1's medication bottles. Based on R1's medication list, R1 is required to take 1 tablet of Lacosomide (100mg) medication daily at 8am, however the med-tech administered 150mg. The facility failed to provide R1's medication as prescribed by the physician. According to the Health and Wellness Director, registry med-techs are always trained prior to administering medications for residents. In addition, it was reported that during each shift, med-techs are required to count all residents' medications. On 6/26/25, the Licensee reported that registry med-tech, provided R1 one tablet (100mg) of Gabapentin at night at 8pm, however Resident 2 (R2) noticed and reported that R1 is supposed to receive three tablets of Gabapentin instead. The med-tech then provided R1 with two more tablets. (Continue to 809C) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 During the visit, LPA reviewed R1's file, including but not limited to; physician's orders for medication, medication list, medication administration record (MAR), and R1's medication bottles. Based on R1's medication list, R1 is required to take 1 tablet of Gabapentin (100mg) at 9am, two tablets of Gabapentin at 1pm and three tablets of Gabapentin at 8pm. Although this incident was caught by R2 and fixed by the med-tech, the med-tech would have administered one tablet of Gabapentin to R1 at 8pm if R2 did not catch this. Deficiencies of the California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC809-D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. A civil penalty of $250.00 is issued today for a repeat violation within the last 12 months. Report is reviewed with the Health and Wellness Director and administrator and a copy is provided with appeal rights.

Type ACCR §87465(a)(4)

Regulation

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care: (a) A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility... (4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement is not met as evidenced by:

Inspector finding

Based on R1's medication list, R1 is required to take 1 tablet of Lacosomide (100mg) medication daily at 8am, however on 6/22/25, the med-tech administered 150mg. The facility failed to provide R1's medication as prescribed by the physician. In addition, Based on R1's medication list, R1 is required to take 1 tablet of Gabapentin (100mg) at 9am, two tablets of Gabapentin at 1pm and three tablets of Gabapentin at 8pm. Although this incident was caught by R2 and fixed by the med-tech, the med-tech…

ComplaintMay 15, 2025· SubstantiatedType A
2 deficiencies

Inspector: Komal Charitra

Plain-language summary

A complaint investigation found that the facility's temporary elevator during construction requires staff to use a key to open it, and residents reported waiting more than 10 minutes for staff to assist them with access, causing them to miss appointments and sit in their cars waiting. The facility was cited for this access issue, and the administrator was notified of potential penalties if corrections are not made.

View full inspector notes

During the investigation, LPA interviewed staff and residents. According to the administrator, the elevator service being used currently during construction requires a key to get inside and/or outside the facility. According to staff interviewed, depending on the day and time, it may take staff longer to get to the elevator to assist residents, however all residents have access to the elevators. Based on the residents interviewed, there have been several times where it's taken staff more than 10 minutes to open the elevators to go inside and/or outside the facility causing residents to miss their appointments and/or sit in their cars. Based on the interviews conducted and information collected, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. Deficiencies of the California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC9099-D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Report is reviewed with Administrator, Jose Acumabig and a copy is provided with appeal rights.

Type ACCR §87307(d)(6)

Regulation

87307 Personal Accommodations and Services: (d) The following space and safety provisions shall apply to all facilities: (6) All outdoor and indoor passageways and stairways shall be kept free of obstruction. This regulation is not met as evidenced by:

Inspector finding

Based on observations, LPA observed uneven pavement, uneven bricks, and overgrown greenery on the side of the walk way which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

Type BCCR §87411(a)

Regulation

87411 Personnel Requirements - General: (a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs... This regulation is not met as evidenced by:

Inspector finding

Based on staff interviews, it was acknowledged that depending on the day and time, it may take staff longer to get to the elevator to assist residents. Based on the residents interviews, there have been several times where it's taken staff more than 10 minutes for staff to open the elevators to go inside and/or outside the facility causing residents to miss their appointments and/or sit in their cars.

Other visitMay 6, 2025Type A
1 deficiency

Plain-language summary

On April 26, 2025, a staff member gave a resident an incorrect dose of seizure medication—100mg instead of the prescribed 150mg. During a follow-up visit the next month, inspectors reviewed the resident's medication records and confirmed the dose did not match the doctor's order. The facility was cited for this violation and assessed a $250 penalty.

View full inspector notes

On May 6, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced case management visit in relation to an incident that occurred on 4/26/25. LPA met with Administrator, Jose Acumabig and explained the purpose of the visit. The Licensee reported on 4/26/25, the PM shift med-tech administered an incorrect dose of Lacosamide to Resident 1 (R1). R1 is required to take 150mg of Lacosamide, however only 100mg was provided. During the visit, LPA reviewed R1's file, including but not limited to; physician's orders for medication, medication list, centrally stored medication record, medication administration record (MAR). Based on R1's physician's order, R1 is required to take 1 tablet of Lacosomide (150mg) medication daily at 8pm, however based on the MAR, the med-tech administered 100mg of Lacosamide instead of 150mg of Lacosamide. The facility failed to provide R1's medication as prescribed by the physician. Deficiencies of the California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC809-D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. A civil penalty of $250.00 is issued today for a repeat violation within the last 12 months. Report is reviewed with the Administrator and a copy is provided with appeal rights.

Type ACCR §87465(a)(4)

Regulation

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care: (a) A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility... (4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement is not met as evidenced by:

Inspector finding

Based on file reviewed, R1 is required to take 1 tablet of Lacosamide (150mg) medication once every evening at 8pm, however based on the MAR, the med-tech administered the wrong doasge and administered 100mg of Lacosamide to R1 which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

InspectionMay 6, 2025
No deficiencies

Plain-language summary

This was a routine annual inspection on May 6, 2025, where the inspector toured the entire facility, reviewed resident and staff records, and checked safety systems including fire extinguishers, carbon monoxide detectors, and medication storage. The facility was found to be clean and well-maintained, with proper food storage, working safety equipment, appropriate emergency procedures, and all medications properly accounted for and secured. No violations were cited.

View full inspector notes

On May 6, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator, Jose Acumabig and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility inside and outside including but not limited to; a random sample of resident rooms, communal bathrooms, activity room, common areas & kitchen. The indoor and outdoor passageways were free of obstruction. No accessible bodies of water of fire safety hazards observed. This is a three story facility. LPA toured main dining room and kitchen on the first floor. LPA observed 2 days perishables and 7 days non-perishables. LPA observed medication room on the first floor to be locked and inaccessible to residents. Communal bathrooms on the first floor were clean and in good repair. Communal areas and activity rooms were observed clean and free from tripping hazards. All resident rooms have a full bathroom. According to the administrator, residents bring their own furniture and linens. There is a laundry room on each floor, no chemicals were observed. Chemicals, medications, and sharps were locked and inaccessible to residents. Hot water temperature throughout the facility was within regulatory requirements. Carbon monoxide detectors are working properly. All fire extinguishers were observed to be charged. Emergency drills are logged and done quarterly. Temperature throughout the facility is comfortable and lighting is sufficient for comfort. LPA reviewed 5 resident records and 5 staff records. Resident records are updated, complete and signed. Staff records are complete, with training logs that have met the basic requirement. Medication review was done, and all medications are accounted for, and centrally stored medication records are updated. No citations are issued during this visit. Report is reviewed with the administrator and a copy is provided.

