Fremont Hills.
Fremont Hills is Ranked in the top 46% of California memory care with 9 CDSS citations on record; last inspected Apr 2026.




140-Bed RCFE with Memory Care Services in Fremont, reviewed on public record.

© Google Street View
Compared to 93 California facilities with a similar number of beds.
RCFE memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · BETA
Fremont Hills has 9 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
9 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
9 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
The rules that apply to this facility.
State requirements with the exact regulation citation, plain-language explanation, and a question to ask on tour. Rules this facility has been cited for appear first.
Plain language
Because a facility markets dementia or Alzheimer's care, state law mandates higher training standards: 12 hours of initial dementia training (6 hours before a staff member works independently with residents, 6 more within the first 4 weeks), 8 hours of annual dementia in-service every year thereafter, and an administrator must include 8 hours of dementia-specific continuing education in every 2-year recertification cycle. Training must cover individualized care plans, behavioral expressions, appropriate supervision, and the facility's dementia care philosophy.
Ask on tour
“Can you show me each direct-care staffer's most recent dementia training certificate, and tell me when their next refresher is due?”
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Fremont Hills's record and state requirements.
State records show one Type A deficiency (actual harm) — what was the nature of this citation, what harm occurred, and what changes were implemented to prevent recurrence?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Six complaints were filed with CDSS during the inspection period — what were the subjects of these complaints, and how many were substantiated versus unfounded?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
With 140 licensed beds, how does the facility ensure adequate supervision and individualized attention for residents with dementia, particularly during evening and overnight shifts?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
18 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2026-04-23Complaint InvestigationNo findings
Plain-language summary
On April 23, 2026, state inspectors conducted an unannounced visit to investigate a death that occurred at the facility on April 22, 2026, after a resident was found unresponsive and staff called 911 and performed CPR. The inspector reviewed incident reports, medical records, and interviewed staff and management, and will request the death certificate and police report by May 7, 2026. No violations were found during this investigation.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 04/23/2026 at 10:00 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) P.Manalo conducted an unannounced Case Management visit regarding a self-reported death report. The facility sent in a death report on 04/22/2026. LPA met with Executive Director (ED), Beena Kumar, and explained the purpose of the visit. Death Report (LIC624A) indicated that on 04/22/2026, Resident 1 (R1) was found unresponsive by S1. S1 and S2 called 911 and CPR was performed until arrival of paramedics. During the visit, LPA reviewed and obtained the following documents included but not limited to facility’s incident report, facility's observation notes, resident's physician report, resident's assessment, and appraisal needs and services plan. LPA also conducted interviews with 6 staff members and ED. LPA will be requesting for a death certificate and police report by 05/07/2026. LPA may return at a later time. No deficiency cited during today’s visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.
2026-03-16Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
During an unannounced follow-up visit on March 16, 2026, inspectors found that the facility failed to report two incidents within the required timeframe—both incidents occurred in February but were not reported to the state until March 6. One resident passed away on March 14, 2026, after being hospitalized; the other resident's current status was not documented in the report. The facility received a technical violation for late reporting but no other deficiencies were cited.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 03/16/2026 at 2:20 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) P.Manalo conducted an unannounced Case Management visit to follow up on the incident reports sent on 03/06/2026. LPA met with Business Office Director, Mimi Co, and explained the purpose of the visit. Executive Director, Beena Kumar, was unavailable during today's visit. Incident Report (LIC624) for R1 indicated that the incident occured on 02/20/2026 and R2's incident occured on 02/24/2026. Both R1's and R2's Incident Report was reported to the Department on 03/06/2026. Facility did not follow the reporting requirements. LPA and Co discussed the reporting requirements regulation. During the visit, LPA reviewed and obtained Resident Roster, R1's service plan dated 01/20/2026, R2's service plan dated 01/20/2026, and R2's physician fax reports. Per Co, R2 did not return back from the hospital and passed away on 03/14/2026. LPA is requesting for the facility to send R1's after visit summary from the hospital and R2's death certificate by 03/25/2026. LPA may return at a later time. A Technical Violation has been issued for Reporting Requirements, Section 87211(a)(1). No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.
