Mercy Retirement & Care Center.
Mercy Retirement & Care Center is Ranked in the top 24% of California memory care with 1 CDSS citation on record; last inspected Mar 2026.

Large RCFE in Oakland's Fruitvale District with One Harm Citation on File, reviewed on public record.

© Google Street View
Compared to 26 California facilities with a similar number of beds.
CCRC · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
Mercy Retirement & Care Center has 1 citation on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
1 deficiency on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
1 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
The rules that apply to this facility.
State requirements with the exact regulation citation, plain-language explanation, and a question to ask on tour. Rules this facility has been cited for appear first.
Plain language
Because a facility markets dementia or Alzheimer's care, state law mandates higher training standards: 12 hours of initial dementia training (6 hours before a staff member works independently with residents, 6 more within the first 4 weeks), 8 hours of annual dementia in-service every year thereafter, and an administrator must include 8 hours of dementia-specific continuing education in every 2-year recertification cycle. Training must cover individualized care plans, behavioral expressions, appropriate supervision, and the facility's dementia care philosophy.
Ask on tour
“Can you show me each direct-care staffer's most recent dementia training certificate, and tell me when their next refresher is due?”
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Mercy Retirement & Care Center's record and state requirements.
State records show one Type A deficiency (actual harm) — what was the nature of that citation, what harm occurred, and what corrective actions were implemented?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Twelve complaints have been filed with CDSS during the inspection period — what were the subjects of those complaints, and how many were substantiated?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
The Type B deficiency (potential for harm) on file indicates a regulatory gap — what was cited, and what process changes have been made to prevent recurrence?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
19 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2026-03-11Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
On March 11, 2026, the state conducted a routine annual inspection and found no violations. The facility maintained proper temperatures, lighting, sanitation, and safety equipment including working smoke detectors and fire extinguishers, and the inspector reviewed staff and resident records without finding deficiencies.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 3/11/2026 at 10:45 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Y. Brown conducted an unannounced annual 1-year required inspection. LPA met with Executive Director Kathleen McCarron and explained the purpose of the visit. The administrator currently holds a certificate (# 7002969740 ) that expires on 2/3/2028. LPA toured the facility including but not limited to bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, common area, and back yard. All indoor passageways are kept free of obstruction. There are no bodies of water observed. A comfortable temperature for clients is maintained at 73 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the clients. Hot water temperature in a random sample of residents rooms were measured at 118.3, 115.3, and 107.4 degrees Fahrenheit. All toilets, hand washing, and bathing are safe, sanitary and in operating condition. The supply of extra hygiene was available for residents. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide combination were in operating condition during visit. Fire extinguisher was last purchased on 3/2/2026. First aid kit was observed to be complete. LPA reviewed five (5) staff and five (5) client records. LPA reviewed a sample of medication. Continued on LIC809C. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Continued from LIC809. Updated copies of the following documents were requested for facility file and are to be submitted to CCL by 3/18/2026: LIC 308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility LIC 309 Administrative Organization LIC 500 Personnel Report LIC 610E Emergency Disaster Plan No deficiencies cited during today's visit. Exit interview conducted with Kathleen and a copy of this report provided.
2026-03-03Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
On March 3, 2026, a state licensing analyst visited the facility to update and finalize a complaint investigation report from 2016. The administrator reviewed and signed the amended report. No violations were found during this visit.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 3/3/26, around 945am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Nguyen arrived unannounced to amend the Complaint Investigation Report dated 01/05/2016 and to obtain the Administrator's signature on the amended report. LPA met with administrator Kathleen McCarron and explained to the administrator why the amendment. LPA amended the report, and after a short discussion about the amendment, the administrator signed the amended report. No citation during this visit. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided.
2026-01-05Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
During a case management meeting on January 5, 2026, state licensing officials reviewed documentation for a resident and could not find incident reports for a fall in November and a wound being treated in December, though the facility said these reports had been submitted; the officials requested the missing documents and fax confirmations by January 7, 2026. The officials also requested care notes covering January 5-15, 2026. No deficiencies were cited during this visit.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 01/05/2026 at 1:30PM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Andrew Christy and Kelly Nguyen conducted a Case Management regarding documentation during a complaint investigation. LPAs explained the nature of the case management to Kathleen McCarron, executive director. During the complaint investigation, LPAs conducted file review for a resident (R1) to ensure reporting requirements were being met. In the file, LPAs did not see incident reports for a fall in November and a wound being treated in December, though executive director claims they were submitted. LPAs requested these documents be sent to them by 01/07/2026, as well as the fax confirmation that they normally include with all sent incident reports. In addition, LPAs request the care notes done for the patient to be sent on 01/16/2025, covering the dates of 01/05/2026-01/15/2026. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was made available to the executive director.