ComplaintApril 29, 2025Type A
1 deficiency

Plain-language summary

A staff member failed to give a resident their prescribed seizure medication on April 20, 2025, at the scheduled time of 8 a.m., which the facility acknowledged during an inspection visit. The facility has been cited for this medication error and issued a $250 civil penalty, as this is a repeat violation within the past year. The administrator was informed of the violation and provided information about the right to appeal.

View full inspector notes

On April 29, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced case management visit in relation to an incident that occurred on April 20, 2025. LPA met with Administrator, Jose Acumabig and explained the purpose of the visit. On April 23, 2025, the Licensee reported on April 20, 2025, the AM shift Med-Tech did not administer Resident 1's (R1's) Lacosomide (100mg) medication at 8am. During the visit, LPA interviewed staff, reviewed R1's file and medication administration records (MAR). According to staff interviewed, it was acknowledged that the AM shift med-tech did not administer R1's medication on 4/20/25 at 8am. Based on R1's physician's order, R1 is required to take 1 tablet of Lacosomide (100mg) medication daily at 8am, however based on the MAR, the med-tech did not administer the medication to R1. The facility failed to provide R1's medication as prescribed by the physician. Deficiencies of the California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC809-D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. A civil penalty of $250.00 is issued today for a repeat violation within the last 12 months. Report is reviewed with the Administrator and a copy is provided with appeal rights.

Type ACCR §87465(a)(4)

Regulation

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care: (a) A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility... (4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement is not met as evidenced by:

Inspector finding

Based on staff interviews, R1's physician's orders and MAR, R1 is required to take 1 tablet of Lacosomide (100mg) medication daily at 8am, however based on the MAR, the med-tech did not administer the medication to R1 which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

ComplaintMarch 18, 2025· Unsubstantiated
No deficiencies

Inspector: Komal Charitra

Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.

ComplaintFebruary 27, 2025· SubstantiatedType A
1 deficiency

Inspector: Komal Charitra

Plain-language summary

An investigator found that a resident did not receive their Parkinson's medication on schedule on February 25, 2025—the medication was given at 8:24 a.m. and 11:15 a.m. instead of the prescribed 6 a.m. and 10 a.m. times. The facility was cited for this medication timing failure, and the state warned that civil penalties may follow if the problem is not corrected.

View full inspector notes

Based on R1's medications reviewed and the MAR, R1 is prescribed to take two tabs of Carbidopa-Levodopa by mouth four times daily at 6am, 10am, 2pm, and 6pm. Based on the MAR, on 2/25/25, R1 was not given his/her Carbidopa medications on time in the morning, as R1 received his/her Carbidopa medication at 8:24am and the second round at 11:15am. Based on the information collected, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. Deficiencies of the California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC9099-D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Report is reviewed with Culinary Service Director, Justin Kang and a copy is provided with appeal rights.

Type ACCR §87465(a)(4)

Regulation

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care: (a) A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility... (4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement is not met as evidenced by:

Inspector finding

Based on R1's medication reviewed and the MAR reviewed, R1 was supposed to be given Carbidopa at 6am and 10am, however was not given the medications until 8:24am and 11:15am which poses an immediate health and safety risk for residents in care.

ComplaintDecember 11, 2024· Unsubstantiated
No deficiencies

Inspector: Komal Charitra

Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.

Plain-language summary

An investigator looked into a complaint about the dining room temperature by interviewing residents and checking the temperature, which was 74 degrees. Four of the five residents interviewed said the dining room felt comfortably warm to them. The department found no violation because there was not enough evidence to prove the complaint.

View full inspector notes

During the investigation, LPA interviewed residents and toured the dining. The dining room temperature was observed to be at 74 degrees F. LPA interviewed 5 residents, according to 4/5 residents interviewed, all 4 residents indicated that the dining room was at a comfortable temperature and they felt warm. Based on observations and interviews conducted, the department has determined that although the above allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Report is reviewed with Administrator and a copy is provided.

ComplaintNovember 14, 2024· SubstantiatedType B
1 deficiency

Inspector: Komal Charitra

Plain-language summary

A complaint investigation found that staff failed to inform residents about a planned fire inspection before it occurred. All four residents interviewed reported that they were not notified in advance, and when the fire alarms sounded and ran for 20-25 minutes, residents felt scared and uncertain about what to do because staff did not communicate with them during the event. The facility has been cited for this violation and warned that failure to correct it may result in civil penalties.

View full inspector notes

Furthermore, according to 4/4 residents interviewed, no notification was provided to them and staff did not communicate to them regarding the fire inspection. Residents interviewed indicated that they were scared, nervous, and did not feel safe because the fire alarms were loud and went on for about 20-25 minutes. In addition, residents stated they were not sure what to do as staff did not tell them anything. Therefore, the allegation staff did not inform residents of planned fire inspection is determined to be substantiated. Deficiencies of the California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC9099-D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Report is reviewed with Administrator and a copy is provided with appeal rights.

Type BCCR §87468.1(a)(2)

Regulation

87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities: (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (2) To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment.

Inspector finding

The facility failed to provide residents notification or communicate with residents regarding a fire inspection that occurred on 11/7/24, resulting in residents to feel unsafe, scared, and nervous. According to the Maintenance Director, he was aware that outside vendor, Cintas was going to come to the facility a few days prior and was aware that Cintas was going to test the fire alarms, however admitted that he allowed them to continue and test the alarms without any notification to residents

ComplaintJuly 12, 2024· Unsubstantiated
No deficiencies

Inspector: Grace Donato

Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.

ComplaintJuly 12, 2024Type A
1 deficiency

Inspector: Grace Donato

Plain-language summary

A complaint alleged that a resident's medication was not given at the correct times during February and March 2024. An investigation found that while medication records from those months showed inconsistent timing, the facility received a corrected doctor's order in April 2024 with specific times (6am, 11am, 5pm), which the resident's physician confirmed was appropriate, and medication administration records have reflected these correct times since then; the complaint was determined to be unfounded.

View full inspector notes

LPA reviewed medication records and it was found out that the medication that is needed to be taken on specific time and interval were not given accordingly on both months of February and March of 2024, the medication were administered on the following times, 2 tablets every 6:30am, 12:00pm, 6:00pm. Having an interval of 4.5 hours to 6 hours. There were no doctors’ orders specific to the time that the medication needs to be given. All that was provided was that it needs to be administered 3x/day. LPA was able to obtain a copy of the order but was dated 4/10/2024. This has been followed upon receiving this order. The medication administration record since April already reflected that it is given at 6am, 11am & 5pm. LPA was also able to interview R1s physician (DR). DR confirmed that the medication should be taken every five hours and that based of the medication orders given it should be at taken at 6am,11am & 5pm. LPA also interviewed a staff (S1) and It was stated that the yellow pill mentioned is an order for daily aspirin, in the morning. That tablet is in fact small and pale yellow in color. During the interview S1 stated that there were no discrepancies, errors, refusals, or conversations about the medications as they were given as prescribed the morning of the 28th. LPA also observed one of the medications for R1 as having a pale yellow in color. Based on interviews and observations, the department has determined that that the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis, therefore the allegations are UNFOUNDED. Report is reviewed and copy is provided.

