Merrill Gardens at Rockridge.
Merrill Gardens at Rockridge is Ranked in the top 1% of California memory care with no CDSS citations on record; last inspected Jan 2026.

Memory Care in Oakland's Rockridge Neighborhood, reviewed on public record.

© Google Street View
Compared to 100 California facilities with a similar number of beds.
RCFE memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
Be first to know if Merrill Gardens at Rockridge's inspection record changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
No citations in the last 36 months.
Finding distribution
none · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
The rules that apply to this facility.
State requirements with the exact regulation citation, plain-language explanation, and a question to ask on tour. Rules this facility has been cited for appear first.
Plain language
Because a facility markets dementia or Alzheimer's care, state law mandates higher training standards: 12 hours of initial dementia training (6 hours before a staff member works independently with residents, 6 more within the first 4 weeks), 8 hours of annual dementia in-service every year thereafter, and an administrator must include 8 hours of dementia-specific continuing education in every 2-year recertification cycle. Training must cover individualized care plans, behavioral expressions, appropriate supervision, and the facility's dementia care philosophy.
Ask on tour
“Can you show me each direct-care staffer's most recent dementia training certificate, and tell me when their next refresher is due?”
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Merrill Gardens at Rockridge's record and state requirements.
CDSS records show 11 complaints filed during the inspection period — what were the subjects of those complaints, and how many were substantiated versus unfounded?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
With 150 licensed beds, what is the staff-to-resident ratio on each shift, and how does staffing differ in the memory care unit versus the general assisted living area?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
California Title 22 §87705 requires dementia-specific staff training — how do you verify that all caregivers, including new hires and per diem staff, have completed the required training before working with memory care residents?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
7 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2026-01-14Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
An inspector visited the facility in January 2026 for the required annual inspection and found no deficiencies. The inspector checked bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, safety equipment including fire extinguishers and smoke detectors, medication storage, food supplies, resident and staff records, and confirmed the facility conducts monthly emergency drills. Everything met regulatory standards.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 01/14/2026 at 01:00 PM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) David Doidge arrived unannounced to conduct 1-Year Annual Required inspection. LPA met with General Manager Niare Feaster and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility including but not limited to, bedrooms, bathrooms, multiple activity rooms, kitchen, and common area. LPA observe lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. Hallway temperature was maintained at 72 degrees Fahrenheit. The hot water temperature in a common bathroom was measured at 120 degrees Fahrenheit. There is a minimum of one week supply of nonperishable and 2-day of perishable foods. Centrally stored medications, sharps are locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were in operating condition during visit. Fire extinguisher was last serviced on 11/12/2025 Emergency disaster drills are conducted monthly, with the last one conducted on 12/23/2025. First aid kit was observed to be complete. LPA reviewed five (5) resident records and six (6) staff records, all were complete. No deficiencies observed or cited during this visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided
2025-11-07Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
On November 7, 2025, state licensing staff visited Garden House to deliver an immediate exclusion letter to a staff member, meaning that person is no longer permitted to work at the facility. No deficiencies were found during the inspection visit itself.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 11/07/2025 at 01:50 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Doidge arrived unannounced to deliver an Immediate Exclusion letter. LPA met with Garden House Director Eric Brown and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA provided a copy of an exclusion letter to Garden House Director Eric Brown. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.
2025-10-30Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint alleged that dining room chairs were uncomfortable and unsafe. The facility inspector observed residents during lunch and found that staff offer residents choices about where to sit and which chair to use, and that staff switch chairs if a resident finds one uncomfortable or unsafe; the facility is transitioning to new chairs while keeping older ones available based on resident feedback. No violation was found.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Continued from LIC9099 Residents interviewed reported that there are three different chairs to choose from, with most residents reporting that the older chairs are the most comfortable. Some residents interviewed were okay with the newer orange chairs. All residents interviewed reported that the round chairs with green and tan fabric were uncomfortable. Staff in the facility reported that Corporate ordered that new chairs as part of a facility refresh, and that the older chairs are slowly being cycled out as the new ones come in. LPA spoke with Vice President of Operations Manager (VPOM) David Tamo via phone. VPOM informed LPA that although the new chairs have been purchased, the facility is committed to the comfort and safety of residents and will keep a dialogue with residents to ensure their comfort while they dine. LPA spoke with Naire Feaster General Manager (GM) on the phone about the chairs. GM informed LPA that the facility has, for now, held off removing all the older chairs, and will keep some of the old chairs to allow residents to get comfortable with the transition. GM is also committed to the comfort and safety of resident while they dine and will ensure that resident continue to have a choice as to which chair they use, and will ensure that staff make reasonable accommodations to residents while they dine. LPA observed residents during lunch service. All residents have a choice of where they sit, and which chair they use. Staff do not mandate where or when residents sit to dine or which chair a resident must use. Residents are always given a choice of chair to use, and staff make accommodations within reason. If a resident cannot use a particular chair, or finds a particular chair unsafe, staff will and do switch out the chair for a more appropriate one. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did occur, therefore the allegation that the Facility dining room chairs are uncomfortable and unsafe is unsubstantiated. No deficiencies observed during visit.