2025-12-15Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
On December 15, 2025, a licensing analyst conducted an unannounced visit to investigate a self-reported death: a resident experienced a change in condition on December 4th (when paramedics assessed them, though the power of attorney refused hospitalization at that time), was taken to the emergency room on December 8th per medical advice, and died at the hospital on December 10th. The analyst reviewed the death report, incident reports, service plan, physician communications, and observation notes. No violations were found.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 12/15/2025 at 2:30 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) P.Manalo conducted an unannounced Case Management visit regarding a self-reported death report. The facility sent in a death report on 12/12/2025. LPA met with Executive Director (ED), Beena Kumar, and explained the purpose of the visit. Death Report (LIC624A) indicated that Resident 1 (R1) had a change in condition and was taken to the Emergency Room per Kaiser Advice Line on 12/08/2025. On 12/10/2025, R1 passed away at the hospital. During the visit, LPA reviewed incident report, death report, R1's service plan, physician report, observation notes, and physician communication log. Observation Notes and facility incident report dated 12/04/2025 revealed that the paramedics came on 12/04/2025 to assessed R1. It also revealed that the Power of Attorney (POA) refused to send R1 to the hospital. A review of the physician communication log dated 12/04/2025 showed that the facility communicated with R1's physician due to R1's change in condition. LPA will be requesting for a death certificate from the facility. LPA may return at a later time. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.
2025-10-30Other VisitType A · 4 findings
Plain-language summary
During a routine annual inspection on October 30, 2025, inspectors found multiple maintenance and safety issues: a resident's toilet, window blinds, and soap holder were in disrepair; two residents' emergency call buttons were being held up with paper towels; paint cans were stored in a resident's room; cleaning supplies and staff medications were left in accessible areas; the tool shed was unlocked; and expired food items were in the kitchen. The facility also did not have current liability insurance on file at the time of the inspection, and inspectors requested updated personnel documentation to be submitted by November 7, 2025.
“Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by having 3 tubs of paint in R1's room, lysol wipes and cleaning spray in R2's room, the tool shed unlocked in the courtyard of the memory care unit, Bissell, Alcohol Antiseptic, staff eyedrop in the backpack, etc. in the memory care unit dining hall which posed an immediate health and safety risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 10/31/2025 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 The Executive Director agrees to self-certify with the staff the regulation, remove the items, and send proof to CCLD by POC date.”
“Based on observation and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not having the current liability insurance on file which poses a potential safety risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 11/03/2025 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 The Executive Director agrees to send the current liability insurance to CCLD by POC date.”
“Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in having R7's toilet, window blinds, and shower soap bar holder in disrepair and R3 and R4's call button that had a paper towel holding the button up which poses a potential safety risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 11/14/2025 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 The Executive Director agrees to repair the items and remove the paper towels from the emergency call light button up. Proof of correction will be sent to CCLD by POC date.”
“Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in having expired sesame sauce, soy sauce, Hershey chocolate powder, etc. which posed a potential health and safety risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 11/07/2025 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 The Executive Director agrees to self-certify the regulation with staff and send proof to CCLD by POC date.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 10/30/2025 at 8:40 AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) P. Manalo and K. Nguyen arrived unannounced to conduct 1-Year Annual Required inspection. LPAs met with Executive Director, Beena Kumar and explained the purpose of the visit. LPAs toured the facility inside and out including but not limited to 7 residents' apartments, bathrooms, multiple activity rooms, kitchen, common area and courtyard. There are no bodies of water observed. LPAs observe lighting in all rooms is adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. Hallway temperature was maintained at 73 degrees F. The hot water temperature in a sample of residents’ shared bathroom was measured at 105, 106.3 109.2, 110.5 degrees Fahrenheit. Residents’ bathrooms are equipped with grab bars and non-skid shower pans. There is a minimum of one week supply of nonperishable and 2-day of perishable foods. Smoke detectors, fire alarm, and carbon monoxide detectors were last tested on 08/15/2025 by Cintas. Fire extinguisher was last serviced on 06/06/2025. First aid kit was observed to be complete. Fire drills were last conducted on 09/18/2025. At 10:00 AM, LPAs reviewed 6 staff records and 6 of 6 are associated to the facility. At 12:40 PM, LPAs reviewed 6 residents records. At 2:30 PM, LPA reviewed two samples of residents’ medications. Continue to LIC809-C... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Continue from LIC809... Updated copies of the following document were requested for facility file and are to be submitted to CCL by 11/07/2025: LIC 500 Personnel Report THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCIES WERE OBSERVED DURING VISIT: At 10:30 AM, LPAs observed R7's toilet, window blinds, and shower soap bar holder in disrepair. At 11:38, LPAs observed R3 and R4 with a paper towel holding the emergency call light button up. At 10:39 AM, LPAs observed 3 tubs of paint in R1's room. LPA observed Lysol wipes and cleaning spray in R2's room. At 10:44 AM, LPAs observed the tool shed unlocked in the courtyard of the memory care unit. At 10:56 AM, LPAs observed Antibacterial Bissell, Alcohol Antiseptic, staff eyedrop in the backpack, etc. in the memory care unit dining hall. At 11:00 AM, LPAs observed expired sesame sauce, soy sauce, Hershey chocolate powder, etc. At 3:30 PM, LPAs observed that the facility did not have the current liability insurance on file. The Facility was cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and/or Health and Safety Code Failure to correct deficiencies by POC date may result in additional Civil Penalties. Exit interview conducted with Executive Director. Appeal Rights and a copy of this report provided.