Type ACCR §87465(a)(4)

Regulation

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care(a) A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility. The plan shall encourage routine medical and dental care and provide for assistance...(4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed.

Inspector finding

This was not met as evidenced by, based on records review, the medication that needs to be given on a specific time was not administered on time between Ferbruary and March 2024, which poses an immediate health, safety, or personal rights risk to clients in care.

ComplaintMay 1, 2024· Substantiated
Citation on file

Inspector: John Calandra

Substantiated — CDSS found a violation and issued a citation. Full citation details are on file with the state.

Plain-language summary

A complaint investigation found that the facility violated residents' personal rights and did not have enough staff to meet resident needs. The investigation determined these allegations were substantiated based on the evidence gathered. The facility has been notified of the violations and families can request a copy of this report.

View full inspector notes

The Department has investigated the above complaint allegations of a possible violation of a resident’s personal rights and insufficient number of staffing to meet the resident needs. Based on the investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are determined to be substantiated. The deficiencies cited on the following pages are in violation of the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8: Maintenance and Operations and Personnel Requirements-General This report is provided and reviewed with facility representative and a copy of this report must be made available for public review upon request. Appeal rights discussed and provided.

ComplaintMarch 19, 2024· SubstantiatedType A
1 deficiency

Inspector: Komal Charitra

Plain-language summary

An investigator looked into a complaint and found that the facility had expired medications and medications for former residents stored in a locked cabinet since January 2024, despite staff telling management about them. The facility failed to properly dispose of these medications as required by law. The investigator documented this violation and warned the facility that failure to correct it could result in penalties.

View full inspector notes

During the visit, LPA observed medication room on the first floor to be locked and inaccessible to clients. LPA observed a locked cabinet with expired medications and medications for residents who no longer reside at the facility. Based on interviewed staff, the expired medications and medications for residents who no longer reside at the facility has been at the facility since they've reopened back in January 2024. Staff indicated they notified the Regional Health and Wellness Director, Blanca Hurtado and the administrator, however they were unsure why the medications were not disposed of immediately after notifying them. Therefore, the allegation f acility staff do not properly dispose of medications which were not taken with the resident(s) upon termination of services is determined to be substantiated. Deficiencies of the California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC9099-D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Report is reviewed with Administrator and a copy is provided with appeal rights.

Type ACCR §87465(i)

Regulation

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care: (i) Prescription medications which are not taken with the resident upon termination of services, not returned to the issuing pharmacy, nor retained in the facility as ordered by the resident’s physician and documented in the resident’s record nor disposed of… shall be destroyed in the facility by the facili…

Inspector finding

Based on observations, LPA observed expired medication and medications for residents who no longer reside at the facility in a locked cabinet in the medication room. In addition, based on interviews conducted, facility staff were aware of the medications that should've been disposed since the facility reopened in January 2024.

Other visitMarch 19, 2024
No deficiencies

Inspector: Komal Charitra

Plain-language summary

This was a routine annual inspection conducted in March 2024, during which the inspector toured the entire facility including resident rooms, bathrooms, kitchen, and outdoor areas and found no violations. The facility maintained proper storage and security of medications, chemicals, and cleaning supplies; had working fire safety equipment and carbon monoxide detectors; kept bathrooms and common areas clean; and had complete, up-to-date resident and staff records. No citations were issued.

View full inspector notes

On March 19, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator, Kaitlyn Clarey and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility inside and outside including but not limited to; resident rooms, communal bathroom, common areas & kitchen. The indoor and outdoor passageways were free of obstruction. No accessible bodies of water of fire safety hazards observed. This is a three story facility. LPA toured main dining room and kitchen on the first floor. Residents were observed eating lunch. LPA observed 2 days perishables and 7 days non-perishables. LPA observed medication room to be locked and inaccessible to residents. Communal bathrooms on the first floor were clean and in good repair. Communal area on the third floor was observed clean and free from tripping hazards. Chemicals, medications, and sharps were locked and inaccessible to residents. Hot water temperature throughout the facility was between 113-115 degrees. Carbon monoxide detectors are working properly. All fire extinguishers have been checked and current as of October 2023. Emergency drills are logged and done monthly. Extra linen and first aid kit was observed present. Temperature throughout the facility is comfortable and lighting is sufficient for comfort. LPA reviewed 5 resident records and 5 staff records. Resident records are updated, complete and signed. Staff records are complete, with training logs that have met the basic requirement. Medication review was done, and all medications are accounted for, and centrally stored medication records are updated. No citations are issued during the visit. Report is reviewed with the administrator and a copy is provided.

Other visitJanuary 4, 2024
No deficiencies

Inspector: Komal Charitra

Plain-language summary

On January 4, 2024, state licensing staff conducted an unannounced health and safety check at the facility and found no violations. The inspector observed residents eating lunch and settling back into the facility, verified that medications were properly locked and stored, and confirmed that adequate food supplies were on hand. Five residents had returned to the facility at the time of the visit, with more expected to return in the following week.

View full inspector notes

On January 4, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced health and safety check. LPA met with Interim Administrator, Kaitlyn Clarey and explained the purpose of the visit. During the visit, LPA observed two residents in the dining room eating lunch, one resident unpacking their belongings in his/her room. LPA observed 7-day non-perishable and 2-day perishable. According to Kaitlyn, there is one resident who requires assistance with medication. Medications were observed locked and inaccessible to residents. Residents interviewed indicated they were content to be back. A total of 5 residents have returned back to the facility, a few more residents are to return this weekend, and will continue till next week. No citations are issued during the visit. Report is reviewed with Kaitlyn and a copy is provided.

Other visitDecember 6, 2023
No deficiencies

Inspector: Komal Charitra

Plain-language summary

This was a follow-up inspection on December 6, 2023, after the facility reopened following months of closure for electrical repairs. The inspector checked water temperatures throughout the building and the beauty salon faucet that had been leaking during a previous visit; both were found to be in proper working order and no violations were cited.