2026-01-05Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
This was a routine inspection that investigated a complaint about a resident sustaining unexplained injuries while in care. The facility's medical records showed the resident had experienced multiple falls over time and required hospital visits, but the facility had a documented fall prevention plan in place including frequent check-ins, assistive devices, and a low bed with protective matting, and staff confirmed they were following this plan. The complaint was found to be unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Review of R1’s medical records documents that R1 sustained approximately 8 falls once a month, resulting in multiple injuries and at least 8 hospital visits. Also documented in R1’s medical records were that R1 was a fall risk, however after reviewing R1 care plan shows fall injuries were counted for and the facility does have a fall intervention in place including but not limited to frequent check in every two hours, clutter free, assistive devices are available in good repair, the bed in low position, half bed rails and with soft matting around the bed. According to the SOC 341 obtained by the department, RP stated that the hospital staff found R1 on the hospital floor. R1 was sent out on 11/28/2025 by the facility via ambulance with an unwellness fall, and it was determined that any fall R1 experiences needs to be sent to the hospital due to R1's care plan. Before sending out, R1 was assessed, and the record shows that R1 did not have any injuries, but due to R1's conditions. The facility followed procedure and called 911 to transport R1 to the hospital, and informed the family member that R1 was sent out. LPAs interviewed S1, S2, S3, and S4; all confirmed that they did carry out the care prevention plan for R1. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging residents sustain unexplained injury while in care. We have found that the complaint was unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED . Exit interview conducted, a copy of this report provided.
2025-09-17Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
Plain-language summary
The facility was investigated after a complaint that staff yelled at residents. Inspectors found no evidence to support this allegation; multiple staff members denied the behavior had occurred.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Facility staff, S1, S2 and S3 also stated that they have never heard facility staff yell at the residents. S1 stating that if she ever did hear staff yell at the residents would be a disciple issue and that has not happened. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging staff yelled at residents in care. We have found that the complaint was unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED . Exit interview conducted, a copy of this report provided.
2025-05-22Complaint InvestigationSubstantiatedType B · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that staff knew a resident was at high risk for falls but received no instructions from management to change care practices, and no formal fall monitoring plan was put in place despite multiple fall incidents. The only precautions taken were lowering the bed and placing a mat on the floor, with staff checking on the resident only randomly—about once every one to two hours when they found time. The facility was cited for this failure to implement adequate fall prevention measures.
“(b) The licensee shall immediately bring any such changes to the attention of the resident's physician and his family or responsible person. Based on observation the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. R1 had multiple falls over a 2-week period and the facility never updated his appraisal.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
***CONTINUES FROM 9099*** The department interviewed staff who stated they were aware that R1 was a fall risk but were never given any instructions from management to change the level of care they were providing to R1. Staff stated that they performed random checks on R1 every hour or two hours at most or more frequent whenever they got the chance but there was no formal monitoring plan in place. The only measures taken were that R1’s bed was lowered, and a fall mat was placed on the floor beside the bed. Multiple interviews with S1 revealed that fall preventative measures did not change and were the same beginning after R1’s first fall to the last fall incident. Based on the department’s observations and interviews which were conducted and record reviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED . California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Exit interview conducted, a copy of this report and appeal rights provided.
2025-04-16Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
On April 16, 2025, state inspectors conducted the facility's required annual inspection and found no violations. The inspectors toured the building, reviewed resident and staff records, checked medications and safety equipment, and confirmed that lighting, temperature, grab bars, fire safety systems, food supplies, and emergency preparedness were all in order.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 4/16/25 at 11:00 a.m., Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Greg Clark and Ardalan Gharachorloo arrived unannounced to conduct 1-Year Annual Required inspection. LPA met with Executive Director, Kathleen McCarron and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility including but not limited to 5 residents’ apartments, bathrooms, multiple activity rooms, kitchen, common area and courtyard. There are no bodies of water observed. LPA observed lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. Hallway temperature was maintained at 70 degrees F. The hot water temperature in the art room was measured at 113.5 degrees Fahrenheit. Residents’ bathrooms are equipped with grab bars and non-skid mats. There is a minimum of one week supply of nonperishable and 2-day of perishable foods. Centrally stored medications, sharps and toxic are locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were in operating condition during visit. Fire extinguisher was last serviced on 4/25/25. Emergency Disaster Plan was last signed on 9/12/24. First aid kit was observed to be complete. Emergency disaster drill was last conducted on 4/15/25. LPAs reviewed 5 residents records and 5 staff records, and all were complete. LPAs also reviewed a sample of resident’s medications. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.