2025-10-22Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
On October 22, 2025, state inspectors conducted an unannounced visit following the facility's self-report that a resident fell unwitnessed in their room and sustained a hip fracture requiring surgery and hospitalization. The inspectors met with the Director of Health and Wellness, reviewed the incident, and requested additional documents including the resident's medical records and care plans for their review. No violations were cited during this visit.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 10/22/2025 at 2:05 PM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) P.Manalo and K. Nguyen conducted an unannounced Case Management visit regarding a self-reported incident. Director of Health and Wellness, Judith Gitonga, self-reported the incident on 10/21/2025. LPAs met with Judith Gitonga and explained the purpose of the visit. Executive Director was unavailable during today's visit. LPA P.Manalo received a self-reported incident report from facility that indicated that the Resident 1 (R1) was taken to the hospital for unwitnessed fall and R1 was treated for a hip fracture. R1 had hip surgery and is in a skilled nursing for recovery. The facility will reassess R1 before returning to the facility. During the visit, LPA interviewed Gitonga and stated that R1 had fell in R1's room. LPAs will be requesting for the following documents such as R1's physician's report, previous and new full care plan, staff schedule, progress notes, and care log for R1 by 10/30/2025. LPAs may return at a later time. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview was conducted with Director of Health and Wellness and a copy of this report was provided.
2025-08-28Other VisitType A · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
This was a health and safety inspection conducted on August 28, 2025 following a priority complaint. Inspectors found the facility's bathrooms, lighting, food supply, and emergency equipment to be in good condition, but observed medications left unsupervised on a medication cart, which violated state regulations. The facility was cited for this deficiency and given a deadline to correct it.
“Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by having Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray and medication syrup on top of the medication cart unsupervised by staff which poses an immediate health and safety risk to persons in care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 08/28/2025 at 4:05 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) P. Manalo conducted a Health & Safety inspection as a result of a priority 1 complaint. LPA met with Director of Health and Wellness , Judith Gitonga and explained the purpose of the visit. Executive Director, Beena Kumar, gave authorization for Gitonga to sign the report. LPA toured facility including but not limited to the bedrooms, bathrooms, common area, kitchen, and courtyard area. Hot water temperature was measured at 109.9, 109.5,112.1, 113.4, and 112 degrees Fahrenheit residents’ bathroom. Residents’ bathrooms are equipped with grab bars and non-skid shower pans. LPA observed lighting in all rooms is adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. There is a minimum of one week supply of nonperishable and 2-day of perishable foods. First-aid kit was complete. Fire extinguisher was observed to be full and last serviced on 06/06/2025. THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCIES WERE OBSERVED DURING VISIT: At 4:46 PM, LPA observed Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray and medication syrup on top of the medication cart unsupervised by staff. The Facility was cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and/or Health and Safety Code Failure to correct deficiencies by POC date may result in additional Civil Penalties. Exit interview conducted with Administrator. Appeal Rights and a copy of this report provided.