View full inspector notes

On December 6, 2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced case-management visit to follow up on a visit conducted on 11/28/2023. LPA met with Maintenance Director, German Briones and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA also spoke to Administrator, Dave Peper via phone and explained the purpose of the visit. On 11/28/2023, LPA Charitra conducted a health and safety visit as a result of facility being closed since April 2023 due to electrical disrepair. During the visit, LPA toured the facility to ensure facility is ready, safe, and comfortable for residents to move back. LPA observed the facility's water temperature to be fluctuating throughout the facility; not within regulatory requirements. In addition, LPA observed the faucet in the beauty salon to be leaking and in disrepair. On 12/6/2023, LPA made a follow up visit to ensure water temperature was within regulatory requirements and to ensure the leaking faucet in the beauty salon was fixed. During the visit today, LPA checked water temperature in 9 resident apartments (3 apartments per floor), 2 communal bathrooms, and the beauty salon. Water temperature measured between 105-120 degrees F. LPA observed faucet in the beauty salon to be repaired and in good working condition. No deficiencies are cited during the visit. LPA reviewed report with Maintenance Director and a copy is provided.

Other visitNovember 28, 2023
No deficiencies

Inspector: Komal Charitra

Plain-language summary

An inspector visited this facility on November 28, 2023, after it had been closed since April 2023 due to electrical problems—there were no residents present at the time. The facility was generally clean and safe, with working safety systems, proper grab bars and non-skid mats in bathrooms, and locked medication storage, though a faucet in the beauty salon was leaking and needed repair. The inspector planned a follow-up visit to confirm the water temperature met requirements and the beauty salon faucet was fixed before residents returned.

View full inspector notes

On November 28, 2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced case-management health and safety visit at the facility as a result of facility being closed since April 2023 due to electrical disrepair. LPA met with Administrator, Joan Johnson, Regional Vice President of Operation with Integral Senior Living, Debi Witt, Vice President of Operation with Cogir Management, Dave Peper and Executive Vice President of with American Health Care, Ray Oborn. LPA toured the facility inside and outside including all three of the facility floors, resident rooms, common areas & kitchen. The indoor and outdoor passageways were free of obstruction. No residents were present at the facility due to facility closure. While touring the facility it was observed that the room temperature was at 71F. Hot water throughout the facility measured between 121-125 degrees F. Carbon monoxide monitor is working properly. All fire extinguishers have been checked and current as of October 2023. Resident apartments and bathrooms were observed to be in good repair, bathrooms equipped with grab bars and non-skid mats. Due to the emergency relocation, most residents took their personal belongings to the facilities they've been relocated to. Beauty salon faucet was observed to be leaking and in disrepair. 7-day non-perishable was present, however 2-day perishables was not present as facility is still closed. Facility will purchase 2-day perishables the day before facility reopens and provide LPA a photo of receipt of perishables purchased. Medication room and medication cabinet were both observed to be locked. Required postings were observed to be present on the 1st floor. Facility is overall clean, however LPA to make a follow up visit to ensure facility water temperature is within regulatory requirements and faucet in the beauty salon has been repaired. Report is reviewed with Administrator, Joan Johnson and Regional Vice President of Operation, Debi Witt.

ComplaintOctober 24, 2023· Unsubstantiated
No deficiencies

Inspector: Komal Charitra

Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.

Plain-language summary

A complaint alleged that staff discriminated against a resident by not allowing them to eat while standing in the dining room, and that the facility failed to control pests in the resident's room. The investigation found no evidence supporting either allegation: staff interviews indicated that other residents felt uncomfortable with the resident's behavior in the dining room (not that staff imposed a rule), and while the resident had concerns about pests, they refused to allow staff or pest control professionals into their room due to their own phobias, so the facility could not address the issue. The complaint was unsubstantiated.

View full inspector notes

Regarding the allegation that staff are discriminating against resident, according to the reporting party, Resident 1 (R1) is being discriminated against for standing up and eating and was told she can’t be in there if he/she is standing. During the investigation, LPA interviewed staff. Administrator denied this allegation and indicated that no staff has told R1 that he/she can't eat in the dining room if he/she is standing. Based on staff interviews, residents addressed to administrator that they were uncomfortable eating because R1 would be standing and eating in the dining room with his/her back towards residents, and would wear a garbage bag. Regarding the allegation that staff did not ensure resident's room was free of pests, according to the reporting party, the facility failed to ensure pests/flies were not in Resident 1's (R1's) room as R1 has OCD and is germaphobic. During the investigation, LPA was unable to tour and observe R1's room due to facility closure, however LPA interviewed staff. According to 3/3 staff interviewed, R1 has OCD, is germaphobic and hoards items in his/her room. Staff interviewed indicated that R1 would not allow any staff to come into his/her room, including housekeepers due to his/her phobias. In addition, according to interviewed staff, when R1 addressed the flies/pests issue to management, ECO-Lab was notified immediately and they came on a regular basis to inspect the facility. Due to R1's phobias, R1 did not let anyone in his/her apartment to inspect or treat the alleged pests. Based on the interviews conducted, record review, and information collected, the allegations above are UNSUBSTANTIATED, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Report is reviewed with Administrator, Joan Johnson and a copy is provided.

Other visitSeptember 29, 2023Type B
3 deficiencies

Inspector: Komal Charitra

Plain-language summary

A licensing analyst conducted an unannounced follow-up visit on September 29, 2023, after the state received a letter regarding a resident's potential eviction due to non-compliance. The facility could not locate the resident's file, did not have a signed admission agreement on record (the resident had refused to sign), and the resident's most recent physician's report was from December 2021—a physical exam had been scheduled for April 2023 but did not occur due to an emergency evacuation on April 28, 2023. The facility was cited for deficiencies and notified that failure to correct them may result in civil penalties.

View full inspector notes

On September 29, 2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced case-management visit to follow up on a letter that was received from state official. LPA met with Resident Care Director, E. Dewitt and explained the purpose of the visit. On September 24, 2023, the Department was notified by the state official of a letter that was sent to Resident 1 (R1) in regards to potential eviction due to non-compliance. R1 has been a resident at Vista Terrace of Belmont prior to the emergency evacuation. LPA requested copies of R1's signed admission agreement, physician's report, care plan, however according to interviewed staff, R1's file has been misplaced and no where to be found. In addition, it was indicated that R1 does not have a signed admission agreement. According to Resident Care Director, R1 refused to sign the admission agreement. R1's physician's report was observed to be dated 12/20/2021. According to the Resident Care Director a care conference was held on 4/19/2023, with R1, R1's family member, administrator, resident care director, and ombudsman regarding R1's care concerns and R1 was to call his/her PCP to schedule a physical on 4/21/2023 or 4/24/2023. Resident Care Director indicated R1 did not schedule the physical due to the emergency evacuation on 4/28/2023. Deficiencies are cited under California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC 809D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Report was discussed with Resident Care Director. A copy of this report and the Appeal Rights is provided.

Type BCCR §87507(c)

Regulation

87507 Admission Agreement: (c) Admission agreements shall be signed and dated, acknowledging the contents of the document, by the resident or the resident’s representative, if any, and the licensee or the licensee’s designated representative no later than seven days following admission... Violation of this regulation is not met as evidenced by:

Inspector finding

Based on record review, facility failed to maintain a copy of a signed and dated admission agreement for R1 prior to admission at Vista Terrace of Belmont.