2025-04-16Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
On April 16, 2025, state inspectors visited to follow up on a special incident report about medication errors that affected 23 residents on April 1, 2025 when the facility was switching pharmacies; most of the missing medications were over-the-counter items and no residents experienced side effects. The facility's executive director confirmed the issue was resolved and no further medication errors have occurred since then. No deficiencies were cited.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 4/16/25 at 2:30 p.m., Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Greg Clark and Ardalan Gharachorloo arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit on this date to provide technical assistance. LPAs received special incident report regarding numerous medication errors that occurred on 4/1/25 for 23 residents. The errors happened when the facility was switching pharmacies. LPAs spoke with Executive Director and reviewed the report with her. LPAs also toured the medication room and observed the current system of dispensing medications and storage. None of the residents experienced any side effects from the missing medications most of which where over the counter medications. Interview with the Executive Director revealed that the issue has been resolved and there have been no further medication errors occurred. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.
2025-01-30Complaint InvestigationNo findings
2025-01-15Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
Plain-language summary
The state investigated a complaint that staff did not provide food in a timely manner or in adequate amounts to this resident. Staff reported the resident is on hospice and often refuses to open her mouth to accept food, drink, and medications, and that staff make efforts to encourage eating and drinking but are often unsuccessful. The state found the complaint unsubstantiated, meaning there was not enough evidence to prove the allegations occurred.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
**CONTINUES FROM 9099** LPAs interviewed S1. S1 stated that R1 is currently on hospice and receiving the end of life care. There was a period of time that R1 did not eat for five days. S1 further reported that R1 often refuses to open her mouth to accept food, drink and medications. S1 also reported that staff make every effort to encourage R1 eat and drink but are often unsuccessful. S1 is confident that R1 is receiving an adequate amount of food in a timely manner as tolerated. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging s taff did not provide resident food in a timely manner and staff are not providing resident with an adequate amount of food. We have found that the complaint was unsubstantiated. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED . Exit interview conducted, a copy of this report provided.
2024-10-03Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
An inspector delivered an amended report to the facility on October 3, 2024, following up on an earlier inspection from September. No violations were found during this visit.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 10/03/24 at 11:15 a.m., Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Greg Clark and Ardalan Gharachorloo arrived unannounced to deliver amended report for the LIC9099 dated 9/12/24. LPA met with Elvira Suciu, Resident Care Director (RCH) and explained the purpose of the visit. Amended report delivered to RCH. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.
2024-10-03Complaint InvestigationNo findings
2024-09-12Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
Plain-language summary
An investigator looked into a complaint that staff were not allowing a resident access to their personal laptop. The facility confirmed that staff do allow the resident to use the laptop as the resident is able to use it, and the investigator found insufficient evidence to support the complaint.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Currently the facility staff provide R1 access to the laptop as tolerated by the resident. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging staff are not allowing a resident in care access to their personal property. We have found that the complaint was unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted, a copy of this report provided.
2024-08-15Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint alleged that staff were not meeting a resident's dietary needs and not following their feeding plan. Investigators reviewed records, observed care, and interviewed staff and found no evidence to support these allegations. The complaint was closed as unsubstantiated.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Allegation: Staff do not ensure that resident's dietary needs are met. Based on file review, observation and interviews this allegation is unsubstantiated. Allegation: Staff are not following resident's feeding plan. Based on file review, observation and interviews this allegation is unsubstantiated. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging staff do not ensure that resident's dietary needs are met and staff are not following resident's feeding plan. We have found that the complaint was unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED . Exit interview conducted, a copy of this report provided.