2025-07-22Other VisitType B · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
During a complaint investigation visit in July 2025, inspectors found that the facility's call button system was broken, leaving residents waiting more than 30 minutes for staff help on several occasions because staff couldn't clear the calls. The facility was cited for this deficiency and notified of potential civil penalties.
“Based on record review and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by having the call button system in disrepair which posed a potential safety risk to persons in care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 07/22/2025 at 1:20 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) P.Manalo arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit. LPA met with Executive Director, Beena Kumar, and explained the purpose for the visit. While LPA P.Manalo was at the facility for a complaint investigation (15-AS-20250325125744) the following deficiency was observed. During the complaint investigation, LPA observed that the call button response time showed there were several incidents where the residents waited for more than 30 minutes for staff assistance. Interview with staff revealed that the facility’s call button system was in disrepair and staff were unable to clear the residents’ call. The deficiency was observed (see LIC 809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Failure to correct deficiency may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report, civil penalty, and appeal rights provided.
2025-07-22Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that a staff member allegedly yelled at a resident and left soiled diapers in a trash can beside the resident's bed, and that staff took a long time to respond to nighttime calls for help; however, the investigation found no violation because most residents reported receiving good care and timely assistance, and while the facility's call system experienced a technical problem on one night in March 2025 that caused some delayed responses, the system was repaired and subsequent response times were within the facility's target of 10 to 15 minutes. The inspector was unable to interview two staff members who did not respond to contact attempts.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Continue from LIC9099... Allegation- Staff does not treat resident with respect and dignity. It was alleged that Staff 3 (S3) yelled at R1 when asked for assistance and that S3 would leave R1’s diaper in the trash can beside R1’s bed without lining the basket with a trash bag. 4 out of 5 residents interviewed stated that the staff are nice and that they receive good care at the facility. R5 stated that when they call for help at night, R5 can fall asleep after receiving care. Interview with S2 indicated that it’s rare for S2 to observe wet diapers in the beginning of their shift on the resident and in the resident’s room, however, it could be a possibility that staff would forget to pick it up. LPA attempted to interview S3 and S4 and did not receive any call back. 3 out of 5 staff members interviewed expressed that they have not heard any other staff members speak to residents rudely. Allegation: Staff did not provide assistance to a resident in a timely manner. Based on interviews conducted with residents, each resident is provided with a call button or pendant that can be utilized to call staff, if needed. R1 stated that when R1 needed assistance at night, S3 and S4 took a long time to arrive to R1’s room for assistance. S1 also stated that during night shifts, the staff are supposed to attend to resident’s calls together. Interview with R5 indicated that when R5 needs assistance at night, R5 will use the call button and have not experienced any issues with the care at night. Also, 4 out of 5 residents interviewed stated that staff will assist them when needed. Staff interviewed revealed that when residents need assistance, staff will receive a radio call from which resident and room needs to be tended to. If a staff member was unable to attend the call, they will reach out to another staff member that is available to respond to the resident. Continue to LIC9099-C... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Continue from LIC9099-C... A review of the facility’s call log dated 03/25/2025 during the night shift between 1:00 AM to 4:30 AM showed that the response time varied from three seconds to about three and a half hours. S1 stated that during this time the system was having computer issues and could not clear the calls. Staff were able to reset the system at around 5:30 AM on 03/25/2025. After the computer issues were resolved, the response time for when residents would call for assistance varied from seconds to about twelve minutes that night. Although a review of the facility’s Resident Alert Call System policy dated 06/01/2025 does not indicate a response time, interviews with S6 and S7 revealed that staff will attempt to respond within 10 to 15 minutes of a residents’ call. There is no deficiency noted. Based on interviews and record reviews conducted, the above allegation is unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated . Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was provided.