2025-10-24Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation looked into claims that unqualified staff were giving residents medication and that facility records were being falsified. Investigators reviewed staff schedules, medication logs, and interviewed staff members, and found no evidence supporting either allegation — records were accurate and consistent with what staff reported. Both complaints are unsubstantiated.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Although the allegation may have occurred, there is not a preponderance of evidence to support that unqualified staff are administering medication(s) to residents in care. Therefore, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated . Allegation: Facility staff falsify documents/records- Unsubstantiated During the course of investigation, interviews were conducted with facility staff, and reviewed facility records, including but not limited to staff schedules, medication logs, were reviewed for accuracy and consistency. No discrepancies or evidence of falsified documentation were identified. Records appeared to be properly maintained, accurate, and consistent with information obtained during interviews. Therefore, allegation is Unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have occurred, there is not a preponderance of evidence to support that facility staff falsified documents or records. Therefore, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated . Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.
2024-12-27Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
A routine annual inspection was conducted on December 27, 2024, and found no violations. The inspector verified that lighting, temperature, hot water, food supplies, medication storage, fire safety equipment, and emergency drills all met requirements, and resident and staff records were complete.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 12/27/2024 at 09:00 AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) D. Doidge arrived unannounced to conduct 1-Year Annual Required inspection. LPA met with, Interim General Manager Aubrey Goo and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility including but not limit to, bedrooms, bathrooms, multiple activity rooms, kitchen, and common area. LPA observe lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. Hallway temperature was maintained at 72 degrees Fahrenheit. The hot water temperature in a common bathroom was measured at 119 degrees Fahrenheit. There is a minimum of one week supply of nonperishable and 2-day of perishable foods. Centrally stored medications, sharps are locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Fire extinguisher was last serviced on 11/16/2024. Emergency disaster drill are conducted monthly, last conducted on 11/20/2024. LPA reviewed five (5) resident records and five (5) staff records, all were complete. No deficiencies observed or cited during this visit. . Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided
2024-01-26Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
An unannounced routine annual inspection was conducted on January 26, 2024, during which inspectors toured the facility, reviewed resident and staff records, and interviewed residents and staff, finding no deficiencies. The facility had adequate lighting and comfortable temperatures, grab bars and non-skid mats in bathrooms, secure storage of medications and hazardous materials, and sufficient food supplies on hand.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 01/26/2024 at 12:10 pm Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) J. Clancy-Czuleger arrived unannounced to do an annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator/General Manager, Anna Reddy and explained the purpose of the visit. Anna Reddy designated Tony Ibarra to sign off on the report. LPA inspected the facility inside out. There is no body of water. Physical plant is consistent with the facility sketch received by Central Application Bureau (CAB) and approved by the fire department. LPA inspected the facility including but not limited to 6 residents’ apartments, bathrooms, multiple activity rooms, kitchen, common area and courtyard. LPA observed lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. Hallway was maintained at a comfortable temperature. The hot water temperature in a sample of residents’ shared bathroom were measured at 106.1 degrees Fahrenheit. Residents’ bathrooms are equipped with grab bars and non-skid mats. There is a minimum of one week supply of nonperishable and 2-day of perishable foods. Centrally stored medications, sharps and toxic are locked and inaccessible to residents in care. At 12:45 p.m., LPA reviewed 5 residents records. At 1:45 p.m., LPA reviewed 5 staff records and 5 of 5 are associated to the facility. LPA interviewed 5 staff and 5 residents. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.
2023-09-05Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found unsubstantiated allegations that staff engaged in inappropriate behavior in front of residents. Interviews with staff and residents revealed rumors but no one reported witnessing such behavior, and most residents and staff interviewed were unaware of the allegation. The facility and licensing authority discussed staff meetings to address rumors and maintain morale.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
...continued from LIC9099 Allegation: Staff engaging in inappropriate behavior while in the presence of residents. UNSUBSTANTIATED LPA conducted interviews with Staff (S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, S6, S10, S11), Residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6) and Witness #1 (W1). S10 stated that several residents and staff members have heard S4 and S5 engaging in inappropriate behavior in the office and in the presence of residents. Interviews with Staff (S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, S6, S10, S11) revealed that they had heard rumors about S4 and S5; no staff stated that they had heard or witnessed S4 and S5 engaging in inappropriate behavior in the presence of residents. R5 stated that he/she thinks there’s a strong possibility of the allegation but would not go into details. R1, R2, R3, R4, R6 and W1 were not aware of the allegation and never witnessed S4, S5 or other Staff engaging in inappropriate behavior in the presence of residents. LPA and S1 discussed scheduling meetings with Staff and Residents to mitigate the spread of rumors at the facility in an effort to maintain good morale within the facility. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview and a copy of this report provided to ADM.
17 older inspections from 2022 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Other facilities in Alameda County.
Other memory care facilities in Alameda County with similar care offerings.
Free · Tour Prep
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.