Type BCCR §87506(a)

Regulation

87506 Resident Records: 87506 Resident Records: (a) The licensee shall ensure that a separate, complete, and current record is maintained for each resident in the facility or in a central administrative location readily available to facility staff and to licensing agency staff. Violation of this regulation is not met as evidenced by:

Inspector finding

Based on record review and staff interviews, facility misplaced R1's file and are unable to provide R1's records (admission agreement, pre-appraisal, care plan) to licensing staff when R1 was residing at Vista Terrace of Belmont, prior to the emergency evacuation

Type BCCR §87458(a)

Regulation

87458 Medical Assessment : (a) Prior to a person's acceptance as a resident, the licensee shall obtain and keep on file, documentation of a medical assessment, signed by a physician, made within the last year. The licensee shall be permitted to use the form LIC 602 (Rev. 9/89), Physician's Report, to obtain the medical assessment. Violation of thi…

Inspector finding

Based on record review, R1's physicians report is dated 12/20/2021 and R1 had a change in condition that was discussed during a care conference on 4/19/2023. Nevertheless, the facility failed to ensure R1's physician's report was current.

ComplaintSeptember 22, 2023· Unsubstantiated
No deficiencies

Inspector: Komal Charitra

Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.

Plain-language summary

A complaint alleged that the facility failed to notify families about a power outage and relocation, and lacked adequate emergency supplies like lanterns. The investigation found no evidence supporting these claims: all four families interviewed confirmed the facility notified them promptly about the relocation, and the facility had an emergency plan with sufficient lanterns and flashlights on hand (additional lanterns were purchased to provide extra lighting during the outage).

View full inspector notes

Regarding the allegation, facility failed to notify family members of emergency situation and relocation, according to the reporting party, the facility did not notify the family members about the power outage when it occurred and the facility did not notify family members about the relocation in a timely manner. During the investigation, LPA interviewed the Administrator, Resident Care Director, and family members. Both the administrator and resident care director denied this allegation and indicated that as soon as they found out about the relocation, both the administrator and the Resident Care Director started calling family members to notify them of the relocation. According to 4/4 of the families interviewed, the facility notified them immediately after being aware of the relocation. Regarding the allegation, facility failed to have an adequate emergency preparedness plan, according to the reporting party, the facility did not have a sufficient amount of lanterns and they administrator had to go out and buy lanterns. During the investigation, LPA interviewed the administrator, resident care director and reviewed facility's emergency preparedness plan. The administrator and resident care director denied this allegation and indicated that the facility had an emergency disaster plan that was kept and adhered to. In addition, it was stated that there were a sufficient amount of lanterns and flashlights for residents, however additional lanterns were purchased to provide residents with additional lighting. Families interviewed indicated that facility tried to ensure residents received necessary supplies to be comfortable at the facility during the power outage. Therefore, based on the interviews conducted and information collected, the allegations above are UNSUBSTANTIATED, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Report is reviewed with Resident Care Director and a copy is provided.

ComplaintMay 17, 2023· Substantiated
Citation on file

Inspector: Komal Charitra

Substantiated — CDSS found a violation and issued a citation. Full citation details are on file with the state.

Plain-language summary

A complaint investigation found that the facility did not routinely maintain or monitor its electrical system after electricians identified breaker problems in January 2023, leading to an electrical failure that required all 36 residents to be evacuated to other locations on April 28, 2023. The facility knew about the electrical issue but failed to have the system inspected or repaired before the emergency occurred. This violation was substantiated.

View full inspector notes

The administrator provided LPA with an invoice dated 2/6/23 and 2/16/23, indicating that service conducted on 1/11/23 and 1/12/23 by Direct Supply electricians diagnosed the main breaker system as an issue. The facility failed to have the Maintenance Director and/or electricians check on the electrical systems routinely after having issues with the power and being aware that the breaker system was an issue based on the services conducted in January. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure the electrical system was in good repair, resulting into an emergency evacuation of all 36 residents to the facility's sister communities on 4/28/23. The deficiencies for the above substantiated allegations is cited in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 and is noted on attached LIC 9099-D. Report is reviewed with Joan Johnson and a copy of the report is provided.

Other visitMay 11, 2023
No deficiencies

Inspector: Komal Charitra

Plain-language summary

On May 11, 2023, state regulators met with the management of Integral Senior Living to discuss electrical problems at Vista Terrace of Belmont that were delaying the facility's reopening. The company outlined a 4-6 month timeline for repairs and discussed options for residents, including helping them move to other communities or retrieve their belongings. The facility was required to provide state regulators with electrical reports and repair timelines.

View full inspector notes

On May 11, 2023, San Bruno Regional Office conducted a Microsoft Teams meeting with Integral Senior Living (ISL) Management along with the Santa Rosa and Oakland Regional Office. During this meeting, ISL discussed the status of the electrical issues, options that will be provided to families and residents due to the delay in reopening, how to coordinate and track residents if they plan to move to other communities or need belongings from Vista Terrace of Belmont. Present in this meeting was Assistant Program Administrator, Stacy Barlow, Regional Manager, Vivien Helbling, Licensing Program Manager, Cara Smith, Licensing Program Analyst, Komal Charitra from the San Bruno Regional Office, Regional Manager, Issac Taggart, Licensing Program Manager, Yvonne Flores from the Oakland Regional Office, Licensing Program Manager, Bethany Moellers from the Santa Rosa Regional Office, and San Mateo Long Term Care Ombudsman, Tom Barrett. In addition, present in this meeting from ISL was Senior VP of Operations, Mike Zeug, Senior VP of Sales/Marketing, Jeffrey Smith, VP of Human Resources, Cathy Battles, , Director of Operational Services, Cossondra Blair, Director of Project Management, Tara Weitor, Executive Director at Vista Terrace of Belmont, Joan Johnson and additional representatives from ISL. In addition, attorney Joel Goldman from Hanson Bridgett was present. During this meeting the following was discussed; 4-6 month timeline for facility electrical repairs, communication with family members regarding delay in repair and the options residents and families will receive, coordinating moving the rest of the residents' belongings from Vista Terrace to their new location, and ongoing status updates that will be provided to CCL, residents and families regarding the electrical repairs. --Licensee to submit the following requested items to CCL; copies of electrical reports/repairs from January 2023 and a copy of electrical report from April 2023 with timelines of required repairs.

Other visitMay 1, 2023
No deficiencies

Inspector: Komal Charitra

Plain-language summary

On May 1, 2023, state regulators met with Integral Senior Living management to discuss a power outage on April 25, 2023 that forced an emergency evacuation of residents on April 28, 2023; residents were moved to their homes or to sister facilities in Petaluma and Oakland. Topics covered included how residents fared after relocation, communication with families, repairs needed, staffing, and updated emergency plans for all three facilities. The company was asked to submit updated staffing schedules, the electrician's report, and a revised plan of operation.