2024-06-19Complaint InvestigationNo findings
2024-04-12Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
An inspector conducted a health and safety inspection on April 12, 2024 following a priority complaint and found no violations. The facility had adequate food supplies, secure medication storage, working smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detection, a complete first-aid kit, and clear indoor and outdoor pathways.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 4/12/24 at 11:00 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Greg Clark conducted a Health & Safety inspection as a result of a priority 1 complaint. LPA met with Elvia Suciu, Resident Care Director and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured facility including but not limited to the apartments, bathrooms, common area, kitchen, and outdoor area. 7-day of non-perishable and 2-day of perishable food supplies were sufficient. Refrigerator temperature was observed at xx degrees F. Resident's medications were kept locked in med carts. Smoke detectors are interconnected with the sprinkler system. Carbon monoxide detector observed. First-aid kit was complete. There are no accessible bodies of water observed. Indoor and outdoor passageways are free of obstruction. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.
2024-03-19Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
This was a routine annual inspection on March 19, 2024, during which the facility was found to meet all requirements for safe operation, including adequate lighting and temperature, functioning smoke and carbon monoxide detectors, properly secured medications and hazardous materials, and complete resident and staff records. The inspector checked bathrooms, common areas, kitchen, emergency equipment, and a sample of medications, and found no violations. The facility can house up to 160 residents and maintains emergency supplies and disaster plans.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 3/19/24 at 1:00 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Greg Clark arrived unannounced to conduct 1-Year Annual Required inspection. LPA met with Josephine Davis, Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. The facility’s fire clearance was approved for 160. LPA toured the facility including but not limited to residents’ apartments, bathrooms, multiple activity rooms, kitchen, common area and courtyard. There are no bodies of water observed. LPA observe lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. Hallway temperature was maintained at 70 degrees F. The hot water temperature in a residents’ bathroom was measured at 116.2 degrees Fahrenheit. Residents’ bathrooms are equipped with grab bars and non-skid mats. There is a minimum of one week supply of nonperishable and 2-day of perishable foods. Centrally stored medications, sharps and toxic are locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were in operating condition during visit. Fire extinguisher was last serviced on 3/07/24. Emergency Disaster Plan was last posted on 10/02/23. First aid kit was observed to be complete. Emergency disaster drill was last conducted on 2/27/24. LPA reviewed 5 residents records and 5 staff records, and all were complete. LPA also reviewed a sample of resident’s medications. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.
2024-01-04Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
On January 4, 2024, the state conducted a health and safety inspection following the facility's change in ownership from Elder Care Alliance to Transforming Age, which was approved by the California Attorney General. The facility held a public meeting in December 2023 with residents, families, staff, and the Attorney General's office to discuss the ownership change; no changes to staffing, residents, or resident contracts are planned at this time. No issues or violations were found.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 1/04/24 at 12:30 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Greg Clark conducted a Health & Safety inspection as a result of notice received from Attorney General Bonta that he had approved a conditional change in the control and governance of this facility from Elder Care Alliance to Transforming Age. LPA met with Administrator, Josephine Davis and explained the purpose of the visit. Due to the facility being in an active COVID out break status LPA was unable to tour the facility or speak to residents. LPA interviewed S1 during the visit. S1 reported that on 12/15/23 a public meeting was held at the facility to discuss the change of control and governance of the facility. In attendance were: residents and family members, facility staff, the CEO's of both Elder Care Alliance and Transforming Age and the Assistant Attorney General of the State of California. The meeting lasted approximately 1.5 hours. S1 further reported that there have been no changes at the facility. All staff and residents remain stable and there is no plans, at this point, to change any of the residents' contract to reflect the change of control and governance. The old contracts will remain in place. No issues identified at this time. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.
2023-07-25Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
A state inspector conducted a routine annual inspection on July 25, 2023, continuing from an earlier visit in March. The inspector interviewed staff, checked the medication room and cart, and reviewed medications for three residents and found no violations.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 7/25/23 at 1:35 p.m., Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Greg Clark arrived unannounced to continue the 1-Year Annual Required inspection started on 3/16/23. LPA met with Asst. Executive Director, Josie Davis and explained the purpose of the visit. During the visit LPA interviewed 5 staff, inspected the medication room, medication cart and reviewed a sample of 3 resident's medications. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.
4 older inspections from 2021 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Other facilities in Alameda County.
Other memory care facilities in Alameda County with similar care offerings.
Free · Full Inspection Record
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.