2025-06-05Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
On June 5, 2025, the state conducted an unannounced visit after the facility self-reported that a resident admitted three days earlier fell on May 29 and sustained a hip fracture requiring surgery. The resident had been documented as a fall risk and was on hourly check-ins at the time of the fall. No violations were found during the visit.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 06/05/2025 at 2:25PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) P.Manalo conducted an unannounced Case Management visit regarding a self-reported incident. Director of Health and Wellness, Judith Gitonga, self-reported the incident on 06/02/2025. LPA met with Judith Gitonga and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA P.Manalo received a self-reported incident report from facility that indicated that the Resident 1 (R1) was taken to the hospital for upper leg pain from an unwitnessed fall on 05/29/2025. R1 was treated for a hip fracture. R1 had hip surgery on 05/30/2025 and is in a skilled nursing for recovery. The facility will reassess R1 before returning to the facility. During the visit, LPA reviewed and obtained R1's Physician's Report, Emergency ID Contact Information, Admission Agreement, Service Plan, and the facility's Fall Reduction Program. Admission Agreement showed that the resident was recently admitted to the facility on 05/26/2025. Prior to the resident's fall, the resident was already placed as a fall risk on the service plan for having multiple falls in the last 3 months. However, R1's Physician's Report dated on 05/05/2025 showed that the resident is bedridden. Since R1 is new to the facility, R1 was placed on an hourly check in. LPA may return at a later time. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview was conducted with Director of Health and Wellness and a copy of this report was provided.
2025-04-16Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
On April 16, 2025, state licensing staff made an unannounced follow-up visit to check on a resident who had been hospitalized and sustained a wound in February 2025. The facility was counseled that it must notify the state before admitting residents with certain health conditions that require specialized care. No violations were found during the visit.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 04/16/2025 at 1:55 PM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) P. Manalo and K. Nguyen conducted an unannounced Case Management Visit. This is a follow up visit that was conducted on 03/14/2025 regarding an incident that was reported to CCLD on 02/27/2025 indicated that Resident 1 (R1) obtained a wound while in the hospital. LPAs met with Interim- Executive Director, Vivian Villegas, and explained the purpose of the visit. The documents that were obtained from the first Case Management visit showed that R1 was discharged from the hospital on 02/25/2025 and was placed on hospice on 03/05/2025. Moving forward, the facility will notify CCLD prior to admitting residents with prohibited or restrictive health conditions. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.
2025-03-27Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
On March 27, 2025, state inspectors visited the facility unannounced to investigate a complaint and observed construction work on resident patios. The facility had obtained a building permit for the patio project, which had been planned for over a year, and had notified families about the work. No violations were found during the visit.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 03/27/2025 at 1:38 PM Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) P.Manalo and L. Fontanilla conducted an unannounced Case Management visit. LPAs met with Interim- Executive Director, Vivian Villegas, and explained the purpose of the visit. While LPAs was at the facility to conduct a complaint investigation (15-AS-20250325125744), LPAs observed construction being done on the front patio in front of the facility. Upon verification made with Interim- Executive Director, she stated that they are working on constructing on 19 residents patios. Vivian stated that this project has been in the plan for over a year, and just got approved with a building permit. Interim- Executive Director was unsure if the construction was reported to CCLD. LPAs obtained the following documents such as building permit, plan of the renovations, and letter to family members notifying the construction. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.
2025-03-14Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
On March 14, 2025, state inspectors conducted a follow-up visit to investigate an incident from February 27, 2025 in which a resident obtained a wound while hospitalized. The inspectors reviewed the resident's medical records, care plans, and assessment documents, and interviewed staff about the evaluation done before the resident returned to the facility. No violations were found during this visit.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 03/14/2025, at 2:15 PM Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs), P. Manalo and K. Nguyen arrived unannounced to conduct a case management following up an incident that was reported to CCLD on 02/27/2025 regarding R1 obtaining a wound while in the hospital. LPAs met with Director of Health and Wellness, Judith Gitonga, and explained the reason for the visit. LPAs reviewed R1's Physician's Report dated 2022, 2023, and 2025, Senior Living Standard Level of Care and Service Plan, Service Plan Report, Watermark Assessment, Elopement Risk Screening, Outside Agency Documentation, Progress Notes, and Discharge Summary. LPAs interviewed S1 and indicated that they had done an assessment prior to the resident returning back to the facility. LPAs are requesting to obtain Staff Contact information, Staff Schedule, Previous Service Plan Reports, and other notes pertaining to R1's injury (Caregiver's Notes) by 03/19/2025. LPAs will return at a later time. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.