View full inspector notes

On May 1, 2023, San Bruno Regional Office conducted a Microsoft Teams meeting with Integral Senior Living (ISL) Management along with the Santa Rosa and Oakland Regional Office. During this meeting, the offices discussed the emergency evacuation that occurred on 4/28/2023 due to a power outage that was reported on 4/25/2023. Residents were relocated back home with their families or to the sister facilities; Windsong of Sonoma located in Petaluma or The Point at Rockridge located in Oakland. Present in this meeting was Assistant Program Administrator, Pam Gill, Regional Manager, Vivien Helbling, Licensing Program Manager, Cara Smith, Licensing Program Analyst, Komal Charitra from the San Bruno Regional Office, Regional Manager, Issac Taggart, Licensing Program Manager, Yvonne Flores from the Oakland Regional Office, Licensing Program Manager, Bethany Moellers from the Santa Rosa Regional Office, Long Term Care Ombudsman, Tom Barrett and Nikki Manske (San Mateo County) and Kiev Harris (Alameda County). In addition, present in this meeting was Director of Operations, Cossandra Blair, Senior Vice President of Operations, Mike Zeug, Interim Administrator, Joan Johnson and additional representatives from ISL. During this meeting, the following was discussed; reassessment of residents after relocation (transfer trauma/injuries), communication between facilities, families and residents, maintenance and repair time-frame, medical transportation, admission agreement addendum, staffing, updated plan of operation for all three facilities in regards to the emergency relocation of residents. --Licensee/Administrator to submit an updated LIC500 (staff schedule) for Windsong of Sonoma and The Point at Rockridge -- Licensee/Administrator to provide LPA with a copy of the electricians report from 4/29/23. --Licensee/Administrator to provide LPA with an updated plan of operation for all three facilities

Other visitApril 28, 2023
No deficiencies

Inspector: Komal Charitra

Plain-language summary

On April 28, 2023, a licensing analyst conducted an unannounced visit following a power outage on April 25 that prompted an emergency evacuation; the facility had backup generators and supplies during the outage, but the main electrical switch required extensive repairs that would take weeks or months. The facility relocated all 36 residents that day—12 to a sister facility in Oakland, 21 to a sister facility in Petaluma, and 3 returned home with family—with staff accompanying residents and bringing medications and records to their new locations. No violations were found during the visit.

View full inspector notes

On April 28, 2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced Health and Safety case management visit as a result of an emergency evacuation due to a power outage that was reported on 4/25/23. LPA met with Interim Administrator, Joan Johnson and explained the purpose of the visit. On 4/24/23, the facility had a power outage. During the time, the facility did have two back up generators, sufficient food supply, 30-day supply of resident medications, and hot water. Residents were provided with lanterns for their rooms at night and extra blankets if they were cold. On 4/27/23, the facility notified CCL that all residents will be relocated due to the main breaker switch being in disrepair. According to the Interim Administrator, it may take weeks to months to repair it as the facility needs a city permit and PG&E's approval. All residents will be relocated to the facility's sister facilities, The Point at Rockridge located in Oakland, and Windsong of Sonoma located in Petaluma. According to the Interim-Administrator, as of now 12 residents will be relocated to the facility in Oakland, 21 will be relocated to the facility in Petaluma, and 3 will be moved back home with family. During the visit, LPA toured the facility, observed sufficient staffing present, observed movers packing resident furniture, facility staff assisting with talking to residents and helping other facility staff and residents pack up their belongings. LPA observed another back-up generator being installed. For residents going back home with family, their responsible parties will sign off on the medications and take it home and for the residents who are going to sister facilities, the staff will take the medications and all resident files with them. The facility's goal is to move out all residents by this evening. Staff will be accompanying residents to their new facility. The facility has scheduled an electric testing company to come to the facility tomorrow morning to evaluate current systems. LPA will continue monitoring the facility. Facility to send LPA a copy of LIC9020- Resident Roster as soon as possible. No citations issued during this visit. LPA reviewed report with Joan Johnson and a copy is provided

Other visitJanuary 12, 2023
No deficiencies

Inspector: Komal Charitra

Plain-language summary

On January 12, 2023, a state inspector conducted an unannounced visit after a storm caused a power outage at the facility. The facility maintained safe conditions during the outage by providing flashlights and lanterns to residents, keeping common areas lit with a backup generator, maintaining comfortable temperatures, and restoring hot water to some areas; residents were observed socializing and dining normally. No violations were found.

View full inspector notes

On January 12, 2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced Health and Safety visit as a result of the Department receiving notice from Emergency Services of San Mateo and the Long-Term Care Ombudsman regarding the power outage at the facility due to the storm. LPA met with Resident Care Director, Ed Dewitt and Administrator, Siobhan Surraco and explained the purpose of the visit. During the visit, LPA toured all three floors of facility. LPA observed 2 day perishable and 7 day non-perishable present. Residents were observed socializing on the third floor and dining on the first floor dining room. A comfortable temperature of 68-69 degrees F is maintained on all floors. Facility has a backup generator and is able to provide sufficient lighting in the hallways of the facility. Bedrooms were observed to have no power, however residents were given flashlights and lanterns for their rooms. According to the Administrator, the facility has restored hot water to partial areas of the facility for residents to take shower. In addition, a larger generator will be arriving tomorrow. Proof of generator will be submitted to CCL tomorrow with a copy of plan of operation for this emergency. Report reviewed with Administrator and a copy is provided. No citations issued during this time.

Other visitDecember 20, 2022Type A
1 deficiency

Inspector: Komal Charitra

Plain-language summary

During a follow-up visit on December 20, 2022, inspectors found that narcotic medications had gone missing in November after a medication technician falsely documented their destruction without actually destroying them and without proper authorization. The technician was terminated on December 1, 2022, the police department was notified, and the facility conducted medication destruction training on December 3, 2022 to prevent similar problems.

View full inspector notes

On December 20, 2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced case management visit regarding an incident that was reported on December 7, 2022. LPA met with Resident Care Director (RCD) Ed Dewitt, and explained the purpose of the visit. The Licensee reported on November 30, 2022, narcotics were missing from the lock box. The RCD immediately conducted an investigation at the facility. According to the Hospice Nurse, on 11/30/22, the nurse signed for the destruction, however did not observe the facility med-tech destroy the medications. On 12/1/22, the RCD and the Administrator spoke to the med-tech and the med-tech admitted that he/she had the hospice nurse sign for destruction without the hospice nurse being present. In addition, the med-tech indicated he/she put the narcotics in a container in the Wellness Center, however there was no container present in the room. According to the RCD, the Administrator or the RCD are the only people who destroys narcotics with another licensed nurse and the med-tech involved did not get the RCD's authorization to destroy medications. During the visit, LPA spoke to the RCD. According to RCD, the med-tech involved was terminated on 12/1/2022 and the police department was notified. An in-service training was conducted regarding medication destruction on 12/3/2022 and a copy of the training sheet was provided. Deficiency of the Residential Care Elderly California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 is observed and cited on a LIC 809D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Report is reviewed with Resident Care Director, Ed Dewitt and a copy is provided with appeals rights.

