Acacia Creek - Union City
What is a CCRC?
A Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC) offers multiple levels of care on a single campus — typically independent living, assisted living, and skilled nursing. Residents often enter under a long-term contract and can transition between care levels as their needs change. CCRCs in California are regulated by the California Department of Social Services.
34400 Mission Blvd. · Union City, 94587
Record last updated April 20, 2026.
Quick facts
Memory care context
Acacia Creek - Union City is a California-licensed RCFE with 376 beds, operated by Masonic Homes Cal & Acacia Creek. The facility is structured as a Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC), though its memory-care capability is unconfirmed in state licensing data. California Title 22 requires any RCFE serving residents with dementia to comply with §87705 and §87706, which govern care planning, staff training, and supervision for cognitively impaired residents. State records show no citations under these dementia-specific sections. CDSS records include 12 inspection reports with 2 total deficiencies: one Type A (actual harm) and one Type B (potential for harm). Six complaints have been investigated during the period on file. The most recent inspection occurred on March 19, 2025.
Questions to ask on your tour
Based on Acacia Creek - Union City's state inspection record.
State records show one Type A citation (actual harm) — what was the nature of this deficiency, what harm occurred, and what corrective actions were implemented?
The facility has one Type B citation (potential for harm) on record — which Title 22 section was cited, and what systemic changes were made to prevent recurrence?
Six complaints have been filed with CDSS — how many were substantiated, and what were the outcomes of those investigations?
State licensing data does not confirm memory-care capability for this CCRC — does Acacia Creek currently accept residents with dementia diagnoses, and if so, what specialized training do staff receive under §87705?
With 376 licensed beds, how does the facility ensure consistent supervision and care quality across all residential areas, particularly during overnight and weekend shifts?
State records
California CDSS · Community Care Licensing Division- License number
- 015601302
- License type
- RCFE-CONTINUING CARE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY
- License status
- LICENSED
- License expires
- Not yet indexed
- Licensed beds
- 376
- Operator
- Masonic Homes Cal & Acacia Creek, Masonic Sen Liv
Inspections & citations
12
reports on file
2
total deficiencies
1
Type A (actual harm)
ComplaintMay 22, 2025No deficiencies
Inspector: Lizette Francisco
Inspector notes
On 6/30/2021 starting at 2:30pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) L. Francisco and Staff Services Analyst (SSA) S. Vincent arrived unannounced to conduct an Infection Control Inspection. LPA and SSA met with Administrator, Martin Herter and explained the purpose of the visit. During the Infection Control Inspection, LPA toured facility including but not limited to front entrance, screening station, hand washing stations, common areas, kitchen and front visitation area. Facility has a sufficient 2-day perishable and one week non-perishable food supply. There is one central entry point for universal screening for staff, residents and visitors. A sign-in policy, thermometer and hand sanitizer were observed at screening station. Cough/sneeze etiquette, social distancing and hand washing posters were observed. Facility staff were observed to be wearing proper PPE. Facility has a 30-day supply of PPEs maintained at central location and easily accessible for staff. Facility has a mitigation plan and maintains record of routine screening for residents and staff. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.
ComplaintApril 16, 2025No deficiencies
Inspector: Kelly Nguyen
Other visitMarch 19, 2025No deficiencies
Inspector notes
On today’s date at around 9:30am, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) K. Nguyen and P. Manalo arrived unannounced to conduct annual required inspection and met with Executive Director, Sandra Simon. LPAs explained to Executive Director purpose of the visit. The facility has a main building consists of 5 floors and 4 cottages. The resident apartments were located on the first 4 floors of the main building and 4 cottages. The facility consists of dining room, bar, game room and board room, art room, multipurpose room, library room, etc. all around the facility LPAs toured facility with Wellness Manager and inspected 6 rooms. The facility has a swimming pool and beauty salon that were locked and enclosed. Executive Director states that there is no lifeguard on duty. However, there are cameras installed in the area. The facility was observed to be clean and odor free. Administrator states that residents have pendants or use their telephone, if they need assistance. Out of 171 residents, all are in the assisted living. There was multiple fire extinguishers observed that appear full and were last serviced on 01/10/2025. The last fire alarm inspection was conducted on 02/19/2025. The fire drill was last conducted on 02/19/2025. The liability insurance is effective 04/01/2025 to 04/01/2026. LPAs reviewed 6 staff files, 6 out of 6 staffs have health clearance on files. LPAs reviewed 10 residents’ files. No deficiencies were observed in the areas that were evaluated. No citations were issued during today’s inspection. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided to Executive Director.