2024-12-13Complaint InvestigationMixedType B · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
This was a complaint investigation into whether staff failed to safeguard a resident's personal belongings. The investigator interviewed a witness who confirmed that the resident's belongings had not been stolen or moved, though they were in a different location in the room than the resident expected. The complaint was found to be unsubstantiated, meaning there was not enough evidence to prove the allegation.
“Resident statement, "They may knock, but then do not wait long enough for me to tell them to come in. It doesn't respect my privacy when they do that."”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
....Continued from LIC 9099 The complaint alleges staff do not ensure resident's personal belongings are safeguarded . The LPA interviewed Witness W1 who stated that Resident R1's belongings had not been stolen or removed from their room. They had been placed in a different location in their room than R1 was used to them being located. The data collected does not confirm the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove it; therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED . Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was provided. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 ...Continued from LIC 9099 A finding that the complaint is SUBSTANTIATED means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Deficiencies are cited per Title 22 California Code of Regulations and listed on LIC 9099-D. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was provided.
2024-11-15Other VisitType B · 2 findings
Plain-language summary
This was a required annual inspection on November 15, 2024, and the facility met most standards for resident safety, including adequate lighting, temperature control, secure medication storage, and current first aid training for staff. The inspectors identified five areas needing correction: two staff members were missing required health screening documents from their files, three staff members lacked current tuberculosis test records, and the facility had not posted required notices about resident rights and complaint procedures in the correct format. The facility was given until November 22, 2024 to submit missing documents and correct these issues.
“Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not having a health screening for S1 and S2 on file. Also, S1, S2, and S5 do not have a TB test on file which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 12/02/2024 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 Generations Program Director agrees to have a health screening completed for S1 and S2. Generations Program Director also agrees to have a TB test completed for S1, S2, and S5. Proof of correction will be sent to CCLD by POC date. Proof of Corrections will be sent to CCLD by POC date.”
“Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in not having the post of personal rights, nondiscrimination notice, and the right size for the complaint and ombudsman poster which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care. Proof of Corrections will be sent to CCLD by POC date. POC Due Date: 11/22/2024 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 Generations Program Director agrees to post the personal rights, nondiscrimination poster, and to obtain the right size for the complaint and ombudsman poster by POC date.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 11/15/2024 at 8:30 AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) P. Manalo and J. Sampair arrived unannounced to conduct the Required Annual inspection. The LPAs met with Generations Program Director, Molly Young, and explained the purpose of the visit. The facility’s fire clearance was approved for one hundred and forty (140) all may be non-ambulatory, of which ten (10) may be bedridden, and ten (10) may be on hospice. The LPAs toured the facility with the Director, including, but not limited to, residents' apartments, bathrooms, multiple activity rooms, kitchen, common area, and courtyard. The LPAs observed that the lighting in all rooms is adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. The residents' room temperature was maintained at 70 degrees Fahrenheit. The hot water temperature in a sample of residents’ shared bathroom was measured at 109.1 degrees Fahrenheit. Residents’ bathrooms are equipped with grab bars. There is a minimum of one week supply of nonperishable and 2 days of perishable foods. Centrally stored medications, sharps, and toxic cleaning materials are locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Fire extinguishers were last serviced on 06/06/2024. Emergency Disaster Plan was last reviewed on 11/15/2024. First aid kit was observed to be complete. Fire drill was last conducted on 08/27/2024. At 9:30 AM, LPAs reviewed 6 residents records. At 10:05 AM, LPAs reviewed 5 staff records and 5 of 5 have current first aid training and 5 of 5 associated to the facility. At 12:00 PM, LPAs reviewed a sample of resident’s medications. Continue to LIC809-C... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Continued from LIC809... Updated copies of the following documents were requested for facility file and are to be submitted to CCLD by 11/22/2024: LIC 308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility LIC 309 Administrative Organization LIC 500 Personnel Report LIC 610E Emergency Disaster Plan Liability Insurance Current Administrator’s Certificate Inspection Report of Fire Alarm and Carbon Monoxide THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCIES WERE OBSERVED DURING VISIT: At 10:15 AM, LPAs observed S1 and S2 did not have LIC 503 in the files. At 10:17 AM, LPAs observed S1, S2, and S5 did not have a TB test on file. At 12:45 PM, LPAs observed that there was no personal rights and nondiscrimination notice information posted. At 12:50 PM, LPAs observed that the Complaint and Ombudsman poster was not the correct poster size. The Facility was cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and/or Health and Safety Code Failure to correct deficiencies by POC date may result in additional Civil Penalties. Exit interview conducted with Generations Program Director. Appeal Rights and a copy of this report provided.