Type ACCR §87465(i)

Regulation

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care: (i) Prescription medications which are not taken with the resident upon termination of services...shall be destroyed in the facility by the facility administrator and one other adult who is not a resident. Both shall sign a record, to be retained for at least three years, which lists the following... Viol…

Inspector finding

Based on documents reviewed and information collected, the faciliy med-tech had a hospice nurse sign for medication destruction without the hospice nurse being present for the destruction. In addition, med-tech acknowledged that he/she did not get authorization to detroy medications.

Other visitOctober 17, 2022Type B
1 deficiency

Inspector: Komal Charitra

Plain-language summary

On October 17, 2022, state licensing staff conducted an unannounced follow-up visit after the facility reported that a medication technician missed giving a resident a scheduled morning dose of prescribed medication on September 29, 2022; the error was discovered the next day and the resident showed no symptoms. This was the second time in 12 months the facility was cited for medication management problems, and the state assessed a $250 penalty for the repeat violation.

View full inspector notes

On October 17, 2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Cara Smith conducted an unannounced case management visit to follow up on an incident that was reported to CCLD on October 12, 2022. LPA and LPM met with Executive Director, Siobhan Surraco and Resident Care Director (RCD) Ed Dewitt, and explained the purpose of the visit. The Licensee reported on September 29, 2022, Resident #1 (R1) missed a dosage of their standing orders for R1's morning medication due to Med-Tech error. According to the Licensee, the error was discovered the following morning. No symptoms were exhibited. In addition, it was indicated that the Med-Tech reported he/she made a mistake. During the visit, LPA spoke to Resident Care Director, Ed Dewitt and reviewed R1's file . Based on file reviewed, R1 has a diagnosis of Parkinsons and is unable to manage their medications. According to the Resident Care Director, the missed medications were prescriptions ordered by resident's physician. Based on record reviewed and staff interviews, the facility Med-Tech missed a dosage of R1's prescribed medication which was ordered by their physician. 87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care: This is the second repeat violation within 12 months. Facility was cited on 10/10/22 under section 87465(c)(2). $250.00 CIVIL PENALTY ASSESSED FOR REPEAT VIOLATION WITHIN 12 MONTHS. Deficiency cited today under California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 follows on LIC809D. If cited deficiency is not corrected by the due date, a civil penalty may be assessed. This report was reviewed and discussed with Resident Care Director, Ed Dewitt and a copy is provided. Appeals Rights were given.

Type BCCR §87465(c)(2)

Regulation

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care: (c) If the resident's physician has stated in writing that the resident is unable to determine his/her own need for nonprescription PRN medication but can communicate his/her symptoms clearly, facility staff designated by the licensee shall be permitted to assist the resident with self-administration...(2) …

Inspector finding

Based on record reviewed and staff interviews, the facility Med-Tech missed a dosage of R1's AM medication as ordered by their physician.

Other visitOctober 10, 2022Type B
1 deficiency

Inspector: Komal Charitra

Plain-language summary

During a follow-up visit on October 10, 2022, inspectors found that two residents missed doses of their prescribed medications on September 18, 2022, because a staff member administering medications made a mistake while rushing. The facility was cited for this medication error, and if the deficiency is not corrected by the due date, a civil penalty may be assessed.

View full inspector notes

On October 10, 2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced case management visit to follow up on an incident that was reported to CCLD on October 6, 2022. LPA met with Executive Director, Siobhan Surraco and explained the purpose of the visit. The Licensee reported on September 18, 2022, Resident #1 (R1) and Resident #2 (R2) missed a dosage of their standing orders for their medications due to Med-Tech error. According to the Licensee, the error was discovered the same day during the change of shift. In addition, it was indicated that the Med-Tech reported he/she made a mistake and was rushing. During the visit, LPA spoke to Executive Director and Resident Care Director, Ed Dewitt and reviewed R1's and R2's files. Based on file reviewed, R1 has a diagnosis of cognitive impairment and diabetes. R2 has a diagnosis of Escherichia coli with muscle weakness. According to the Resident Care Director, the missed medications were prescriptions ordered by both resident's physicians. Based on record reviewed and staff interviews, the facility Med-Tech missed a dosage of R1 and R2's prescribed medication which were ordered by their physician. Deficiency cited today under California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 follows on LIC809D. If cited deficiency is not corrected by the due date, a civil penalty may be assessed. This report was reviewed and discussed with Executive Director, Siobhan Surraco, and a copy is provided. Appeals Rights were given.

Type BCCR §87465(c)(2)

Regulation

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care: (c) If the resident's physician has stated in writing that the resident is unable to determine his/her own need for nonprescription PRN medication but can communicate his/her symptoms clearly, facility staff designated by the licensee shall be permitted to assist the resident with self-administration...(2) …

Inspector finding

Based on record reviewed and staff interviews, the facility Med-Tech missed a dosage of R1 and R2's prescribed medication as ordered by their physician.

InspectionJune 28, 2022
No deficiencies

Inspector: Komal Charitra

Plain-language summary

A state inspector conducted a follow-up visit on June 28, 2022, to review an incident that had occurred on April 11, 2022. After investigation, no violations were found and the matter was closed.

View full inspector notes

On June 28, 2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra, conducted an unannounced case management visit to follow-up on a visit that LPA conducted on 4/20/2022 concerning an incident that occurred on 4/11/2022. The Department referred this incident to the Investigation Branch. An investigation regarding Resident #1 (R1) was conducted by Investigation Branch and based on the information collected, there was no deficiencies found and this incident does not require any additional investigation. This investigation is closed. Report is reviewed with Interim Executive Director, Ryan Mussato and a copy is provided.

Other visitJune 16, 2022
No deficiencies

Inspector: Komal Charitra

Plain-language summary

During an unannounced infection control inspection on June 16, 2022, inspectors found the facility's infection control practices, social distancing measures, and hygiene supplies to be in order, with properly functioning laundry rooms on each floor and adequate personal protective equipment on hand. Inspectors advised the facility to cover bathroom trash cans with lids and post social distancing signs on elevator doors. The facility's medication storage, first aid kit, and hazardous materials storage were all found to be secure and appropriate.

View full inspector notes

On June 16, 2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced annual infection control inspection. LPA met with Resident Care Director (RCD), Ed Dewitt and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA was screened at entry point and RCD was able to provide screening log documentation for staff, visitors, and residents. LPA toured facility and grounds. No accessible bodies of water or fire safety hazards observed. This is a 3 story building with rooms on each floor. LPA observed the laundry room on each floor to be fully functioning and in good repair. LPA observed 4 residents maintaining social distancing in the activities room on the 2nd floor. 30-day PPE supply was observed on the second floor storage room. LPA toured the 1st floor and observed the dining room to have tables 6ft apart to maintain social distancing. Communal bathrooms were equipped with liquid soap and paper towels; LPA advised to cover trash cans with lids in all bathrooms. The Wellness center room on the 1st floor was observed to be locked with resident files and medication. LPA observed the dining hall to have tables 6ft apart to maintain social distancing. Infection control practices are reviewed: entry procedures, staff training and policies, resident/ visitors/ and staff daily monitoring records, and 30-day PPE supply. LPA advised to put social distancing and masking sign on the elevator door. Toxins and sharps are stored appropriately and inaccessible to residents, and a comfortable temperature is maintained. Lighting is sufficient for comfort. First aid kit was observed to be completed. LPA requests the following documents to be submitted to CCLD by June 23, 2022: LIC309 Administrative Organization LIC308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility LIC500 Personnel Report Administrator Certificate LIC610E Emergency Disaster Plan Report is reviewed with Resident Care Director, ED Dewitt and a copy is provided.