ComplaintMarch 7, 2025No deficiencies
Inspector: Kelly Nguyen
Inspector notes
The investigation revealed that Resident 1 (R1) entered into an agreement for residency at the community in June of 2016 and occupied a residential living unit for independent living until July of 2017 when he required a higher level of care. In July of 2017, R1 entered a skilled nursing facility affiliated with the community and remained there through the end of life until, March of 2019. To enter the community and receive the benefits of a continuum of care, R1 paid an entrance fee that is refundable based on a 36 month amortization. The beneficiaries to R1’s estate claim that the entrance fee should have been amortized based on the time frame beginning from entering into the agreement through entering into the skilled nursing facility, however the amortization was based on the date of death. The Residence and Care Agreement, document number 1243823.17, was approved by the Department for use. It states under Section VI – Termination, subsection E Refund to Resident it states that “Any refund paid under this Section VI.E.1 shall be made within fourteen (14) days after all of the following events occur: (1) you or your estate makes your Apartment available to Acacia in its original clean condition ( excluding normal wear and tear); (2) if applicable, you vacate any facility operated by Acacia Creek Union City (ACUC) or Masonic Homes of California (MHC) pursuant to this Agreement; and (3) you or your estate executes a document releasing Acacia from any and all duties and obligations under this Agreement.” In this case, R1, the subject of the complaint entered into a skilled nursing facility operated by MHC and therefore would not be entitled to refund. The allegation of “Staff did not refund the entrance fee as required by the continuing care contract” is UNFOUNDED. A finding of unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was given to Executive Director.
Other visitDecember 5, 2024No deficiencies
Inspector: Kelly Nguyen
Inspector notes
On 03/19/2025 at 2:30 PM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) K. Nguyen and P.Manalo conducted an unannounced Case Management Visit related to the previous complaint 15-AS-20241204123458. LPAs met with Vilarmina Paje-Forsythe, Wellness Manager, and explained the purpose of the visit. Executive Director was unavailable during the visit and gave authorization on the phone for staff to sign the report. LPAs reviewed Resident 1’s (R1) record shows facility did not have proper documentation of the resident’s care plan. Care Plan did not indicate what services was needed for the residents to have 1:1 care. Plan of correction is for the facility to review all resident’s care plan and physician’s report to indicate what services the residents do or do not need. No deficiency cited during the visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.
InspectionMay 29, 2024No deficiencies
Inspector: Kelly Nguyen
Inspector notes
On 12/05/24 at 2:15PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Nguyen conducted an unannounced Health and Safety check due to the department receiving a priority 2 complaint. LPA explained the purpose of the visit with Executive Director, Sandra Simon. During the health and safety check, LPA observed facility is preparing for the tree light event. LPA toured facility with Executive Director, including but not limited to bedrooms, kitchen, dining rooms, activities rooms, bathroom, outdoor garden and common areas. LPA observed residents comfortable in their surroundings, relaxing in their apartment, and common areas with family and friends. Residents in care appear to be safe and there are no imminent health/safety concerns on today's date. No deficiencies cited during the health and safety check. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.
ComplaintAugust 29, 2023· UnsubstantiatedNo deficiencies
Inspector: Kelly Nguyen
Unsubstantiated — CDSS investigated and did not find violations.
Inspector notes
Based on the information gathered, there was not a substantial amount of evidence to prove that the facility staff do not safeguard resident’s personal items. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.
ComplaintAugust 29, 2023· UnsubstantiatedNo deficiencies
Inspector: Kelly Nguyen
Unsubstantiated — CDSS investigated and did not find violations.
Inspector notes
*****THIS IS AN AMENDED REPORT FROM VISIT 3/7/25***** On 3/7/2025, the department interviewed staff (S1), resident (R1), and owner of assisting hands home care agency (OSA). The department reviewed staff roster with contact numbers, physician's report, care plan, emergency information, progress notes, Unusual Incident/ Injury report (UIR), and resident dinner check off list to for date confirmation. R1 physician report shows R1 is independent with only need of toileting assist. R1 needs and service plan shows that R1 is not a fall risk and doesn’t need staff to come unless R1 press the pendant. S1 confirmed that S1 only attended to R1 only when R1 press the pendant. This was confirmed with R1 during the interview regarding to the facility care staff attending to R1 only when R1 press the pendant that’s when facility care staff comes. R1 stated the reason why R1 hired a private caretaker due companionship and for R1 personal needs such as clean R1 apartment daily, because the facility only cleans the apartment once a week. R1 want private caretaker to wash dishes daily, laundry, take out the trash, ect. R1 did not sustained any major injury, but R1 sustained minor cut on R1 eyebrow. Allegation: Staff did not ensure that resident's toileting needs were met On 3/7/2025, the department reviewed R1 care plan, and interviewed resident (R1), showed that R1 toileting needs were met. R1 care plan shows that R1 is not a fall risk and only press the pendant when R1 needs assistance from facility care staff. R1 stated “I have no complaint of any care staff because when I need assistance with toileting, they provided to me”. R1 stated staffs are very friendly and helpful. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.
ComplaintJune 28, 2023· UnsubstantiatedNo deficiencies
Inspector: Kelly Nguyen
Unsubstantiated — CDSS investigated and did not find violations.
Inspector notes
Based on the information gathered, there was not a substantial amount of evidence to prove that the facility staff smokes marijuana at the facility. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.