2024-09-27Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
On September 27, 2024, regulators conducted a case management visit after a resident left the facility without authorization; the resident was located by police and returned safely without injury. The facility director reported the resident was taken to a doctor the next day, and the facility committed to hiring additional staff for morning and afternoon shifts. No violations were cited.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On this day 09/27/2024 at 3:35 pm, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Patricia Manalo and Luisa Fontanilla arrived to the facility to conduct a case management visit regarding an elopement and met with Generations Program Director, Molly Young and explained the purpose of the visit. During the visit, LPAs interviewed R1, S1, S2, and Generations Program Director. LPAs obtained R1's Physician's Report and Needs, Services Plan, and updated Care Plan. Based on interviews conducted, R1 was found outside the facility. The Union City Police Department brought R1 back to the facility. The Director states R1 was brought to the doctor the next day. R1 did not sustain any injury during the incident. Generations Program Director stated that the facility will hire additional staffing for AM and PM shifts. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.
2023-11-14Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint alleged that staff were not meeting residents' hygiene and clothing needs, not responding to calls promptly, and not providing clean bedding, and that the facility was dirty and odorous. The investigator interviewed staff and all four residents, reviewed care logs, and toured the facility; staff and residents consistently stated that daily hygiene care is provided, call buttons are answered within five minutes or less, bedding is kept clean, and the facility is clean with no odors, which the investigator's own observations confirmed. The complaint was unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence of violation.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Continue from Lic9099... It was alleged that; Staff do not ensure that resident's hygiene needs are being met while in care and Staff do not ensure that resident's clothing needs are being met while in care. Based on interviews and record review, residents’ activities of Daily living (ADLs) are being cared for and staff are meeting all residents care needs in the morning by care givers. S1 stated that residents’ are on an ADL schedule which indicates that each residents’ ADLs are preformed twice or 3 times a week; some residents’ can request ADLs to be performed if needed. LPA reviewed the facilities point of care logs, which indicates that the residents’ ADLs are being met by care staff. All 3 staff stated ADLs are preformed every day to residents. All 4 residents’ stated that staff care for residents’ ADLs every day and residents’ do not have a problem with their needs being met. Some residents’ are independent and can preform their own ADLs as well. It was alleged that; Staff do not provide assistance to residents in a timely manner and Staff do not ensure that resident is provided with clean bedding while in care. Based on interviews with staff and residents, all 3 staff stated that when a resident calls for assistance, staff will go to the resident’s room to see what assistance the resident needs, and staff will assist resident with their care needs. Staff stated it takes about 5 minutes or less to response to a residents call after a resident pushes their call button or little longer if a staff is assisting other residents. All 4 residents stated that staff come to their room after the call button is pressed, and sometimes it takes little longer but staff do come to their room shortly after. All 4 residents also mentioned that staff clean their rooms and makes sure all bed sheets are clean and new for the resident to use. Page 2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 It was alleged that, the facility is odiferous , and the facility is unsanitary. Based on observation and interviews, LPA observed that the facility is clean and sanitary. LPA did not observe the facility to be dirty and is kept clean and smells good. LPA toured the facility, and entered resident’s rooms and observed that the rooms of the facility are kept clean, sanitary and did not have any smell. Staff stated to LPA that care staff makes sure that the facility and the resident’s rooms are kept clean and do not have an odor to them. Based on Interviews and observation conducted, Although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED . Exit interview conducted with MCD, and a copy of this report provided. Page 3 of 3
2023-09-29Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