Other visitJune 16, 2022Type A
1 deficiency

Inspector: Komal Charitra

Plain-language summary

During a case management visit on June 16, 2022, inspectors found that a resident with memory loss and cognitive impairment left the facility unsupervised for about an hour on June 3rd and was missing until brought back by family; the facility was cited for failing to provide adequate supervision. The facility also reported that one medication tablet went missing between shifts in May, though it was never found and the facility has no history of medication problems; staff were retrained on medication counting procedures.

View full inspector notes

On June 16, 2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an case management visit regarding two incidents that were reported to CCLD. LPA met with Resident Care Director (RCD), Ed Dewitt and explained the purpose of the visit. The Licensee reported on 5/26/22, that there was a medication mismanagement that occurred and was discovered in the Wellness Center. During the visit today, LPA interviewed the Resident Care Director (RCD) and observed the Wellness Center. The Wellness center is located on the 1st floor and is locked at all times. According to the RCD, the missing medication (1 tablet) went missing sometime between the end of the PM shift and the beginning of the NOC shift. The facility conducted an immediate investigation, however did not find the missing medication. The facility has no priors of medication mismanagement. RCD trained med-techs regarding medication count and provided LPA with a completed log of an in-service training. On June 13, 2022, the facility reported that one resident #1 (R1) AWOL (Absent Without Official Leave) on 6/3/2022. During the visit, LPA reviewed R1's file and interviewed staff. According to the files reviewed, R1 has memory changes and has mild cognitive impairment (MCI). In addition, documents reviewed also indicated that R1 is unable to leave the facility unassisted. According to the interviewed staff, R1 was seen in the dining room around 6:30pm before AWOL. R1 was missing for about an hour and returned to the community by her responsible party. Based on interviews, and record review during the course of the investigation, the facility did not ensure basic services were being met, due to lack of supervision, R1 AWOL. Deficiency cited today under California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 follows on LIC809D. If cited deficiency is not corrected by the due date, a civil penalty may be assessed. This report was reviewed and discussed with Resident Care Director, Ed Dewitt, and a copy is provided. Appeals Rights were given.

Type ACCR §87464(f)(1)

Regulation

87464(f)(1) Basic Services(f)- Basic services shall at a minimum include: (1) Care and supervision as defined in Section 87101(c)(3) and Health and Safety Code section 1569.2(c). Violation of this regulation is not met as evidenced by:

Inspector finding

Based on the file reviewed and interviewed conducted, the facility did not ensure basic services were being met, due to lack of supervision R1 AWOL. In addition, R1 is unable to leave the facility unassisted, which poses an immediate health, safety and personal rights risk to residents.

Other visitApril 20, 2022
No deficiencies

Inspector: Komal Charitra

Plain-language summary

On April 20, 2022, a state licensing inspector conducted an unannounced follow-up visit to investigate an incident that occurred on April 11, 2022. The inspector reviewed the resident's file, interviewed facility leadership, and received an updated care plan, but determined that further investigation was needed. The details of the incident were discussed with facility management and a copy of the report was provided to them.

View full inspector notes

On April 20, 2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced case management visit to follow up on an incident that occurred on 4/11/2022. LPA met with Interim Executive Director, Ryan Mussato and explained the purpose of the visit. During the visit, LPA reviewed resident's (R1's) file and received documents in relation to the incident. LPA Charitra interviewed the Interim Administrator. An updated care plan was submitted to LPA by email. During this time, R1 was at the hospital for a routine check up. This incident requires further investigation. This report is discussed and reviewed with Interim Executive Director, Ryan Mussato. A copy is provided.

InspectionMarch 10, 2022
No deficiencies

Inspector: Komal Charitra

Plain-language summary

A state inspector visited the facility on March 10, 2022 to investigate an incident that occurred on or around February 26, 2022. The inspector interviewed the resident involved and requested additional documents from the facility's administrator. The investigation was not yet complete at the time of this visit.

View full inspector notes

On March 10, 2022 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced Case Management visit regarding an incident that occurred around February 26, 2022. LPA Charitra was greeted by Front Desk Receptionist, Amina Lmamoune and the Director of Sales, Tina Morrill joined shortly thereafter. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. During today's visit, LPA interviewed the resident regarding the incident. LPA Charitra requested copies of pertinent documents to be sent to LPA via email by 3/14/22 from the Administrator. This incident requires further investigation. This report is discussed and reviewed with the Director of Sales and a copy is provided.

ComplaintJune 29, 2021
No deficiencies

Inspector: Christopher Hopkins-Clarke

Plain-language summary

This was a routine annual inspection on June 29, 2021, and the facility was found to be in full compliance with state regulations. The inspector observed that the facility was clean and well-maintained, bathrooms had safety equipment, medications and toxic materials were properly secured, staff had required background clearances, and resident records were complete. No deficiencies were identified.

View full inspector notes

On June 29, 2021 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Hopkins conducted an unannounced annual required inspection. LPA met with Business Director Arturo Lock and Executive Director Michael Li and stated the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the indoor and outdoor premises of the facility. The indoor and outdoor passageways were free of obstruction. LPA observed the resident bathroom, and it is equipped with non-skid mats and grab bars. Bathroom is sanitary and odorless. The hot water temperature was measured in residents room #301 bathroom at 117 degrees Fahrenheit and residents room #213 at 118 degrees Fahrenheit. The facility is observed to be clean, odorless, and well maintained. Residents bedrooms were observed to be well organized and fully furnished with adequate lighting. Toxic materials were observed locked in the Janitorial closet and inaccessible to residents. Food supply in kitchen was observed with an adequate two day perishable and seven day non-perishable food supply. Carbon monoxide, smoke detectors, and fire extinguisher were present at the facility. Centrally stored medication was locked in the Medication cart located on the 1st floor Medication room and inaccessible by residents. All medication was labeled and sorted by resident name. Staff records were reviewed. Staff have criminal record and fingerprint clearances on file. Resident records were reviewed and were observed to be complete with documents such as Admission Agreements, Medical Assessments, and Personal Rights. No deficiencies observed today. Facility is operating in compliance with Title 22 regulations. This report was discussed with Business Director Arturo Lock , and a copy of this report was provided via email.

Federal summary

CMS Care Compare

Not a CMS-certified facility

California RCFEs (residential care facilities for the elderly) are licensed by the state, not by CMS. CMS data only applies to skilled nursing facilities or to CCRCs that operate a licensed SNF wing.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

No published reviews yet. Use the button above to share your experience.

← Back to Belmont