InspectionApril 14, 2023No deficiencies
Inspector: Kelly Nguyen
Inspector notes
At around 9:30am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Nguyen arrived unannounced to conduct annual required inspection and met with Administrator Chuck Major. LPA explained to Administrator purpose of the visit. The facility has a main building consists of 5 floors and 4 cottages. The resident apartments were located on the first 4 floors of the main building and 4 cottages. Dining room, bar, game room and board room are all located on the 5th floor. LPA with Administrator inspected 5 rooms. The facility has a swimming pool and spa that were locked and enclosed. Administrator states that there is no lifeguard on duty. However, there are cameras installed in the area. The facility was observed to be clean and odor free. Administrator states that residents have pendants or use their telephone, if they need assistance. Out of 159 residents, 6 are in the assisted living. There were multiple fire extinguishers observed that appear full and were last serviced on 01/17/2024. The last fire alarm inspection was conducted on 4/26/2024. There was sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable foods observed. Freezer temperature was observed at -2- and 0-degrees Fahrenheit. Refrigerator temperature measured at 37.5- and 35.4-degrees Fahrenheit. First aid kit was observed complete. Vehicle insurance and registration were verified as current. continuation on Lic 809C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LPA reviewed 6 staff files 6 out of 6 staffs have health clearance on files. LPA reviewed 6 residents files. No deficiencies were observed in the areas that were evaluated. No citations were issued during today’s inspection. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided via email to Executive Director.
InspectionMay 23, 2022Type A2 deficiencies
Inspector: Luisa Fontanilla
Inspector notes
At around 9am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Luisa Fontanilla arrived unannounced to conduct annual required inspection and met with Administrator Chuck Major. LPA explained to Administrator purpose of the visit. LPA Leslie Ibo was also present during this visit. The facility has a main building consists of 5 floors and 4 cottages. The resident apartments were located on the first 4 floors of the main building and 4 cottages. Dining room, bar, game room and board room are all located on the 5th floor. LPAs with Administrator inspected 5 rooms. The facility has a swimming pool and spa that were locked and enclosed. Administrator states that there is no lifeguard on duty. However, there are cameras installed in the area. The facility was observed to be clean and odor free. Administrator states that residents have pendants or use their telephone, if they need assistance. Out of 154 residents, 7 are in the assisted living. There were multiple fire extinguishers observed that appear full and were last serviced on 1/11/2023 . The last fire alarm inspection was conducted on 2/8/2022 . There was sufficient supply of perishable and non perishable foods observed. Freezer temperature was observed at -2 and 0 degrees Fahrenheit. Refrigerator temperature measured at 37.5 and 35.4 degrees Fahrenheit. First aid kit was observed complete. Vehicle insurance and registration were verified as current. continuation on Lic 809C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 At 11:30 am , LPAs reviewed medication and Medication Administration Record (MAR) with facility nurse. At approximately 1:15 pm, LPAs interviewed 5 staff and 2 out of 5 residents. At 2:30 pm, LPAs reviewed 5 resident files and 5 staff files. The following deficiencies were observed: at 10:51 am, 10:53 am and 11:05 am, LPAs observed housekeeping carts with chemicals were left unlocked and unattended in the hallways at 11:25 am, LPAs observed freezer cleaner stored in the non perishable foods storage Deficiencies were cited per Title 22 California Code of Regulations. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator and Appeal Rights was provided.
(a) Disinfectants, cleaning solutions, poisons, firearms and other items which could pose a danger if readily available to clients shall be stored where inaccessible to clients.
Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in failing to lock chemicals in the housekeeping carts which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 04/14/2023 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 Staff locked all chemicals in the 3 housekeeping carts during inspection. The deficiency is cleared,
(b) The following food service requirements shall apply: (25) Soaps, detergents, cleaning compounds or similar substances shall be stored in areas separate from food supplies.
Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in failing to store freezer cleaner in area separate from non perishable foods which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 04/14/2023 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 Facility removed freezer cleaner from the food storage area during visit. This deficiency is cleared.
InspectionJune 30, 2021No deficiencies
Inspector: Catherine Lin
Inspector notes
On 5/23/2022 starting approximately at 11:09 a.m., Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Catherine Lin arrived unannounced to conduct Infection Control Inspection. LPA met with Administrator Martin Herter and disclosed the purpose of the visit. Upon entry, LPA’s temperature was checked by the staff, asked to fill out Covid-19 questionnaire, and checked oxygen level. LPA toured facility including but not limited to front entrance, screening station, hand washing stations, bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, and common areas. There is one central entry point for universal screening for staff, residents, and visitors. A sign-in policy, thermometer and hand sanitizer were observed at screening station. Cough/sneeze etiquette and hand washing posters were observed. Facility staff were observed to be wearing proper PPE. Facility has a sufficient 2-day perishable and one-week non-perishable food supply. Facility has a 30-day supply of PPEs maintained at central location and easily accessible for staff. Facility has Mitigation Plan, Emergency Disaster Plan, and maintains record of routine screening for residents, staff, and visitors. No deficiency cited during visit. Exit interview conducted with Administrator, and a copy of this report provided.
Federal summary
CMS Care CompareNot a CMS-certified facility
California RCFEs (residential care facilities for the elderly) are licensed by the state, not by CMS. CMS data only applies to skilled nursing facilities or to CCRCs that operate a licensed SNF wing.
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
No published reviews yet. Use the button above to share your experience.