On September 29, 2023, a licensing inspector made an unannounced routine annual inspection of this 109-bedroom facility and found no violations. The inspector checked the building's safety systems, temperature controls, food supplies, medications for 10 residents, and staff records, and confirmed that hallways were clear, bathrooms had non-slip mats, and detectors were working properly. The facility was asked to submit some updated paperwork by early October.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 9/29/2023 starting at 2:50 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) L. Fici arrived unannounced to conduct 1-Year Annual Required Inspection. LPA met with Viray, Bernadette, administrator (ADM) and explained the purpose of the visit. The facility’s fire clearance was approved for One Hundred Forty (140) non-ambulatory residents, of which Ten (10) may be bedridden. Upon entry, LPA observed three (3) staff and two (2) residents present during inspection. Starting at 2:56 PM, LPA toured facility with ADM including but not limited to one hundred nine (109) bedrooms, 109 bathrooms, kitchen, common area and backyard. The facility consists of 109 total bedrooms, which eighty five (85) bedrooms are private, and twelve (12) bedrooms are shared. All outdoor and indoor passageways are kept free of obstruction. There are no bodies of water observed. A comfortable temperature is maintained at 73 Degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents'. The hot water temperature in residents’ bathroom on the second floor was measured at 119.8 Degrees Fahrenheit. Residents’ bathrooms are equipped non-skid mats. There is a minimum of one-week supply of nonperishable and 2-day supply of perishable foods. Sharps and toxins were locked and inaccessible to residents'. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were in operating condition during visit. Fire extinguisher was observed last serviced on 6/6/2023. First aid kit was observed to be complete. Continue on Lic809-C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Continued from Lic809 Starting At 4:03 PM, LPA reviewed 10 of 10 staff records. At 5:14 PM, LPA reviewed 10 of 10 residents' records. At 6:25 PM, LPA reviewed 10 of 10 residents' medications. Updated copies of the following documents were requested for facility file and are to be submitted to CCL by 10/6/2023: · LIC 308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility · LIC 500 Personnel Report · LIC 610E Emergency Disaster Plan (9 Pages) · Liability Insurance No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted with ADM, and a copy of this report provided.
2023-09-22Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint alleged that a resident was left on the floor for extended periods, did not receive bathing assistance, staff did not respond timely to call buttons, and dietary restrictions were not followed. The investigation found no evidence to support these allegations—staff interviews and facility records showed residents receive hourly check-ins, daily bathing assistance, timely responses to call buttons within 5-10 minutes, and documented dietary accommodations for each resident's needs. The complaint is unsubstantiated.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Continue on Lic9099 It was alleged that; Resident was left on the floor for an extended period of time and staff do not ensure adequate supervision is provided to residents in care. Based on interviews conducted, all staff stated that staff check on residents every hour to 2 hours to make sure residents are doing well. Staff stated that, depending on residents’ care plan, staff will check on residents more often than others to ensure that residents are doing fine. During the AM, and PM shifts, staff stated that there are 3 to 4 care staff plus one med tech, and during the NOC shift, there are 2 staff in the memory unit and 2 staff in the assisted living unit plus ones med tech. All residents stated that staff check on residents daily and often to ensure residents are doing well. It was alleged that; Staff do not ensure resident receives bathing assistance and staff do not respond to resident’s signal system in a timely manner. Based on interviews and record review conducted, staff stated that ADLs are performed on a daily basis and showers are given to all residents, usually in the mornings or as needed per resident’s needs. LPA reviewed point of care (POC) logs which indicated that staff are preforming R1’s ADLs which are documented. Staff stated when a resident calls for assistance, it alerts staff on their radio, so staff knows which room to go to. LPA reviewed facility call log, which indicated that staff are responding to R1’s calls in a timely manner when R1 calls for assistance. Residents stated that ADLs are preformed on a daily basis by staff or residents are able to care for their own ADLs without staff assisting them. Residents have also stated that when a resident calls for staff, staff are there to assist residents within 5 minutes to 10 minutes. It was alleged that; Staff do not follow resident’s dietary restrictions. Based on interviews conducted, all staff stated that if a resident has a dietary restriction, a log is created that informs staff what each resident can or cannot have. If a resident need purred food, mechanical soft foods, no certain meats, or low salt foods, etc, facility will accommodate for those dietary needs. Dietary logs are located in the memory care unit, in the kitchen and dinning area for staff to see. Based on Interviews record review conducted, Although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED . Exit interview conducted with ADM, and a copy of this report provided.
6 older inspections from 2021 are not shown in the free view.
6 older inspections from 2021 are not shown in the free view.
Other facilities in Alameda County.
Other memory care facilities in Alameda County with similar care offerings.
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.



